2006 Malegaon terror attack: All 9 Muslims discharged by Mumbai court

[email protected] (CD Network)
April 25, 2016

Mumbai, Apr 25: In a major development all nine Muslim men, falsely accused in 2006 Malegaon bomb blast case, were acquitted by a court here on Monday.

Malegaon

Noorul Huda, Shabbir Ahmed, Raees Ahmed, Salman Farsi, Farogh Magdumi, Shaikh Mohammed Ali, Asif Khan, Mohammed Zahid and Abrar Ahmed, who languished in the jail for years, had filed a discharge application earlier.

One accused in the case has died, while six were released earlier in 2011 on bail. Two other accused have been convicted in the 2006 train blasts case.

The Monday's order was passed by Sessions Judge V V Patil.

The National Investigation Agency on Thursday told a Mumbai court it has found no evidence to link nine Muslims arrested in the 2006 Malegaon blasts case to the terror attack, a move that could see them walk free.

The NIA did not object to the discharge applications filed by the arrested accused, saying evidence collected by it were "not in consonance" with those obtained earlier by Maharashtra Anti-terrorism Squad and the Central Bureau of Invgestigation, which had recommended their prosecution.

"It is submitted that evidence collected by NIA in further investigation is not in consonance with evidence collected by the Anti-Terrorism Squad and the CBI. The court may kindly pass appropriate orders in the matter," the anti-terror agency told a special NIA court in response to discharge applications filed by the nine accused.

It said no evidence was found in support of the conclusion drawn in final reports filed by ATS and CBI, which had probed the case earlier, and recommended prosecution of the accused arrested in connection with the September 8, 2006 explosions that killed 37 people and wounded 125.

Judge Y D Shinde adjourned hearing till next month. The 2006 bombings were part of a series of explosions that had rocked Malegaon, a communally sensitive power-loom town in Nashik district of Maharashtra, located about 300 km from Mumbai. The blasts had occurred in a Muslim cemetery, adjacent to a mosque, after Friday prayers on Shab-e-Barat.

The Maharashtra ATS, which first probed the case, had arrested Noorul Huda Samsudoha, Shabbir Ahmed Masiullah, Raees Ahmed Rajab Ali Mansuri, Salman Farsi Abdul Latif Aimi, Farogh Iqbal Ahmed Magdumi, Mohammad Ali Alam Sheikh, Asif Khan Bashir Khan alias Junaid, Mohammad Zahid Abdul Majid Ansari and Abrar Ahmed Gulam Ahmed.

The case was later handed over to the CBI, which endorsed the findings of Maharashtra ATS, before it was transfered to NIA after it came into existence in 2009. After the confessions made by Swami Aseemanand, an accused in the 2007 Mecca Masjid blast, the role of Hindu right wing organisation 'Abhinav Bharat' in the blasts came to light.

Following Aseemanand's confession, the accused moved the court with discharge applications. In May this year, NIA filed its charge sheet in the case against four accused-- Lokesh Sharma, Dhan Singh, Manohar Singh and Rajendra Choudhary, contradicting the findings of the ATS and the CBI.

Malegaon had seen another terror attack on September 29, 2008, also allegedly masterminded by 'Abhinav Bharat' in which seven persons were killed.

Comments

Kishor Mahajan
 - 
Tuesday, 26 Apr 2016

The problem was congress wanted to show the world that a hindu can be a terrorist thats why Sadhvi & Cornel Purohit framed .......AntiHinduCongress

Rikaz
 - 
Monday, 25 Apr 2016

They were arrested because of their religion...Governments should come forward and release all muslims from the jail....they are all prolonging in jail with no case on them at all...only fault of them is they are all muslims...that is it....

CPK
 - 
Monday, 25 Apr 2016

As of today police arrested only innocent Muslim youths in connection with many Bomb blast and later after 10 to 15 years the will released with lame excuses.The real culprits were enjoying some where with the help of authorities,officers of investigating agencies.(95% of them are Hindus) who are helping the real culprits.Now people has to decide who are the real TERRORIST in our India.

NOOR
 - 
Monday, 25 Apr 2016

AL HAMDULLILLAH... Thanks and praise be to ALLAH. So what happens to all these suffering through out this ordeal.
We Muslims believe that ALLAH is the lord of all that exists and He has the Power over all things & He has kept a TIME to deal on the INJUSTICE done on this earth (the enemies tried a lot to hide the REALITY but all in VAIN - All their evil plans are FLOPPED).

umar Farugue
 - 
Monday, 25 Apr 2016

finally truth s out, innocents were simply punished.

Suraj shetty
 - 
Monday, 25 Apr 2016

the time congress ruling they destroyed each and every evidence, finally they saved their chelas.

Deepika
 - 
Monday, 25 Apr 2016

congress destroyed all the evidence now they are saving them,

priyanka shetty
 - 
Monday, 25 Apr 2016

confusing! what about the Malegaon blasts, Mecca Masjid bombing, Samjhauta Express bombings & Ajmer sharif dargah blast?

arjun mahajan
 - 
Monday, 25 Apr 2016

Is the National Investigation Agency Sabotaging the Malegaon Blast.

Sukvindar
 - 
Monday, 25 Apr 2016

Congress sabotaged #Malegaon blast case.

Pasha
 - 
Monday, 25 Apr 2016

ironic comment on NIA u-turn in Malegaon blast. Unique case were hindu n Muslim both r accused.

chattarji
 - 
Monday, 25 Apr 2016

NIA says not 'favoring' or 'opposing' discharge in Malegaon blast, let judge decide.

Arnab
 - 
Monday, 25 Apr 2016

As NIA does a U-turn on Malegaon blast case, accused Muslim men plunge back into helplessness

jeevan Sequira
 - 
Monday, 25 Apr 2016

If those wrongly accused of Malegaon Blast require help to seek compensation.

Mehak Chamka
 - 
Monday, 25 Apr 2016

High Court Discharges 8 Muslim Accused 06 MALEGAON blast will Govt punish ATS officers for their torture,loss of time, ordeal, livelihood.

Fateh Ali khan
 - 
Monday, 25 Apr 2016

2006 Malegaon blast accused discharged ?? how come?? unless they are acquitted in arnab goswami's court, they will remain accused.

Fair talker
 - 
Monday, 25 Apr 2016

Who is responsible for the whole suffering during this 10years course of ordeal.
This is a great shame to all those agencies involved in the probe including judiciary system.

How such a huge difference in findings of the SO CALLED 2 great INVESTIGATING AGENCY.

The first ATS has falsely charged the victims.
poor people have to suffer at the cost of failure of our investigation
Honorably pay the good compensation, since apology and charge that agency who made them to suffer with false charges.

Taking 10years to find the justice.
Once again shame to so called GREAT NATION.

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com news network
June 14,2020

Mangaluru, Jun 14: In a fresh case of vigilante attack, a cattle trader was tied to a buffalo-laden vehicle and thrashed by the miscreants belonging to Bajrang Dal in the city today. 

The victim has been identified as Mohammad Haneef Guddemane (34), a resident of Jokatte village on the outskirts of the city. 

The attack took place in the early morning near Infosys office at Urva, when Haneef was transporting his four buffalos to Kudroli slaughter house. 

The miscreants continued to thrash him until the local police reached spot. Based on the complaint of ‘illegal cattle transportation’ by the Bajrang Dal, the police took the victim to custody and also seized the buffalos. 

The police also took the victim to hospital and subjected him to covid test before producing him before a local judge.

While the Bajrang Dal members lodged complaint of illegal transpiration against the victim, the victim showed all the records of the cattle and lodged a counter complaint against the attackers.

It is learnt that Haneef had purchased 10 cattle from Haveri district and sold six among them. He was transporting remaining four buffalos to Kudroli slaughter house.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 18,2020

Bengaluru, Feb 18: Deputy chief minister Laxman Savadi was elected to the legislative council on Monday and although it was a done deal that he would win, a vote from across the aisle spiced up the election.

Counting was conducted soon after ballots were cast and Savadi polled 113 of the 120 votes cast, including the vote of disgruntled JD(S) legislator GT Devegowda. Seven votes were declared invalid. Members of the two opposition parties — Congress and JD(S) — abstained from voting.

The election was necessitated following the resignation of Rizwan Arshad of the Congress. Rizwan resigned after he was elected to the legislative assembly from the Shivajinagar constituency in the assembly bypolls held for 15 seats in December last year.

BR Anil Kumar, who was initially promised the support of both Congress and JD(S) was supposed to contest as an independent candidate. However, as both parties refused to support him at the last minute, he withdrew, paving the way for Savadi’s victory.

The BJP has 117 members in the 225-member assembly, but N Mahesh of the BSP and two independents, H Nagesh and Sharath Bachchegowda, besides GT Devegowda also voted, taking the total electorate to 120 (including the speaker). BJP’s SA Ramadas did not turn up because of health reasons.

“I would like to thank all those who were responsible for my victory. Special thanks to leaders of my party and chief minister BS Yediyurappa, who gave me the opportunity to be the BJP candidate,” said Savadi.

Winning this council election was crucial for Savadi to retain his ministry as he was not an elected member of either of the houses. Rules mandate that a non-member must get elected either to the assembly or council within six months after taking over as minister. February 20 was the deadline for Savadi, who had lost 2018 assembly polls from Athani, to get elected.

Officials in the assembly secretariat said seven votes were invalid because voters had wrongly marked their choices on ballot paper. According to norms, a voter has to mark numerical one, two and three against the names of the candidates in order of preference. Marking only numerical one is allowed. However, six ballots had a tick mark, while a voter had registered a cross mark. Since it was a secret ballot, it was not known who the MLAs were whose votes were invalid.

“The ballot papers bear serial numbers and they are randomly distributed. It is virtually impossible to say who a voter cast his or her vote for,” said assembly secretary MK Vishalakashi, the retuning officer for the bypoll.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 16,2020

Bengaluru, Feb 16: Deputy chief minister Laxman Savadi’s election to the lone vacant council seat, for which a bypoll has been called, is only a formality as the only other candidate in the contest, independent BR Anil Kumar, dropped out on Saturday.

Kumar conveyed his decision to council secretary and returning officer Vishalakshmi. He decided to withdraw from the February 17 bypoll after failing to get support from Congress and JD(S) legislators.

The bypoll was necessitated after sitting member Rizwan Arshad of Congress resigned as he moved to the legislative assembly as an MLA. Rizwan won the Shivajinagar bypoll in December last year.

“Since the notification on candidates in the fray, after the last date of withdrawal, has already been published, irrespective of any candidate’s retirement, the election has to be conducted,” an official said.

Savadi’s victory was always assured as BJP has 119 members in the House.

Still, Ramanagara BJP district president Rudresh and MP BY Raghavendra reportedly approached Kumar, urging him to withdraw. Kumar, however, denied that he was persuaded by BJP.

“I entered the fray thinking secular parties and likeminded MLAs will support me, but that didn’t happen, so I decided to retire,”he said.

A section of Congress and JD(S) politicians, led by former minister HD Revanna, had persuaded Kumar to enter the contest with the hope that disgruntlement among some BJP legislators over Savadi’s promotion as the deputy CM would result in an upset.

Former chief minister HD Kumaraswamy also offered to support Kumar. Siddaramaiah of Congress refused to do the same. Congress and JD(S) did not field any candidates of their own as they don’t have the requisite numbers in the House.

Savadi must get elected to the council before February 20, otherwise he will lose his cabinet role. According to rules, a person who is not a member of either House should get elected within six months after becoming a minister. Savadi took oath on August 20 last year.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.