366 farmers arrested in Gujarat after clash with police

Agencies
May 16, 2018

Ahmedabad, MAY 14: The Gujarat police arrested 366 farmers for staging a violent protest in Surka village of Bhavnagar district against land acquisition by state-owned lignite mining firm, Gujarat Power Corporation Limited (GPCL).

On Sunday night, over 2,500 farmers, including women and children, gathered at the site and opposed mining by GPCL, despite the imposition of Section 144 that restricts gathering of more than four persons. The farmers took out a rally to the site and later entered into an altercation with the police. The police, in turn, used about 60 tear gas shells.

"We have been agitating against this project for over a month, but have never resorted to violence. Even on Sunday, we did nothing but the police began lobbing teargas shells and started beating women and children with batons. Eight farmers and a seven-year-old child were hurt," Narendrasinh Gohil, president of Ghogha Khedut Samaj, said.

Anand Yagnik, the lawyer representing the farmers, claimed that the police detained women and children who had gathered at the site from 12 villages of Ghogha and Bhavnagar taluka.

Third clash

The clash between farmers and police is the third such incident since April 1. The GPCL had acquired 1,414 hectares of land between 1995 and 2005 for mining purposes under the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. It had also paid compensation to the farmers. However, it had not taken physical possession of the land then and allowed locals to continue with farming. With the passage of time, the GPCL required the area for mining of lignite, the fuel for its power plant.

The farmers claim that the GPCL had forcefully acquired land in violation of Section 24 (2) of Land Acquisition And Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (LARR). As the project had not begun in stipulated time, the land belonged to the original owners, they say.

Euthanasia plea

Interestingly, over 5,000 farmers from the region have petitioned to the President, to be allowed euthanasia. "We request you to accede to our request of being shot dead by army jawans as the GPCL, Gujarat government, Bhavnagar collector and Gujarat Police are making us feel like terrorists," the farmers said in the petition.

Comments

Riyaz
 - 
Thursday, 17 May 2018

Should have thought about this before screaming and shouting Modi modi.

 

Modi and shah are all in favour of the industries as they get all the financies from them. farmers are only required during the elections and their votes is fro sure for BJP no matter how they are treated. just talk something about Ayodhya, Muslims, love Jihad, and some stupid things like this. 

 

Good governance by BJP. please continue the same and destroy the whole of gujrat and dear modi jee please try to replicate the same in all india level. 

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
July 23,2020

Expressing concern over the ban imposed on TikTok by the government of India, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has reportedly called the development in the south Asian country “worrisome”.

TikTok was amongst the 59 Chinese apps that were banned in India but why it hogs the maximum limelight because TikTok had the second-largest user base in India with over 200 million users.

As per The Verge writer Casey Newton, Zuckerberg was worried about TikTok’s India ban. Although it soon cashed into the opportunity and released a TikTok clone “Reels”, the government’s reason behind banning the app in India wasn’t received well by Mark Zuckerberg. 

He had said that if India can ban a platform with over 200 million users in India without citing concrete reasons, it can also ban Facebook if something goes amiss on the security and privacy front.

Why Mark finds it particularly worrisome because Facebook is already involved in a lot tussle with the governments across the world involving national security concerns. 

“Facebook already faces fights around the world from governments on both the left and the right related to issues that fit under the broad umbrella of national security: election interference, influence campaigns, hate speech, and even just plain-old democratic speech. Zuckerberg knows that the leap from banning TikTok on national security grounds to banning Facebook on national security grounds is more of a short hop,” the report by Casey read.

Facebook till now has not faced any kind of issue in India but considering the debacle with the other governments, it is not entirely wrong to worry about its future in India if any national security issue arises. Back in 2016, Facebook’s Free Basics service, which means a free but restricted internet service, was banned in India by the telecom regulators. 

The TRAI had said that the Free Basic services were banned in India because it violated the principles of net neutrality. With Free Basics services, Facebook had planned to bring more unconnected users online. But since 2016, there has been no major tussle between the Indian government and Zuckerberg due to national security issues.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 13,2020

New Delhi, Jan 13: The Jawaharlal Nehru University Students' Union (JNUSU) has alleged that the varsity administration has blocked the registration of 300 students on the basis of 'fake Proctor inquiries'.

The union had on Saturday asked students of the university to pay their academic tuition fee but not the hiked hostel fee.

"Today the Vice Chancellor first blocked the fee payment portal and then blocked the payment of tuition fees. It is clear that the VC was lying through the teeth when he said students want to register but are not being allowed to by protesters," JNUSU president Aishe Ghosh said.

She said the VC has also blocked the registration of 300 students based on fake proctor enquiries which are not even completed.

"The truth is that it is the administration which does not want students to register and is blocking their registration," she said.

JNUSU vice president Saket Moon said that in the meetings held in HRD ministry, it was decided that the administration would take a lenient view on the students' protest and not take action against them.

He said many students, who opened the portal for registration found they had been academically suspended and could not register.

He said the JNUSU had softened its stand by saying that they would register by paying the old fees but that has been kept on hold.

On Sunday, the administration extended the date for the winter semester registration till January 15.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 27,2020

New Delhi, Jan 27: The government on Monday issued the preliminary information memorandum for 100 per cent stake sale in national carrier Air India. As part of the strategic disinvestment, Air India would also sell 100 per cent stake in low cost airline Air India Express and 50 per cent shareholding in joint venture AISATS, as per the bid document issued on Monday.

Management control of the airline would also be transferred to the successful bidder.

The government has set March 17 as the deadline for submitting the Expression of Interest (EoI).

EY is the transaction adviser for Air India disinvestment process.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.