58 candidates in 8 assembly constituencies of Dakshina Kannada: Here’s the list

coastaldigest.com news network
April 28, 2018

Mangaluru: As many as 58 candidates remained in the fray for the May 12 Karnataka Legislative Assembly elections in the eight constituencies of the coastal district of Dakshina Kannada.

District Returning Officer and Deputy Commissioner Sasikanth Senthil told reporters that eight candidates withdrew their candidature on Friday, the last date for the withdrawal of nomination papers, while many nominations rejected.

Here is the list of candidates:

Belthangady (6)

K Vasanth Bangera (Congress)

Sumathi S Hegde (JDS)

Harish Poonja (BJP)

Venkatesh Bende (Independent)

Jagannath (MEP)

Syed Hussein (Independent)

Moodbidri (7)

K Abhaychandra Jain (Congress)

Umanath Kotian (BJP)

Jeevan Krishna Shetty (JDS)

K Yadav Shetty (CPM)

Ashwin Jossy Pereira (Independent)

Reena Pinto (Independent)

Abdul Rehman (MEP)

Mangaluru City North (7)

Suresh B Salian (Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha)

Mohiuddin Bava (Congress)

Dr Y Bharath Shetty (BJP)

Muneer Katipalla (CPM)

P M Ahmed (MEP)

Supreth Kumar Poojary (Lok Awaz Dal)

Maxim Pinto (Independent)

Mangaluru City South (11)

J R Lobo (Congress)

Sunil Kumar Bajaal (CPM)

D Vedvyas Kamath (BJP)

Ratnakar Suvarna (JDS)

Mohammed Iqbal (MEP)

Dharmendra (Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha)

Madan M C (Independent)

R Srikar Prabhu (Independent)

Supreth Kumar Poojary (Independent)

Mohammed Khaled (Independent)

Reena Pinto (Independent)

Mangaluru/Ullal (5)

Nithin Kuttar (CPM)

Santhosh Kumar Rai (BJP)

U T Khader (Congress)

K Ashraf (JDS)

Usman (MEP)

Bantwal (5)

B Ramanath Rai (Congress)

Rajesh Naik (BJP)

Ibrahim Kailar (Independent)

Balakrishna Poojary (Lok Awaz Dal)

Shameer (MEP)

Puttur (11)

Shakunthala Shetty (Congress)

Sanjeev Matandoor (BJP)

Shekar B (Praja Parivarthan Party)

M Sheshappa Rao (Janata Party)

I C Kailas (JDS)

Shabana S Sheik (MEP)

Majeed (JDU)

Abdul Basheer (Independent)

Vidyashree (Independent)

B S Chethan Kumar (Independent)

Amarnath B K (Independent)

Sullia (6)

Angara S (BJP)

Dr B Raghu (Congress)

Raghu (BSP)

Sanjeev Baburao Kurnad (Independent)

Sundara K (Independent)

Chandrashekar K (Independent)

Comments

shaji
 - 
Sunday, 29 Apr 2018

Name sake muslim candidates are bribed by anti social and antial religious party only to divide votes of Muslims and make gain to particular communaal party.  Shame on these muslim candidates.   they are stabbing their own people for the sake of position and money.  I think they have no fear of Almighty God.  Money and power is their God.  Shame on you.   You are supporting Iblees.   Why dont you join them and accept their belief.   Dont try to be MIr Qasim and Mir Jafar who betrayer Indians and collaborated swith British.  I request all the Votes not to cast a single vote to these Muslims candidates who are supporting communaal party.  MEP is a branch of BJP and nothing else.   MEP leader has close relation with BJP leaders.   BJP is forecasting her as a Goddess who is distributing cash to poors only to fool them.   She is spreading Fitna of Dajjal and we should be careful about it.  

Arun
 - 
Saturday, 28 Apr 2018

I really appreciate SDPIs stand for withdrwing the all nomination...

 

Jj
 - 
Saturday, 28 Apr 2018

See the stupidity of Muslims candidates....... How many candidates are in field? Just to devide votes.

 

Shame on you......

But Muslim voters should not fall prey to this.... determine who is winning candidates and vote. Don't go for cast policy...... 

 

 

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com news network
February 14,2020

Bengaluru, Feb 14: In a major embarrassment to the police, the Karnataka High Court has termed as illegal the prohibitory orders imposed under Section 144 of CrPC by the City Police Commissioner in December 2019 in the light of the anti-Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) protests in Bengaluru.

The orders were passed “without application of mind” and without following due procedures, the court noted. Giving reasons for upholding the arguments of the petitioners that there was no application of mind by the Police Commissioner (Bhaskar Rao) before imposing restrictions, a division bench of the High Court said he had not recorded the reasons, except reproducing the contents of letters addressed to him by the Deputy Commissioners of Police (DCPs). 

The state government had contended that prohibitory orders were passed based on reports submitted by the DCPs who expressed apprehension about anti-social elements creating law and order problems and damaging public property by taking advantage of the anti-CAA protests.  

The High Court bench said the Police Commissioner should have conducted inquiry as stated by the Supreme Court to check the reasons cited by the DCPs who submitted identical reports. Except for this, there were no facts laid out by the Police Commissioner, the court said.

“There is complete absence of reasons. If the order indicated that the Police Commissioner was satisfied by the apprehension of DCPs, it would have been another matter,” it said.  

“The apex court has held that it must record the reasons for imposition of restrictions and there has to be a formation of opinion by the district magistrate. Only then can  the extraordinary powers conferred on the district magistrate can be exercised. This procedure was not followed. Hence, exercise of power under Section 144 by the commissioner, as district magistrate, was not at all legal”, the bench said. 

“We hold that the order dated December 18, 2019 is illegal and cannot stand judicial scrutiny in terms of the apex court’s orders in the Ramlila Maidan case and Anuradha Bhasin case,” the HC bench said while upholding the arguments of Prof Ravivarma Kumar, who appeared for some of the petitioners.   

Partly allowing a batch of public interest petitions questioning the imposition of prohibitory orders and cancelling the permission granted for protesters in the city, the bench of Chief Justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka and Justice Hemant Chandangoudar observed that, unfortunately, in the present case, there was no indication of application of mind in passing prohibitory orders.

The bench said the observation was confined to this order only and it cannot be applicable in general. If there is a similar situation (necessitating imposition of restrictions), the state is not helpless, the court said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 27,2020

Bengaluru, May 27: Congress leader Siddaramaiah on Wednesday hit out at Chief Minister BS Yediyurappa-led Karnataka government for allegedly "betraying" the people by not fulfilling its Rs 1,610 crore COVID-19 package promise.

Taking a dig at Yediyurappa over the matter, the Congress leader tweeted, "Chief Minister of Karnataka BS Yediyurappa has betrayed people by not fulfilling his Rs 1,610 crore package promise. He seems to be following his @BJP4India leader @PMOIndia @narendramodi."

"Crisis and vulnerability should not be misused for political gains and BJP for India is insensitive towards the same," the former Karnataka Chief Minister said.

On May 6, Yediyurappa had urged migrant workers to stay back as construction activities have resumed and announced a Rs 1,610 crores COVID-19 financial package for the state.

"A package of Rs 1,610 crores will be released as COVID-19 financial relief. One time compensation of Rs 5,000 will be given to 2,30,000 barbers and 7,75,000 drivers," the Chief Minister said.

Referring to media reports, Siddarmiah cornered the state government for asking the licence to release funds for unorganised sector workers.

"How can we expect washermen and other unorganised sector workers to have licence for their work?" he asked.

It looks like Karnataka Chief Minister is very far from reality, he added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 21,2020

Mangaluru, Feb 21: Police officials including the Mangaluru city Commissioner of Police P S Harsha would be summoned to appear before the panel conducting a magisterial probe into December 19, 2019 firing on anti-CAA protesters in the city which left two people dead.

Notices would be served on 176 police officers and staff to appear for hearing, Udupi deputy commissioner G Jagadeesha, conducting the magisterial probe into the incident said here on Thursday.

He told reporters that officials, including the city police commissioner Harsha, would be summoned to depose on the violence which led to police firing that killed two people.

Mangaluru (North) Assistant Commissioner K U Belliappa, who is the nodal officer for the police department, has given a list of 176 policemen who are ready to adduce evidence in the hearing.

The police officers would be summoned in phases.

The next hearing is on February 25.

He said so far, 203 members of the public have deposed before him on the incident.

Former city Mayor K Ashraf, who is under treatment in hospital, has also provided a written statement.

The remaining members of the public can provide evidence during next hearings, he said.

On December 19, two people were killed in police firing as protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) turned violent here.

The protesters had attempted to besiege the Mangaluru north police station and tried to attack police personnel, following which force was used to disperse them, police had said.

Two people received bullet injuries in the firing and they later succumbed at a hospital, the police had said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.