Aamir Khan's comments may mar Parliament session

November 25, 2015

New Delhi, Nov 25: Actor Aamir Khan’s statement on “rising intolerance” seems to have once again raked up a debate on the issue ahead of the Winter Session of Parliament beginning Thursday.

indiaDuring an interaction at a journalism award ceremony here on Monday evening, the actor said his wife, Kiran Rao, wanted to leave India due to the growing insecurity in the country.

Aamir’s statement was endorsed by Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi on Tuesday, setting off another bout of attack by the BJP and counterattack from the Opposition.

Leader of the Congress in the Lok Sabha, Mallikarjun Kharge, said: “We have already given notice for discussion on ‘intolerance’ and it should be admitted under Rule 193.”

Rahul also attacked Prime Minister Narendra Modi, saying that the government should desist from branding people questioning Modi as “unpatriotic” and “motivated”, and instead reach out to them.

“Instead of branding all those who question the govt & Modiji as unpatriotic, anti-national or motivated…The govt would do better to reach out to people to understand what’s disturbing them,” said Rahul in a series of tweets.

Rahul’s support for Aamir came shortly after Minister of State for Home Affairs Kiren Rijiju said the actor’s remark tarnishes the image of India.

"We won’t let Aamir leave the country, he is safe. This kind of comment influenced by a politically motivated campaign insults those who have given so much honour to Aamir in India,” said Union minister Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi. The BJP fielded its spokesperson Shahnawaz Hussain in Mumbai who said, “There is no better country like India and no better neighbour than a Hindu for an Indian Muslim.” Hussain also cited situations in Muslim countries and in Europe to argue that there is intolerance everywhere.

Aamir’s comment came during the function attended by four Union ministers – Arun Jaitley, M Venkaiah Naidu, Ravi Shankar Prasad and Piyush Goyal.

The ministers did not react to the comment then, though one of them was apparently prodded by the anchor for a response. The BJP leaders pointed out that Aamir was not so candid in articulating his views on “intolerance” debate during an interview for a news channel on November 11.

When the actor was asked to react on political events, since he had earlier expressed concerns on Gujarat, Narmada and gender discrimination issues, Aamir had said that he was not following political events in the last one year.

Talking about the prime minister, whom he had met after the NDA came to power last May, Aamir had said that Modi has promised inclusion and that’s what we look up to him. In the same interview, the actor appreciated India’s openness to change.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 9,2020

Feb 9: The Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) used in Delhi Assembly polls are kept under tight security, in the 'Strong Room' located at Atal Adarsh Bengali Balika Vidyalaya in Gol Market.

Voting for Delhi Assembly elections took place on Saturday with voters turnout well short of the 2015 election mark.

Counting of the votes will be on February 11.

Earlier, Deputy Election Commissioner Sudip Jain had said the Delhi elections took place peacefully and smoothly.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 7,2020

New Delhi, Jan 7: When a reign of terror was unleashed by "masked goons" in the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) on Sunday, Delhi Police registered two cases against varsity students union president Aishe Ghosh, who was badly injured in the attack, within a span of five minutes.

The registration of cases on two separate complaints against Ghosh and other students filed by JNU security department on January 3 and January 4 were registered on Sunday night when the violence was on, triggering questions about the motive behind the timing.

While the FIRs against Ghosh and others were registered between 8.44 pm and 8.49 pm after the JNUSU president was admitted to AIIMS, an FIR on the Sunday violence was registered on Monday at 5.36 am against unknown persons. The Sunday violence case has been transferred to Crime Branch for further investigations.

Questions are being raised over the registration of FIRs on Sunday while the complaints were filed on the previous days. Students allege that it was an afterthought from the police and authorities, as a nationwide outrage erupted as soon as the violence was reported.

Delhi Police is under attack for not coming to the aid of students targeted by the mob of ABVP activists armed with iron rods and sticks who went on a rampage on the campus. While no single person in the Sunday violence was arrested, the police are also accused of being a "mute spectator" by allowing the rioters to leave the campus without being arrested.

In its complaints, the JNU Security Department has alleged that Ghosh and others entered into a verbal and physical scuffle with security guards, including women, when officials tried to open the Centre for Information System (CIS) that was blocked by students protesting against the fee hike and registration process.

While the January 3 complaint claims that the students switched off the power supply to the CIS and evicted staff forcefully, the January 4 complaint alleged that they damaged the information system.

They also claimed the students damaged the servers, made it dysfunctional, severely damaged optic fibre cables and broke the biometric system in the CIS. The complaint also cited a Supreme Court order that prevented any protest within 100 metres of Administration Block and claimed the students violated the direction.

The FIR filed on Sunday violence on the basis of the statement of Inspector Anand Yadav said that the first phase of violence was reported at 3.45 pm when "40-50 unidentified" people who had "covered their faces" attacked students in Periyar Hostel and the situation was brought under control.

However at around 7 pm, "50-60 people with rods in their hands" targeted students in Sabarmati Hostel in which students were attacked and public property destroyed.

The FIR said that students were injured but skipped the mention of the attack on teachers, who were injured. At least two faculty members Sucharita Sen and Ameet Parameswaran were taken to AIIMS while several other teachers suffered minor injuries.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 26,2020

Jaipur, Mar 26: Two new COVID-19 positive cases were registered in Rajasthan taking the total number of coronavirus cases to 38 in the state.
The Union Health Ministry had on Wednesday reported 606 positive COVID-19 cases in India including 43 foreign nationals.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.