AAP crisis: Tomar's custody extended in fake degree case, party MLA Pankaj slams Kejriwal

June 14, 2015

New Delhi, Jun 14: More trouble is likely in store for ex-law minster of Delhi Jitendra Singh Tomar, who is already embroiled in an alleged fake degree case, as Delhi Police said on Saturday that his BSc degree too has been proven fake.

fake degreeThe Delhi Police, which took Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Jitendra Singh Tomar to Faizabad and Ayodhya as part of its investigation in the 'fake degree' case, has found that his graduation degree too is fake, ANI reported.

As per ANI, Delhi Police further said that verification of Jitender Singh Tomar's LLB degree is underway.

Delhi Police also said that Tomar had no knowledge about anything related to his educational qualification when questioned at the Faizabaad Awadh University and Ayodhya Saket College.

“No such degree has been issued by the University or college in his name,” ANI quoted Delhi Police as saying.

The investigating officers, however, found his name in the admission register of Vishwanath Singh Institute of legal Studies in Bihar's Munger.

Meanwhile, Saket Court today extended the police custody of Tomar by two days after. On expiry of his four-day police custody, Tomar was produced in the court.

According to news agency ANI, Delhi police had asked the trial court to extend Tomar's custody by 11 days saying every document that has surfaced during investigation is "fabricated", adding that it included a forged RTI which said that a Munger college, from where Tomar claims to have done his LLB, had said that Tomar had studied from their college.

The police also said that Tomar was required for further custodial interrogation to know about the persons who had allegedly connived with him in procurement of purported fake educational certificates.

"Every document produced by him (Tomar) is fabricated and it needs to be probed who are the people in connivance with Tomar in procuring these documents," police told the court, adding, "prima facie" charge under Prevention of Corruption Act was likely to come into effect in the case.

It alleged that records of Tilka Manjhi University, Bhagalpur, Bihar, were "torn which showed connivance of university officials with Tomar" and it might attract charges under the anti-graft law.

It said that lots of documents were required to be probed and the four-day remand granted earlier was not sufficient as almost 45 hours were spent in travelling more than 3,000 km.

Giving details of the probe carried out by it, the police said "Tomar's migration certificate issued from Bundelkhand University was also fabricated and we need to go there and probe this angle."

49-year-old Tomar, who was arrested in the case on June 9, was earlier in the day produced before Metropolitan Magistrate Pooja Aggarwa.

During the hearing, while Advocate Tarunveer Singh Khehar appeared as Special Public Prosecutor for Delhi Police, Delhi HC Bar Association Chairman Advocate Rajiv Khosala was appointed as the lawyer for the former Delhi law minister.

Opposing the police's plea, PTI quoted advocate Rajiv Khosla as saying that police had already been to all the places and seized all the documents.

Khosla also said that Tomar was not well and the only purpose for extension of remand was to "harass him as police were totally biased and acting on someone's will".

Tomar, who was present in the court room, told the court that he was being harassed by the police and all documents have already been recovered so there was no need for extension of the police remand.

He also said that his counsel was not allowed to be with him during the four-day custody. "All the registers and documents were seized and signed but I was not allowed to see them," Tomar alleged.

However, it was confirmed on Friday that Tomar had passed law examination in 1998-99 from a Bihar college.

Officials present during the questioning of Tomar, who was brought from Delhi by police at Biswanath Law College in Munger, said on condition of anonymity that college registers revealed that the former minister had enrolled in it under roll number 10136 in 1994-95 session.

The AAP minister was arrested last Tuesday following an investigation into a complaint by the Bar Council of Delhi that Tomar had obtained a fake law degree from the Institute of Legal Studies College in Munger.

Furthermore, AAP MLA Pankaj Pushkar lashed out at the top leadership of the party over its handling of Tomar's issue and asked Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal to "apologise" to the people.

Pushkar, who had publicly sided with ousted AAP leaders Yogendra Yadav and Prashant Bhushan, said that the party should have acted against Tomar when the issue had first come to light.

"The facts came to light four months back. Why did not the party take action against him back then? If the leadership had paid heed to few voices, then this situation could have been avoided.

"The biggest damage has been inflicted on public trust. The party and Arvind Kejriwal should definitely apologise to the people of Delhi," Pushkar told PTI.

The Timarpur MLA said that the party should have a mechanism of "self-disclosure" instead of waiting for outside forces to compel it to disclose something.

"The other cases involving Vishesh Ravi (Karol Bagh MLA), Surinder Singh (Delhi Cantt MLA) should be acted upon. In case of doubt, one should go for immediate self-disclsoure," he said.

Pushkar said he would continue to raise his voice against apparent deviations from the principles of Swaraj, transparency and ethics by the party.

"I do not fear any action against me. But I cannot go against my principles," he said.

He also extended his full support to the Swaraj Abhiyaan movement launched by Yadav and Bhushan.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
March 25,2020

New Delhi, Mar 25: The Indian Rail Catering and Tourism Corporation (IRCTC) on Wednesday appealed to the people not to cancel their e-tickets on their own in case of trains being cancelled by the national transporter due to nation-wide lockdown to help curb the spread of novel coronavirus pandemic.

Clearing the doubts of the railway passengers, IRCTC spokesperson Siddharth Singh said, "Doubts have been raised regarding cancellation of e-tickets subsequent to the halting of railway passenger trains.

"It may be submitted that for trains cancelled by the railways in its complete run, refund on e-tickets is full and automatic. In this case, no cancellation exercise is required to be done on the part of the user," he said.

The IRCTC official said that if user cancels his e-ticket in situations of train cancellations, there are chances he may get "less refund". "Hence passengers are advised not to cancel e-tickets on their own for those trains which have been cancelled by the railways," he said.

He also said that the refund amount will be credited to the user account used for booking e-tickets automatically and no charges will be deducted by the railways in case of train cancellation.

His remarks came as the national transporter announced the suspension of the passenger, mail and express services from March 23 till March 31. However, the railways extended the suspension of services till April 14 in the wake of the three week lockdown announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi from March 25 during his second special address to the nation on Tuesday night.

The railways has cancelled over 13,600 passengers trains across the country in a bid to combat the spread of novel coronavirus. Only freight trains are running to ensure the supply of essential services. About 9,000 freight trains are transporting essential items every day across the country.

On Wednesday, India recorded 562 cases of COVID-19 with 10 deaths.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Nerwork
June 7,2020

New Delhi, Jun 7: Rain lashed some parts of the Delhi-NCR on Sunday morning.

The India Meteorological Department (IMD) has predicted partly cloudy sky with possibility of development of thunder lightning for three days from June 10 onwards with minimum and maximum temperature will hover around 29° Celcius and 42° Celcius respectively.

Strong surface winds during day time have been predicted for today by IMD.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
July 30,2020

Kochi, Jul 30: The Kerala High Court on Thursday refused to grant the extension for the stay of a 74-year-old US citizen, Johnny Paul Pierce, who had earlier said that he felt safer to remain in India than in the United States amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

The single-judge bench of Justice CS Dias, which considered the writ petition, observed that the grant or extension of visa to foreign nationals fall exclusively within the domain of the Government of India (GoI) and that judicial review in such matters is minimal.

The power of the GoI to expel foreigners is absolute and unlimited, the bench said.

"In view of the categoric declaration of law by the Supreme Court, the plea of the petitioner to permit him to stay back in India cannot be accepted, as it falls within the purview of the guidelines and the discretion of the Government of India," the order said.

"The petitioner cannot be heard that the guidelines/policies/regulations formulated by the Government of India, that an American national though has been granted a visa having validity of five years has to leave India within 180 days, is irrational or unreasonable," it added.

The High Court, which was hearing a plea to permit the US citizen to stay in India for a further period of six months, said that the petitioner does not have a case that there is an infraction of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

"The petitioner was well aware of the visa conditions when he arrived in India, and it is too late in the day for him to raise a grievance on the visa conditions," the bench said noting that the petitioner's love for India was heartening.

The High Court also directed the Foreigners Registration Officer to consider the petitioner's representation within a period of two weeks in accordance with the applicable guidelines and policies.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.