Anger managed, job done: A new Virat Kohli emerges

February 18, 2015

Feb 18: There was something different about Virat Kohli at the Adelaide Oval on February 15. Actually, there were several things different about him at a venue that he can now claim to have made his own with a third international ton in three innings this Australian summer.

For one thing, the lynchpin of the Indian batting wasn't at his very best. He has called his 22nd One-Day International hundred, the first by an Indian against Pakistan in World Cup cricket, 'perhaps one of the biggest in my career', but this was no dominant, eye-catching Kohli masterpiece.

Virat KohliFor another, Kohli didn't get angry. He didn't snarl and gripe and thirst for a fight. He actually smiled. A lot. More than he has ever smiled on a cricket field, probably.

He didn't leap up in the air and let loose a string of expletives when he reached a memorable, milestone hundred. He merely took his helmet off, sank into the arms of Suresh Raina, and acknowledged the cheers from every section of a packed stadium dotted extensively by colourful Indian fans.

When a throw from Shahid Afridi pinged him on his backside as he completed a sharp single, Kohli again smiled. He didnt break stride, his face didn't contort into a mask of rage and indignation. He recognised a cricketing accident for what it was. Unlike earlier on this tour, when he took offence to a Mitchell Johnson throw on his follow through during the Melbourne Boxing Day Test.

Then, with the match won and lost, he engaged Sohail Khan in the first verbal battle of a long, tense but surprisingly uneventful evening. Again, while the tall Pakistani paceman was close to losing his shirt, Kohli was beaming. Broadly. And, finally, with Umesh Yadav settling under the catch that sealed Indias sixth successive win over Pakistan in World Cup history, Kohli was a picture of composure, delighted at the result but keeping his oftentimes volatile emotions well in check.

Kohli is one of those figures on the cricket field that magnetically draws attention. Sometimes by accident, but sometimes by design too, and especially when he gets into oral confrontations that he invariably seems to be a part of. But whether you love him, like all Indian fans do at most times, or whether you hate him, like most Australian fans appear to at all times, you simply can't ignore him.

On Sunday, Kohli faced one of the bigger tests of a career that has just gone up and up since his second coming as a Test cricketer. As the vice-captain of the team and one of only four surviving members from the 2011 World Cup-winning team, he had to set the tone. This was no Sunday backyard game; this was India v Pakistan, the first match each for both sides in a brand new World Cup, a game where victory and only victory was acceptable to fans from both sides of the border.

Normally, this is precisely the kind of stage on which you would expect Kohli to revel. But the last month hasn't exactly been normal so far as Kohli was concerned. After a fourth hundred of the series in the Sydney Test a little under five weeks back, the runs had dried up. In four games during the tri-series with Australia and England, he had scores of 9, 4, 3* and 8. In the two warm-up games against Australia and Afghanistan respectively, he was dismissed for 18 and 5. His place in the batting order was discussed threadbare. Should he bat at No. 3 where he has had great success? Or should he come in at No. 4 where, despite having even better numbers, he isn't entirely at home? Should he be exposed early to the swinging ball in the event of one opener falling cheaply? Or, being the best batsman in the side, should he be given the responsibility of seeing off that little period and then doing what he does best?

Mahendra Singh Dhoni repeatedly emphasised during the tri-series that it wasn't about the number in the batting order, it was about the state of the match. Overs bowled. Nature of surface. Behaviour of the ball. No matter. Most of what he said fell on deaf ears. Only one thing registered: "I know individuals love to bat at a certain slot. If you dont have people who can float around in the batting order, it becomes very difficult." It was construed as a direct barb at the man who has succeeded him as Test skipper, and will do so not too far from now in the limited-overs game too. More grist to the team mein daraar (rift in the team) rumour mills. 'Ha!', Dhoni must have said, and Kohli must have replied, 'Ha indeed', MS.

His success on Sunday can and perhaps will be attributed to his batting position, but if cricket were just a matter of No. 3 or No. 4, how simple it would be. Kohli walked out in the eighth over with the ball not quite swinging around, but with the bounce a little variable, with stroke-making not a very prudent option. Then again, seeing Shikhar Dhawan bat, you wouldn't have guessed that. Himself out of sorts for the last couple of months, Dhawan was striking the ball beautifully. Kohli, by contrast, had to battle his way through a tough early part, and even as he built his innings brick by careful brick, you never ever sensed that he had the bowling at his mercy.

And yet, he scored at a perfectly acceptable clip. This wasn't a free-flowing, boundary-ridden hundred. Only seven fours in the 100, but made off only 119 deliveries. Dropped on 3, dropped again on 76 a little after having played his part in Dhawan's run out for a fluent 73, but never losing sight of the larger goal. The constant in consecutive stands of 129 and 110 with Dhawan and Raina respectively, content to play second fiddle as the two left-hand batsmen took the fight to the opposition. No ego, no competition with his mates. Mature Kohli. Team man Kohli. Magnificent Kohli. Not so much for the quality of stroke production as his approach. There were some stunning strokes alright, primarily off the legpsin of Yasir Shah, but the entire package was even more stunning.

"Virat batted really well. Every game, according to demands and the behaviour of the wicket, you have to alter your game. Virat did that," gushed Dhoni later. Not just lip service there. But hang on, listen to Kohli too. "My role in the team is to bat through (the innings), and the power-hitters can play around knowing that one end is secure." Don't bet against him batting through the innings, one end secure, and himself turning on the class and the power and the booming boundaries in the near future.

For Kohli and India, Sunday was just about the perfect day. So much had been riding on the result, apart from the fact that this was a match against them India were winless since arriving in Australia in late November. So much had been riding for Kohli — he is the kind of player who, if he begins a tournament or series well, just gets on a roll and becomes impossible to stop. Both boxes ticked. "I hate to lose, I play passionately," Kohli told us — ah, we didn't know that, did we? "I like the expectations. The last couple of days have been too tough, too many people in the hotel getting worked up. You just have to stay in your little space."

Kohli did that brilliantly. Gradually, his little space expanded, and it gobbled up Pakistan.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 5,2020

Mar 5: India reached a maiden women's Twenty20 World Cup final Thursday after their last four clash against England was washed out, sparking calls for the International Cricket Council to include reserve days in future events.

Harmanpreet Kaur's unbeaten side were due to face the 2009 champions at the Sydney Cricket Ground, but the rain began pouring early in the day with barely any let-up.

With a minimum 10 overs per side needed for a result and no break in the weather, the umpires called it off without a ball being bowled.

Normally, five overs per side are needed to constitute a Twenty20 match, but the rules are different for ICC tournaments.

Four-time champions Australia are scheduled to take on South Africa later in the second semi-final, with that match also under threat.

With no reserve day, the highest-ranked teams from the two groups move into the final if play is not possible

That would pit India against South Africa at the Melbourne Cricket Ground on Sunday, where organisers are hoping to attract 90,000 plus fans, denying Australia a chance to defend their crown.

A reserve day is allowed for the final and the lack of one for the semis has been criticised by some players, with England captain Heather Knight among those calling for change.

"If both semi-finals are lost it would be a sad time for the tournament," she told reporters ahead of the match. "It's obviously going to be a shame if it does happen and I'm sure there will be a lot of pressure on the ICC to change that."

Cricket Australia chief Kevin Roberts said he sought clarification from the ICC about adding a reserve day with the Sydney weather looking ominous, but the request was denied.

"We've asked the question and it's not part of the playing conditions and we respect that," he told Melbourne's SEN radio.

"It gives you cause to reflect and think about how you might improve things in the future, but going into a tournament with a given set of playing conditions and rules, I don't think it's time to tinker with the rules."

It is not the way India would have wanted to make the final, but they are deserving of being there having gone through the group phase as the only unbeaten team.

After opening their campaign by upsetting Australia, they beat Bangladesh, New Zealand and then Sri Lanka.

While the entire team played well, teenage batting prodigy Shafali Verma excelled, which saw her elevated to the top of the ICC T20 batting rankings this week aged just 16.

She is only the second Indian after Mithali Raj to reach number one, pushing New Zealand veteran Suzie Bates down to second.

Ranked four in the world, India had made three semi-finals before this year and lost every time, including against England at the last World Cup.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 18,2020

New Delhi, Jan 18: There was not much rustiness but just the initial nervousness, which a “pleasantly surprised” Sania Mirza shook off to win a title in her first tournament in 27 months, capping off her comeback from a maternity leave in style.

Partnering Ukraine's Nadiia Kichenov, the trailblazing Indian tennis player annexed the Hobart International trophy with a straight sets win over second seed Chinese pair of Shuai Peng and Shuai Zhang.

She worked hard to get into shape but the way she moved, it seemed Sania was never away from the courts.

“It's something I did not expect totally, so to say, but I am excited to be able to do this in my first tournament on comeback," Sania told PTI in an exclusive interview from Melbourne.

“I honestly thought I would be a bit more rustier than I was. I was pleasantly surprised that I was not. But there are things I can improve and that is what makes a champion. You always want to get better in what you are doing, no matter how well you do."

The 33-year-old winner of six Grand Slam titles said she played without pressure, and insisted there was no secret to the swift success on comeback.

“There is no key, I wish I knew, there was one key to winning. I just enjoyed my game. You have to work hard, play your game. I was playing with a new partner, new gear after two-and-a-half years. There was no pressure and no expectations.

"The first match was the only one when I felt a bit nervous because I did not know how my body would react and how I would play. That match was difficult but it set the tone and momentum. I was happy to come though that one and after that things kept getting better and better," she said.

Sania said her body has certainly changed after giving birth to son Izhaan but she did not have to tweak her post-match recovery process much.

“It does change. I was dealing with a calf injury, from last month and I aggravated a bit today. I am still icing it as we speak but it should not be serious.

“The body is a lot different now. It recovers different. But recovery (process) has not changed so much, it's similar."

Asked if she could go for her shots as she was doing before the break, she said, “I was able to do enough, I can improve, no matter how I play."

"My serve was decent but I can improve. I the first match I was not serving that well and was not returning well on important points but by the time I was playing the final, I was doing both of those little better. It is a process, it does not happen overnight. It's something will keep working on."

Serena Williams set an example in 2018 when she came out playing highly competitive tennis after giving birth to her daughter Olympia. There are other tennis moms like Victoria Azrenka and Evgeniya Rodina.

Sania said she did not seek any input from tennis moms but their presence on the Tour is inspiring enough.

“I did not speak to anyone but it is inspiring to see so many moms around, playing well in different sports."

Sania will play the Australian Open mixed doubles with compatriot Rohan Bopnna after her original first-choice Rajeev Ram opted out due to health reasons.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 10,2020

New Delhi, May 10: Former Australia captain Ian Chappell has proposed radical changes in the LBW laws, stating that a batsman should be given out leg before as long as the ball is hitting the stumps irrespective of the spot of its landing and impact.

Chappell also said captains should agree on one way of working up the ball which will encourage swing bowling, even as the ICC is considering the use of artificial substances to shine the ball instead of sweat and saliva in post-COVID-19 scenario.

"The new lbw law should simply say: 'Any delivery that strikes the pad without first hitting the bat and, in the umpire's opinion, would go on to hit the stumps is out regardless of whether or not a shot is attempted'," he wrote in a column for ESPNcricinfo.

"Forget where the ball pitches and whether it strikes the pad outside the line or not; if it's going to hit the stumps, it's out."

The 76-year-old said the change in lbw law would attract expected criticism from the batsmen but it would make the game more fair.

"There will be screams of horror - particularly from pampered batsmen - but there are numerous positives this change would bring to the game. Most important is fairness.

"If a bowler is prepared to attack the stumps regularly, the batsman should only be able to protect his wicket with the bat. The pads are there to save the batsman from injury not dismissal.

"It would also force batsmen to seek an attacking method to combat a wristspinner pitching in the rough outside the right-hander's leg stump," said Chappell.

He cited Sachin Tendulkar's example on how he negotiated Shane Warne's round the wicket tactic during the 1997-98 Test series in India.

"Contrast Sachin Tendulkar's aggressive and successful approach to Shane Warne coming round the wicket in Chennai in 1997-98 with a batsman who kicks away deliveries pitching in the rough and turning in toward the stumps. Which would you rather watch?

"The current law encourages "pad play" to balls pitching outside leg while this change would force them to use their bat. The change would reward bowlers who attack the stumps and decrease the need for negative wide deliveries to a packed off-side field," he said.

Chappell said his proposed change to the lbw law would also cut down "frivolous" DRS challenges.

"This change to the lbw law would also simplify umpiring and result in fewer frivolous DRS challenges. Consequently, it would speed up a game that has slowed drastically in recent times.

"It would also make four-day Tests an even more viable proposition as mind-numbing huge first-innings totals would be virtually non-existent."

On the substitute of shining the ball without sweat and saliva, Chappell said international captains should find out a way of working up the ball.

"With ball-tampering always a hot topic, in the past I've suggested that administrators ask international captains to construct a list (i.e. the use of natural substances) detailing the things bowlers feel will help them to swing the ball.

"From this list, the administrators should deem one method to be legal with all others being punishable as illegal," the cricketer-turned-commentator added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.