Anger managed, job done: A new Virat Kohli emerges

February 18, 2015

Feb 18: There was something different about Virat Kohli at the Adelaide Oval on February 15. Actually, there were several things different about him at a venue that he can now claim to have made his own with a third international ton in three innings this Australian summer.

For one thing, the lynchpin of the Indian batting wasn't at his very best. He has called his 22nd One-Day International hundred, the first by an Indian against Pakistan in World Cup cricket, 'perhaps one of the biggest in my career', but this was no dominant, eye-catching Kohli masterpiece.

Virat KohliFor another, Kohli didn't get angry. He didn't snarl and gripe and thirst for a fight. He actually smiled. A lot. More than he has ever smiled on a cricket field, probably.

He didn't leap up in the air and let loose a string of expletives when he reached a memorable, milestone hundred. He merely took his helmet off, sank into the arms of Suresh Raina, and acknowledged the cheers from every section of a packed stadium dotted extensively by colourful Indian fans.

When a throw from Shahid Afridi pinged him on his backside as he completed a sharp single, Kohli again smiled. He didnt break stride, his face didn't contort into a mask of rage and indignation. He recognised a cricketing accident for what it was. Unlike earlier on this tour, when he took offence to a Mitchell Johnson throw on his follow through during the Melbourne Boxing Day Test.

Then, with the match won and lost, he engaged Sohail Khan in the first verbal battle of a long, tense but surprisingly uneventful evening. Again, while the tall Pakistani paceman was close to losing his shirt, Kohli was beaming. Broadly. And, finally, with Umesh Yadav settling under the catch that sealed Indias sixth successive win over Pakistan in World Cup history, Kohli was a picture of composure, delighted at the result but keeping his oftentimes volatile emotions well in check.

Kohli is one of those figures on the cricket field that magnetically draws attention. Sometimes by accident, but sometimes by design too, and especially when he gets into oral confrontations that he invariably seems to be a part of. But whether you love him, like all Indian fans do at most times, or whether you hate him, like most Australian fans appear to at all times, you simply can't ignore him.

On Sunday, Kohli faced one of the bigger tests of a career that has just gone up and up since his second coming as a Test cricketer. As the vice-captain of the team and one of only four surviving members from the 2011 World Cup-winning team, he had to set the tone. This was no Sunday backyard game; this was India v Pakistan, the first match each for both sides in a brand new World Cup, a game where victory and only victory was acceptable to fans from both sides of the border.

Normally, this is precisely the kind of stage on which you would expect Kohli to revel. But the last month hasn't exactly been normal so far as Kohli was concerned. After a fourth hundred of the series in the Sydney Test a little under five weeks back, the runs had dried up. In four games during the tri-series with Australia and England, he had scores of 9, 4, 3* and 8. In the two warm-up games against Australia and Afghanistan respectively, he was dismissed for 18 and 5. His place in the batting order was discussed threadbare. Should he bat at No. 3 where he has had great success? Or should he come in at No. 4 where, despite having even better numbers, he isn't entirely at home? Should he be exposed early to the swinging ball in the event of one opener falling cheaply? Or, being the best batsman in the side, should he be given the responsibility of seeing off that little period and then doing what he does best?

Mahendra Singh Dhoni repeatedly emphasised during the tri-series that it wasn't about the number in the batting order, it was about the state of the match. Overs bowled. Nature of surface. Behaviour of the ball. No matter. Most of what he said fell on deaf ears. Only one thing registered: "I know individuals love to bat at a certain slot. If you dont have people who can float around in the batting order, it becomes very difficult." It was construed as a direct barb at the man who has succeeded him as Test skipper, and will do so not too far from now in the limited-overs game too. More grist to the team mein daraar (rift in the team) rumour mills. 'Ha!', Dhoni must have said, and Kohli must have replied, 'Ha indeed', MS.

His success on Sunday can and perhaps will be attributed to his batting position, but if cricket were just a matter of No. 3 or No. 4, how simple it would be. Kohli walked out in the eighth over with the ball not quite swinging around, but with the bounce a little variable, with stroke-making not a very prudent option. Then again, seeing Shikhar Dhawan bat, you wouldn't have guessed that. Himself out of sorts for the last couple of months, Dhawan was striking the ball beautifully. Kohli, by contrast, had to battle his way through a tough early part, and even as he built his innings brick by careful brick, you never ever sensed that he had the bowling at his mercy.

And yet, he scored at a perfectly acceptable clip. This wasn't a free-flowing, boundary-ridden hundred. Only seven fours in the 100, but made off only 119 deliveries. Dropped on 3, dropped again on 76 a little after having played his part in Dhawan's run out for a fluent 73, but never losing sight of the larger goal. The constant in consecutive stands of 129 and 110 with Dhawan and Raina respectively, content to play second fiddle as the two left-hand batsmen took the fight to the opposition. No ego, no competition with his mates. Mature Kohli. Team man Kohli. Magnificent Kohli. Not so much for the quality of stroke production as his approach. There were some stunning strokes alright, primarily off the legpsin of Yasir Shah, but the entire package was even more stunning.

"Virat batted really well. Every game, according to demands and the behaviour of the wicket, you have to alter your game. Virat did that," gushed Dhoni later. Not just lip service there. But hang on, listen to Kohli too. "My role in the team is to bat through (the innings), and the power-hitters can play around knowing that one end is secure." Don't bet against him batting through the innings, one end secure, and himself turning on the class and the power and the booming boundaries in the near future.

For Kohli and India, Sunday was just about the perfect day. So much had been riding on the result, apart from the fact that this was a match against them India were winless since arriving in Australia in late November. So much had been riding for Kohli — he is the kind of player who, if he begins a tournament or series well, just gets on a roll and becomes impossible to stop. Both boxes ticked. "I hate to lose, I play passionately," Kohli told us — ah, we didn't know that, did we? "I like the expectations. The last couple of days have been too tough, too many people in the hotel getting worked up. You just have to stay in your little space."

Kohli did that brilliantly. Gradually, his little space expanded, and it gobbled up Pakistan.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 13,2020

New Delhi, Jun 13: Five centrally contracted Indian cricketers including Cheteshwar Pujara, Ravindra Jadeja and KL Rahul have been issued notices by National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) for failing to disclose their whereabouts as the BCCI cited "password glitch" as the reason for delay.

The other players to have received the notice include women stars Smriti Mandhana and Deepti Sharma, who are among the five cricketers in the 110 strong National Registered Testing Pool (NRTP). Speaking to PTI, NADA DG Navin Agarwal confirmed that BCCI has sent an official explanation for their five NRTP players' failure to submit whereabouts.

"There are two ways to fill up the whereabouts form in the ADAMS (Anti Doping Administration & Management Systems) software. Either athlete does it himself or association fills it up on his or her behalf," Agarwal said. "Now athletes in some discipline aren't educated enough or do not have access to internet and find themselves unable to handle the whereabouts clause of the ADAMS or upload the filled up

"They use assistance of their concerned federations. So federations have accepted responsibility of uploading their whereabouts," Agarwal said.

He said cricketers too at times find it tough to complete the process on their own. "Similarly in cricket also, although these people are well qualified and they can do it, perhaps they don't have the time for whatever reasons, so the federation concerned, the BCCI has taken upon itself the responsibility of uploading their whereabouts." So why didnt BCCI upload the the three-month whereabouts this time?

"Well they have given an explanation which appears to be reasonable but a decision will be taken. They have said that there has been a glitch with regards to password in ADAMS. Now they have said that issue has been resolved," Agarwal added. NADA DG added that "BCCI's explanation will be discussed as to whether it will be counted as one of three filing failures or not. It will be decided on the explanation given and how they (BCCI) proceed from here."

While country has been under lockdown, the rule to submit three months of whereabouts is mandatory. Three such failures to disclose leads to one Anti Doping Rule Violation (ADRV), which could lead up to two years of suspension upon hearing.

While BCCI has "officially gagged" its employees from talking to the media, it couldn't be ascertained that why as normal a glitch as a password error took days to resolve. A BCCI veteran, who has been privy to cricket operations, asked why the five cricketers were not told to upload the form themselves.

"This was lockdown period where they are not living out of suitcases. Some of the names have also engaged in multiple instagram chats and podcasts which their agents are managing," he said.

"If cricket operations team were having a glitch in fixing password, well the five cricketers could have been asked to do so and they would have done it individually with some guidance. "Probably NADA would be lenient this time but if it becomes an official warning, then who's responsible," he added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 9,2020

Jun 9: Former West Indies skipper Darren Sammy has released a video, alleging racism within the SunRisers Hyderabad camp. Last week, Sammy had lost his cool after learning the meaning of the word "Kalu", which he alleged was directed at him during his Indian Premier League (IPL) stint with the SunRisers Hyderabad. The T20 World Cup-winning Windies skipper had said that he along with Sri Lanka player Thisara Perera were sometimes called that word when they played for SunRisers Hyderabad. However, Sammy did not specify as to who directed these slurs at him, but now the player has released a video, saying he will message all those who called him that word.

"I have played all over the world and I have been loved by many people, I have embraced all dressing rooms where I have played, so I was listening to Hasan Minhaj as to how some of the people in his culture describe black people," Sammy said in a video posted on his Instagram account.

"This does not apply to all people, so after I found out a meaning of a certain word, I had said I was angry on finding out the meaning and it was degrading, instantly I remembered when I played for SunRisers Hyderabad, I was being called exactly the same word which is degrading to us black people," he added.

Sammy said that at the time when he was being called with the word, he didn''t know the meaning, and his team-mates used to laugh every time after calling him by that name.

"I will be messaging those people, you guys know who you are, I must admit at that time when I was being called as that word I thought the word meant strong stallion or whatever it is, I did not know what it meant, every time I was called with that word, there was laughter at that moment, I thought teammates are laughing so it must be something funny," Sammy said.

"Now, I realise it was degrading, I will be texting you guys and I will ask you as to when you called me with that name, did you all mean it in any bad way or form? I have had great memories in all my dressing rooms, so all those who used to you call me with that word, think about it, let's have a conversation, if it was in a bad way then I would be really disappointed," he added.

The former Windies skipper has been a vocal supporter of the protests that are currently going on in the United States over the death of an African-American man named George Floyd.

Sammy had also made an appeal to the ICC and other cricket boards to support the fight against social injustice and racism.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 18,2020

Jun 18: Sri Lanka "sold" the 2011 World Cup final to India, the country's former sports minister said on Thursday, reviving one of cricket's most explosive match-fixing controversies. Mahindananda Aluthgamage, who was sports minister at the time, is the second senior figure to allege the final was fixed, after 1996 World Cup-winning skipper Arjuna Ranatunga. "I tell you today that we sold the 2011 World Cup finals," Aluthgamage told Sirasa TV. "Even when I was sports minister I believed this."

Aluthgamage, sports minister from 2010 to 2015 and now state minister for renewable energy and power, said he "did not want to disclose" the plot at the time.

"In 2011, we were to win, but we sold the match. I feel I can talk about it now. I am not connecting players, but some sections were involved," he said.

Sri Lanka lost the match at Mumbai's Wankhede stadium by six wickets. Indian players have strongly denied any wrongdoing.

Ranatunga, who was at the stadium as a commentator, has previously called for an investigation into the defeat.

"When we lost, I was distressed and I had a doubt," he said in July 2017. "We must investigate what happened to Sri Lanka at the 2011 World Cup final."

"I cannot reveal everything now, but one day I will. There must be an inquiry," added Ranatunga, who said players could not hide the "dirt".

Sri Lanka batted first and scored 274-6 off 50 overs. They appeared in a commanding position when Indian superstar Sachin Tendulkar was out for 18.

But India turned the game dramatically, thanks partly to poor fielding and bowling by Sri Lanka, who were led by Kumar Sangakkara.

Sri Lankan cricket has regularly been involved in corruption controversies, including claims of match-fixing ahead of a 2018 Test against England.

Earlier this month, the Sri Lankan cricket board said the International Cricket Council was investigating three unnamed former players over alleged corruption.

Sri Lanka introduced tough penalties for match-fixing and tightened sports betting restrictions in November in a bid to stamp out graft.

Another former sports minister, Harin Fernando, has said Sri Lankan cricket was riddled with graft "from top to bottom", and that the ICC considered Sri Lanka one of the world's most corrupt nations.

Former Sri Lankan fast bowler Dilhara Lokuhettige was suspended in 2018 for corruption relating to a limited-overs league.

He was the third Sri Lankan charged under the ICC anti-corruption code, following former captain and ex-chief selector Sanath Jayasuriya, and former paceman Nuwan Zoysa.

Jayasuriya was found guilty of failing to cooperate with a match-fixing probe and banned for two years. Zoysa was suspended for match-fixing.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.