Belgium Eliminates Team USA

July 2, 2014

USA Fall

Salvador/Brazil, Jul 2: It felt as if Tim Howard would never go down. As if the United States would never go down, standing there, taking shots like an undersized fighter clinging to a puncher's chance. Howard saved with his hands, his feet, his legs, his chest.

Trying to figure out where soccer fits into the fabric of America is a popular topic these days but, on Tuesday, sports fans across the country were inspired by the performance of a soccer goalkeeper. In a loss.

The ending was cruel, but then so is the game. The United States' captivating run in the World Cup ended here, on the coast of Brazil, as Belgium beat the Americans, 2-1 after extra time, to eliminate the U.S. A win would have sent the Americans to a mouth-watering quarterfinal against Lionel Messi and Argentina on Saturday; this loss, instead, sent them home.

Of course, they did not go quietly. Buoyed by the incredible showing from Howard, whose 16 saves were the most by a goalkeeper in a World Cup game since 1966, the U.S. scraped into extra time tied at 0-0 and then responded after giving up two goals in the first of the two 15-minute extra periods. Julian Green, a substitute making his first World Cup appearance, scored to set up a frantic finish.

Ultimately, there was not enough from the Americans. Three draining group games in far-flung locations - including a trip to the Amazon - left the team gasping for air at the finish, and Romelu Lukaku's goal in the 105th minute proved to be the difference for Belgium.

At the final whistle, the fans here applauded, knowingly, surely mirroring the reactions of those watching on television back home. The ride had been incredible: Americans purchased more tickets to games here than fans from any country other than Brazil, and television ratings in the U.S. blasted through ceilings, surpassing those of the NBA finals or the World Series.

Watch parties, too, popped up in places far more varied than just craft breweries in New York, with fans gathering everywhere from Hermosa Beach in California to a library in Birmingham, Alabama, to the Tulsa Drillers minor league baseball stadium in Oklahoma. A gathering at Grant Park in Chicago on Tuesday was moved to nearby Soldier Field to accommodate a crowd reported to exceed 25,000.

There are many explanations for why the World Cup, finally, caught fire in the U.S. this year. Some have pointed to Brazil's time zone being favorable for U.S. viewers (especially as compared to South Africa four years ago). Others say soccer's spike is simply the result of increasing interest among Hispanics and Millennials - in other words, a steady rise in the number of soccer-loving children growing up to become consumer adults.

"These are all young people who grew up with the game, followed the sports, whether it be the English Premier League or Major League Soccer, and they don't need to be convinced that soccer is a sport that is worthy of their attention," said Don Garber, the commissioner of MLS. "The country has changed. This is a new America."

Statistics seem to support that claim. Roughly 14 percent of people between the ages of 12-24 said professional soccer was their favorite sport, second only to the NFL, according to Rich Luker, who runs a sports research firm. That leads to savvier and more-informed fans who are more likely to continue following the sport even after the pageantry of the World Cup is over.

"Fans are connecting the dots," said Jeff L'Hote, who runs a soccer-focused management consultancy. "One of the great things about the continued maturation of the sport is people know that Messi plays for Barcelona, not just Argentina."

Whatever the theory, the sheer entertainment value of this tournament has surely helped drive interest. Including Tuesday's games, 154 goals have already been scored, more than the total for the entire 2010 World Cup.

Also, for casual U.S. fans who find watching games end in ties about as appealing as doing their taxes, this tournament has been a revelation: there were only nine draws in the 48 group stage games, or four fewer than the average during the past four World Cups.

The grittiness of the U.S. team has been a draw, too. Drama, in one form or another, has followed the Americans ever since they opened a pre-tournament training camp in Northern California in early May.

First there was the question about whether leaving Landon Donovan off the roster was a bad mistake. Then came concerns about whether the Americans could win a must-have game against Ghana (yes, barely); whether they could get a decent result against Portugal (yes, agonizingly) and, finally, whether they could avoid a blowout against Germany (yes, mercifully).

Through it all, fans back in the United States gnawed through fingernails or, for those who followed the games via social media, clicked frantically as the Americans took each of their games into the final minutes with the result still in doubt.

It happened again here. Belgium, which won all three of its group games with late goals, was the aggressor from the start, neutralizing coach Jurgen Klinsmann's attempts to open up the U.S. attack with more players pushing forward.

Things got worse for the U.S. when Fabian Johnson, one of Klinsmann's most reliable players on the outside, pulled up with a hamstring injury and was taken off in the first half.

The Americans spent most of the rest of the game buckled in, holding off an onslaught from the Belgians, with Howard standing squarely in the middle. Making it to extra time felt like a small victory on its own, but then Lukaku's fresh legs led to Kevin De Bruyne lashing a shot past Howard from close range. Moments later, Lukaku claimed his own goal, too.

Green provided a flicker of hope and, with Howard making two more important saves to keep the game in range, the U.S. kept pushing.

Clint Dempsey missed a chance. Chris Wondolowski missed a chance. The Belgian goalkeeper, Thibaut Courtois, dived to push a shot away.

This time, the miracle never came.

At the final whistle, many of the U.S. players collapsed to the ground. Howard did not. He bent at the waist for just a moment, his hands on his knees, but then he stood up. Even then - in defeat, his tournament over - Howard refused to tumble.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 6,2020

New Delhi, Jul 6: India's cricket chief Sourav Ganguly says improved fitness standards and a change in culture have led to the country developing one of the world's best pace attacks.

Spearheads Mohammed Shami and Jasprit Bumrah are part of a battery of five formidable quick bowlers that have helped change India's traditional reliance on spin bowling.

"You know culture has changed in India that we can be good fast bowlers," Ganguly said in a chat hosted on the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) Twitter feed.

"Fitness regimes, fitness standards not only just among fast bowlers but also among the batters, that has changed enormously. That has made everyone understand and believe that we are fit, we are strong and we can also bowl fast like the others did."

The West Indies dominated world cricket in the 1970s and 1980s led by a fearsome pace attack that included all-time greats such as Michael Holding, Andy Roberts, Malcolm Marshall and Joel Garner.

Recently Indian quicks have risen to the top in world cricket with Shami, Bumrah, Ishant Sharma, Umesh Yadav and Bhuvneshwar Kumar in a deadly arsenal.

"The West Indies in my generation were naturally strong," the former India captain said.

"We Indians were never such naturally strong... but we worked hard to get strong. But I think it is the change in culture as well that is very important."

Shami last month claimed that the current Indian pace attack may be the best in Test history.

"You and everyone else in the world will agree to this -- that no team has ever had five fast bowlers together as a package," said Shami.

"Not just now, in the history of cricket, this might be the best fast-bowling unit in the world."

Shami took 13 wickets during India's 3-0 home Test sweep over South Africa last year, while Bumrah has claimed 68 scalps in 14 Tests since his debut.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 12,2020

New Delhi, May 12: Virat Kohli's natural talent makes him a cricketing equivalent of Roger Federer while Steve Smith's mental fortitude matches that of Rafael Nadal, said South African swashbuckler AB de Villiers comparing the two contemporary greats.

In an instagram chat with former Zimbabwe seamer Pommie Mbangwa, de Villiers spoke about the two batsmen, who are easily the game's biggest crowd-pullers right now.

"It's a difficult one, but Virat is definitely the more natural ball-striker, there's no doubt about that," de Villiers said during his interaction on 'Sports Hurricane'.

"In tennis terms, I'd say he's more like a (Roger) Federer whereas Smith is like a (Rafael) Nadal. Smith is mentally very strong and figures out a way of scoring runs - he doesn't look natural, but he ends up writing records and doing amazing things at the crease.

"I think mentally, Smith is one of the best I have ever seen. Virat has also scored runs all over the world and won games under pressure," de Villiers,himself a modern day great, said.

De Villiers also felt that when it comes to chasing, Kohli is a shade ahead of Tendulkar.

"Sachin is a role model for both of us (him and Kohli). The way he stood out in his era, the things he achieved and with the grace he did all that is a great example for everyone," de Villiers said.

"And I think Virat will also say that he set the standards for us to follow.

"But personally, in a chase, I'd say Virat is the best I've seen in my life. Sachin was amazing in all formats and all situations, but Virat comes out on top while chasing."

The world knows Kohli as a prolific cricketer but for de Villiers, he is a friend, who has interests beyond cricket and is spiritual at one level.

"He's much deeper than just a cricket player...I think most people realise after a while that there's more to life than just cricket," de Villiers said.

"...Virat's always been a thinker, he experiments (with) a lot of things, he loves trying new things out - gym wise, what he puts in his mouth. He thinks a lot about life after life - what's to come, the different religions, we talk about everything."

De Villiers said that he also shares a great bond with Indian captain's actor wife Anushka Sharma, conversing on a lot of issues including family life.

"We go pretty deep and his missus as well, Anushka, we have very deep conversations, which is fantastic. We talk about children and family. We're waiting for that first little Kohli to come.

"It's a good friendship and we always find a way to talk about cricket as well, but 90 per cent of the time we talk about other stuff. It's refreshing and in the middle of a very intense IPL tournament," he shared.

IPL, for de Villiers, is not just a tournament but also about friendships that he cherishes.

"Obviously, when it comes to the IPL in India, it's been more than friendship," De Villiers said, when asked who his best friends in cricket are.

"Virat obviously - not only during the IPL, we chat throughout the year, which means it's different than just the IPL or cricketing friendship.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
January 5,2020

Mumbai, Jan 5: All-rounder Irfan Pathan on Saturday announced his retirement from all forms of cricket, ending an injury-ridden career that prevented him from realising his true potential.

The 35-year-old's retirement was on expected lines, considering he last played a competitive game in February 2019 during the Syed Mushtaq Ali trophy for Jammu and Kashmir.

He did not even put himself in the IPL auction pool, last month.

The left-arm seamer's bowling was like a breath of fresh air when he made his India debut against Australia at the Adelaide Oval in 2003.

He never had express pace but his natural ability to swing the ball into the right-handers got him instant success, also drawing comparisons with the great Kapil Dev.

It seemed India had found the all-rounder they were looking for since Kapil left the scene. Pathan, who last played for India in October 2012, featured in 29 Tests (1105 runs and 100 wickets), 120 ODIs (1544 runs and 173 wickets) and 24 T20 Internationals (172 runs and 28 wickets).

He was part of the victorious Indian team at the 2007 World Twenty20 and was the man-of-the-match in the final against Pakistan.

One of his best performances came on the tour of Pakistan in 2006 when he became the second Indian after Harbhajan Singh to take a Test hat-trick, removing Salman Butt, Younis Khan and Mohammad Yusuf during the Karachi game.

He also played a big role in India winning a Test match against Australia on a tough Perth wicket, which offered steep bounce.

Injuries and lack of form troubled him thereafter and his ability to swing the ball deteriorated.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.