Belgium Eliminates Team USA

July 2, 2014

USA Fall

Salvador/Brazil, Jul 2: It felt as if Tim Howard would never go down. As if the United States would never go down, standing there, taking shots like an undersized fighter clinging to a puncher's chance. Howard saved with his hands, his feet, his legs, his chest.

Trying to figure out where soccer fits into the fabric of America is a popular topic these days but, on Tuesday, sports fans across the country were inspired by the performance of a soccer goalkeeper. In a loss.

The ending was cruel, but then so is the game. The United States' captivating run in the World Cup ended here, on the coast of Brazil, as Belgium beat the Americans, 2-1 after extra time, to eliminate the U.S. A win would have sent the Americans to a mouth-watering quarterfinal against Lionel Messi and Argentina on Saturday; this loss, instead, sent them home.

Of course, they did not go quietly. Buoyed by the incredible showing from Howard, whose 16 saves were the most by a goalkeeper in a World Cup game since 1966, the U.S. scraped into extra time tied at 0-0 and then responded after giving up two goals in the first of the two 15-minute extra periods. Julian Green, a substitute making his first World Cup appearance, scored to set up a frantic finish.

Ultimately, there was not enough from the Americans. Three draining group games in far-flung locations - including a trip to the Amazon - left the team gasping for air at the finish, and Romelu Lukaku's goal in the 105th minute proved to be the difference for Belgium.

At the final whistle, the fans here applauded, knowingly, surely mirroring the reactions of those watching on television back home. The ride had been incredible: Americans purchased more tickets to games here than fans from any country other than Brazil, and television ratings in the U.S. blasted through ceilings, surpassing those of the NBA finals or the World Series.

Watch parties, too, popped up in places far more varied than just craft breweries in New York, with fans gathering everywhere from Hermosa Beach in California to a library in Birmingham, Alabama, to the Tulsa Drillers minor league baseball stadium in Oklahoma. A gathering at Grant Park in Chicago on Tuesday was moved to nearby Soldier Field to accommodate a crowd reported to exceed 25,000.

There are many explanations for why the World Cup, finally, caught fire in the U.S. this year. Some have pointed to Brazil's time zone being favorable for U.S. viewers (especially as compared to South Africa four years ago). Others say soccer's spike is simply the result of increasing interest among Hispanics and Millennials - in other words, a steady rise in the number of soccer-loving children growing up to become consumer adults.

"These are all young people who grew up with the game, followed the sports, whether it be the English Premier League or Major League Soccer, and they don't need to be convinced that soccer is a sport that is worthy of their attention," said Don Garber, the commissioner of MLS. "The country has changed. This is a new America."

Statistics seem to support that claim. Roughly 14 percent of people between the ages of 12-24 said professional soccer was their favorite sport, second only to the NFL, according to Rich Luker, who runs a sports research firm. That leads to savvier and more-informed fans who are more likely to continue following the sport even after the pageantry of the World Cup is over.

"Fans are connecting the dots," said Jeff L'Hote, who runs a soccer-focused management consultancy. "One of the great things about the continued maturation of the sport is people know that Messi plays for Barcelona, not just Argentina."

Whatever the theory, the sheer entertainment value of this tournament has surely helped drive interest. Including Tuesday's games, 154 goals have already been scored, more than the total for the entire 2010 World Cup.

Also, for casual U.S. fans who find watching games end in ties about as appealing as doing their taxes, this tournament has been a revelation: there were only nine draws in the 48 group stage games, or four fewer than the average during the past four World Cups.

The grittiness of the U.S. team has been a draw, too. Drama, in one form or another, has followed the Americans ever since they opened a pre-tournament training camp in Northern California in early May.

First there was the question about whether leaving Landon Donovan off the roster was a bad mistake. Then came concerns about whether the Americans could win a must-have game against Ghana (yes, barely); whether they could get a decent result against Portugal (yes, agonizingly) and, finally, whether they could avoid a blowout against Germany (yes, mercifully).

Through it all, fans back in the United States gnawed through fingernails or, for those who followed the games via social media, clicked frantically as the Americans took each of their games into the final minutes with the result still in doubt.

It happened again here. Belgium, which won all three of its group games with late goals, was the aggressor from the start, neutralizing coach Jurgen Klinsmann's attempts to open up the U.S. attack with more players pushing forward.

Things got worse for the U.S. when Fabian Johnson, one of Klinsmann's most reliable players on the outside, pulled up with a hamstring injury and was taken off in the first half.

The Americans spent most of the rest of the game buckled in, holding off an onslaught from the Belgians, with Howard standing squarely in the middle. Making it to extra time felt like a small victory on its own, but then Lukaku's fresh legs led to Kevin De Bruyne lashing a shot past Howard from close range. Moments later, Lukaku claimed his own goal, too.

Green provided a flicker of hope and, with Howard making two more important saves to keep the game in range, the U.S. kept pushing.

Clint Dempsey missed a chance. Chris Wondolowski missed a chance. The Belgian goalkeeper, Thibaut Courtois, dived to push a shot away.

This time, the miracle never came.

At the final whistle, many of the U.S. players collapsed to the ground. Howard did not. He bent at the waist for just a moment, his hands on his knees, but then he stood up. Even then - in defeat, his tournament over - Howard refused to tumble.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 20,2020

The International Cricket Council (ICC) today confirmed the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup in Australia 2020 has been postponed due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic

At today’s meeting of the IBC Board (the commercial subsidiary of the ICC), windows for the next three ICC men’s events were also agreed to bring clarity to the calendar and give the sport the best possible opportunity over the next three years to recover from the disruption caused by COVID-19.

The windows for the Men’s events are:

1. ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2021 will be held October – November 2021 with the final on 14 November 2021

2. ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2022 will be held October – November 2022 with the final on 13 November 2022

3. ICC Men’s Cricket World Cup 2023 will be held in India October – November 2023 with the final on 26 November 2023

The IBC Board agreed to continue to monitor the rapidly changing situation and assess all the information available in order to make a considered decision on future hosts to ensure the sport is able to stage safe and successful global events in 2021 and 2022.

The IBC Board will also continue to evaluate the situation in relation to being able to stage the ICC Women’s Cricket World Cup 2021 in New Zealand in February next year. In the meantime, planning for this event continues as scheduled.

The Board will also continue to evaluate the situation in relation to being able to stage the ICC Women’s Cricket World Cup 2021.

ICC Chief Executive Manu Sawhney said: “We have undertaken a comprehensive and complex contingency planning exercise and through this process, our number one priority has been to protect the health and safety of everyone involved in the sport.

“The decision to postpone the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup was taken after careful consideration of all of the options available to us and gives us the best possible opportunity of delivering two safe and successful T20 World Cups for fans around the world.

“Our Members now have the clarity they need around event windows to enable them to reschedule lost bilateral and domestic cricket. Moving the Men’s Cricket World Cup to a later window is a critical element of this and gives us a better chance of maintaining the integrity of the qualification process. This additional time will be used to reschedule games that might be lost because of the pandemic ensuring qualification can be decided on the field of play.

“Throughout this process we have worked closely with our key stakeholders including governments, Members, broadcasters, partners and medical experts to enable us to reach a collective decision for the good of the game and our fans. I would like to thank everyone involved for their commitment to a safe return to cricket.”

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 29,2020

Kolkata, May 29: Former skipper Kumar Sangakkara believes missing Angelo Mathews due to an injury hurt Sri Lanka badly in the summit clash of the 2011 World Cup, which hosts India won after a gap of 28 years.

Having played a key role in their thrilling semifinal win against New Zealand, Mathews was forced out of the final against India at Mumbai's Wankhede Stadium by a quadriceps muscle injury.

Reflecting on the six-wicket loss to India, the former Sri Lankan captain said Mathews' injury forced him to opt for a 6-5 combination and was also the reason behind his decision to bat first after winning the toss.

"In that WC final, that's the biggest thing I look back and think...You can talk about drop catches and all of that happens. But the composition of the side and the fact that we were forced to make the change was to me the turning point," Sangakkara said in the latest episode of Instagram series 'Reminisce with Ash' hosted by India off-spinner Ravichandran Ashwin.

Mahela Jayawardene's unbeaten 103 went in vain as India hunted down 275 with Gautam Gambhir setting up the chase with a 97-run knock before skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni finished off in style, smashing Nuwan Kulasekara for the winning six in his unbeaten 91.

"But for 100 per cent, if Angelo (Mathews) had been fit, I know for sure we would have gone for chase... I'm not sure whether the result would have changed. That balance of team that Mathews would give at seven really was a bonus," the former wicketkeeper batsman said

"If you take our entire campaign, whatever we did Mathews' overs and his ability to bat with the tail and read situations was an incredible bonus to us. He was a young chap who came into the side and from day one he could read situations. It's just instinct, how to up the rate, how to control the bowler, when to accelerate."

During the conversation, Ashwin also asked him about the controversial toss when the coin was flipped twice amid the cacophony of the Wankhede and eventually Sangakkara elected to bat.

"The was crowd was huge. It never happens in Sri Lanka. Once I had this at Eden Gardens when I could not talk to the first slip and then of course at the Wankhede. I remember calling on the toss then Mahi wasn't sure and said did you call tail and I said no I called head.

"The match referee actually said I won the toss, Mahi said he did not. There was a little bit of confusion there and Mahi said let's have another toss of the coin and heads went up again," he said.

"I am not sure whether it was luck that I won. I believe probably India might have batted if I had lost."

The loss prolonged Sri Lanka's wait for another world title as yet again the 1996 champions failed in the final hurdle.

"Whether we win or lose, we have this equilibrium on how to take a win or loss. The smile hides a huge amount of sadness, of disappointment, of thinking of 20 million people back in Sri Lanka who had been waiting for this for so long, since 1996.

"We had an opportunity in 2011, opportunity in 2007, then T20 opportunities in 2009 and 2012," Sangakkara said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 6,2020

Melbourne, Mar 6: Experienced middle-order batter Veda Krishnamurthy believes that "destiny" is in favour of first-time finalist India to win their maiden ICC Women's T20 World Cup title provided they get a grip on their nerves in the summit clash against Australia on Sunday.

India will have a psychological advantage going into the final as they had stunned the defending champions by 17 runs in the tournament opener.

The Harmanpreet Kaur-led India reached the final on the basis of their unbeaten record in the tournament after their semifinal against England was washed out on Thursday.

Krishnamurthy, who was a part of the Indian team that finished runner-up to England in the 2017 Women's ODI World Cup, knows the pain of missing out on a world title.

"It's all about destiny, and I'm a big believer in destiny. I feel like this is the way it was meant to be. There is a joke going around that this World Cup is made in such a way that it's helping us, starting from the wickets to everything else," she was quoted as saying by the tournament's official website.

"Being in the final is just reward for the way we played in the group stages. There was an advantage to having won all our games with the weather not in our hands."

The team's first target of reaching the final having achieved, the 27-year-old player said the Indians now need to hold their nerves and remain focussed leading up to the big day on Sunday.

"We said the first aim was to get to the final and take it from there. We've crossed the first stage. We need to make sure we hold our nerves and we do what we need to do on the final day," she said.

India's recent rivalry with Australia has taken fascinating twists and turns, with Kaur's outfit chasing down 173 in their recent tri-series, then getting home by 17 runs in the T20 World Cup opener.

But all is not hunky-dory for Krishnamurthy on the personal front. Considered a great finisher, she has recovered from a series of single-digit scores in the tri-series to score 20 from 11 balls in a finishing role against Bangladesh.

Having amassed just 35 runs from four matches in the tournament so far, the Karnataka batter knows her role in the team.

"As an individual, the role given to me is very consistent in the last year. They've put the effort in the last year to keep me there and I've been supported by every individual, not just one or two. The entire team, with all the support staff, have shown faith in me," she said.

"I know coming into the World Cup, I would play a crucial role to finish the innings well, which I felt I was unable to do in the last World Cup in the West Indies," she added.

Krishnamurthy said specific roles have been set for every player of the squad and they all are trying to contribute as much as they can to help the team achieve its goal.

"I was very motivated to do my role and I've been working on that. It's not just me, all 15 players involved know what their role is," she said.

"I'm happy we're all putting in efforts and executing our role properly. Even if it's a smallish contribution of saving a couple of runs, it's all panned out really well."

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.