Belgium Eliminates Team USA

July 2, 2014

USA Fall

Salvador/Brazil, Jul 2: It felt as if Tim Howard would never go down. As if the United States would never go down, standing there, taking shots like an undersized fighter clinging to a puncher's chance. Howard saved with his hands, his feet, his legs, his chest.

Trying to figure out where soccer fits into the fabric of America is a popular topic these days but, on Tuesday, sports fans across the country were inspired by the performance of a soccer goalkeeper. In a loss.

The ending was cruel, but then so is the game. The United States' captivating run in the World Cup ended here, on the coast of Brazil, as Belgium beat the Americans, 2-1 after extra time, to eliminate the U.S. A win would have sent the Americans to a mouth-watering quarterfinal against Lionel Messi and Argentina on Saturday; this loss, instead, sent them home.

Of course, they did not go quietly. Buoyed by the incredible showing from Howard, whose 16 saves were the most by a goalkeeper in a World Cup game since 1966, the U.S. scraped into extra time tied at 0-0 and then responded after giving up two goals in the first of the two 15-minute extra periods. Julian Green, a substitute making his first World Cup appearance, scored to set up a frantic finish.

Ultimately, there was not enough from the Americans. Three draining group games in far-flung locations - including a trip to the Amazon - left the team gasping for air at the finish, and Romelu Lukaku's goal in the 105th minute proved to be the difference for Belgium.

At the final whistle, the fans here applauded, knowingly, surely mirroring the reactions of those watching on television back home. The ride had been incredible: Americans purchased more tickets to games here than fans from any country other than Brazil, and television ratings in the U.S. blasted through ceilings, surpassing those of the NBA finals or the World Series.

Watch parties, too, popped up in places far more varied than just craft breweries in New York, with fans gathering everywhere from Hermosa Beach in California to a library in Birmingham, Alabama, to the Tulsa Drillers minor league baseball stadium in Oklahoma. A gathering at Grant Park in Chicago on Tuesday was moved to nearby Soldier Field to accommodate a crowd reported to exceed 25,000.

There are many explanations for why the World Cup, finally, caught fire in the U.S. this year. Some have pointed to Brazil's time zone being favorable for U.S. viewers (especially as compared to South Africa four years ago). Others say soccer's spike is simply the result of increasing interest among Hispanics and Millennials - in other words, a steady rise in the number of soccer-loving children growing up to become consumer adults.

"These are all young people who grew up with the game, followed the sports, whether it be the English Premier League or Major League Soccer, and they don't need to be convinced that soccer is a sport that is worthy of their attention," said Don Garber, the commissioner of MLS. "The country has changed. This is a new America."

Statistics seem to support that claim. Roughly 14 percent of people between the ages of 12-24 said professional soccer was their favorite sport, second only to the NFL, according to Rich Luker, who runs a sports research firm. That leads to savvier and more-informed fans who are more likely to continue following the sport even after the pageantry of the World Cup is over.

"Fans are connecting the dots," said Jeff L'Hote, who runs a soccer-focused management consultancy. "One of the great things about the continued maturation of the sport is people know that Messi plays for Barcelona, not just Argentina."

Whatever the theory, the sheer entertainment value of this tournament has surely helped drive interest. Including Tuesday's games, 154 goals have already been scored, more than the total for the entire 2010 World Cup.

Also, for casual U.S. fans who find watching games end in ties about as appealing as doing their taxes, this tournament has been a revelation: there were only nine draws in the 48 group stage games, or four fewer than the average during the past four World Cups.

The grittiness of the U.S. team has been a draw, too. Drama, in one form or another, has followed the Americans ever since they opened a pre-tournament training camp in Northern California in early May.

First there was the question about whether leaving Landon Donovan off the roster was a bad mistake. Then came concerns about whether the Americans could win a must-have game against Ghana (yes, barely); whether they could get a decent result against Portugal (yes, agonizingly) and, finally, whether they could avoid a blowout against Germany (yes, mercifully).

Through it all, fans back in the United States gnawed through fingernails or, for those who followed the games via social media, clicked frantically as the Americans took each of their games into the final minutes with the result still in doubt.

It happened again here. Belgium, which won all three of its group games with late goals, was the aggressor from the start, neutralizing coach Jurgen Klinsmann's attempts to open up the U.S. attack with more players pushing forward.

Things got worse for the U.S. when Fabian Johnson, one of Klinsmann's most reliable players on the outside, pulled up with a hamstring injury and was taken off in the first half.

The Americans spent most of the rest of the game buckled in, holding off an onslaught from the Belgians, with Howard standing squarely in the middle. Making it to extra time felt like a small victory on its own, but then Lukaku's fresh legs led to Kevin De Bruyne lashing a shot past Howard from close range. Moments later, Lukaku claimed his own goal, too.

Green provided a flicker of hope and, with Howard making two more important saves to keep the game in range, the U.S. kept pushing.

Clint Dempsey missed a chance. Chris Wondolowski missed a chance. The Belgian goalkeeper, Thibaut Courtois, dived to push a shot away.

This time, the miracle never came.

At the final whistle, many of the U.S. players collapsed to the ground. Howard did not. He bent at the waist for just a moment, his hands on his knees, but then he stood up. Even then - in defeat, his tournament over - Howard refused to tumble.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 21,2020

Melbourne, Jul 21: Cricket Australia's chief executive Nick Hockley has said that the Indian players and staff will most likely be asked to face two weeks of quarantine before the four-match Test series.

This scenario will bring the Adelaide Oval and its newly constructed hotel firmly into view as the sort of biosecure bubble, ESPNCricinfo reported.

India and Australia are slated to face each other in a four-match Test series, which is to begin from December 4 at Brisbane.

"The two-week quarantine is pretty well-defined. What we are working on is making sure that even within that quarantine environment, the players have got the absolute best training facilities, so that their preparation for the matches is as optimal as it can possibly be," ESPNCricinfo quoted Hockey as saying.

"Certainly the fact that the Adelaide Oval has a hotel. It does provide a facility not dissimilar to Old Trafford or Ageas Bowl where the hotels are integrated into the venue," he added.

Hockley also said that an exacting standard of biosecurity and testing would be applied before the series against India as the coronavirus cases are spiking in the subcontinent.

"It's widely known and it's unlikely that international travel restrictions would have lifted by the time that India will be due to come into the country. Clearly there will be testing regimes. We will be able to test people before that they get on to the plane and it is the nature of the situation of making sure we have the quarantine arrangements in line with government and health authority protocols," Hockley said.

"The key thing for the players is that there's regular testing and that we appropriately quarantine them when they come in and all of those plans are currently in development," he added.

The International Cricket Council (ICC) on Monday announced the postponement of the T20 World Cup 2020 slated to be held in Australia from October 18-November 15 due to the coronavirus pandemic.

Following the announcement, the BCCI is likely to go ahead with the Indian Premier League (IPL) in the October-November window. However, it is known where the T20 tournament will be played as cases continue to rise in India.
"I think the BCCI has made no secrets that they are considering what that means for the IPL. For us, it's about getting a bit of an understanding and certainty around what that means. Clearly, in a normal course, some of our best players are obviously top picks for those IPL teams," Hockley said.

"It's a bit premature to speculate on that. We need to understand what the plans are if any and once we understand that we will make decisions accordingly," he added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 6,2020

New Delhi, Jun 6: Former West Indies pacer Michael Holding has come out in support of MS Dhoni, saying that the wicket-keeper batsman indeed wanted to win the match against England in the 2019 World Cup.

India's performance in the World Cup match against England last year has once again become a matter of debate as all-rounder Ben Stokes in his book titled 'On Fire' questioned the intent of the Indian side.

Stokes also said that Dhoni's intent was questionable as he did not go for big shots when India still had a chance to win the match.

However, Holding said that nowadays people tend to write anything in their books.

"Well, people will write anything in books these days, because people are a lot more free with their opinions and when they are writing books, they need to be making headlines at times," Holding said on his official YouTube channel.

"But, to be honest, a lot of people watching that game perhaps wouldn't have arrived to the same conclusion that Ben Stokes arrived at that India were not trying to win," he added.

Holding did say that it seemed like that India did not have the same intensity as they would have had if the match was a do-or-die match.

"It was not the game that India had to win, but I don't think anyone can say that was a team tactic to lose the game. I watched that game and it appeared to me as if India weren't putting up their 100 per cent, but I realised it was not the case when the expression on MS Dhoni's face told me that he desperately wanted to win, so I do not think it was a team decision to not try to win," the former Windies pacer said.

"But I don't think they went with the same intensity of wanting to win the game, say, if it was a do-or-die situation. If it was, we would have seen a different game," he added.

On his official YouTube channel, Holding also said that no team goes in with a set pattern in terms of chasing targets.

In the round-robin stage match against England in Birmingham, India failed to chase down the massive target of 338 and fell short by 31 runs.

That was the only game that India lost in the premier tournament last year before the semifinal loss against the Kiwis.

India's chasing approach, in particular of wicket-keeper batsman Dhoni, was criticised by many, including the fans at home.

As soon as Stokes mentioned Dhoni's lack of intent in his book 'On Fire', Pakistan fans started saying that India deliberately lost the match to knock out their neighbours.

However, Stokes clarified that he never said India lost deliberately and some people were twisting his words.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 3,2020

New Delhi, Jun 3: Shuttler HS Prannoy has hit out at the Badminton Association of India (BAI) and has questioned the selection criteria for the Arjuna Award.

The shuttler has said that the players who have won nothing have been recommended, while the players who have medals to their credit have been snubbed.

His remarks come as BAI recommended doubles pair of Satwiksairaj Rankireddy and Chirag Shetty and men's singles player Sameer Verma for the Arjuna Award on Tuesday.

"Same old story. Guy who has Medals in CWG and Asian Championships not even recommended by Association. And guy who was not there on any of these major events recommended #waah #thiscountryisajoke," Prannoy tweeted.

Prannoy had been left out from the list last year as well and the shuttler had slammed the criteria then as well.

"If you ever want your name in the awards list, make sure you have people who will get your name to the list. Performance is least considered in our country. Sad state of our county but can't help it. Let go and just play until you can," Prannoy had tweeted last year.

Prannoy had won the mixed team gold at the 2018 Commonwealth Games in Gold Coast and he also has a men's singles bronze medal at the 2018 Asian Championships.

On Tuesday, the BAI has also recommended the renowned National Institute of Sports (NIS)-certified coaches, S. Murlidharan and Bhaskar Babu for the Dronacharya Award.

Murlidharan has been working relentlessly for the growth and development of the sport in Kerala, besides being an able administrator.

He has coached the likes of Vimal Kumar, Rupesh Kumar and Sanave Thomas amongst many other renowned former players.

He has also been a recipient of the Meritorious Service Award given by the Badminton World Federation (BWF) in 1996.

For the Dhyanchand Award, BAI has recommended the names of Pradeep Gandhe and Manjusha Kanwar.

Gandhe is a two-time Asian Games bronze medallist while Manjusha is a South Asian Games silver medallist.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.