BJP finds going tough in Bihar

October 18, 2015

Patna, Oct 18: The weather in Bihar has suddenly changed dramatically, and so has the political permutation and combination.

Before the first vote was cast on October 12, it was nearly impossible to forecast the Assembly election result, so close was the fight between the BJP-led NDA and the Nitish Kumar-led grand alliance.

modiHowever, after two rounds of polling in 49 and 32 constituencies on October 12 and October 16, respectively, the mist is clearing with each passing day.

In these 81 constituencies, out of the total 243 seats in Bihar, the turnout of women voters has been remarkably better. This is not only a clear indication of the growing aware-ness (about voting rights) among them but could possibly spell trouble for the BJP-led alliance.

While working out the caste arithmetic, BJP strategists had perhaps not calculated how this section, miffed with the steep rise in prices of pulses and onion, could upset all the BJP formulae.

Chief Minister Nitish Kumar and RJD chief Lalu Prasad, during the fag end of the campaign, did not miss the opportunity to remind rural woman voters how their kitchen budget had gone haywire due to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who had promised “achchhe din” and assured control of prices if voted to power during the Lok Sabha polls.

The lengthy queues of Muslim women with men of the family during the first two phases of polling should also be an eye-opener for NDA mandarins.

After all, leaders like Haryana Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar, who said Muslims would have to give up beef if they want to stay in India, party MP Shatrughan Sinha, who said onions could make the BJP cry, and Mohan Bhagwat, who reiterated his stand on review of reservation, have done more damage than the saffron camp had anticipated.

Another noticeable point is the large turnout of weaker sections, particularly Dalits and the Extremely Backward Classes (EBCs). While it had appeared before the polls that the EBC and Dalit votes would split vertically, reports from the interiors indicate Nitish Kumar remains the favourite.

The JD(U) strongman appears to be reaping a rich harvest from the cycle, uniform and scholarship schemes for students, and Rs 10,000 sops to those who pass their Class X examination in first division.

This Deccan Herald correspondent, who travelled nearly 2,900 km in the last 45 days — from Bhagalpur in the east to Buxar in the west and Imamganj in the south to Kalyanpur in the north — found parents of such students, particularly girls, expressing solidarity with Nitish.

Their only common grouse was why he had joined hands with Lalu, who still symbolises lawlessness.

Split

Nitish was quick to respond that had he not aligned with Lalu, secular votes would have split, much like it had happened during the Lok Sabha elections, and would have helped the BJP.

In light of unfavourable news, Modi, the BJP’s biggest campaigner, has reportedly cut down his rallies in Bihar on the pretext of the Navratras.

The grand alliance leaders have taunted: “If he was in the US during last year’s Navratra, why is he now shying away from Bihar? Has he read the writing on the wall?”

But until the last three phases of voting take place on October 28, November 1 and

November 5, the alliance should not be overconfident. One small error by either camp could change the tide in no time.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 9,2020

New Delhi, May 9: The Trinamool Congress on Saturday responded to Union home minister Amit Shah’s charge that the Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government is not facilitating the movement of stranded migrant workers.

Amit Shah has written to West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee, saying her government is doing “injustice” to migrant workers by not allowing the special Shramik trains to reach the state.

“Union home minister Amit Shah speaks after weeks of silence only to mislead people with lies,” the TMC’s Abhishek Banerjee was quoted as saying by news agency PTI.

“The Centre is lying… West Bengal is running 711 camps for migrants in the state. We are taking good care of them,” Abhishek Banerjee, who is also the chief minister’s nephew, said.

Amit Shah had pointed out in his letter that the Centre was not receiving the “expected support” from the state government in helping stranded migrant workers from West Bengal.

“West Bengal government is not allowing trains with migrants reaching the state. This is injustice with WB migrant labourers. This will create further hardship for them,” Amit Shah had said in his letter to Mamata Banerjee.

The issue of migrant workers is the latest flashpoint between the Centre and the West Bengal government amid a row over the state’s efforts to control the coronavirus disease (Covid-19).

The Centre and the state have exchanged allegations over the criteria for reporting deaths from the infection, and while While Bengal says the Centre is trying to politicise a public health crisis, the Union government maintains that state officials are ignoring repeated warnings to step up the fight against the disease.

Federal officials have said that the region has not conducted adequate tests and that there has been mismanagement over identifying hotspots and containing them.

Union home secretary Ajay Bhalla also slammed the state government for a very low rate of testing and high rate of mortality, 13.2%, by far the highest for any state.

The Centre has also accused the state government of not allowing cross-border movement of goods trucks to Bangladesh.

There are 1,678 Covid-19 cases and 160 deaths in West Bengal until Saturday morning.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 9,2020

May 9: Two more companies are said to be eyeing stakes in Reliance Jio Platforms, the $65-billion digital unit of Mukesh Ambani-controlled Reliance Industries, suggests a Bloomberg report. If these deals materialise, they would add to a growing list of firms that have recently invested in the Indian company.

US private equity firm General Atlantic was considering investing about $850 million to $950 million in the Mumbai-based company, a Bloomberg report said, citing people with knowledge of the matter.

The deal could be completed as soon as this month, though no agreement had been finalised and plans may change, it added.

Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund (PIF) is also considering to buy a minority stake in Jio, Bloomberg said in a separate report.

General Atlantic declined to comment on the report, while Jio and PIF did not immediately respond to Reuters request for comment. Hours earlier on Friday, Reliance Industries announced a $1.5 billion stake sale in Jio to Vista Equity Partners, the third deal in just over two weeks.

The conglomerate cut a $5.7 billion deal with Facebook for a 9.99 per cent stake in Jio on April 22 and a few days later, it secured a $750 million investment from private equity firm Silver Lake.

Together the three deals will inject a combined $8 billion in the telecoms-to-energy group and help it pare its debt.

Vista's investment gave Jio an equity value of Rs 4.91 trillion ($65 billion) and an enterprise value of Rs 5.16 trillion, said Reliance, controlled by billionaire tycoon Mukesh Ambani.

The potential investments from New York-based General Atlantic and the Saudi sovereign wealth fund, which manages over $300 billion in assets, would inject money on top of the $8 billion which Jio has already raised.

Saudi's PIF has been buying minority stakes several companies. Last month, it disclosed an 8.2 per cent stake in coronavirus-hit Carnival Corp, sending the cruise operator's shares up nearly 30 per cent higher.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 3,2020

Jun 3: Emphasising that airlines are clearly the safest mode of transportation, IndiGo CEO Ronojoy Dutta on Tuesday said there is no evidence yet of coronavirus infection getting transmitted among passengers onboard an aeroplane.

His comments against the backdrop of instances of some passengers, who had taken flights after resumption of domestic air services on May 25, testing positive for coronavirus.

"Those people had the virus before they got on to the aeroplane. What is noteworthy is that they have done the tracing after that. There is no evidence of transmission onboard there... that is a very encouraging sign on the safety of airline travel," he said during an earnings call.

According to him, airlines are clearly the safest mode of transportation and there is no evidence yet of contamination on an aircraft.

"You can come in contaminated but so far there is no evidence of passing it on to a fellow passenger," he noted.

Amid concerns over the coronavirus pandemic, aviation regulator DGCA has asked airlines to ensure that to the extent possible, middle seat in flights should be kept empty.

In this regard, Dutta said the airline would keep the middle seat empty wherever it can and "where we have to fill the middle seat, we will have the extra protective gown".

To a query about possible hedging of fuel prices, he said it would be a dumb idea and that airlines adjust to ups and downs in fuel prices.

"I can't overemphasise what a dumb idea it will be for an airline to hedge fuel prices. I looked at it from different angles and it is not a good idea... we looked at hedging and we talked about it at the board level and we said no," he noted.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.