Bypolls a setback for BJP, morale-booster for Opposition

August 26, 2014

New Delhi, Aug 26: The results of the by-elections in 18 Assembly constituencies in Bihar, Punjab, Madhya Pradesh and Karnataka, three months after the NDA swept the general elections, gave the BJP a jolt while bringing cheer to the Opposition camp.

The Congress and its allies won 10 seats and the BJP and its allies the remaining eight.mod

The Congress that won five seats on its own was cautious and described its victory as a “qualitative rather than a quantitative” change. The big story, however, was the success of the “Grand Alliance” in Bihar, where the RJD (3), the JD(U) (2) and the Congress (1) pooled their resources and won six of the 10 seats, losing two by margins as small as 700 and 400 votes. After the BJP-led combine won 31 of the 40 Lok Sabha seats in Bihar earlier this year, it had expected to replicate its performance.

In Karnataka, the Congress wrested Bellary — a seat that became synonymous with the mining mafia — from the BJP and retained Chikkodi-Sadalga. BJP vice-president B.S. Yeddyurappa’s son B.Y. Raghavendra squeaked through in Shikaripur.

In Punjab, the Congress lost Talwandi Sabo to the SAD but retained the Patiala seat. In Madhya Pradesh, the Congress wrested Bahoriband from the BJP, while the BJP won the Vijayraghavgarh and Agar seats.

The results are also a morale booster for the Opposition camp ahead of Assembly elections in Maharashtra, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir and Jharkhand.

Morale-booster for Opposition

With the “grand alliance” of the Congress, the RJD and the JD(U) putting up an excellent show in the Bihar by-elections, what remains to be seen is whether they will contest the Assembly election in 2015 together.

The results are a morale booster to the Opposition camp ahead of the Maharashtra, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir and Jharkhand Assembly elections this year.

Two key issues will have to be resolved ahead of the Bihar election — which party of the grand alliance will field a chief ministerial candidate and whether the Congress leadership will accept that a coalition is the only way forward for the party.

Emboldened by the alliance’s showing, JD(U) leader Nitish Kumar said on Monday that the voters had expressed their “displeasure” with the Narendra Modi government. He suggested that the alliance be broadened with the Left parties to check the BJP’s “communal agenda.”

The two seats that the combine narrowly lost — Narkatiaganj and Banka — were represented by Muslim candidates, a sign that the Hindu consolidation seen during the general election is still to fade.

Welcoming the by-election result, Congress general secretary Shakeel Ahmed said, “The BJP’s efforts to create a ‘Modi wave’ again have failed. Today’s results are in line with what we have been seeing. We lost all five Lok Sabha seats in Uttarakhand, but immediately thereafter, won three Assembly seats in the by-elections. We control nine of the 11 districts in the State as nine of our candidates became zilla parishad chairmen through direct elections.”

In Karnataka, the Congress wrested Bellary Rural, a seat that is synonymous with the mining mafia, from the BJP and retained Chikkodi Sadalga. BJP vice-president B.S. Yeddyurappa’s son B.Y Raghavendra won the Shikaripura seat, earlier held by his father, by just 6,430 votes.

In Madhya Pradesh, the Congress wrested Bahoriband from the BJP, while the BJP won Vijayraghavgarh that was earlier held by the Congress. This happened after the sitting Congress MLA joined the BJP and contested the election. The third seat, Agar, was retained by the BJP.

In Punjab, the Congress lost Talwandi Sabo to the Shiromani Akali Dal and retained Patiala Urban. Former Union Minister Preneet Kaur, who lost from the Patiala Lok Sabha constituency, won from Patiala Urban Assembly seat.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
July 23,2020

Expressing concern over the ban imposed on TikTok by the government of India, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has reportedly called the development in the south Asian country “worrisome”.

TikTok was amongst the 59 Chinese apps that were banned in India but why it hogs the maximum limelight because TikTok had the second-largest user base in India with over 200 million users.

As per The Verge writer Casey Newton, Zuckerberg was worried about TikTok’s India ban. Although it soon cashed into the opportunity and released a TikTok clone “Reels”, the government’s reason behind banning the app in India wasn’t received well by Mark Zuckerberg. 

He had said that if India can ban a platform with over 200 million users in India without citing concrete reasons, it can also ban Facebook if something goes amiss on the security and privacy front.

Why Mark finds it particularly worrisome because Facebook is already involved in a lot tussle with the governments across the world involving national security concerns. 

“Facebook already faces fights around the world from governments on both the left and the right related to issues that fit under the broad umbrella of national security: election interference, influence campaigns, hate speech, and even just plain-old democratic speech. Zuckerberg knows that the leap from banning TikTok on national security grounds to banning Facebook on national security grounds is more of a short hop,” the report by Casey read.

Facebook till now has not faced any kind of issue in India but considering the debacle with the other governments, it is not entirely wrong to worry about its future in India if any national security issue arises. Back in 2016, Facebook’s Free Basics service, which means a free but restricted internet service, was banned in India by the telecom regulators. 

The TRAI had said that the Free Basic services were banned in India because it violated the principles of net neutrality. With Free Basics services, Facebook had planned to bring more unconnected users online. But since 2016, there has been no major tussle between the Indian government and Zuckerberg due to national security issues.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
March 14,2020

New Delhi, Mar 14: India on Friday was mulling over the option of deporting The Wall Street Journal's South Asia deputy bureau chief for misreporting Delhi riots in which over 50 people were killed last month. However, the government denied that it had made any such decision.

Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Raveesh Kumar said that a complaint was registered against Eric Bellman, the WSJ South Asia deputy bureau chief based in New Delhi, by a private individual on the government's online grievance redressal platform.

"Referring the complaint to the related office is a routine matter as per standard procedure. No such decision on deportation has been taken by the Ministry of External Affairs," Kumar said.

However, government-funded Prasar Bharati News Services had earlier tweeted screenshots of the complaint which was filed by an undersecretary in the Ministry of External Affairs, Vinesh K Kalra, saying that the ministry has asked the Indian embassy in the US to "look into the request for immediate deportation of Bellman for his "anti-India behaviour".

The official had complained to the embassy about Bellman's controversial reportage on the killing of an Intelligence Bureau staffer named Ankit Sharma.

The WSJ had reported that Ankit Sharma's brother had said that he was killed by a mob belonging to a particular religious community. Ankit's brother later told Indian media that he never spoke to the WSJ reporter.

After the Prasar Bharati tweet got circulated widely on social media, the government backtracked and said that no such decision has been taken.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 23,2020

Jun 23: The U.S. government on Monday restricted charter flights from India, accusing the nation of "unfair and discriminatory practices" by violating a treaty governing aviation between the two countries.

Air India Ltd. has been making flights to repatriate its citizens during the travel disruptions caused by the Covid-19 outbreak, but also has been selling tickets to the public, the Transportation Department alleged.

At the same time, U.S. airlines have been prohibited from flying to India by aviation regulators there, the DOT said in its order. The situation "creates a competitive disadvantage for U.S. carriers," the agency said in a press release.

Air India is advertising a schedule that is more than half of pre-virus operations, the department said. "The charters go beyond true repatriations, and it appears that Air India may be using repatriation charters as a way of circumventing" that nation's flight restrictions, the U.S. agency said.

The order becomes effective in 30 days, the department said.

Indian airlines must apply to the DOT for authorization before conducting charter flights so that it can scrutinize them more closely, it said. The department will reconsider the restrictions once India lifts restrictions on U.S. carriers.

The action against India follows weeks of DOT restrictions against Chinese airlines after the U.S. agency accused that nation of unfairly banning American carriers in the wake of the virus. On June 15, the U.S. announced it would agree to allow four flights a week from China after it allowed the same number by U.S. carriers.

Attempts to reach Air India and the Indian embassy in Washington after business hours were unsuccessful.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.