CAG to apex court: state can use its report in Yeddyurappa cases

February 27, 2017

New Delhi, Feb 27: The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has told the Supreme Court that the state government and its prosecuting agencies are free to take any decision on its reports relating to land denotifications undertaken during the tenure of the then chief minister B S Yeddyurappa.

Yeddyurappa“The issue whether the report of the CAG could be made basis for initiation of criminal proceedings is a matter which would fall within the domain of the state government and its prosecuting agencies,” it said in an affidavit filed in the apex court. The stand taken by the CAG comes in support of the Karnataka government which, in its special leave petition, contended that the reports prepared by the constitutional body could be relied upon for initiating action for “cognisable offence” against Yeddyurappa.

The CAG’s affidavit came in response to a notice issued by the Supreme Court, which has been hearing the Karnataka government’s petition challenging the Karnataka High Court’s single-judge bench order of January 5, 2016.

The CAG submitted that it has undertaken performance audit on denotification of land by the state government and allotment of sites by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The audit findings were based on a sample determined at 40% of 126 denotification cases done by the government during 2007-12. The CAG also said its performance audit on land management was taken across the country in eight states and was not limited to Karnataka.

Allowing a batch of 15 petitions by Yeddyurappa, the high court had then held the CAG report could not be the basis for registration of FIRs relating to denotification of lands acquired by the BDA in Bilekahalli, Halagavaderahalli, J B Kaval and other places in Bengaluru city when he was the chief minister.

Yeddyurappa, on his part, has denied before the court any wrongdoing in passing orders for various denotification of land. He claimed the registration of 15 FIRs on the direction by the Lokayukta on the basis of CAG’s reports was “completely misplaced” and has rightly been quashed by the Karnataka High Court.

Responding to the apex court’s notice, Yeddyurappa said, “The CAG report cannot be the sole basis of registration of the FIR. Since the reports (2010-11 and 2012) submitted to the governor on November 21, 2012, is in the process of consideration of the Public Accounts Committee, no other authority can act upon the said report.”

Comments

Skazi
 - 
Monday, 27 Feb 2017

Yeddy .... Be careful before barking and showing fingers at others ..... All politicians are naked in the bath rooms ....

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 29,2020

Bengaluru, Jan 29: The high court has granted bail to a 37-year-old Bangladeshi woman from the Christian community on the strength of Citizenship (Amendment) Act 2019.

The court cited Section 2 of the amended Citizenship Act 1955, according to which minorities from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan who entered India on or before December 31, 2014 should not be treated as illegal immigrants, while granting her bail.

Allowing the petition filed by Archana Purnima Pramanik, an illegal immigrant from Bangladesh, who claims to be staying in India since 2003, justice John Michael Cunha on Monday directed her to furnish a bail bond for Rs 2 lakh to the satisfaction of the investigating officer and cooperate with the probe.

The judge observed the allegations made against her must be proved in a full-dressed trial. Archana was booked for obtaining documents such as PAN and Aadhaar cards and also fraudulently obtaining an Indian passport on March 28 last year. Based on a complaint filed by the assistant passport officer, Archana was arrested on November 7, 2019 and her bail petition was dismissed by a sessions court on December 4, 2019.

Born on March 23, 1983 at Tanore, Rajshahi district of Bangladesh, Archana came to India in 2003 to pursue a career in nursing. After obtaining a diploma in general nursing and midwifery at Ranchi in 2006, she worked in many reputed hospitals.

In 2010, she got married to Rajashekaran Krishnamurthy and the marriage was registered at Ranchi. After the wedding, she moved to Bengaluru and obtained PAN, Aadhaar and voter ID cards.

On April 1, 2019, Archana applied for a visa to Bangladesh for herself and her son. During her journey on May 20, 2019, they were detained at Kolkata airport and released later. However, the regional passport office issued a notice revoking Archana’s passport and she was arrested by RT Nagar police on November 7, 2019.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 28,2020

Bengaluru,  Jun 28: Sixteen deaths due to COVID-19 and 1,267 new cases of COVID-19 were reported in Karnataka, according to information provided by the State Health Department.

The total number of COVID-19 cases in Karnataka has reached 13,190, including 783 cases from Bengaluru Urban. While 7,507 patients have been discharged after treatment, 207 deaths have been reported, said the health department.

With 19,906 new cases, the highest single-day spike so far, India's COVID-19 count touched 5,28,859 including 2,03,051 active cases, 3,09,713 cured/discharged/migrated, according to the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. 410 deaths were reported in the last 24 hours and the cumulative toll reached 16,095 deaths. 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 4,2020

New Delhi, Mar 4: The Supreme Court on Wednesday directed a trial court in Ramanagara district of Karnataka to ensure the presence of absconding self-styled godman Swami Nithyananda to face trial in a 2010 rape case.

A bench headed by Chief Justice SA Bobde also allowed a plea by K Lenin alias Nithya Dharmananda, former driver of Nithyananda and had filed a complaint against Nithyananda, for cancellation of non-bailable warrants issued against him.

The apex court ordered the cancellation of the non-bailable warrants issued against the complainant in the case on the condition he shows up before the trial court in Ramanagara district today itself.

He had challenged the Karnataka High Court's February order where non-bailable warrants were issued against Lenin for not appearing before the court for recording evidence.

"Having heard the counsel appearing for the petitioner and upon perusal of the record, we see no reason to interfere with the judgment and order passed by the High Court, which merely directs the petitioner to give evidence in support of his complaint," read the apex court order passed on Tuesday.

The Bench also directed that "the concerned trial court shall make every effort to ensure the presence of accused (Nithyananda) to face the proceedings."

The Karnataka High Court had last month cancelled the bail granted to Nithyananda, even as the state police claimed the absconding godman was on a 'spiritual tour'.

Nithyananda is facing charges of rape and indulging in unnatural sex. He was arrested on April 22, 2010, however, granted bail on June 11, the same year.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.