Sea erosion: A permanent solution, finally?

[email protected] (CD Network)
July 14, 2011

MP_0

“You’re back again, eh? You people remember us once in a year, come here, peep in our houses and disappear. It’s then just us and our suffering!” exclaims Asha of Mohaveerapatna, Ullal, mistaking team Coastal Mirror to be politicians. She is later told the visitors are journalists but pat comes her reply – “Ultimately, nothing has changed as far as our lives are concerned. Life’s still the same for us out here…”

And their life is, badly ‘hit’, every time the harsh sea waves do the trespassing and smash their dwelling. “Water comes into our house and we have to keep removing it every now and then. Should we cook food or should we keep cleaning our house?” she asks.

“Even if we cook food and keep, the sea waves take it away too along with them,” her neighbour Chitra joins in. “There have been instances where our ration card and other things inside the house got drenched due to the invading waves. Nothing is really safe in our little houses when these waves go berserk. But we cannot leave the sea and go away. Even if government gives us land, they will give it in some other area away from the sea which we don’t want. Our life is dependent on the sea and our income comes from fishing and related sea activities. We can’t go away from here” she adds.

Right next to Asha’s residence stand the ruins of Premakka’s house which fell prey to the monster waves about four years ago. For about a year or so, Premakka and her daughters had to manage in a little room attached to her husband’s ‘goodangadi’. That year, Premakka’s daughter Roopini, now studying BBM, was in tenth standard. “It was tough studying and preparing for SSLC exams in that makeshift house,” she recalls. Today, Premakka lives in another house nearby, constructed and gifted to her by Maruthi Yuvakara Mandali, a local organization. Did the government not step in and help her? “The Mandali didn’t bother knocking the government’s door. At the end of it all, the ones in trouble are given a thousand or two thousand rupees and the files keep moving from one table to another. So Mandali members didn’t bother going to them and built a house for this lady themselves,” says Ismail Podimonu, social worker.

“The CRZ authorities have laid out rules stating that houses constructed after 1991 in the restricted area, will not be entitled for any compensation and are considered illegal by them. The restricted area they say are divided into two zones – 0 to 200 meters which is the Zone A and the danger zone, and Zone B ranging from 200 to 500 meters. Ironically, the fish meal plant constructed on the Ullal coastline just recently, falls in that restricted zone. How come these industries got clearance from the authorities? Besides, the sea was far away from the current houses in 1991. How can they fix that year as the cut-off point?” Podimonu questions.

And the sea was indeed far away a few years ago. In those days, for many a family who live on the coastline of Dakshina Kannada, Udupi and Uttara Kannada districts, their houses provided a typically beautiful ‘sea view’ which most people wish they had. Today, as they open their main doors, the same sea which once used to make a picturesque vista for them has turned into their nemesis, violently greeting them knocking right at their door. Contentment has paved way to irritation, for the uninvited guests that are the waves, keep storming into their houses. Not to mention the damage they have caused over the years.

“It was far far away. About 2-3 kilometers away from our house some 20 years ago,” recalls 70 year old Aminamma of Kotepura in Ullal. Today, she sees her little grandchildren being made to sleep in others’ houses and women in her own house sit together in one corner of a room to stay safe from the threat of the rampaging waves, which at times even smash the roof of their little dwelling. Young men on the other hand are busy keeping vigil at nights. “You never know. We live in constant fear and try to stay alert as much as we can, for the walls can collapse anytime,” says Abdul Ameen, Aminamma’s son.

62 year old Idinabba struggles as he walks along the boulders of the retaining walls laid across the coast to reach his residence. The monster waves hadn’t spared his family either. “Couple of years ago, the waves hit my house hard and a wall caved in, leaving one of my daughters with her leg injured as a result. She had to be hospitalised,” Idinabba recollects. Damaging walls notwithstanding, these waves create problems of a different kind as well. “They make our walls moist all the time and we keep getting electric shocks while trying to operate the electric switches,” he reveals.

The problem of sea erosion is not, however a simple nut to crack. It has its own complexities. “Sea erosion is a result of certain structural factors and certain weak points in the earth. Besides, this phenomenon is only seen in monsoon. The general perception is that sea erosion is caused by attack of storm waves hitting the beach. But there are certain other factors too that cause sea erosion, especially in our region. It is a wrong notion that the entire coastal stretch is prone to sea erosion. There are only some areas with certain geological aspects influencing the phenomenon. Sea erosions, especially in our coast, take place in areas where rivers meet the Arabian sea,” says Dr B M Ravindra, Deputy Director, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Karnataka.

Dr Ravindra lays greater emphasis on the role of rivers in causing sea erosion in the region. “If you observe our coast and the areas that are normally affected by sea erosion, you will see small strips of land standing as a block between the river and the sea. During monsoon, excess water in these rivers also contributed by the waters that flow down from the Western Ghats, create pressure in the river channel. They do not get released into the Arabian Sea due to the strips of land blocking them (as in the case of Kotepura stretch and similar stretches in our coast) and have just a small opening or outlet for the river water to meet the sea. It’s like a little a bottleneck and immense amount of water inside the bottle that wants to flow out. Because of this blocking by the land strips, pressure is created in the river channel which is exerted on the land strip or the sandy alluvium, making it weak and vulnerable. Sand absorbs water and so does clay which lies beneath it. This weak strip of land, when encounters a harsh sea wave, invariably loses a chunk of land which the waves take away with them, which we call erosion,” Dr Ravindra explains.

He substantiates his point of rivers playing a role in the process by pointing out the areas prone to sea erosion in our coastal belt. “River Udyavara exerts pressure on coastal strips of areas from Udyavara to Kapu. River Pavanje and River Mulki play a role in sea ersion in areas of Sasihitlu and Mukka. Similarly, River Sita and River Swarna join the sea near Hoode and Bengre. So Hoode and Bengre areas are prone. Likewise, Sowparnika river exerts pressure on the thin strip of land at Maravanthe on which the National Highway is situated. In fact, it is just that piece of land that separates the sea from the river at Maravanthe, which is one of the majorly affected sea erosion areas. Every year the authorities have to do some circus to save the National Highway there from sea erosion,” he quips.

It is this aspect of the rivers playing a part in the erosion problem that makes Dr Ravindra and a few others have their own doubts of whether the proposal of building submersible sea walls will turn out to be a permanent solution or not. “By building a sea wall, they will be only taking care of the sea waves hitting the beach but the problem of rivers exerting pressure on the strips of land will remain. The problem will still be only partially solved. So I have my own doubts if this would succeed”, he says.

Dr S G Mayya, Department of Applied Mechanics and Hydraulics, National Institute of Technology - Karnataka, Surathkal, also has similar concerns. “At Ullal especially, there is a lot of circulation problem with respect to waves. By constructing a submersible sea wall, they will be blocking the waves alright but the measures they take to take care of orientation of waves are important. There has to be orientation in terms of waves around the breakwater, the coast and water coming out of the river mouth. Or else there are chances of waves getting diverted which will cause erosion at some other place. We cannot rule out the impact River Nethravathi has on erosion process at Ullal either. So a lot will depend on what they have planned to tackle this,” Prof. Mayya says.

Dr Subba Rao, an oceanology expert who has studied extensively the Mangalorean coasts, and also from the Department of Applied Mechanics and Hydraulics, National Institute of Technology - Karnataka, Surathkal, is quite positive about the project but maintains that much will depend on the way it is carried out. “It will reduce the waves hitting the shore considerably. But a lot will depend on the structure and the way it is constructed,” he says.

For Prof. Jayappa, Department of Marine Geology, Mangalore University, the greater concern is the durability of the seawall being built. “It will block the waves, no doubt. But it needs to be seen as to how long it will last. We will have to see since this is something new that is being implemented in our coast. But I feel shelling out 250 odd crores for just the Ullal stretch is a little too much” he opines.

However, concerned authorities are confident that the submersible reef plan would succeed and the region will soon breathe easy as they see in it a permanent solution to the problem of sea erosion. The entire project has been divided into three phases. As part of the first phase, work will begin at Ullal’s waters and areas such as Sasihitlu, Hosabettu , Devbagh and Majali will be taken care of later on, phase-wise. The proposed plan of the submersible reef intends to cut the waves off at a distance away from the coast itself, thereby avoiding harsh waves from hitting the coast. Artificial reefs will be constructed which will be submersible i.e. under the water to block the strong waves at a distance of 600 meters away from the coast. This submersible sea wall will be around 38 meters long and 6 meters high from the sea bed. The sea wall’s foundation will comprise of geo textile material, which the authorities claim has the potential to withstand the harshest of sea waves. Another feature of this submersible sea wall would be the geo-tubes filled with sand which will be placed like bricks one above the other. The structure will be eco-friendly and cause no environmental harm and pollution, they say. Besides, four off-shore berms will be set up at the coast to help retain sand and prevent it from getting washed away and the nearby breakwater will also be altered a bit.

ARTIFICIAL_REEF_PLAN

“Much thought and research has gone into bringing out this solution. Consultancy services were taken from ANZDEC, a company from New Zealand, who gave us this solution after having extensively studied the problem of erosion in our region and carrying out practical experiments with this model,” reveals A Srujan Rao, Assistant Executive Engineer, Department of Port and Inland Water Transport, Mangalore, who is one of the experts in the team formed for the sea wall project.

State minister for environment Krishna J Palemar who is also the district in-charge minister had announced earlier that a comprehensive project worth Rs 911 crore, with financial assistance from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) has been formulated. However, as of now, an amount of about 250 crores has been earmarked for the first phase i.e. submersible seawall at Ullal. “This seawall will be the first of its kind to be built in the entire country. Apart from tacking the sea erosion menace, this submersible seawall will also facilitate fish breeding and help in fishing activities. Earlier, because of breakwaters, fishermen would encounter problems. But with this seawall, those problems would be solved,” says UT Khader, Ullal MLA.

However, the project has still not seen initiation thanks to the delay in the tender process. As many as four bidders including two Indian and two foreign firms had taken part in the pre-bidding meeting held recently. Of them, only one bidder has come forward. “With just one bidder, we are not content. We want a couple of bidders more for the tender,” says Shanth Kumar, Joint Director, Coastal Protection and Management Project, Department of Ports and Inland Water, Mangalore. MLA UT Khader on the other hand has said that concerned authorities will be urged to start the project even though just one bidder has knocked the door. “We will urge them to accept the one bid they have received so far and go ahead with the project. In my knowledge, it is a foreign company which is willing to work in collaboration with a Hyderabad company,” Khader reveals.

By September the tender has to be approved anyway, says Khader. Given that the work begins after rainy season this year, it will still take about 2 years to complete the entire project at Ullal which means that people who live dangerously at the coastline, will have to wait longer to breathe easy. Temporary arrangements will be made as usual this year too by the state government, laying boulders and creating temporary retaining walls to counter the troubling waves.

But until that submersible reef sees the light of the day, people of Ullal and other erosion prone areas will have to continue dreading the devil that is the deep blue sea. (courtesy: Coastal Mirror)


.

MP_1

MP_2

MP_3

MP_4

MP_5

MP_6

MP_7

MP_8

MP_9

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
August 9,2020

Contrary to present impression that Muslims are separatists due to whom the partition of India took place, the truth is that Muslims contributed to freedom movement and upheld India’s composite culture in equal measure. The partition process, mainly due to British policy of ‘divide and rule’ well assisted by Hindu and Muslim communalists is being hidden from the popular vision in India and Muslims in general are held responsible for the same. Not only that the communal historiography introduced by British to pursue their policies has become the bedrock of communal politics and worsening of the perceptions about Muslims is in progress in India.

Yet another example of this has been a series of tweets by the bureaucrat, who is close to retirement, K. Nageshwar Rao. Contrary to the service rules he has made statements, through his tweets which are appreciative of RSS-BJP and demonise the stalwarts Muslim leaders who not only contributed to the freedom movement but also later gave valuable service in laying the foundation of Independent India. As per Rao, his tweets he accuses Maulana Azad and the other Muslim Education ministers of “deracination of Hindus”. After naming “Maulana Abul Kalam Azad — 11 years (1947-58)”; “Humayun Kabir, M C Chagla & Fakruddin Ali Ahmed — 4 years (1963-67)”; and, “Nurul Hassan — 5 years (1972-77)”, he posts: “Remaining 10 years other Leftists like VKRV Rao.”

He points out that their policies were meant to “1. Deny Hindus their knowledge, 2. Vilify Hinduism as collection of superstitions, 3. Abrahamise Education, 4. Abrahamise Media & Entertainment, 5. Shame Hindus about their identity!  and 6. Bereft of the glue of Hinduism Hindu society dies.”

Then he goes on to praise RSS-BJP for bringing the glory back to Hindus. These statements of his on one hand promote the Hate and on the other tantamount to political statement, which civil servants should not by making. CPM politburo member Brinda Karat has written a letter to Home Minister Amit Shah to take suitable action against the erring bureaucrat.

Rao begins with Maulana Abul kalam Azad. Surely Azad was one of the major leaders of freedom movement, who was also the youngest President of INC, in 1923 and later between 1940 to 1945. He opposed the partition process tooth and nail till the very last. As the Congress President in 1923 he wrote a remarkable Para, symbolizing the urge for Hindu Muslim unity, “If an angel descends from heaven and offers me Swaraj in 24 hours on condition that I give up Hindu Muslim Unity, I will refuse. Swaraj we will get sooner or later; its delay will be a loss for India, but loss of Hindu Muslim unity will be a loss for human kind”. His biographer Syeda Hamid points out “He spoke without an iota of doubt about how debacle of Indian Muslims has been the result of the colossal mistakes committed by Muslim League’s misguided leadership. He exhorted Muslims to make common cause with their Hindu, Sikh, Christian fellow countrymen.” He was the one who promoted the translation of Hindu scriptures Ramayan and Mahabharat in to Persian.

Surely Mr. Rao, neither has read Azad or read about him nor knows his contributions to making of Modern India. While today, the ideological formation to which Mr. Rao seems to be pledging his commitment is critical of all that happened during Nehru era, it was during this period when as education minister Azad was shepherding the formations of IITs, Academies of Science, Lalit kala Academies. It was during this period that the efforts to promote Indian composite culture were undertaken through various steps.

The other stalwarts who are under the hammer have been outstanding scholars and giants in their own field of education. Humayun Kabir, Nurul Hasan, Dr.Zakir Husssain gave matchless ideas and practical contributions in different fields of education. One can say that contrary to the accusations, India could match up to the Computer era, software and associate things, due to creation of large manpower in these areas mainly due to these foundations which were laid down particularly in the field of education during this period.

The charge that these ‘Muslim’ education ministers white washed the bloody Islamic rule is a blind repetition of the offshoot of communal historiography introduced by British. While Kings were ruling for power and wealth, their courts had Hindus and Muslim both officers. The jaundiced vision sees this as a bloody Islamic rule but as a matter of fact the syncretic culture and traditions developed precisely this period. It was during this period that Bhakti Traidtion with Kabir, Tukaram, Namdeo, Tulsidas flourished. It was during this period that humane values of Sufi saints reached far and wide. It was during this period that poets like Rahim and Raskhan produced their classic literature n praise of Hindu Gods.

We also need to remind ourselves that large number of Muslims participated in the freedom Movement. Two scholars Shamsul Islam and Nasir Ahmad have come out with books on the myriad such freedom fighters, to recall just a few names. Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan, Zakir Hussain, Syed Mohammad Sharfuddin Kadri, Bakht Khan, Muzzafar Ahmad, Mohammad Abdir Rahman,, Abbas Ali, Asaf Ali, Yusuf Mehrali, Maulana Mazahrul Hague.

These are just a few of the names. The movement, led by Gandhi, definitely laid the foundations where composite Indian culture and respect for all religions, others’ religion was paramount and this is what created Indian fraternity, one of the values which finds its place in the preamble of Indian Constitution.

This blaming of Education ministers who were Muslims is an add-on to the process of Islamophobia in India. So for there have been many actions of Muslim kings which are selectively presented as being bloody, now the post Independent History, where glorious contributions have been made by Muslim leaders are being used to further deepen the divisive process. We need to pay respects to builders of modern India, irrespective of their religion.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
January 26,2020

During last couple of decades we have been witnessing the coming up of various statues in different parts of the country. There is diverse political logic and different set of political tendencies for erecting these statues. When Mayawati was UP CM, she got multiple of her own statues made, in addition to many statues of major dalit icons, irrespective of the criticism against that act. As per her strategy it was a symbol of identity of dalit assertion. The biggest statue to come up was that of Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel, a lifelong Congressman, whom RSS combine is trying to appropriate. This statue of Unity was ‘Made in China’. The clever trick was that the same forces were behind this statue, which was banned by Patel in the aftermath of Gandhi murder. Interestingly while currently BJP is blaming Congress for Partition of India, ironically it was Sardar Patel who was in the committee which gave final stamp of approval for the partition of India.

There is also a talk in UP, where the Ram temple campaign yielded rich electoral dividends for BJP, to have tallest statue of Lord Ram in Ayodhya. In a state where children are dying in hospitals due to lack of Oxygen cylinders, a huge budgetary allocation will be required for such project. While on statues one should also remember that in Maharashtra a tall statue of Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj is underway in Arabian Sea, near Mumbai. Only few voices of protest against it came up, e.g. that of renowned journalist, now, MP, Kumar Ketkar, whose house was vandalised for his opposing the move on the grounds that same massive amount can be utilized for welfare-development activities in the state.

On the back of this comes a comparatively low budget 114 feet tall statue of Jesus Christ in Karnataka, in Kappala hills Harobele village, where Christian pilgrims have been thronging from last several centuries. The land for this has been donated by Congress leader Shivaprasad and his brother, a Congress MP. It is planned to be carved out from a single rock. The plan of this statue is being opposed by those who have been behind most of the statue projects so far. Hindu Jagran Vedike, VHP, RSS are up in arms saying that they will not let this come up. There are various arguments cited for this opposition. It is being said that this was a place of worship of Lord Munnieshwara (a form of Lord Shiva).

More than this it is being argued that Shivakumar is trying to please his Italian boss in the party. Also that this will bring back the period of slavery of foreign rule, the colonial rule of British. As such this opposition is more in tune with the ideology of RSS combine, which has been for a statue here and a statue there. Their politics regards Christianity as a ‘foreign religion’! It is true that in Citizenship Amendment Act, they have not excluded Christianity while other religion, which they regard as ‘Foreign’ i.e. Islam. Here they are using a different logic, that the countries from where persecuted minorities are coming, are Muslim countries, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangla Desh.

In India the major targeting by RSS combine has been against Muslims, but Christians are also not spared. Starting in the decade of 1980, an intense propaganda has been going on that Christian Missionaries are converting. As RSS affiliate Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram became active in Adivasi areas, the likes of Swami Aseemanand, Swami Laxmanand and followers of Aasaram bapu spread out in Tribal areas. They started their programs to popularise Shabri and Hanuman, with congregations like Shabri Kumbh being regularly organized in these areas. The aim was to Hinduize the people in those areas.

The first major anti Christian violence came up in the ghastly form of burning alive of Pastor Graham Steward Stains along with his two minor sons Timothy and Philip. RSS affiliate Bajrang Dal's Dara Siingh aka Rajendra Pal was behind this and he is serving the life term for that. At the same time Wadhva Commission was appointed to investigate this crime which shook the country and President K.R. Narayan termed it as the one belonging to the inventory of the black deeds of human history.

The Wadhva commission report pointed out that there was no statistical significant change in the region where the pastor was working. Similarly the national figures tell us that the Christian population, if at all, has marginally declined in last five decades as per the census figures. They stand like this, percentage of Christians in population, 1971-2.60, 1981- 2.44, 1991-2.34, 2001-2.30 and 2011-2.30. There are arguments that some people are converting to Christianity but are not revealing their religion. This may be true in case of miniscule percentage of dalits, who may not reveal there conversion, as they stand to loose reservation provisions if they convert.

The anti Christian violence is scattered and is below the radar most of the places. There was massive valence in Kandhamal, Orissa, when on the pretext that Christians have murdered Swami Laxmananand, a massive violence was unleashed in 2008. On regular basis prayer meetings of Christians are attacked on the pretext that these are attempts at conversion. While there is a huge demand for the schools and colleges run by Christian groups, in Adivasis areas and remote areas the work of Swamis is on.

Now the trend is to dump Christian traditions. Since Ramnath Kovind became President, the usual practice of Carol Singers visiting Rashtrapati Bhavan has been stopped. In the army retreat so far ‘Abide with me’ by Scottish poet, Henri Francis Lyte, a Christian song, a favourite of Gandhi, has been dropped. The Christian minorities have perceived the threat in various forms. Currently they are as much part of the protests against CAA, NPR and NRIC as any other community.

While statues and identity issues cannot have primacy over the social development issues, it cannot be selective. To oppose Jesus Christ statue while spending fortunes for other statues is a part of the agenda of RSS combine, which is unfolding itself in various forms. opposition to Jesus Christ statue being yet another step in the direction.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
February 4,2020

As democracy is seeping in slowly all over the world, there is an organization which is monitoring the degree of democracy in the individual countries, The Economist Intelligence Unit. As such in each country there are diverse factors which on one hand work to deepen it, while others weaken it. Overall there is a march from theoretical democracy to substantive one. The substantive democracy will herald not just the formal equality, freedom and community feeling in the country but will be founded on the substantive quality of these values. In India while the introduction of modern education, transport, communication laid the backdrop of beginning of the process, the direction towards deepening of the process begins with Mahatma Gandhi when he led the non-cooperation movement in 1920, in which average people participated. The movement of freedom for India went on to become the ‘greatest ever mass movement’ in the World.

The approval and standards for democracy were enshrined in Indian Constitution, which begins ‘We the people of India’, and was adopted on 26th January 1950. With this Constitution and the policies adopted by Nehru the process of democratization started seeping further, the dreaded Emergency in 1975, which was lifted later restored democratic freedoms in some degree. This process of democratisation is facing an opposition since the decade of 1990s after the launch of Ram Temple agitation, and has seen the further erosion with BJP led Government coming to power in 2014. The state has been proactively attacking civil liberties, pluralism and participative political culture with democracy becoming flawed in a serious way. And this is what got reflected in the slipping of India by ten places, to 51st, in 2019. On the index of democracy India slipped down from the score of 7.23 to 6.90. The impact of sectarian BJP politics is writ on the state of the nation, country.

Ironically this lowering of score has come at a time when the popular protests, the deepening of democracy has been given a boost and is picking up with the Shaheen Bagh protests. The protest which began in Shaheen Bagh, Delhi in the backdrop of this Government getting the Citizenship amendment Bill getting converted into an act and mercilessly attacking the students of Jamia Milia Islamia, Aligarh Muslim University along with high handed approach in Jamia Nagar and neighbouring areas.  From 15th December 2019, the laudable protest is on.

It is interesting to note that the lead in this protest has been taken by the Muslim women, from the Burqa-Hijab clad to ‘not looking Muslim’ women and was joined by students and youth from all the communities, and later by the people from all the communities. Interestingly this time around this Muslim women initiated protest has contrast from all the protests which earlier had begun by Muslims. The protests opposing Shah Bano Judgment, the protests opposing entry of women in Haji Ali, the protests opposing the Government move to abolish triple Talaq. So far the maulanas from top were initiating the protests, with beard and skull cap dominating the marches and protests. The protests were by and large for protecting Sharia, Islam and were restricted to Muslim community participating.

This time around while Narendra Modi pronounced that ‘protesters can be identified by their clothes’, those who can be identified by their external appearance are greatly outnumbered by all those identified or not identified by their appearance.

The protests are not to save Islam or any other religion but to protect Indian Constitution. The slogans are structured around ‘Defence of democracy and Indian Constitution’. The theme slogans are not Allahu Akbar’ or Nara-E-Tadbeer’ but around preamble of Indian Constitution. The lead songs have come to be Faiz Ahmad Faiz’s ‘Hum Dekhenge’, a protest against Zia Ul Haq’s attempts to crush democracy in the name of religion. Another leading protest song is from Varun Grover, ‘Tanashah Aayenge…Hum Kagaz nahin Dikhayenge’, a call to civil disobedience against the CAA-NRC exercise and characterising the dictatorial nature of the current ruling regime.

While BJP was telling us that primary problem of Muslim women is Triple talaq, the Muslim women led movements has articulated that primary problem is the very threat to Muslim community. All other communities, cutting across religious lines, those below poverty line, those landless and shelter less people also see that if the citizenship of Muslims can be threatened because of lack of some papers, they will be not far behind in the victimization process being unleashed by this Government.

While CAA-NRC has acted as the precipitating factor, the policies of Modi regime, starting from failure to fulfil the tall promises of bringing back black money, the cruel impact of demonetisation, the rising process of commodities, the rising unemployment, the divisive policies of the ruling dispensation are the base on which these protest movements are standing. The spread of the protest movement, spontaneous but having similar message is remarkable. Shaheen Bagh is no more just a physical space; it’s a symbol of resistance against the divisive policies, against the policies which are increasing the sufferings of poor workers, the farmers and the average sections of society.

What is clear is that as identity issues, emotive issues like Ram Temple, Cow Beef, Love Jihad and Ghar Wapasi aimed to divide the society, Shaheen Bagh is uniting the society like never before. The democratisation process which faced erosion is getting a boost through people coming together around the Preamble of Indian Constitution, singing of Jan Gan Man, waving of tricolour and upholding the national icons like Gandhi, Bhagat Singh, Ambedkar and Maulana Azad. One can feel the sentiments which built India; one can see the courage of people to protect what India’s freedom movement and Indian Constitution gave them.

Surely the communal forces are spreading canards and falsehood against the protests. As such these protests which is a solid foundation of our democracy. The spontaneity of the movement is a strength which needs to be channelized to uphold Indian Constitution and democratic ethos of our beloved country.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.