Sea erosion: A permanent solution, finally?

[email protected] (CD Network)
July 14, 2011

MP_0

“You’re back again, eh? You people remember us once in a year, come here, peep in our houses and disappear. It’s then just us and our suffering!” exclaims Asha of Mohaveerapatna, Ullal, mistaking team Coastal Mirror to be politicians. She is later told the visitors are journalists but pat comes her reply – “Ultimately, nothing has changed as far as our lives are concerned. Life’s still the same for us out here…”

And their life is, badly ‘hit’, every time the harsh sea waves do the trespassing and smash their dwelling. “Water comes into our house and we have to keep removing it every now and then. Should we cook food or should we keep cleaning our house?” she asks.

“Even if we cook food and keep, the sea waves take it away too along with them,” her neighbour Chitra joins in. “There have been instances where our ration card and other things inside the house got drenched due to the invading waves. Nothing is really safe in our little houses when these waves go berserk. But we cannot leave the sea and go away. Even if government gives us land, they will give it in some other area away from the sea which we don’t want. Our life is dependent on the sea and our income comes from fishing and related sea activities. We can’t go away from here” she adds.

Right next to Asha’s residence stand the ruins of Premakka’s house which fell prey to the monster waves about four years ago. For about a year or so, Premakka and her daughters had to manage in a little room attached to her husband’s ‘goodangadi’. That year, Premakka’s daughter Roopini, now studying BBM, was in tenth standard. “It was tough studying and preparing for SSLC exams in that makeshift house,” she recalls. Today, Premakka lives in another house nearby, constructed and gifted to her by Maruthi Yuvakara Mandali, a local organization. Did the government not step in and help her? “The Mandali didn’t bother knocking the government’s door. At the end of it all, the ones in trouble are given a thousand or two thousand rupees and the files keep moving from one table to another. So Mandali members didn’t bother going to them and built a house for this lady themselves,” says Ismail Podimonu, social worker.

“The CRZ authorities have laid out rules stating that houses constructed after 1991 in the restricted area, will not be entitled for any compensation and are considered illegal by them. The restricted area they say are divided into two zones – 0 to 200 meters which is the Zone A and the danger zone, and Zone B ranging from 200 to 500 meters. Ironically, the fish meal plant constructed on the Ullal coastline just recently, falls in that restricted zone. How come these industries got clearance from the authorities? Besides, the sea was far away from the current houses in 1991. How can they fix that year as the cut-off point?” Podimonu questions.

And the sea was indeed far away a few years ago. In those days, for many a family who live on the coastline of Dakshina Kannada, Udupi and Uttara Kannada districts, their houses provided a typically beautiful ‘sea view’ which most people wish they had. Today, as they open their main doors, the same sea which once used to make a picturesque vista for them has turned into their nemesis, violently greeting them knocking right at their door. Contentment has paved way to irritation, for the uninvited guests that are the waves, keep storming into their houses. Not to mention the damage they have caused over the years.

“It was far far away. About 2-3 kilometers away from our house some 20 years ago,” recalls 70 year old Aminamma of Kotepura in Ullal. Today, she sees her little grandchildren being made to sleep in others’ houses and women in her own house sit together in one corner of a room to stay safe from the threat of the rampaging waves, which at times even smash the roof of their little dwelling. Young men on the other hand are busy keeping vigil at nights. “You never know. We live in constant fear and try to stay alert as much as we can, for the walls can collapse anytime,” says Abdul Ameen, Aminamma’s son.

62 year old Idinabba struggles as he walks along the boulders of the retaining walls laid across the coast to reach his residence. The monster waves hadn’t spared his family either. “Couple of years ago, the waves hit my house hard and a wall caved in, leaving one of my daughters with her leg injured as a result. She had to be hospitalised,” Idinabba recollects. Damaging walls notwithstanding, these waves create problems of a different kind as well. “They make our walls moist all the time and we keep getting electric shocks while trying to operate the electric switches,” he reveals.

The problem of sea erosion is not, however a simple nut to crack. It has its own complexities. “Sea erosion is a result of certain structural factors and certain weak points in the earth. Besides, this phenomenon is only seen in monsoon. The general perception is that sea erosion is caused by attack of storm waves hitting the beach. But there are certain other factors too that cause sea erosion, especially in our region. It is a wrong notion that the entire coastal stretch is prone to sea erosion. There are only some areas with certain geological aspects influencing the phenomenon. Sea erosions, especially in our coast, take place in areas where rivers meet the Arabian sea,” says Dr B M Ravindra, Deputy Director, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Karnataka.

Dr Ravindra lays greater emphasis on the role of rivers in causing sea erosion in the region. “If you observe our coast and the areas that are normally affected by sea erosion, you will see small strips of land standing as a block between the river and the sea. During monsoon, excess water in these rivers also contributed by the waters that flow down from the Western Ghats, create pressure in the river channel. They do not get released into the Arabian Sea due to the strips of land blocking them (as in the case of Kotepura stretch and similar stretches in our coast) and have just a small opening or outlet for the river water to meet the sea. It’s like a little a bottleneck and immense amount of water inside the bottle that wants to flow out. Because of this blocking by the land strips, pressure is created in the river channel which is exerted on the land strip or the sandy alluvium, making it weak and vulnerable. Sand absorbs water and so does clay which lies beneath it. This weak strip of land, when encounters a harsh sea wave, invariably loses a chunk of land which the waves take away with them, which we call erosion,” Dr Ravindra explains.

He substantiates his point of rivers playing a role in the process by pointing out the areas prone to sea erosion in our coastal belt. “River Udyavara exerts pressure on coastal strips of areas from Udyavara to Kapu. River Pavanje and River Mulki play a role in sea ersion in areas of Sasihitlu and Mukka. Similarly, River Sita and River Swarna join the sea near Hoode and Bengre. So Hoode and Bengre areas are prone. Likewise, Sowparnika river exerts pressure on the thin strip of land at Maravanthe on which the National Highway is situated. In fact, it is just that piece of land that separates the sea from the river at Maravanthe, which is one of the majorly affected sea erosion areas. Every year the authorities have to do some circus to save the National Highway there from sea erosion,” he quips.

It is this aspect of the rivers playing a part in the erosion problem that makes Dr Ravindra and a few others have their own doubts of whether the proposal of building submersible sea walls will turn out to be a permanent solution or not. “By building a sea wall, they will be only taking care of the sea waves hitting the beach but the problem of rivers exerting pressure on the strips of land will remain. The problem will still be only partially solved. So I have my own doubts if this would succeed”, he says.

Dr S G Mayya, Department of Applied Mechanics and Hydraulics, National Institute of Technology - Karnataka, Surathkal, also has similar concerns. “At Ullal especially, there is a lot of circulation problem with respect to waves. By constructing a submersible sea wall, they will be blocking the waves alright but the measures they take to take care of orientation of waves are important. There has to be orientation in terms of waves around the breakwater, the coast and water coming out of the river mouth. Or else there are chances of waves getting diverted which will cause erosion at some other place. We cannot rule out the impact River Nethravathi has on erosion process at Ullal either. So a lot will depend on what they have planned to tackle this,” Prof. Mayya says.

Dr Subba Rao, an oceanology expert who has studied extensively the Mangalorean coasts, and also from the Department of Applied Mechanics and Hydraulics, National Institute of Technology - Karnataka, Surathkal, is quite positive about the project but maintains that much will depend on the way it is carried out. “It will reduce the waves hitting the shore considerably. But a lot will depend on the structure and the way it is constructed,” he says.

For Prof. Jayappa, Department of Marine Geology, Mangalore University, the greater concern is the durability of the seawall being built. “It will block the waves, no doubt. But it needs to be seen as to how long it will last. We will have to see since this is something new that is being implemented in our coast. But I feel shelling out 250 odd crores for just the Ullal stretch is a little too much” he opines.

However, concerned authorities are confident that the submersible reef plan would succeed and the region will soon breathe easy as they see in it a permanent solution to the problem of sea erosion. The entire project has been divided into three phases. As part of the first phase, work will begin at Ullal’s waters and areas such as Sasihitlu, Hosabettu , Devbagh and Majali will be taken care of later on, phase-wise. The proposed plan of the submersible reef intends to cut the waves off at a distance away from the coast itself, thereby avoiding harsh waves from hitting the coast. Artificial reefs will be constructed which will be submersible i.e. under the water to block the strong waves at a distance of 600 meters away from the coast. This submersible sea wall will be around 38 meters long and 6 meters high from the sea bed. The sea wall’s foundation will comprise of geo textile material, which the authorities claim has the potential to withstand the harshest of sea waves. Another feature of this submersible sea wall would be the geo-tubes filled with sand which will be placed like bricks one above the other. The structure will be eco-friendly and cause no environmental harm and pollution, they say. Besides, four off-shore berms will be set up at the coast to help retain sand and prevent it from getting washed away and the nearby breakwater will also be altered a bit.

ARTIFICIAL_REEF_PLAN

“Much thought and research has gone into bringing out this solution. Consultancy services were taken from ANZDEC, a company from New Zealand, who gave us this solution after having extensively studied the problem of erosion in our region and carrying out practical experiments with this model,” reveals A Srujan Rao, Assistant Executive Engineer, Department of Port and Inland Water Transport, Mangalore, who is one of the experts in the team formed for the sea wall project.

State minister for environment Krishna J Palemar who is also the district in-charge minister had announced earlier that a comprehensive project worth Rs 911 crore, with financial assistance from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) has been formulated. However, as of now, an amount of about 250 crores has been earmarked for the first phase i.e. submersible seawall at Ullal. “This seawall will be the first of its kind to be built in the entire country. Apart from tacking the sea erosion menace, this submersible seawall will also facilitate fish breeding and help in fishing activities. Earlier, because of breakwaters, fishermen would encounter problems. But with this seawall, those problems would be solved,” says UT Khader, Ullal MLA.

However, the project has still not seen initiation thanks to the delay in the tender process. As many as four bidders including two Indian and two foreign firms had taken part in the pre-bidding meeting held recently. Of them, only one bidder has come forward. “With just one bidder, we are not content. We want a couple of bidders more for the tender,” says Shanth Kumar, Joint Director, Coastal Protection and Management Project, Department of Ports and Inland Water, Mangalore. MLA UT Khader on the other hand has said that concerned authorities will be urged to start the project even though just one bidder has knocked the door. “We will urge them to accept the one bid they have received so far and go ahead with the project. In my knowledge, it is a foreign company which is willing to work in collaboration with a Hyderabad company,” Khader reveals.

By September the tender has to be approved anyway, says Khader. Given that the work begins after rainy season this year, it will still take about 2 years to complete the entire project at Ullal which means that people who live dangerously at the coastline, will have to wait longer to breathe easy. Temporary arrangements will be made as usual this year too by the state government, laying boulders and creating temporary retaining walls to counter the troubling waves.

But until that submersible reef sees the light of the day, people of Ullal and other erosion prone areas will have to continue dreading the devil that is the deep blue sea. (courtesy: Coastal Mirror)


.

MP_1

MP_2

MP_3

MP_4

MP_5

MP_6

MP_7

MP_8

MP_9

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
July 20,2020

As Covid 19 has created havoc all rounds, the rulers of certain countries are using it to further intensify their set agendas. The democratic freedoms are being curtailed in certain forms, the reaction to which has come in America in the form of a campaign, which is opposing “stifling” cultural climate that is imposing “ideological conformity” and weakening “norms of open debate and toleration of differences”. In India similar intimidations have been intensified. In addition the occasion has been used by the sectarian forces first to link the spread of Corona to Muslim community and now in the name of reducing the burden of curriculum certain chapters on core concepts related to Indian nationalism are being deleted from the text books.

It has been reported that chapters on federalism, citizenship, nationalism, secularism, Human Rights, Legal Aid and Local Self Government and the like are being dropped. Education has been an important area for communal forces and they constantly keep saying that leftists have dominated the curriculum content, it suffers from the impact of Macaulay, Marx and Mohammad and so needs to be Indianized. The first such attempt was done when BJP came to power in 1998 as NDA and had Murli Manohar Joshi as the MHRD minister. He brought the changes which were termed as ‘saffronization of education’. Their focus is more on social science. Some of the highlights of this were introduction of subjects like Astrology and Paurohitya, and chapters defending caste system, nationalism of the type of Hitler was praised.

With defeat of NDA in 2004, the UPA did try to rectify some of these distortions. Again after 2014 the RSS affiliates working in the area of education have been active, interacting with MHRD officials to impress upon them the need to change the curriculum matching with their Hindu nationalist agenda. Its ‘Shiksha Sanskriti Utthan Nyas’ has been asking for removal of English, Urdu words in the texts. It has asked for removal of thoughts of Rabindranath Tagore on Nationalism, extracts of autobiography of M F Husain, references to benevolence of Muslim rulers, references to BJP being Hindu party, apology of Dr. Manmohan Singh for anti Sikh pogrom of 1984, the reference to killings of Gujarat carnage in 2002 among others. This they call as Bhartiykaran of syllabus.

As RSS is a multithreaded hydra one of its pracharak Dinanath Batra has set up ‘Shiksha Bachao Abhiyan Samiti’ which has been pressurizing various publishers to drop the books which are not conforming to their ideology. One recalls their pressuring withdrawal of Wendy Doniger’s ‘The Hindus’, as it does present the ancient India through the concerns of dalits and women. Mr. Batra has already come out with a set of nine books for school curriculum, giving the RSS view of the past and RSS understanding of social sciences. These have already been translated into Gujarati and thousands of the sets of these books are being used in Gujarat Schools.

The present step of deleting parts of curriculum which gives the basics of Indian Nationalism, secularism and human rights is a further step in the same direction. These are the topics which have made the Hindu nationalists uncomfortable during last few years. They have been defaming secularism. They removed it from the preamble of Indian constitution, when they put out an ad on the eve of Republic day in 2015. From last few decades since the Ram Temple movement was brought up, simultaneously the secular ethos of India’s freedom movement and secular values of Indian constitution have been constantly criticized. Many an RSS ideologues and BJP leaders have been asking for change of Indian Constitution for this very reason.

Secularism is part of the concept of Indian nationalism. In the name of religious nationalism, sectarian divisive nationalism they have been attacking various student leaders in particular. When we study Nationalism, the very genesis of Indian nationalism tells us the plurality of our freedom movement with its anti colonial roots. The struggle was for Indian nationalism and so the Muslims and Hindu communalists kept aloof from this great struggle against colonial masters, it was this struggle which built the Indian nation with all its diversity.

Similarly as we have equal rights as citizens the chapters on citizenship are being dropped. Federalism has been the core part of India’s administrative and political structure. As the dictatorial tendencies are becoming stronger, federalism is bound to suffer and that explains the dropping of this subject. Democracy is decentralization of power. Power reaching the lowermost part of the system, the villages and average citizens. This got reflected in Local self Government. The power is distributed among villages, cities, state and center. By removing chapters on federalism and local self government, the indications of the ideology of ruling party are on display.

While we are not dealing with all the portents of the planned omissions, one more aspect that related to dropping of chapter on Human rights needs our attention. The concept of Human rights and dignity are interlinked. This concept of Human rights also has international ramifications. India is signatory to many an UN covenants related to Human rights. The indications are clear that now rights will be for the few elite and ‘duties’ for the large deprived sections will be put on the forefront.

In a way this incidental ‘Corona gifted opportunity’ to the ruling Government is being fully used to enhance the agenda of ruling party in the arena of Educational Curriculum. The part of curriculum with which the ruling party is uncomfortable is being removed. This act of omission does supplement their other acts of commission in changing the shape of educational curriculum, which are reflected in RSS affiliates’ suggestions to MHRD regarding Bhartiyakaran of contents of syllabus. As per this the things like regarding the great epics like Ramayana and Mahabharata as History, the things like India having all the stem cell technology, plastic surgery, aviation science etc. will have a place in the changes planned by communal forces!

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
August 9,2020

Contrary to present impression that Muslims are separatists due to whom the partition of India took place, the truth is that Muslims contributed to freedom movement and upheld India’s composite culture in equal measure. The partition process, mainly due to British policy of ‘divide and rule’ well assisted by Hindu and Muslim communalists is being hidden from the popular vision in India and Muslims in general are held responsible for the same. Not only that the communal historiography introduced by British to pursue their policies has become the bedrock of communal politics and worsening of the perceptions about Muslims is in progress in India.

Yet another example of this has been a series of tweets by the bureaucrat, who is close to retirement, K. Nageshwar Rao. Contrary to the service rules he has made statements, through his tweets which are appreciative of RSS-BJP and demonise the stalwarts Muslim leaders who not only contributed to the freedom movement but also later gave valuable service in laying the foundation of Independent India. As per Rao, his tweets he accuses Maulana Azad and the other Muslim Education ministers of “deracination of Hindus”. After naming “Maulana Abul Kalam Azad — 11 years (1947-58)”; “Humayun Kabir, M C Chagla & Fakruddin Ali Ahmed — 4 years (1963-67)”; and, “Nurul Hassan — 5 years (1972-77)”, he posts: “Remaining 10 years other Leftists like VKRV Rao.”

He points out that their policies were meant to “1. Deny Hindus their knowledge, 2. Vilify Hinduism as collection of superstitions, 3. Abrahamise Education, 4. Abrahamise Media & Entertainment, 5. Shame Hindus about their identity!  and 6. Bereft of the glue of Hinduism Hindu society dies.”

Then he goes on to praise RSS-BJP for bringing the glory back to Hindus. These statements of his on one hand promote the Hate and on the other tantamount to political statement, which civil servants should not by making. CPM politburo member Brinda Karat has written a letter to Home Minister Amit Shah to take suitable action against the erring bureaucrat.

Rao begins with Maulana Abul kalam Azad. Surely Azad was one of the major leaders of freedom movement, who was also the youngest President of INC, in 1923 and later between 1940 to 1945. He opposed the partition process tooth and nail till the very last. As the Congress President in 1923 he wrote a remarkable Para, symbolizing the urge for Hindu Muslim unity, “If an angel descends from heaven and offers me Swaraj in 24 hours on condition that I give up Hindu Muslim Unity, I will refuse. Swaraj we will get sooner or later; its delay will be a loss for India, but loss of Hindu Muslim unity will be a loss for human kind”. His biographer Syeda Hamid points out “He spoke without an iota of doubt about how debacle of Indian Muslims has been the result of the colossal mistakes committed by Muslim League’s misguided leadership. He exhorted Muslims to make common cause with their Hindu, Sikh, Christian fellow countrymen.” He was the one who promoted the translation of Hindu scriptures Ramayan and Mahabharat in to Persian.

Surely Mr. Rao, neither has read Azad or read about him nor knows his contributions to making of Modern India. While today, the ideological formation to which Mr. Rao seems to be pledging his commitment is critical of all that happened during Nehru era, it was during this period when as education minister Azad was shepherding the formations of IITs, Academies of Science, Lalit kala Academies. It was during this period that the efforts to promote Indian composite culture were undertaken through various steps.

The other stalwarts who are under the hammer have been outstanding scholars and giants in their own field of education. Humayun Kabir, Nurul Hasan, Dr.Zakir Husssain gave matchless ideas and practical contributions in different fields of education. One can say that contrary to the accusations, India could match up to the Computer era, software and associate things, due to creation of large manpower in these areas mainly due to these foundations which were laid down particularly in the field of education during this period.

The charge that these ‘Muslim’ education ministers white washed the bloody Islamic rule is a blind repetition of the offshoot of communal historiography introduced by British. While Kings were ruling for power and wealth, their courts had Hindus and Muslim both officers. The jaundiced vision sees this as a bloody Islamic rule but as a matter of fact the syncretic culture and traditions developed precisely this period. It was during this period that Bhakti Traidtion with Kabir, Tukaram, Namdeo, Tulsidas flourished. It was during this period that humane values of Sufi saints reached far and wide. It was during this period that poets like Rahim and Raskhan produced their classic literature n praise of Hindu Gods.

We also need to remind ourselves that large number of Muslims participated in the freedom Movement. Two scholars Shamsul Islam and Nasir Ahmad have come out with books on the myriad such freedom fighters, to recall just a few names. Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan, Zakir Hussain, Syed Mohammad Sharfuddin Kadri, Bakht Khan, Muzzafar Ahmad, Mohammad Abdir Rahman,, Abbas Ali, Asaf Ali, Yusuf Mehrali, Maulana Mazahrul Hague.

These are just a few of the names. The movement, led by Gandhi, definitely laid the foundations where composite Indian culture and respect for all religions, others’ religion was paramount and this is what created Indian fraternity, one of the values which finds its place in the preamble of Indian Constitution.

This blaming of Education ministers who were Muslims is an add-on to the process of Islamophobia in India. So for there have been many actions of Muslim kings which are selectively presented as being bloody, now the post Independent History, where glorious contributions have been made by Muslim leaders are being used to further deepen the divisive process. We need to pay respects to builders of modern India, irrespective of their religion.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
February 29,2020

Like most of the political phenomenon, even the practice of Nationalism is not a static one. It changes with the changing political equations of the political forces and assumes the expressions which are very diverse. As such the phenomenon of Nationalism has a long journey and various state policies in particular have used it for purposes which relate more to the power of the state ‘vis a vis’ its people, power of the state ‘vis a vis’ the neighboring countries among others.

In India there has been a certain change in the practices of the state which have transformed the meaning of Nationalism during last few years. Particularly with BJP, the Hindu Nationalist outfit gaining simple majority, it has unfolded the policies where one can discern the drastic change in the meaning and application of Nationalism in regard to its citizens, particularly those belonging to minority community, with regard to those who are liberal, and with those who stand with the concept of Human rights.

Our former Prime Minister of Dr. Manmohan Singh hit the nail on the head when he said that “Nationalism and the "Bharat Mata Ki Jai" slogan are being misused to construct a "militant and purely emotional" idea of India that excludes millions of residents and citizens. Former Prime Minister recently stated this in an apparent attack on the BJP.” The occasion was the release of a book, ‘Who is Bharat Mata’, edited by Purushottam Agarwal and Radhakrishna. This is a compilation of significant extracts from writings of Nehru, and important assessments of and contributions of Nehru by prominent personalities.

Dr. Singh went on to add "With an inimitable style…Nehru laid the foundation of the universities, academies and cultural institutions of Modern India. But for Nehru's leadership, independent India would not have become what it is today," This statement of Dr. Singh has great importance in contemporary times, as Nehru is being denigrated by Hindu nationalists for all the problems which India is facing today and attempts are on to undermine his role and glorifying Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel. This is also significant as it gives us the glimpses of what Nationalism meant for Nehru.

As Singh’s statement captures the present nationalism being practiced by BJP and company, the Hindu nationalists, immediately shot back saying that Dr. Singh is supporting the anti India activities at JNU and Jamia and his party is supporting the anti India nationalists. They asked whether Singh likes the nationalism of the likes of Shashi Tharoor or Manishankar Ayer who are provoking the Shaheen Bagh protest rather than making the protestors quiet. Whether he likes the anti national protests which go on at JNU or Jamia? As per them there is no Nationalism in Congress. One more example being cited is the private visit of Shatrughan Sinha who talked to Pakistani President during his visit there recently!

Most of the arguments being used to oppose Dr. Singh are very superficial. What is being referred to; is not opposition to Indian nationalism and its central values which were the core of anti colonial struggles. While ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’ may not be acceptable to a section of population, even the book he was releasing has the title ‘Who is Bharat Mata’. What is being stated by Singh is the twist which slogan ‘Bharat Mata ki Jai’ has been used by Hindu nationalists to frighten the religious minorities.

Indian nation came into being on the values, which later were the foundation of Indian Constitution. Indian Constitution carefully picked up the terminology which was away from the concepts of Hindu or Muslim nationalism. That’s how the country came to be called as ‘India that is Bharat’. The freedom of expression which was the hallmark of freedom movement and it was given a pride of place in our Constitution. It respected the diversity and formulated rules where the nation was not based on particular culture, as Hindu nationalists will like us to believe, but cultural diversity was centrally recognized in the Constitution. In addition promoting good relations with neighbors and other countries of the World was also part of our principles.

JNU, Jamia and AMU are being demonized as most institutions so far regard the freedom of expression as a core part of Indian democracy. These institutions have been thriving on discussions and debates which have base in liberalism. Deliberately some slogans have been constructed to defame these institutions. While Constitution mandates good relations with neighbors, creation of ‘Anti Pakistan hysteria’ is the prime motive of many a channels and sections of other media, which are servile to the ideology of ruling Government. They also violate most of the norms of ethical journalism, where the criticism of the ruling party is an important factor to keep the ruling dispensation in toes.

A stifling atmosphere has been created during last six years. In this the Prime Minster can take a detour, land in Pakistan to have a cup of tea with Pakistan PM, but a Congress leader talking to Pakistani President is a sign of being anti National. Students taking out a march while reading the preamble of Indian Constitution are labeled as anti-national; and are stopped while those openly wielding guns near Jamia or Shaheen Bagh roam freely.

Nationalism should promote amity and love of the people; it should pave the way for growth and development. Currently the nationalism which is dominant and stalking the streets has weakened the very fraternity, which is one of the pillars of our democracy. Nehru did explain that Bharat Mata is not just our mountains, rivers and land but primarily the people who inhabit the land. Which nationalism to follow was settled during the freedom movement when Muslim nationalism and Hindu nationalism were rejected by the majority of people of India in favor of the Nationalism of Gandhi, Nehru, Patel and Maulana Azad, where minorities are equal citizens, deserving affirmative action. In today’s scenario the Hindu nationalists cannot accept any criticism of their policies.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.