Sea erosion: A permanent solution, finally?

[email protected] (CD Network)
July 14, 2011

MP_0

“You’re back again, eh? You people remember us once in a year, come here, peep in our houses and disappear. It’s then just us and our suffering!” exclaims Asha of Mohaveerapatna, Ullal, mistaking team Coastal Mirror to be politicians. She is later told the visitors are journalists but pat comes her reply – “Ultimately, nothing has changed as far as our lives are concerned. Life’s still the same for us out here…”

And their life is, badly ‘hit’, every time the harsh sea waves do the trespassing and smash their dwelling. “Water comes into our house and we have to keep removing it every now and then. Should we cook food or should we keep cleaning our house?” she asks.

“Even if we cook food and keep, the sea waves take it away too along with them,” her neighbour Chitra joins in. “There have been instances where our ration card and other things inside the house got drenched due to the invading waves. Nothing is really safe in our little houses when these waves go berserk. But we cannot leave the sea and go away. Even if government gives us land, they will give it in some other area away from the sea which we don’t want. Our life is dependent on the sea and our income comes from fishing and related sea activities. We can’t go away from here” she adds.

Right next to Asha’s residence stand the ruins of Premakka’s house which fell prey to the monster waves about four years ago. For about a year or so, Premakka and her daughters had to manage in a little room attached to her husband’s ‘goodangadi’. That year, Premakka’s daughter Roopini, now studying BBM, was in tenth standard. “It was tough studying and preparing for SSLC exams in that makeshift house,” she recalls. Today, Premakka lives in another house nearby, constructed and gifted to her by Maruthi Yuvakara Mandali, a local organization. Did the government not step in and help her? “The Mandali didn’t bother knocking the government’s door. At the end of it all, the ones in trouble are given a thousand or two thousand rupees and the files keep moving from one table to another. So Mandali members didn’t bother going to them and built a house for this lady themselves,” says Ismail Podimonu, social worker.

“The CRZ authorities have laid out rules stating that houses constructed after 1991 in the restricted area, will not be entitled for any compensation and are considered illegal by them. The restricted area they say are divided into two zones – 0 to 200 meters which is the Zone A and the danger zone, and Zone B ranging from 200 to 500 meters. Ironically, the fish meal plant constructed on the Ullal coastline just recently, falls in that restricted zone. How come these industries got clearance from the authorities? Besides, the sea was far away from the current houses in 1991. How can they fix that year as the cut-off point?” Podimonu questions.

And the sea was indeed far away a few years ago. In those days, for many a family who live on the coastline of Dakshina Kannada, Udupi and Uttara Kannada districts, their houses provided a typically beautiful ‘sea view’ which most people wish they had. Today, as they open their main doors, the same sea which once used to make a picturesque vista for them has turned into their nemesis, violently greeting them knocking right at their door. Contentment has paved way to irritation, for the uninvited guests that are the waves, keep storming into their houses. Not to mention the damage they have caused over the years.

“It was far far away. About 2-3 kilometers away from our house some 20 years ago,” recalls 70 year old Aminamma of Kotepura in Ullal. Today, she sees her little grandchildren being made to sleep in others’ houses and women in her own house sit together in one corner of a room to stay safe from the threat of the rampaging waves, which at times even smash the roof of their little dwelling. Young men on the other hand are busy keeping vigil at nights. “You never know. We live in constant fear and try to stay alert as much as we can, for the walls can collapse anytime,” says Abdul Ameen, Aminamma’s son.

62 year old Idinabba struggles as he walks along the boulders of the retaining walls laid across the coast to reach his residence. The monster waves hadn’t spared his family either. “Couple of years ago, the waves hit my house hard and a wall caved in, leaving one of my daughters with her leg injured as a result. She had to be hospitalised,” Idinabba recollects. Damaging walls notwithstanding, these waves create problems of a different kind as well. “They make our walls moist all the time and we keep getting electric shocks while trying to operate the electric switches,” he reveals.

The problem of sea erosion is not, however a simple nut to crack. It has its own complexities. “Sea erosion is a result of certain structural factors and certain weak points in the earth. Besides, this phenomenon is only seen in monsoon. The general perception is that sea erosion is caused by attack of storm waves hitting the beach. But there are certain other factors too that cause sea erosion, especially in our region. It is a wrong notion that the entire coastal stretch is prone to sea erosion. There are only some areas with certain geological aspects influencing the phenomenon. Sea erosions, especially in our coast, take place in areas where rivers meet the Arabian sea,” says Dr B M Ravindra, Deputy Director, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Karnataka.

Dr Ravindra lays greater emphasis on the role of rivers in causing sea erosion in the region. “If you observe our coast and the areas that are normally affected by sea erosion, you will see small strips of land standing as a block between the river and the sea. During monsoon, excess water in these rivers also contributed by the waters that flow down from the Western Ghats, create pressure in the river channel. They do not get released into the Arabian Sea due to the strips of land blocking them (as in the case of Kotepura stretch and similar stretches in our coast) and have just a small opening or outlet for the river water to meet the sea. It’s like a little a bottleneck and immense amount of water inside the bottle that wants to flow out. Because of this blocking by the land strips, pressure is created in the river channel which is exerted on the land strip or the sandy alluvium, making it weak and vulnerable. Sand absorbs water and so does clay which lies beneath it. This weak strip of land, when encounters a harsh sea wave, invariably loses a chunk of land which the waves take away with them, which we call erosion,” Dr Ravindra explains.

He substantiates his point of rivers playing a role in the process by pointing out the areas prone to sea erosion in our coastal belt. “River Udyavara exerts pressure on coastal strips of areas from Udyavara to Kapu. River Pavanje and River Mulki play a role in sea ersion in areas of Sasihitlu and Mukka. Similarly, River Sita and River Swarna join the sea near Hoode and Bengre. So Hoode and Bengre areas are prone. Likewise, Sowparnika river exerts pressure on the thin strip of land at Maravanthe on which the National Highway is situated. In fact, it is just that piece of land that separates the sea from the river at Maravanthe, which is one of the majorly affected sea erosion areas. Every year the authorities have to do some circus to save the National Highway there from sea erosion,” he quips.

It is this aspect of the rivers playing a part in the erosion problem that makes Dr Ravindra and a few others have their own doubts of whether the proposal of building submersible sea walls will turn out to be a permanent solution or not. “By building a sea wall, they will be only taking care of the sea waves hitting the beach but the problem of rivers exerting pressure on the strips of land will remain. The problem will still be only partially solved. So I have my own doubts if this would succeed”, he says.

Dr S G Mayya, Department of Applied Mechanics and Hydraulics, National Institute of Technology - Karnataka, Surathkal, also has similar concerns. “At Ullal especially, there is a lot of circulation problem with respect to waves. By constructing a submersible sea wall, they will be blocking the waves alright but the measures they take to take care of orientation of waves are important. There has to be orientation in terms of waves around the breakwater, the coast and water coming out of the river mouth. Or else there are chances of waves getting diverted which will cause erosion at some other place. We cannot rule out the impact River Nethravathi has on erosion process at Ullal either. So a lot will depend on what they have planned to tackle this,” Prof. Mayya says.

Dr Subba Rao, an oceanology expert who has studied extensively the Mangalorean coasts, and also from the Department of Applied Mechanics and Hydraulics, National Institute of Technology - Karnataka, Surathkal, is quite positive about the project but maintains that much will depend on the way it is carried out. “It will reduce the waves hitting the shore considerably. But a lot will depend on the structure and the way it is constructed,” he says.

For Prof. Jayappa, Department of Marine Geology, Mangalore University, the greater concern is the durability of the seawall being built. “It will block the waves, no doubt. But it needs to be seen as to how long it will last. We will have to see since this is something new that is being implemented in our coast. But I feel shelling out 250 odd crores for just the Ullal stretch is a little too much” he opines.

However, concerned authorities are confident that the submersible reef plan would succeed and the region will soon breathe easy as they see in it a permanent solution to the problem of sea erosion. The entire project has been divided into three phases. As part of the first phase, work will begin at Ullal’s waters and areas such as Sasihitlu, Hosabettu , Devbagh and Majali will be taken care of later on, phase-wise. The proposed plan of the submersible reef intends to cut the waves off at a distance away from the coast itself, thereby avoiding harsh waves from hitting the coast. Artificial reefs will be constructed which will be submersible i.e. under the water to block the strong waves at a distance of 600 meters away from the coast. This submersible sea wall will be around 38 meters long and 6 meters high from the sea bed. The sea wall’s foundation will comprise of geo textile material, which the authorities claim has the potential to withstand the harshest of sea waves. Another feature of this submersible sea wall would be the geo-tubes filled with sand which will be placed like bricks one above the other. The structure will be eco-friendly and cause no environmental harm and pollution, they say. Besides, four off-shore berms will be set up at the coast to help retain sand and prevent it from getting washed away and the nearby breakwater will also be altered a bit.

ARTIFICIAL_REEF_PLAN

“Much thought and research has gone into bringing out this solution. Consultancy services were taken from ANZDEC, a company from New Zealand, who gave us this solution after having extensively studied the problem of erosion in our region and carrying out practical experiments with this model,” reveals A Srujan Rao, Assistant Executive Engineer, Department of Port and Inland Water Transport, Mangalore, who is one of the experts in the team formed for the sea wall project.

State minister for environment Krishna J Palemar who is also the district in-charge minister had announced earlier that a comprehensive project worth Rs 911 crore, with financial assistance from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) has been formulated. However, as of now, an amount of about 250 crores has been earmarked for the first phase i.e. submersible seawall at Ullal. “This seawall will be the first of its kind to be built in the entire country. Apart from tacking the sea erosion menace, this submersible seawall will also facilitate fish breeding and help in fishing activities. Earlier, because of breakwaters, fishermen would encounter problems. But with this seawall, those problems would be solved,” says UT Khader, Ullal MLA.

However, the project has still not seen initiation thanks to the delay in the tender process. As many as four bidders including two Indian and two foreign firms had taken part in the pre-bidding meeting held recently. Of them, only one bidder has come forward. “With just one bidder, we are not content. We want a couple of bidders more for the tender,” says Shanth Kumar, Joint Director, Coastal Protection and Management Project, Department of Ports and Inland Water, Mangalore. MLA UT Khader on the other hand has said that concerned authorities will be urged to start the project even though just one bidder has knocked the door. “We will urge them to accept the one bid they have received so far and go ahead with the project. In my knowledge, it is a foreign company which is willing to work in collaboration with a Hyderabad company,” Khader reveals.

By September the tender has to be approved anyway, says Khader. Given that the work begins after rainy season this year, it will still take about 2 years to complete the entire project at Ullal which means that people who live dangerously at the coastline, will have to wait longer to breathe easy. Temporary arrangements will be made as usual this year too by the state government, laying boulders and creating temporary retaining walls to counter the troubling waves.

But until that submersible reef sees the light of the day, people of Ullal and other erosion prone areas will have to continue dreading the devil that is the deep blue sea. (courtesy: Coastal Mirror)


.

MP_1

MP_2

MP_3

MP_4

MP_5

MP_6

MP_7

MP_8

MP_9

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
January 14,2020

In the beginning of January 2020 two very disturbing events were reported from Pakistan. One was the attack on Nankana Sahib, the holy shrine where Sant Guru Nanak was born. While one report said that the place has been desecrated, the other stated that it was a fight between two Muslim groups. Prime Minister of Pakistan Imran Khan condemned the incident and the main accused Imran Chisti was arrested. The matter related to abduction and conversion of a Sikh girl Jagjit Kaur, daughter of Pathi (One who reads Holy Guru Granth Sahib in Gurudwara) of the Gurudwara. In another incident one Sikh youth Ravinder Singh, who was out on shopping for his marriage, was shot dead in Peshawar.

While these condemnable attacks took place on the Sikh minority in Pakistan, BJP was quick enough to jump to state that it is events like this which justify the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). Incidentally CAA is the Act which is discriminatory and relates to citizenship with Religion, which is not as per the norms of Indian constitution. There are constant debates and propaganda that population of Hindus has come down drastically in Pakistan and Bangla Desh. Amit Shah, the Home minister stated that in Pakistan the population of Hindus has come down from 23% at the time of partition to 3.7% at present. And in Bangla Desh it has come down from 22% to present 8%.

While not denying the fact that the religious minorities are getting a rough deal in both these countries, the figures which are presented are totally off the mark. These figures don’t take into consideration the painful migrations, which took place at the time of partition and formation of Bangla Desh later. Pakistan census figures tell a different tale. Their first census was held in 1951. As per this census the overall percentage of Non Muslim in Pakistan (East and West together) was 14.2%, of this in West Pakistan (Now Pakistan) it was 3.44 and in Eat Pakistan it was 23.2. In the census held in Pakistan 1998 it became 3.72%. As far as Bangla Desh is concerned the share of Non Muslims has gone down from 23.2 (1951) to 9.6% in 2011.

The largest minority of Pakistan is Ahmadis, (https://minorityrights.org/country/pakistan/) who are close to 4 Million and are not recognised as Muslims in Pakistan. In Bangla Desh the major migrations of Hindus from Bangla Desh took place in the backdrop of Pakistan army’s atrocities in the then East Pakistan.

As far as UN data on refugees in India it went up by 17% between 2016-2019 and largest numbers were from Tibet and Sri Lanka.  (https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publication…)

The state of minorities is in a way the index of strength of democracy. Most South Asian Countries have not been able to sustain democratic values properly. In Pakistan, the Republic began with Jinnah’s classic speech where secularism was to be central credo of Pakistan. This 11th August speech was in a way what the state policy should be, as per which people of all faiths are free to practice their religion. Soon enough the logic of ‘Two Nation theory” and formation of Pakistan, a separate state for Muslim took over. Army stepped in and dictatorship was to reign there intermittently. Democratic elements were suppressed and the worst came when Zia Ul Haq Islamized the state in collusion with Maulanas. The army was already a strong presence in Pakistan. The popular formulation for Pakistan was that it is ruled by three A’s, Army, America and Allah (Mullah).

Bangla Desh had a different trajectory. Its very formation was a nail in the coffin of ‘two nation theory’; that religion can be the basis of a state. Bangla Desh did begin as a secular republic but communal forces and secular forces kept struggling for their dominance and in 1988 it also became Islamic republic. At another level Myanmar, in the grip of military dictatorship, with democratic elements trying to retain their presence is also seeing a hard battle. Democracy or not, the army and Sanghas (Buddhist Sang has) are strong, in Myanmar as well. The most visible result is persecution of Rohingya Muslims.

Similar phenomenon is dominating in Sri Lanka also where Budhhist Sanghas and army have strong say in the political affairs, irrespective of which Government is ruling. Muslim and Christian minorities are a big victim there, while Tamils (Hindus, Christians etc.) suffered the biggest damage as ethnic and religious minorities. India had the best prospect of democracy, pluralism and secularism flourishing here. The secular constitution, the outcome of India’s freedom struggle, the leadership of Gandhi and Nehru did ensure the rooting of democracy and secularism in a strong way.

India so far had best democratic credentials amongst all the south Asian countries. Despite that though the population of minorities rose mainly due to poverty and illiteracy, their overall marginalisation was order of the day, it went on worsening with the rise of communal forces, with communal forces resorting to identity issues, and indulging in propaganda against minorities.

While other South Asian countries should had followed India to focus more on infrastructure and political culture of liberalism, today India is following the footsteps of Pakistan. The retrograde march of India is most visible in the issues which have dominated the political space during last few years. Issues like Ram Temple, Ghar Wapasi, Love Jihad, Beef-Cow are now finding their peak in CAA.

India’s reversal towards a polity with religion’s identity dominating the political scene was nicely presented by the late Pakistani poetess Fahmida Riaz in her poem, Tum bhi Hum Jaise Nikle (You also turned out to be like us). While trying to resist communal forces has been an arduous task, it is becoming more difficult by the day. This phenomenon has been variously called, Fundamentalism, Communalism or religious nationalism among others. Surely it has nothing to do with the religion as practiced by the great Saint and Sufi traditions of India; it resorts mainly to political mobilization by using religion as a tool.

Comments

Ashi
 - 
Tuesday, 14 Jan 2020

If Malaysia implement similar NRC/CAA, India and China are the loser.

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
March 14,2020

In the wake of Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) UN High Commissioner, Michele Bachelet, has filed an intervention in the Supreme Court petition challenging the constitutionality of the Citizenship Amendment Act, as she is critical of CAA. Responding to her, India’s Foreign Minister S. Jai Shanker strongly rebutted her criticism, saying that the body (UNHCR) has been wrong and is blind to the problem of cross border terrorism. The issue on hand is the possibility of scores of people, mainly Muslims, being declared as stateless. The problem at hand is the massive exercise of going through the responses/documents from over 120 crore of Indian population and screening documents, which as seen in Assam, yield result which are far from truthful or necessary.

The issue of CAA has been extensively debated and despite heavy critique of the same by large number of groups and despite the biggest mass opposition ever to any move in Independent India, the Government is determined on going ahead with an exercise which is reminiscent of the dreaded regimes which are sectarian and heartless to its citizens, which have indulged in extinction of large mass of people on grounds of citizenship, race etc. The Foreign minister’s assertion is that it is a matter internal to India, where India’s sovereignty is all that matters! As far as sovereignty is concerned we should be clear that in current times any sovereign power has to consider the need to uphold the citizenship as per the principle of non-discrimination which is stipulated in Art.26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political (ICCPR) rights.

Can such policies, which affect large number of people and are likely to affect their citizenship be purely regarded as ‘internal’? With the World turning into a global village, some global norms have been formulated during last few decades. The norms relate to Human rights and migrations have been codified. India is also signatory to many such covenants in including ICCPR, which deals with the norms for dealing with refugees from other countries. One is not talking of Chicago speech of Swami Vivekanand, which said that India’s greatness has been in giving shelter to people from different parts of the World; one is also not talking of the Tattariaya Upanishad’s ‘Atithi Devovhav’ or ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbkam’ from Mahaupanishad today.

What are being talked about are the values and opinions of organizations which want to ensure to preserve of Human rights of all people Worldwide. In this matter India is calling United Nations body as ‘foreign party’; having no locus standi in the case as it pertains to India’s sovereignty. The truth is that since various countries are signatories to UN covenants, UN bodies have been monitoring the moves of different states and intervening at legal level as Amicus (Friend of the Court) to the courts in different countries and different global bodies. Just to mention some of these, UN and High Commissioner for Human Rights has often submitted amicus briefs in different judicial platforms. Some examples are their intervention in US Supreme Court, European Court of Human Rights, International Criminal Court, and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. These are meant to help the Courts in areas where UN bodies have expertise.

 Expertise on this has been jointly formulated by various nations. These interventions also remind the nations as to what global norms have been evolved and what are the obligations of individual states to the values which have evolved over a period of time. Arvind Narrain draws our attention to the fact that, “commission has intervened in the European Court of Human Rights in cases involving Spain and Italy to underscore the principle of non-refoulement, which bars compulsory expulsion of illegal migrants… Similarly, the UN has intervened in the International Criminal Court in a case against the Central African Republic to explicate on the international jurisprudence on rape as a war crime.”

From time to time organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have been monitoring the status of Human rights of different countries. This puts those countries in uncomfortable situation and is not welcome by those establishments. How should this contradiction between ‘internal matter’, ‘sovereignty’ and the norms for Human rights be resolved? This is a tough question at the time when the freedom indices and democratic ethos are sliding downwards all over the world. In India too has slid down on the scale of these norms.

In India we can look at the intervention of UN body from the angle of equality and non discrimination. Democratic spirit should encourage us to have a rethink on the matters which have been decided by the state. In the face of the greatest mass movement of Shaheen bagh, the state does need to look inwards and give a thought to international morality, the spirit of global family to state the least.

The popular perception is that when Christians were being persecuted in Kandhmal the global Christian community’s voice was not strong enough. Currently in the face of Delhi carnage many a Muslim majority countries have spoken. While Mr. Modi claims that his good relations with Muslim countries are a matter of heartburn to the parties like Congress, he needs to relook at his self gloating. Currently Iran, Malaysia, Indonesia and many Muslim majority countries have spoken against what Modi regime is unleashing in India. Bangladesh, our neighbor, has also seen various protests against the plight of Muslims in India. More than the ‘internal matter’ etc. what needs to be thought out is the moral aspect of the whole issue. We pride ourselves in treading the path of morality. What does that say in present context when while large section of local media is servile to the state, section of global media has strongly brought forward what is happening to minorities in India.   

The hope is that Indian Government wakes up to its International obligations, to the worsening of India’s image in the World due to CAA and the horrific violence witnessed in Delhi.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.