Men in Blues fall from grace after the rout in England

[email protected] (CD Network)
August 25, 2011

MS-Dhoni-Edgbaston_2636572

How could this happen? Is there no poetic justice in this world? Was it destined to end this way?


No, these weren’t questions I asked when Tim Bresnan’s length delivery at Edgbaston saw Shantha Sreesanth hole out to gully and signal England’s rise to the top of the ICC Test rankings for the first time since 1980.


No, these were questions I asked myself when, in 1999, I witnessed the heartbreaking manner in which South Africa tumbled out of the World Cup, after Allan Donald needlessly ran himself out against Australia in the semi-final.


It was indeed a poetic story, one that every cricket fan remembers with pain! Following their rise from the ashes of apartheid, the team blazed through the tournament on the back of Jacques Kallis’ smashing efforts with the bat, and Lance
Klusener’s exploits in both departments. The latter’s look of abject disappointment as the stewards led him off the field after that semi-final burned those questions in my heart.


The similarly fairy-tale story of India’s position at the top of the Test rankings came to an ignominious end at Edgbaston. In the age of fast food, fast money and Twenty20, Test cricket had suddenly risen to grip the world’s attention, as two heavyweights began their tussle at Lord’s. But the giants leading that charge, India, were swiftly brought to their knees as they folded in the face of England’s superior performance - and the afore mentioned questions were joined by one that had long been asked.


Were we too tired and are we, in fact, playing too much cricket? As tiresome as the stories involving such grievances have become, the issues remain key to understanding a drop in performance when it matters.


A series in South Africa at the start of the year, a one-day international World Cup (which clearly we played until the final day), an Indian Premier League season with not a moment to lose and then a tour of the West Indies, before traveling to our rankings graveyard in England. Is it any surprise we’ve had our walking wounded exposed to the fullest extent and looking like schoolboys?


However, Team India’s chief selector Krishnamachari Srikkanth would have us believe otherwise. “It is not the Indians only,” he said. “The fact is that cricket is being played the whole year in whatever format - Test, ODI or Twenty20. So I don't think that it is the fatigue factor for the performance in England.”


He goes on to mention that the “same bunch of cricketers” beat South Africa in their backyard. His logic would mean that a group performing well month-in month-out would be invincible. However, that would be akin to asking a marathon runner, who’s led the pack for half the distance to continue his pace no matter what. It defies logic. No amount of money can counter a massive build-up of lactic acid, over such a long period, if you will pardon the Biology lesson!


Sportspersons are human, but their bodies require a significantly different maintenance regime than your average Joe. It is a continuous process of build-up and cool-down. It is not something that can be avoided during the off-season even, the bodies must be kept in proper shape no matter what. Trials and tribulations, though, are at every turn, and the process of staying on top of one’s fitness is a constant struggle.


Tennis legend Andre Agassi was forced to shoot cortisone injections in his back twice a day (sometimes between matches as well) to even think of completing a day’s training or a competitive match. Cyclist Lance Armstrong battled testicular cancer to make a hugely successful return to the sport. Sachin Tendulkar’s troubles against his own back and a tennis elbow have been the subject of various cricketing “obituaries”, while Zaheer Khan’s long-standing hamstring predicament cries out for India to fast-track his successor’s grooming. Even the Don faced death when diagnosed with acute appendicitis during Australia’s 1934 tour of England. However, the stories of thousands of unsung players going through similar and worse physical battles remain off the back pages.


The general masses perhaps remain unaware of the strain that a player takes on a personal level in order to keep himself match-fit. What we see is the insane amounts of money thrown out, not just as BCCI salaries, but also as part of franchise tournaments, advertising and the whole gamut of extra-vocational activities. And the inevitable snide remarks follow when the team does not perform well: “So much money and he gets out for 10!”, “Why do we pay them so much when all they do is have fun on tour?”


Money talks of course, so the need to rake in astronomical amounts clouds the judgements of our administrative leaders. Series after series, in a bid to boost advertising revenue - all under the clever guise of promoting the game - becomes an everyday affair. To take the IPL as an example again, the average routine of a player would go as follows: prepare for the match, play it, sleep the odd hours that you can find, wake up next morning for a rush to the airport, another city, another stadium, and do the whole thing all over again. Gautam Gambhir’s much-publicised efforts for Kolkata Knight Riders while nursing an elbow injury was just the tip of the iceberg. To be fair, it did spark the “tiredness” debate for a bit. But with other such “important” affairs like Preity Zinta’s ego battle with Shilpa Shetty doing the rounds, who had the time to care about the people who actually played the game right?


So when nearly half the core players of a team are on the nursing table, what other word would you care to use? None, but that which has been bandied around ever since people woke up to the rude shock that an IPL tournament was to be played a week after we lifted the World Cup - “Tired”, and its many variants such as “too much cricket”.


When MS Dhoni took the field at Nottingham after rescinding the appeal over Ian Bell’s moment of madness, a fellow journalist commented how the skipper’s face gave off the tell-tale signs of a man who was resigned to his fate, of having given up. And as if to cement the I-dont-care-anymore attitude, the very next Test saw jokes being shared by teammates even as England built one partnership after another like nails in a coffin. All manner of behavior shouted out “We don’t care anymore. Just show us the end to the turmoil and we’ll happily walk towards the light.”


The light has shone, the bells have tolled and the humble pie has been eaten. What we do with the leftovers, will define our quest to reach the top once again. Feed it to the dogs of constant criticism and you risk losing all that is good about a sport in the very bloodstream of a country. Use it to create a new generation of champions and the world will remember the Edgbaston squad, whose fall from grace shook the gold dust off administrative eyes.

bibs

Bibhash Dash is a Mangalore-based freelance sports writer

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
February 4,2020

As democracy is seeping in slowly all over the world, there is an organization which is monitoring the degree of democracy in the individual countries, The Economist Intelligence Unit. As such in each country there are diverse factors which on one hand work to deepen it, while others weaken it. Overall there is a march from theoretical democracy to substantive one. The substantive democracy will herald not just the formal equality, freedom and community feeling in the country but will be founded on the substantive quality of these values. In India while the introduction of modern education, transport, communication laid the backdrop of beginning of the process, the direction towards deepening of the process begins with Mahatma Gandhi when he led the non-cooperation movement in 1920, in which average people participated. The movement of freedom for India went on to become the ‘greatest ever mass movement’ in the World.

The approval and standards for democracy were enshrined in Indian Constitution, which begins ‘We the people of India’, and was adopted on 26th January 1950. With this Constitution and the policies adopted by Nehru the process of democratization started seeping further, the dreaded Emergency in 1975, which was lifted later restored democratic freedoms in some degree. This process of democratisation is facing an opposition since the decade of 1990s after the launch of Ram Temple agitation, and has seen the further erosion with BJP led Government coming to power in 2014. The state has been proactively attacking civil liberties, pluralism and participative political culture with democracy becoming flawed in a serious way. And this is what got reflected in the slipping of India by ten places, to 51st, in 2019. On the index of democracy India slipped down from the score of 7.23 to 6.90. The impact of sectarian BJP politics is writ on the state of the nation, country.

Ironically this lowering of score has come at a time when the popular protests, the deepening of democracy has been given a boost and is picking up with the Shaheen Bagh protests. The protest which began in Shaheen Bagh, Delhi in the backdrop of this Government getting the Citizenship amendment Bill getting converted into an act and mercilessly attacking the students of Jamia Milia Islamia, Aligarh Muslim University along with high handed approach in Jamia Nagar and neighbouring areas.  From 15th December 2019, the laudable protest is on.

It is interesting to note that the lead in this protest has been taken by the Muslim women, from the Burqa-Hijab clad to ‘not looking Muslim’ women and was joined by students and youth from all the communities, and later by the people from all the communities. Interestingly this time around this Muslim women initiated protest has contrast from all the protests which earlier had begun by Muslims. The protests opposing Shah Bano Judgment, the protests opposing entry of women in Haji Ali, the protests opposing the Government move to abolish triple Talaq. So far the maulanas from top were initiating the protests, with beard and skull cap dominating the marches and protests. The protests were by and large for protecting Sharia, Islam and were restricted to Muslim community participating.

This time around while Narendra Modi pronounced that ‘protesters can be identified by their clothes’, those who can be identified by their external appearance are greatly outnumbered by all those identified or not identified by their appearance.

The protests are not to save Islam or any other religion but to protect Indian Constitution. The slogans are structured around ‘Defence of democracy and Indian Constitution’. The theme slogans are not Allahu Akbar’ or Nara-E-Tadbeer’ but around preamble of Indian Constitution. The lead songs have come to be Faiz Ahmad Faiz’s ‘Hum Dekhenge’, a protest against Zia Ul Haq’s attempts to crush democracy in the name of religion. Another leading protest song is from Varun Grover, ‘Tanashah Aayenge…Hum Kagaz nahin Dikhayenge’, a call to civil disobedience against the CAA-NRC exercise and characterising the dictatorial nature of the current ruling regime.

While BJP was telling us that primary problem of Muslim women is Triple talaq, the Muslim women led movements has articulated that primary problem is the very threat to Muslim community. All other communities, cutting across religious lines, those below poverty line, those landless and shelter less people also see that if the citizenship of Muslims can be threatened because of lack of some papers, they will be not far behind in the victimization process being unleashed by this Government.

While CAA-NRC has acted as the precipitating factor, the policies of Modi regime, starting from failure to fulfil the tall promises of bringing back black money, the cruel impact of demonetisation, the rising process of commodities, the rising unemployment, the divisive policies of the ruling dispensation are the base on which these protest movements are standing. The spread of the protest movement, spontaneous but having similar message is remarkable. Shaheen Bagh is no more just a physical space; it’s a symbol of resistance against the divisive policies, against the policies which are increasing the sufferings of poor workers, the farmers and the average sections of society.

What is clear is that as identity issues, emotive issues like Ram Temple, Cow Beef, Love Jihad and Ghar Wapasi aimed to divide the society, Shaheen Bagh is uniting the society like never before. The democratisation process which faced erosion is getting a boost through people coming together around the Preamble of Indian Constitution, singing of Jan Gan Man, waving of tricolour and upholding the national icons like Gandhi, Bhagat Singh, Ambedkar and Maulana Azad. One can feel the sentiments which built India; one can see the courage of people to protect what India’s freedom movement and Indian Constitution gave them.

Surely the communal forces are spreading canards and falsehood against the protests. As such these protests which is a solid foundation of our democracy. The spontaneity of the movement is a strength which needs to be channelized to uphold Indian Constitution and democratic ethos of our beloved country.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
February 29,2020

Like most of the political phenomenon, even the practice of Nationalism is not a static one. It changes with the changing political equations of the political forces and assumes the expressions which are very diverse. As such the phenomenon of Nationalism has a long journey and various state policies in particular have used it for purposes which relate more to the power of the state ‘vis a vis’ its people, power of the state ‘vis a vis’ the neighboring countries among others.

In India there has been a certain change in the practices of the state which have transformed the meaning of Nationalism during last few years. Particularly with BJP, the Hindu Nationalist outfit gaining simple majority, it has unfolded the policies where one can discern the drastic change in the meaning and application of Nationalism in regard to its citizens, particularly those belonging to minority community, with regard to those who are liberal, and with those who stand with the concept of Human rights.

Our former Prime Minister of Dr. Manmohan Singh hit the nail on the head when he said that “Nationalism and the "Bharat Mata Ki Jai" slogan are being misused to construct a "militant and purely emotional" idea of India that excludes millions of residents and citizens. Former Prime Minister recently stated this in an apparent attack on the BJP.” The occasion was the release of a book, ‘Who is Bharat Mata’, edited by Purushottam Agarwal and Radhakrishna. This is a compilation of significant extracts from writings of Nehru, and important assessments of and contributions of Nehru by prominent personalities.

Dr. Singh went on to add "With an inimitable style…Nehru laid the foundation of the universities, academies and cultural institutions of Modern India. But for Nehru's leadership, independent India would not have become what it is today," This statement of Dr. Singh has great importance in contemporary times, as Nehru is being denigrated by Hindu nationalists for all the problems which India is facing today and attempts are on to undermine his role and glorifying Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel. This is also significant as it gives us the glimpses of what Nationalism meant for Nehru.

As Singh’s statement captures the present nationalism being practiced by BJP and company, the Hindu nationalists, immediately shot back saying that Dr. Singh is supporting the anti India activities at JNU and Jamia and his party is supporting the anti India nationalists. They asked whether Singh likes the nationalism of the likes of Shashi Tharoor or Manishankar Ayer who are provoking the Shaheen Bagh protest rather than making the protestors quiet. Whether he likes the anti national protests which go on at JNU or Jamia? As per them there is no Nationalism in Congress. One more example being cited is the private visit of Shatrughan Sinha who talked to Pakistani President during his visit there recently!

Most of the arguments being used to oppose Dr. Singh are very superficial. What is being referred to; is not opposition to Indian nationalism and its central values which were the core of anti colonial struggles. While ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’ may not be acceptable to a section of population, even the book he was releasing has the title ‘Who is Bharat Mata’. What is being stated by Singh is the twist which slogan ‘Bharat Mata ki Jai’ has been used by Hindu nationalists to frighten the religious minorities.

Indian nation came into being on the values, which later were the foundation of Indian Constitution. Indian Constitution carefully picked up the terminology which was away from the concepts of Hindu or Muslim nationalism. That’s how the country came to be called as ‘India that is Bharat’. The freedom of expression which was the hallmark of freedom movement and it was given a pride of place in our Constitution. It respected the diversity and formulated rules where the nation was not based on particular culture, as Hindu nationalists will like us to believe, but cultural diversity was centrally recognized in the Constitution. In addition promoting good relations with neighbors and other countries of the World was also part of our principles.

JNU, Jamia and AMU are being demonized as most institutions so far regard the freedom of expression as a core part of Indian democracy. These institutions have been thriving on discussions and debates which have base in liberalism. Deliberately some slogans have been constructed to defame these institutions. While Constitution mandates good relations with neighbors, creation of ‘Anti Pakistan hysteria’ is the prime motive of many a channels and sections of other media, which are servile to the ideology of ruling Government. They also violate most of the norms of ethical journalism, where the criticism of the ruling party is an important factor to keep the ruling dispensation in toes.

A stifling atmosphere has been created during last six years. In this the Prime Minster can take a detour, land in Pakistan to have a cup of tea with Pakistan PM, but a Congress leader talking to Pakistani President is a sign of being anti National. Students taking out a march while reading the preamble of Indian Constitution are labeled as anti-national; and are stopped while those openly wielding guns near Jamia or Shaheen Bagh roam freely.

Nationalism should promote amity and love of the people; it should pave the way for growth and development. Currently the nationalism which is dominant and stalking the streets has weakened the very fraternity, which is one of the pillars of our democracy. Nehru did explain that Bharat Mata is not just our mountains, rivers and land but primarily the people who inhabit the land. Which nationalism to follow was settled during the freedom movement when Muslim nationalism and Hindu nationalism were rejected by the majority of people of India in favor of the Nationalism of Gandhi, Nehru, Patel and Maulana Azad, where minorities are equal citizens, deserving affirmative action. In today’s scenario the Hindu nationalists cannot accept any criticism of their policies.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.