“Communication Minister”, Kapil Sibal cannot be faulted if he feels that he and his class of ministers alone are entitled to freedom of speech and expression. Look at how wonderfully they use this fundamental right by yelling, swearing, sometime even hurling objects at one another. When some ordinary citizen shows the guts to question their behavior, these honorable MPs take refuge under the Parliamentary Privileges.
In all we have 4896 MP’s and MLA’s in our country of 1.2 billion people. However, this miniscule minority imposes their decisions upon the rest of the population using various legitimate channels at their disposal. Despite India being a democracy, an ordinary citizen barely has a space or resource to express his opinion unless he is a prolific writer or a conformist. The ‘tools of expression’ are either expensive or are systematically defunct. People are expected to accept whatever is being imposed on them.
This New-World order predominated by the so called “democracy” has divided the society into following categories.
1. Political Representative, 2. Industrialist, 3. Religion 4. Military and 5. Mango Man also known as Aam Aadmi or Common Man.
It has also been observed, that the Government representatives both at the Central and the State not only take it as an offence when an ordinary citizen demands information through Right to Information Act – 2005, but also have challenged and questioned its existence for ‘destabilising’ their authority.
On several occasion, various stakeholders, including the Prime Minister’s office affected by the RTI Act, have also constantly dissuaded, passed negative comments or discouraged the use of RTI since it severed its vested interest. This is merely because with all the power and fanfare the ministers feel like “God” and are simply not used to critics but only devotees.
The privileges of ministers have no bounds. It ranges from his/her salary to the unending perks and allowances. Despite all their political differences, the MPs and MLAs get the proposals for an increase in the salaries and allowances passed within minutes. Treated to such privileges, it is obvious why our political leaders get annoyed when citizens express their uncensored opinion on the public domain.
Moreover, in today’s context it may be further easy for the government to justify this move especially when the online censorship has become a trend in the Western countries, especially with super-powers like United Kingdom and United States, who recently, went to the extent of even threatening businesses that supported Wikileaks. So it’s not surprising that the Union Communication Ministry has taken a cue and come out boldly to suppress the voice of the nation.
It perhaps seems easier for the government to retain its international image by killing or suppressing criticism, than put its house that is already plagued with allegation of corruption an irregularities, erroneous public policies; failure to maintain the GDP growth, lack of will to formulate anti-corruption policy etc, in order
Interestingly, since Mr. Digvijay Singh is busy updating and predicting the “Bhavishyavaani” on Twitter, (not sure if he is the brand ambassador of Twitter), the “Fall Guy” or the troubleshooter expressing the interest of the ministerial brotherhood is Mr. Sibal, who has already issued series of “gag orders” to the “leash” the online tongue of the citizens.
Perhaps the Communication and Information minister has forgotten that even under his leadership, the online media has reached only 8 % of the population in India. So by slitting the voice of the online content, and only allowing his favorites to be published online, he is just reducing the government’s credibility and non-transparent nature.
Moreover, it is also not clear how the Minister intends to suppress the rest of the 92 percent that is “offline India”, using similar fiats. Obviously the print media could be easily made to fall-in-line simply by withholding advertisements or simply instructing the District Magistrate to update the license renewal clause to accommodate embedded media or censorship of journalism.
It was interesting to note that between July and December 2010, Google received 282 requests from different Indian law enforcement agencies to remove/restrict online content and block as many as 2439 profiles and 236 communities on social networking sites that did not suit their specification. Google says even “criticism of a local politician” has been removed. It may be shocking, but it’s a fact that this is the kind of system we delude ourselves calling a democracy.
It is more than obvious that this type of “screening request” may be a routine exercise for the Ministry of Communication. It is one of those instances where the details spilled out of the bag drawing public scrutiny. While for some it might be a shock, this block request by Sibal to the online service providers, might have merely done by his text message or perhaps a ping request to block certain websites and promote his favorite page.
While it might take some time for the government to understand that merely an online content does not influence people’s opinion. People apply their mind and ascertain the veracity of the content that is published online before acting on it. Therefore, instead of slashing the free speech or gaging criticism, it would be wise on the part of the government address the concerns and grievances of the people head on.
Harsharaj Gatty is a freelance writer and an RTI activist
Comments
Add new comment