Is Pejawar honest in his support to the anti-UPCL fight?

[email protected] (CD Network)
January 31, 2012

9pdb_pejavara_1_copy

The genesis of the agitation against the setting up of thermal power plant in Padubidri dates back to early 90s. In fact, the Udupi Power Corporation Limited has had a long tryst with opposition and resistance. The fiasco surrounding the fast undertaken by Vishwesha Tirtha Swami of Pejawar Math to support the cause of the agitators sums up quite efficiently why the agitation has failed all these years.

Nandikur had been identified as a possible spot for the setting up of an international airport in the 80s. However, the dream of the airport could not take wings because of the lackadaisical approach of certain political heavyweights of the region. Subsequently NTPC made a futile bid to set foot in the region. This was followed by the entry of Cogentrix, a power major from the USA. People’s resistance and ligitation forced them out.

However, the Nagarjun Company, an Andhra-based firm, achieved what others could not. Despite all the opposition it has been able to execute its ambitious plan of setting up a thermal power project. The plant, under the name of UPCL, has commenced functioning although presently it is operating at just 50 per cent of its 1100 mega watt generation capacity.

Despite the inconveniences caused to the locals in Padubidri by the UPCL, the company has been able to operationalise its project speaks volumes about the patronage it enjoyed from the government. Although there have been a number of agitations against the power plant, the government had been able to quell the unrest by using police force. The Nandikur Jana Jagruthi Samithi has been spearheading an ideological war against the project. At the same time organisations like Raitha Sangha and Hasiru Sene have tried to infuse new energy to the movement over the last two three years. However, these organistations have been found wanting when it comes to commitment to the cause at hand.

Once the UPCL started its operation, the people started feeling the heat. The water in the wells became salty. The skies were filled with thick smoke and the women engaged in horticulture started to complain about their crops being affected. Naturally, the tell-tale signs of pollution led to the outburst of pent up anger. The people started questioning the integrity of Pejawar Swamiji, who had been periodically issuing warnings to the Government on the adverse impact of the project on environment.

In order to contain the raging acrimony, the district in-charge minister V.S. Acharya adopted the time-tested delaying tactics. He set up a committee to study the impact of the project on water, air and land. There were two experts in the panel, handpicked by Swamiji namely T.V Ramachandra and Prof. Y.B. Ramakrishna. Deputy commissioner, experts from MIT and NITK were other members of the 7-member panel. The panel also had an expert chosen by Dr. Acharya whose brief was to “protect the interest of the company”.

The panel did not meet even once before the members of the public openly aired their anguish. The first task was to carry out a survey. Although the panel fixed dates several time, it got delayed on flimsy grounds. It appeared as though the government did not want a survey to be carried out at all. However, when public started mounting pressure on the Government, the panel got into overdrive. In a matter of just 45 days, the survey was completed, a public meeting was held and as many as 1036 petitions, both oral and written, were collected.

Just when the panel was about to submit its report, word spread that some part of the report had been leaked to the press. In another couple of days, the report was published in a leading daily. Two experts said to be loyal to Pejawar Swamiji were removed from the panel overnight on the pretext that they had a role in the leaking the report. The seer considered it to be an insult to him and he raised the issue with chief minister D.V. Sadananada Gowda directly.

Mr. Gowda, who was preoccupied with issues like Sullia incident and the dissidence activities of B.S. Yeddyurappa camp, could not mollify the seer, who got further agitated when he was asked to resolve the issue by holding talks with Acharya, who had by now emerged as a strong votary of the power project.

Although Acharya, in all other matters, behaved like the de facto shishya of Pejawar, the two have been at loggerheads on the UPCL row. Fully aware of the Acharya’s stand on the issue, the seer declared that he was going on a three-day fast from January 8. The efforts by RSS leaders and Swamiji’s disciples to contact the chief minister did not succeed. The announcement hit the chord with the organisations who were protesting against the project. Esha Vittaladasa Swamiji of Kemaru Sandhipini Math also declared his support. Interestingly, the Subrahmanya Math pontiff Sugunendra Tirtha, who had arrived at the Durga Parameshwari temple to discuss the controversy surrounding the Paryaya also declared his support to the fast.

In the meanwhile, efforts by Dr. Acharya to persuade Swamiji to renege on his fast did not succeed. The minister also tried to convince the seer that the problem can be solved if more land is provided to the UPCL to set up an ash pond and manage the waste in a scientific way. However, the seer did not budge and amidst the stalemate, Pejawar started his fast. The key demand of the seer was that the two sacked members should be reinstated and the full-fledged committee should submit its report in 15 days.

The fast evoked widespread support and a number of social organisations and activists joined the stir. Mr. Acharya, who was frightened by the widespread support, tried to pressurize Pejawar to back out. He continued to hold parleys with the seer, but refused to climb down from the declared position. In the meantime, former Energy Minister and the BJP State President K.S. Eshwarappa tried to mediate between the government and the agitating seer. The BJP leader succeeded in his mission and the three-day fast ended inside 26 hours.

Pejawar, who had become a laughing stock for changing his stance quite frequently on the issue, once again exhibited his double standards. Even before he secured any concrete assurances from the government, he withdrew his fast much to the disappointment of the leaders and workers of anti-UPCL organisations. As per the formula worked out during the compromise talks, the government will set up a task force which will give weekly updates after conducting a survey of the project area. The government will fill the two vacancies in the panel after getting four nominations from the seer. The somersault by the Pejawar seer has left the activists and the citizens of Padubidri baffled.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
January 26,2020

During last couple of decades we have been witnessing the coming up of various statues in different parts of the country. There is diverse political logic and different set of political tendencies for erecting these statues. When Mayawati was UP CM, she got multiple of her own statues made, in addition to many statues of major dalit icons, irrespective of the criticism against that act. As per her strategy it was a symbol of identity of dalit assertion. The biggest statue to come up was that of Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel, a lifelong Congressman, whom RSS combine is trying to appropriate. This statue of Unity was ‘Made in China’. The clever trick was that the same forces were behind this statue, which was banned by Patel in the aftermath of Gandhi murder. Interestingly while currently BJP is blaming Congress for Partition of India, ironically it was Sardar Patel who was in the committee which gave final stamp of approval for the partition of India.

There is also a talk in UP, where the Ram temple campaign yielded rich electoral dividends for BJP, to have tallest statue of Lord Ram in Ayodhya. In a state where children are dying in hospitals due to lack of Oxygen cylinders, a huge budgetary allocation will be required for such project. While on statues one should also remember that in Maharashtra a tall statue of Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj is underway in Arabian Sea, near Mumbai. Only few voices of protest against it came up, e.g. that of renowned journalist, now, MP, Kumar Ketkar, whose house was vandalised for his opposing the move on the grounds that same massive amount can be utilized for welfare-development activities in the state.

On the back of this comes a comparatively low budget 114 feet tall statue of Jesus Christ in Karnataka, in Kappala hills Harobele village, where Christian pilgrims have been thronging from last several centuries. The land for this has been donated by Congress leader Shivaprasad and his brother, a Congress MP. It is planned to be carved out from a single rock. The plan of this statue is being opposed by those who have been behind most of the statue projects so far. Hindu Jagran Vedike, VHP, RSS are up in arms saying that they will not let this come up. There are various arguments cited for this opposition. It is being said that this was a place of worship of Lord Munnieshwara (a form of Lord Shiva).

More than this it is being argued that Shivakumar is trying to please his Italian boss in the party. Also that this will bring back the period of slavery of foreign rule, the colonial rule of British. As such this opposition is more in tune with the ideology of RSS combine, which has been for a statue here and a statue there. Their politics regards Christianity as a ‘foreign religion’! It is true that in Citizenship Amendment Act, they have not excluded Christianity while other religion, which they regard as ‘Foreign’ i.e. Islam. Here they are using a different logic, that the countries from where persecuted minorities are coming, are Muslim countries, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangla Desh.

In India the major targeting by RSS combine has been against Muslims, but Christians are also not spared. Starting in the decade of 1980, an intense propaganda has been going on that Christian Missionaries are converting. As RSS affiliate Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram became active in Adivasi areas, the likes of Swami Aseemanand, Swami Laxmanand and followers of Aasaram bapu spread out in Tribal areas. They started their programs to popularise Shabri and Hanuman, with congregations like Shabri Kumbh being regularly organized in these areas. The aim was to Hinduize the people in those areas.

The first major anti Christian violence came up in the ghastly form of burning alive of Pastor Graham Steward Stains along with his two minor sons Timothy and Philip. RSS affiliate Bajrang Dal's Dara Siingh aka Rajendra Pal was behind this and he is serving the life term for that. At the same time Wadhva Commission was appointed to investigate this crime which shook the country and President K.R. Narayan termed it as the one belonging to the inventory of the black deeds of human history.

The Wadhva commission report pointed out that there was no statistical significant change in the region where the pastor was working. Similarly the national figures tell us that the Christian population, if at all, has marginally declined in last five decades as per the census figures. They stand like this, percentage of Christians in population, 1971-2.60, 1981- 2.44, 1991-2.34, 2001-2.30 and 2011-2.30. There are arguments that some people are converting to Christianity but are not revealing their religion. This may be true in case of miniscule percentage of dalits, who may not reveal there conversion, as they stand to loose reservation provisions if they convert.

The anti Christian violence is scattered and is below the radar most of the places. There was massive valence in Kandhamal, Orissa, when on the pretext that Christians have murdered Swami Laxmananand, a massive violence was unleashed in 2008. On regular basis prayer meetings of Christians are attacked on the pretext that these are attempts at conversion. While there is a huge demand for the schools and colleges run by Christian groups, in Adivasis areas and remote areas the work of Swamis is on.

Now the trend is to dump Christian traditions. Since Ramnath Kovind became President, the usual practice of Carol Singers visiting Rashtrapati Bhavan has been stopped. In the army retreat so far ‘Abide with me’ by Scottish poet, Henri Francis Lyte, a Christian song, a favourite of Gandhi, has been dropped. The Christian minorities have perceived the threat in various forms. Currently they are as much part of the protests against CAA, NPR and NRIC as any other community.

While statues and identity issues cannot have primacy over the social development issues, it cannot be selective. To oppose Jesus Christ statue while spending fortunes for other statues is a part of the agenda of RSS combine, which is unfolding itself in various forms. opposition to Jesus Christ statue being yet another step in the direction.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
February 29,2020

Like most of the political phenomenon, even the practice of Nationalism is not a static one. It changes with the changing political equations of the political forces and assumes the expressions which are very diverse. As such the phenomenon of Nationalism has a long journey and various state policies in particular have used it for purposes which relate more to the power of the state ‘vis a vis’ its people, power of the state ‘vis a vis’ the neighboring countries among others.

In India there has been a certain change in the practices of the state which have transformed the meaning of Nationalism during last few years. Particularly with BJP, the Hindu Nationalist outfit gaining simple majority, it has unfolded the policies where one can discern the drastic change in the meaning and application of Nationalism in regard to its citizens, particularly those belonging to minority community, with regard to those who are liberal, and with those who stand with the concept of Human rights.

Our former Prime Minister of Dr. Manmohan Singh hit the nail on the head when he said that “Nationalism and the "Bharat Mata Ki Jai" slogan are being misused to construct a "militant and purely emotional" idea of India that excludes millions of residents and citizens. Former Prime Minister recently stated this in an apparent attack on the BJP.” The occasion was the release of a book, ‘Who is Bharat Mata’, edited by Purushottam Agarwal and Radhakrishna. This is a compilation of significant extracts from writings of Nehru, and important assessments of and contributions of Nehru by prominent personalities.

Dr. Singh went on to add "With an inimitable style…Nehru laid the foundation of the universities, academies and cultural institutions of Modern India. But for Nehru's leadership, independent India would not have become what it is today," This statement of Dr. Singh has great importance in contemporary times, as Nehru is being denigrated by Hindu nationalists for all the problems which India is facing today and attempts are on to undermine his role and glorifying Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel. This is also significant as it gives us the glimpses of what Nationalism meant for Nehru.

As Singh’s statement captures the present nationalism being practiced by BJP and company, the Hindu nationalists, immediately shot back saying that Dr. Singh is supporting the anti India activities at JNU and Jamia and his party is supporting the anti India nationalists. They asked whether Singh likes the nationalism of the likes of Shashi Tharoor or Manishankar Ayer who are provoking the Shaheen Bagh protest rather than making the protestors quiet. Whether he likes the anti national protests which go on at JNU or Jamia? As per them there is no Nationalism in Congress. One more example being cited is the private visit of Shatrughan Sinha who talked to Pakistani President during his visit there recently!

Most of the arguments being used to oppose Dr. Singh are very superficial. What is being referred to; is not opposition to Indian nationalism and its central values which were the core of anti colonial struggles. While ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’ may not be acceptable to a section of population, even the book he was releasing has the title ‘Who is Bharat Mata’. What is being stated by Singh is the twist which slogan ‘Bharat Mata ki Jai’ has been used by Hindu nationalists to frighten the religious minorities.

Indian nation came into being on the values, which later were the foundation of Indian Constitution. Indian Constitution carefully picked up the terminology which was away from the concepts of Hindu or Muslim nationalism. That’s how the country came to be called as ‘India that is Bharat’. The freedom of expression which was the hallmark of freedom movement and it was given a pride of place in our Constitution. It respected the diversity and formulated rules where the nation was not based on particular culture, as Hindu nationalists will like us to believe, but cultural diversity was centrally recognized in the Constitution. In addition promoting good relations with neighbors and other countries of the World was also part of our principles.

JNU, Jamia and AMU are being demonized as most institutions so far regard the freedom of expression as a core part of Indian democracy. These institutions have been thriving on discussions and debates which have base in liberalism. Deliberately some slogans have been constructed to defame these institutions. While Constitution mandates good relations with neighbors, creation of ‘Anti Pakistan hysteria’ is the prime motive of many a channels and sections of other media, which are servile to the ideology of ruling Government. They also violate most of the norms of ethical journalism, where the criticism of the ruling party is an important factor to keep the ruling dispensation in toes.

A stifling atmosphere has been created during last six years. In this the Prime Minster can take a detour, land in Pakistan to have a cup of tea with Pakistan PM, but a Congress leader talking to Pakistani President is a sign of being anti National. Students taking out a march while reading the preamble of Indian Constitution are labeled as anti-national; and are stopped while those openly wielding guns near Jamia or Shaheen Bagh roam freely.

Nationalism should promote amity and love of the people; it should pave the way for growth and development. Currently the nationalism which is dominant and stalking the streets has weakened the very fraternity, which is one of the pillars of our democracy. Nehru did explain that Bharat Mata is not just our mountains, rivers and land but primarily the people who inhabit the land. Which nationalism to follow was settled during the freedom movement when Muslim nationalism and Hindu nationalism were rejected by the majority of people of India in favor of the Nationalism of Gandhi, Nehru, Patel and Maulana Azad, where minorities are equal citizens, deserving affirmative action. In today’s scenario the Hindu nationalists cannot accept any criticism of their policies.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.