‘Kalladka Bhat is not interfering in local politics’ - Interview with Anwar Manippady

[email protected] (Abrar Ahmed Khan)
July 22, 2012
Anwar Manippady, Chairman, Karnataka State Minorities Commission, was recently in the news for exposing scholarship and Wakf Board scams, the latter bringing to light alleged misappropriation of Rs 200,000 crore. In this exclusive interview he speaks to Coastaldigest.com about them and other issues.

Manippady


You recently exposed some scholarship irregularities claiming that injustice has been done to minority students. Could you elaborate on that?


In Bangalore, something called as the Taj Educational Trust was formed by IAS and KAS officers. It is supposed to have been set up to train Muslim students to face IAS and KAS exams. For the purpose they had built a building at the Navbahar Makan Wakf property of about 12 acres of land in Bangalore’s Bharatinagar constituency with classrooms and library facilities. But now, there are no classrooms and hardly any classes are being conducted there. The building has been converted into a lodge in the first and second floors and the ground floor has been converted into a Shadi Mahal. In the library, I found many gunny bag bundles. When I got them opened I found lots and lots of unopened covers bearing applications addressed to the Directorate of Minorities from students for scholarships, along with affidavits and photographs. I was later told that the Directorate of Minorities had been treating this library room as a godown and from the last 4-5 years these bundles were being stored at the place.

If students are not eligible for the scholarship, it is the duty of the Directorate to write back to them and inform them about it. But forget about responding back to students, they had not even opened the covers. This shows that the scholarships have been going to people whom they decide or they must be giving some benaami names and taking the money themselves. Even now I get complaints from places like Kolar, Bhatkal and so on stating that students who had applied for scholarships have not got their money. Sadiya Sultana, the present Director of the Directorate of Minorities, Karnataka, has been indicted of manipulating Wakf property in Bidar. The Muslim bureaucrats along with the so called leaders are all hand in glove and are depriving the rights of the Muslim have-nots.

Your expose on Wakf irregularities and submission of a report to the Chief Minister on the same created quite a few ripples. Did you find irregularities in Wakf properties in Mangalore too?


In a gazette notification I found that Nadu Masjid in Bunder area of Mangalore owns 15 acres of land. It has also been registered in the records of the Wakf Board in Bangalore. I thought 15 acres in Bunder is an interesting mention as that would mean that almost one third of the entire Bunder area would belong to the mosque. When I checked with the mosque authorities I was told they own just 19 cents of land. The rest of the land has been occupied by shopkeepers.

In the coastal belt people give land as Wakf to a mosque in the form of property or land elsewhere maybe in the form of arecanut farms and so on. But the Wakf Board officials sell them to other people which is not right. According to the Supreme Court, once a Wakf property always a Wakf property, but these irregularities have taken place and Mangalore is no exception.

What is the status of the Windsor Manor Wakf property in Bangalore which you highlighted in your report?


The High Court has directed for mediation between the Wakf Board and the Hotel. In other words, it has asked for a compromise. The people who are in the Wakf Board are a bunch of jokers and they will even go for a compromise rather than trying to get back the property which belongs to the community. As per the norms, pork and wine business has no place on a Wakf property and that is what is happening at the hotel today. It would be a disgrace if the Wakf Board members contend with a compromise with the hotel. I personally feel the hotel must be converted into a high standard hospital which could benefit the community and many Muslims have expressed their support in this regard.

Why is that only Congress and JDS leaders have been named in your report? Many allege that it is a political ploy of the BJP for which you have been used…


No it is not political at all. From the last 60 years the state was ruled by the Congress. So all these years it was their leaders who were governing the Wakf Board. So there is no real substance in the allegation that only Congress and JDS leaders have been named in my report. But still, I have spoken against Mumtaz Ali Khan, who was our Wakf Minister and who happens to belong to the BJP. Even during his tenure he did not take complaints of Wakf property irregularities seriously. For instance, the Ramnagara Wakf property measuring about 7 acres where an Eidgah is also existing, has been taken over by one Timmegowda, a liquor baron. A PIL was filed and the Wakf Board won it in the High Court. It was clearly established that there was an encroachment and the government order was also in favour of the Wakf Board. The government order is with the Wakf to get back the encroached land but none of them including Mumtaz Ali Khan took action. When it came to my notice, I went there with the documents and the orders and made it clear that I want all the encroachments demolished. Tomorrow I am scheduled to visit Ramanagara and I will make sure that I myself bulldoze the encroached walls and property. I have made it clear that I want everything to be cleared in this month of Ramadan and that I would offer my Eid prayers at that very Eidgah.


True that you did take on Mumtaz Ali Khan but there is also this allegation against you that you went against him with an intention to emerge as the more powerful Muslim leader in the BJP with an eye on the ministerial berth in minority quota. How do you respond to that?


I have not gone against anyone with an eye on a ministerial berth. I have given it in writing to the Chief Minister that I am not aspiring for a minister post at all. I have made it very clear by staying away from lobbying for a minister berth in the recently formed Jagadish Shettar cabinet. Now that the cabinet formation is over and my mission of carrying out my duties as Minorities Commission chief is still on, I don’t think anybody should be making this allegation against me that I am a ministerial aspirant. My political ambition is simple – I want to complete my responsibilities as a Minority Commission chief before I think of minister-ship.

What do you have to say about the three Chief Ministerial changes and constant cabinet reshuffles in the state in the current BJP term?


Multiple changes in Chief Minister’s post is something that has happened in the Congress governments of the past too. It is the decision of the party to make changes.

Are you happy with C T Ravi being made the district in charge minister for Dakshina Kannada or do you feel that somebody from the district itself should have been given the post?


I don’t think C T Ravi being given the post of Dakshina Kannada district in charge minister is a bad move as such. The cabinet posts have been filled and since he is the nearest person from another district to Mangalore, he has been chosen for the job. He is a man who has an eye for development. In Chikmagalur too he has done a lot of development works and those have not been done to please anyone. They have been done for the people. Even the minority Muslims are happy with his work as an MLA.

The role played by RSS leader Kalladka Prabhakar Bhat in the recent Shettar cabinet formation was widely discussed following Haladi Srinivas Shetty’s remarks against him. You have in the past come out in support of Mr. Bhat in a public programme when he was being criticized for his anti-minorities speech. Now that voices are being raised against him even from within the BJP, what do you have to say?


I would say that I came out in his support in a public programme for something that he had not said. I had heard the recording of his speech and some sections of the media had published things that he had not said at all. The media misunderstood his words regarding the burqa and Muslim women. He was only saying that instead of wooing Hindu women, Muslim men should go after ladies in their own community. He said Muslim women are more beautiful than Hindu women and in this context he said that this beauty of their lies behind their veils. But some media carried reports saying that Kalladka Prabhakar Bhat had advocated opening of veils of Muslim women and so on. I stood by him because I felt he was misunderstood.

I think it would be wrong to say that Kalladka Prabhakar Bhat has been dominating and interfering in local politics. Barring Haladi Srinivas Shetty, I have not come across anyone who has said so. Yes, Haladi Srinivas Shetty may be an aggrieved party but to blame Kalladka Prabhakar Bhat for that is not right. I was in Bangalore when the cabinet formation was going on and I was keeping a close eye on all the developments because I also happen to be a spokesperson of the party. As far as I know, he has not tried to interfere in those matters at all.

A murder attempt was made on Rahim Uchil, also a leader who associates himself with the BJP, not too long ago. Are you worried about you being targeted in the future too because you associate yourself with the BJP? Have you received any threats?


The attack on Rahim Uchil was carried out by a few who are misleading the Muslims and have wronged their happiness. As far as I am concerned, I would say I am under constant threat even by individuals as I have put my hand into the property irregularities of many people. But I have not asked for any security and neither am I scared. In fact, if something happens to me, the cause for which I am fighting will get a huge boost and the Muslim community will benefit immensely. There will be a great reaction and the support for my struggle to bring the so called servants of Muslim Community to book will increase ten times than what it is now.

What else has the Commission been doing for the minorities?


Minorities Commission has got a responsibility towards the minorities in every field. The government has made many provisions for the minorities and given them lot of sops. But many officials in various departments have failed in their duty to give the minorities their due. I regularly hold reviews in an open court format with a prior announcement in the newspapers that I would be holding a review meet. I invite people with grievances to inform me and attend the meet. In the presence of media, the officers and the aggrieved people, I hold the meet. During the meet I get complaints against officials and accordingly I take steps. Because of my initiatives many officers including education officers, child welfare officers, health department officials etc have been suspended for not doing their duty. We are supposed to monitor the progress made by the respective departments as far as minorities’ development and their rights are concerned. We have been doing a good job. In fact, many people might not have been aware of the Minorities Commission until my party came to power. After we started functioning, people have come to know what the powers of the Commission are. Until we came, the Commission was just there lying dormant. But now exciting things are happening under the Commission and we would continue to keep up the good work.

Photo by Ahmed Anwar

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
August 9,2020

Contrary to present impression that Muslims are separatists due to whom the partition of India took place, the truth is that Muslims contributed to freedom movement and upheld India’s composite culture in equal measure. The partition process, mainly due to British policy of ‘divide and rule’ well assisted by Hindu and Muslim communalists is being hidden from the popular vision in India and Muslims in general are held responsible for the same. Not only that the communal historiography introduced by British to pursue their policies has become the bedrock of communal politics and worsening of the perceptions about Muslims is in progress in India.

Yet another example of this has been a series of tweets by the bureaucrat, who is close to retirement, K. Nageshwar Rao. Contrary to the service rules he has made statements, through his tweets which are appreciative of RSS-BJP and demonise the stalwarts Muslim leaders who not only contributed to the freedom movement but also later gave valuable service in laying the foundation of Independent India. As per Rao, his tweets he accuses Maulana Azad and the other Muslim Education ministers of “deracination of Hindus”. After naming “Maulana Abul Kalam Azad — 11 years (1947-58)”; “Humayun Kabir, M C Chagla & Fakruddin Ali Ahmed — 4 years (1963-67)”; and, “Nurul Hassan — 5 years (1972-77)”, he posts: “Remaining 10 years other Leftists like VKRV Rao.”

He points out that their policies were meant to “1. Deny Hindus their knowledge, 2. Vilify Hinduism as collection of superstitions, 3. Abrahamise Education, 4. Abrahamise Media & Entertainment, 5. Shame Hindus about their identity!  and 6. Bereft of the glue of Hinduism Hindu society dies.”

Then he goes on to praise RSS-BJP for bringing the glory back to Hindus. These statements of his on one hand promote the Hate and on the other tantamount to political statement, which civil servants should not by making. CPM politburo member Brinda Karat has written a letter to Home Minister Amit Shah to take suitable action against the erring bureaucrat.

Rao begins with Maulana Abul kalam Azad. Surely Azad was one of the major leaders of freedom movement, who was also the youngest President of INC, in 1923 and later between 1940 to 1945. He opposed the partition process tooth and nail till the very last. As the Congress President in 1923 he wrote a remarkable Para, symbolizing the urge for Hindu Muslim unity, “If an angel descends from heaven and offers me Swaraj in 24 hours on condition that I give up Hindu Muslim Unity, I will refuse. Swaraj we will get sooner or later; its delay will be a loss for India, but loss of Hindu Muslim unity will be a loss for human kind”. His biographer Syeda Hamid points out “He spoke without an iota of doubt about how debacle of Indian Muslims has been the result of the colossal mistakes committed by Muslim League’s misguided leadership. He exhorted Muslims to make common cause with their Hindu, Sikh, Christian fellow countrymen.” He was the one who promoted the translation of Hindu scriptures Ramayan and Mahabharat in to Persian.

Surely Mr. Rao, neither has read Azad or read about him nor knows his contributions to making of Modern India. While today, the ideological formation to which Mr. Rao seems to be pledging his commitment is critical of all that happened during Nehru era, it was during this period when as education minister Azad was shepherding the formations of IITs, Academies of Science, Lalit kala Academies. It was during this period that the efforts to promote Indian composite culture were undertaken through various steps.

The other stalwarts who are under the hammer have been outstanding scholars and giants in their own field of education. Humayun Kabir, Nurul Hasan, Dr.Zakir Husssain gave matchless ideas and practical contributions in different fields of education. One can say that contrary to the accusations, India could match up to the Computer era, software and associate things, due to creation of large manpower in these areas mainly due to these foundations which were laid down particularly in the field of education during this period.

The charge that these ‘Muslim’ education ministers white washed the bloody Islamic rule is a blind repetition of the offshoot of communal historiography introduced by British. While Kings were ruling for power and wealth, their courts had Hindus and Muslim both officers. The jaundiced vision sees this as a bloody Islamic rule but as a matter of fact the syncretic culture and traditions developed precisely this period. It was during this period that Bhakti Traidtion with Kabir, Tukaram, Namdeo, Tulsidas flourished. It was during this period that humane values of Sufi saints reached far and wide. It was during this period that poets like Rahim and Raskhan produced their classic literature n praise of Hindu Gods.

We also need to remind ourselves that large number of Muslims participated in the freedom Movement. Two scholars Shamsul Islam and Nasir Ahmad have come out with books on the myriad such freedom fighters, to recall just a few names. Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan, Zakir Hussain, Syed Mohammad Sharfuddin Kadri, Bakht Khan, Muzzafar Ahmad, Mohammad Abdir Rahman,, Abbas Ali, Asaf Ali, Yusuf Mehrali, Maulana Mazahrul Hague.

These are just a few of the names. The movement, led by Gandhi, definitely laid the foundations where composite Indian culture and respect for all religions, others’ religion was paramount and this is what created Indian fraternity, one of the values which finds its place in the preamble of Indian Constitution.

This blaming of Education ministers who were Muslims is an add-on to the process of Islamophobia in India. So for there have been many actions of Muslim kings which are selectively presented as being bloody, now the post Independent History, where glorious contributions have been made by Muslim leaders are being used to further deepen the divisive process. We need to pay respects to builders of modern India, irrespective of their religion.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
July 20,2020

As Covid 19 has created havoc all rounds, the rulers of certain countries are using it to further intensify their set agendas. The democratic freedoms are being curtailed in certain forms, the reaction to which has come in America in the form of a campaign, which is opposing “stifling” cultural climate that is imposing “ideological conformity” and weakening “norms of open debate and toleration of differences”. In India similar intimidations have been intensified. In addition the occasion has been used by the sectarian forces first to link the spread of Corona to Muslim community and now in the name of reducing the burden of curriculum certain chapters on core concepts related to Indian nationalism are being deleted from the text books.

It has been reported that chapters on federalism, citizenship, nationalism, secularism, Human Rights, Legal Aid and Local Self Government and the like are being dropped. Education has been an important area for communal forces and they constantly keep saying that leftists have dominated the curriculum content, it suffers from the impact of Macaulay, Marx and Mohammad and so needs to be Indianized. The first such attempt was done when BJP came to power in 1998 as NDA and had Murli Manohar Joshi as the MHRD minister. He brought the changes which were termed as ‘saffronization of education’. Their focus is more on social science. Some of the highlights of this were introduction of subjects like Astrology and Paurohitya, and chapters defending caste system, nationalism of the type of Hitler was praised.

With defeat of NDA in 2004, the UPA did try to rectify some of these distortions. Again after 2014 the RSS affiliates working in the area of education have been active, interacting with MHRD officials to impress upon them the need to change the curriculum matching with their Hindu nationalist agenda. Its ‘Shiksha Sanskriti Utthan Nyas’ has been asking for removal of English, Urdu words in the texts. It has asked for removal of thoughts of Rabindranath Tagore on Nationalism, extracts of autobiography of M F Husain, references to benevolence of Muslim rulers, references to BJP being Hindu party, apology of Dr. Manmohan Singh for anti Sikh pogrom of 1984, the reference to killings of Gujarat carnage in 2002 among others. This they call as Bhartiykaran of syllabus.

As RSS is a multithreaded hydra one of its pracharak Dinanath Batra has set up ‘Shiksha Bachao Abhiyan Samiti’ which has been pressurizing various publishers to drop the books which are not conforming to their ideology. One recalls their pressuring withdrawal of Wendy Doniger’s ‘The Hindus’, as it does present the ancient India through the concerns of dalits and women. Mr. Batra has already come out with a set of nine books for school curriculum, giving the RSS view of the past and RSS understanding of social sciences. These have already been translated into Gujarati and thousands of the sets of these books are being used in Gujarat Schools.

The present step of deleting parts of curriculum which gives the basics of Indian Nationalism, secularism and human rights is a further step in the same direction. These are the topics which have made the Hindu nationalists uncomfortable during last few years. They have been defaming secularism. They removed it from the preamble of Indian constitution, when they put out an ad on the eve of Republic day in 2015. From last few decades since the Ram Temple movement was brought up, simultaneously the secular ethos of India’s freedom movement and secular values of Indian constitution have been constantly criticized. Many an RSS ideologues and BJP leaders have been asking for change of Indian Constitution for this very reason.

Secularism is part of the concept of Indian nationalism. In the name of religious nationalism, sectarian divisive nationalism they have been attacking various student leaders in particular. When we study Nationalism, the very genesis of Indian nationalism tells us the plurality of our freedom movement with its anti colonial roots. The struggle was for Indian nationalism and so the Muslims and Hindu communalists kept aloof from this great struggle against colonial masters, it was this struggle which built the Indian nation with all its diversity.

Similarly as we have equal rights as citizens the chapters on citizenship are being dropped. Federalism has been the core part of India’s administrative and political structure. As the dictatorial tendencies are becoming stronger, federalism is bound to suffer and that explains the dropping of this subject. Democracy is decentralization of power. Power reaching the lowermost part of the system, the villages and average citizens. This got reflected in Local self Government. The power is distributed among villages, cities, state and center. By removing chapters on federalism and local self government, the indications of the ideology of ruling party are on display.

While we are not dealing with all the portents of the planned omissions, one more aspect that related to dropping of chapter on Human rights needs our attention. The concept of Human rights and dignity are interlinked. This concept of Human rights also has international ramifications. India is signatory to many an UN covenants related to Human rights. The indications are clear that now rights will be for the few elite and ‘duties’ for the large deprived sections will be put on the forefront.

In a way this incidental ‘Corona gifted opportunity’ to the ruling Government is being fully used to enhance the agenda of ruling party in the arena of Educational Curriculum. The part of curriculum with which the ruling party is uncomfortable is being removed. This act of omission does supplement their other acts of commission in changing the shape of educational curriculum, which are reflected in RSS affiliates’ suggestions to MHRD regarding Bhartiyakaran of contents of syllabus. As per this the things like regarding the great epics like Ramayana and Mahabharata as History, the things like India having all the stem cell technology, plastic surgery, aviation science etc. will have a place in the changes planned by communal forces!

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
January 14,2020

In the beginning of January 2020 two very disturbing events were reported from Pakistan. One was the attack on Nankana Sahib, the holy shrine where Sant Guru Nanak was born. While one report said that the place has been desecrated, the other stated that it was a fight between two Muslim groups. Prime Minister of Pakistan Imran Khan condemned the incident and the main accused Imran Chisti was arrested. The matter related to abduction and conversion of a Sikh girl Jagjit Kaur, daughter of Pathi (One who reads Holy Guru Granth Sahib in Gurudwara) of the Gurudwara. In another incident one Sikh youth Ravinder Singh, who was out on shopping for his marriage, was shot dead in Peshawar.

While these condemnable attacks took place on the Sikh minority in Pakistan, BJP was quick enough to jump to state that it is events like this which justify the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). Incidentally CAA is the Act which is discriminatory and relates to citizenship with Religion, which is not as per the norms of Indian constitution. There are constant debates and propaganda that population of Hindus has come down drastically in Pakistan and Bangla Desh. Amit Shah, the Home minister stated that in Pakistan the population of Hindus has come down from 23% at the time of partition to 3.7% at present. And in Bangla Desh it has come down from 22% to present 8%.

While not denying the fact that the religious minorities are getting a rough deal in both these countries, the figures which are presented are totally off the mark. These figures don’t take into consideration the painful migrations, which took place at the time of partition and formation of Bangla Desh later. Pakistan census figures tell a different tale. Their first census was held in 1951. As per this census the overall percentage of Non Muslim in Pakistan (East and West together) was 14.2%, of this in West Pakistan (Now Pakistan) it was 3.44 and in Eat Pakistan it was 23.2. In the census held in Pakistan 1998 it became 3.72%. As far as Bangla Desh is concerned the share of Non Muslims has gone down from 23.2 (1951) to 9.6% in 2011.

The largest minority of Pakistan is Ahmadis, (https://minorityrights.org/country/pakistan/) who are close to 4 Million and are not recognised as Muslims in Pakistan. In Bangla Desh the major migrations of Hindus from Bangla Desh took place in the backdrop of Pakistan army’s atrocities in the then East Pakistan.

As far as UN data on refugees in India it went up by 17% between 2016-2019 and largest numbers were from Tibet and Sri Lanka.  (https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publication…)

The state of minorities is in a way the index of strength of democracy. Most South Asian Countries have not been able to sustain democratic values properly. In Pakistan, the Republic began with Jinnah’s classic speech where secularism was to be central credo of Pakistan. This 11th August speech was in a way what the state policy should be, as per which people of all faiths are free to practice their religion. Soon enough the logic of ‘Two Nation theory” and formation of Pakistan, a separate state for Muslim took over. Army stepped in and dictatorship was to reign there intermittently. Democratic elements were suppressed and the worst came when Zia Ul Haq Islamized the state in collusion with Maulanas. The army was already a strong presence in Pakistan. The popular formulation for Pakistan was that it is ruled by three A’s, Army, America and Allah (Mullah).

Bangla Desh had a different trajectory. Its very formation was a nail in the coffin of ‘two nation theory’; that religion can be the basis of a state. Bangla Desh did begin as a secular republic but communal forces and secular forces kept struggling for their dominance and in 1988 it also became Islamic republic. At another level Myanmar, in the grip of military dictatorship, with democratic elements trying to retain their presence is also seeing a hard battle. Democracy or not, the army and Sanghas (Buddhist Sang has) are strong, in Myanmar as well. The most visible result is persecution of Rohingya Muslims.

Similar phenomenon is dominating in Sri Lanka also where Budhhist Sanghas and army have strong say in the political affairs, irrespective of which Government is ruling. Muslim and Christian minorities are a big victim there, while Tamils (Hindus, Christians etc.) suffered the biggest damage as ethnic and religious minorities. India had the best prospect of democracy, pluralism and secularism flourishing here. The secular constitution, the outcome of India’s freedom struggle, the leadership of Gandhi and Nehru did ensure the rooting of democracy and secularism in a strong way.

India so far had best democratic credentials amongst all the south Asian countries. Despite that though the population of minorities rose mainly due to poverty and illiteracy, their overall marginalisation was order of the day, it went on worsening with the rise of communal forces, with communal forces resorting to identity issues, and indulging in propaganda against minorities.

While other South Asian countries should had followed India to focus more on infrastructure and political culture of liberalism, today India is following the footsteps of Pakistan. The retrograde march of India is most visible in the issues which have dominated the political space during last few years. Issues like Ram Temple, Ghar Wapasi, Love Jihad, Beef-Cow are now finding their peak in CAA.

India’s reversal towards a polity with religion’s identity dominating the political scene was nicely presented by the late Pakistani poetess Fahmida Riaz in her poem, Tum bhi Hum Jaise Nikle (You also turned out to be like us). While trying to resist communal forces has been an arduous task, it is becoming more difficult by the day. This phenomenon has been variously called, Fundamentalism, Communalism or religious nationalism among others. Surely it has nothing to do with the religion as practiced by the great Saint and Sufi traditions of India; it resorts mainly to political mobilization by using religion as a tool.

Comments

Ashi
 - 
Tuesday, 14 Jan 2020

If Malaysia implement similar NRC/CAA, India and China are the loser.

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.