Mangalore’s Bohras: Blend of Modernity and Tradition

[email protected] (Abrar Ahmed Khan)
December 20, 2012
A walk around the Bhatkal Bazaar street after dusk in Mangalore’s Bunder/Kudroli area in early Muharram and one gets to listen to a few singing voices emanating from an oldish looking building. A closer peep through the window of that prayer-house, and you have scenes of men in white wearing differently looking kurtas reciting poetry in Gujarati and Urdu,  the sound produced by slapping of their palms against their chests(maatham) sounding like a background beat for the poem (marasya) being sung. The little group busy with its ‘majlis’ (gathering) is hard to spot in the populated Bunder area, just the way the community itself has been in living in Mangalore – unnoticed.

 

The minuscule Bohra community has been living in Mangalore since about three and a half centuries. Hardly possessing strength of 85-90 people, this Gujarati ghetto living in Mangalore is the only Bohra contingent one would find across the entire coastal strip of Dakshina Kannada, Udupi and Uttara Kannada districts.

 

“About 350 years ago, our ancestors came to Mangalore for trade from a place called Khambaat (Cambay) and Surat in Gujarat. That also happens to be a coastal region like Mangalore and we came here via sea route. Our people would take back roof tiles from here as Mangalore was known for its tiles back then. In return they would sell perfumes. Some of them liked Mangalore and saw business opportunity here and settled down. The Bunder area was the gateway for all the trade and even today all of us are housed in this Bunder/Kudroli area itself. There are 18 families here in Mangalore and this is the only Bohra group you will find around. We do not have any presence in Bhatkal either. Originally there were 10-12 houses but our tally grew with 4-5 additional families joining us some ten years ago. These families came for hardware business, hailing from Siddhpur in Gujarat”, says Juzer Ibrahim Kagzi, a member of the Mangalorean Bohra community and a trader at the Bibi Alabi Road.

bohra__1

bohra__2

bohra__3

bohra__4

bohra__5

bohra__6

bohra__9

bohra__10

bohra__11

bohra__12

bohra__13

bohra__14

bohra__15

bohra__17

bohra__20

bohra__19

The Bohras are predominantly traders. “Trade has always been our forte and here in Mangalore too, we are more into trade. We are a rich community worldwide. We are peace loving people and are normally not associated with violence and riots. As traders we have got adopted to Mangalore well. Although our mother tongue remains Gujarati, we speak Beary, Tulu, Kannada, Malayalam etc with ease. However, one finds many Arabic words mixed in our Gujarati and that way our language is slightly different from the one spoken by Gujarati Hindus”, says Mr. Kagzi.

 

A look at the calendar at Mr. Kagzi’s shop and one gets to see a glimpse of the Gujarati connection that the community has. The calendar with Gujarati text and numerals, referred to as the ‘Misri’ calendar, is of great importance to Bohras. “We only follow the Misri calendar. Although the months and dates are Hijri dates, the calendar is called ‘Misri’ because of its Egyptian link. Egyptians were expert astronomers and we refer to this calendar in terms of the change of months etc unlike others for whom sighting of the moon is of greater importance. That is the reason why there is no question of 29 fasts in Ramadan for us. Our Ramadan is of complete 30 days and we celebrate Eid on the very day of Eid mentioned in the Misri calendar. However, one must not confuse Arab tradition as being different from the Egyptian tradition. At the time of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), Egypt was part of the larger Arab landscape”, reveals Mr. Kagzi.

 

The entire Bohra community in Mangalore belongs to the Dawoodi Bohra clan. A noteworthy feature of the community is its effort in maintaining a distinct identity and bonding. Says Musthansir, Secretary, Bohra Association, Mangalore: “As a community, we Bohras give a lot of importance to brotherhood and remaining organized. Many Bohra students from other parts of the world, especially from the African continent come down to Mangalore and Manipal to study. Our Bohra organizational structure is such that each of those students or any Bohra coming down to our place here will first find out where the Bohra community centre is. Our prayer sessions and ‘majlis’ sessions are such that it is mandatory for each and every Bohra to attend them. No Bohra goes away without coming in contact with us. Besides, all Bohras around the world have an ‘E-Jamaath Card’ with them as a common identity proof. No matter which part of the world he may be in, a scan of his E-Jamaath Card and his entire bio data will be available. This system was introduced 10 years ago. Our community is completely computerized. Our headquarters which provides us these identity cards is in Mumbai”.

 

That apart, another interesting system in place in the Bohra society is the supply of food for all Bohra families from a common centre. “We Bohras do not cook food except on Sundays. We get food from the community centre. In every Bohra society all around the world, this system has now come into force. We have a community centre here in Mangalore too called Faizul Burhaniyya, from where food is supplied to all Bohra families living in the city. Each family places its tiffin boxes at the centre and they are returned back full of food. Normally breakfast and dinner needs are fulfilled through this system. Since most of us are traders, we have lunch outside. But otherwise, it is the food that comes from the centre that we all eat”, says Mr. Musthansir.

 

The Bohras of Mangalore love their food. “We are passionate eaters. We have a royal breakfast and a good dinner. The lunch is rather light. From kheemas, omlettes, jam and chapattis to a host of other delicious dishes, our breakfast is normally heavy. We believe that the morning food intake has to be a heavy one”, grins Mr. Kagzi. Appetite apart, the Bohras hold values and traditions of dining in high esteem. “We take food keeping the Sunnah (method) of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) in mind. We sit together and eat in one Thaal (plate). Not a single grain of food is to be left alone and thrown into the wash basin. Salt and head covering are inseparable aspects of our dining. The first thing to be tasted is salt and so should be the case at the end. No Bohra will eat without the topi (cap) on his head. When someone eats without a topi and without salt, we consider it inferior in our circles. Also, you are not likely to find a Bohra without a beard. We develop a sense of tradition among our children this way”, discloses Mr. Kagzi.

 

The ‘topi’ or the skull caps that Bohras wear also have some distinctness about them. All Bohras wear a white uniform styled topi with a unique design accentuated with the borders made of either golden or silver threads. “The topi is one of our objects of identity. We can recognize a Bohra merely with the topi’, says Mr. Kagzi. Another distinct attire worn by Bohras is the white overcoat called as the ‘Imaami Libaas’. “The ‘Imaami Libaas’ is worn by Bohras on special prayer meetings. We generally wear white ‘Imaami Libaas’ as Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) liked white. Likewise, in all major important events like weddings, festivals, funerals etc, it is mandatory for us to wear the ‘Imaami Libaas’. You will not find Bohras wearing suits etc in weddings. Generally no pants or jeans are entertained with the ‘Imaami Libaas’. It is always the traditional ‘Izaar’. We keep stitching new Imaami Libaas for ourselves. Men would have 15-20 Imaami Libaas dresses with them. Other than that, on the occasion of Shab-e-Baraat, and Lailat-ul-Qadr, we make it a point that we pray on these nights wearing new clothes. We always keep separate clothes for ‘Namaaz’. The women too have dozens of traditional clothes with them. Unlike the usual burkha, they wear what is called as the ‘Rida’. The Ridas are expensive. Our women generally do not prefer black. They go for other colours. Some women will possess about a hundred Ridas”, says he.

 

Bohra women also visit the masjid to offer prayers. “There is no restriction on women. They will have a separate section to pray in the prayer house. It is not compulsory for them to come but they are not stopped from visiting the prayer house”, says Mr. Musthansir.

 

The Mangalorean Bohra community prays in a 350 year old prayer house located in the Bunder/Kudroli area. A priest, referred to as ‘Janaab Saheb’ by the Bohras, leads prayers and ‘majlis’ meetings. “The ‘Janaab Saheb’ is revered greatly by us. He is appointed and sent by the head of the community called as the ‘Daai-e-Mutlaq’. He takes care of the Imaamat responsibilities besides teaching our children Quran and other aspects of religion”, adds Mr. Musthansir.

 

For a community with apparent leanings towards the Shia school of thought, the month of Muharram is of great significance to Bohras. The Islamic new year on the first day of Muharram is celebrated in a grand way. “The Islamic new year is a pompous affair in Bohra circles. That day, we will have about 50 dishes on our dining menu comprising of samosas, cutlets, sweets, fruits, meat, curds, fish etc. The idea behind this is that we ask Allah to feed us throughout the year with all his different bounties”, says Mr. Kagzi. A key aspect for Bohras is that the fish brought from the market must be alive. “It is only after we touch it saying Bismillah (In the name of Allah) does it become Halaal (permissible) to eat. The fishermen wait for this opportunity and sell live fish to us at a high price that day because they know we will be coming for it”, jokes Mr. Kagzi. The first day of Muharram apart, ‘majlis’ sessions are held everyday at the prayer house for ten days and on the tenth day (ashura), the day on which Hazrath Imaam Hussain (ra), the grandson of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was martyred, a procession is taken out along the streets of Bunder wherein all members of the local Bohra community participate.

 

Although based in Mangalore for long, one does not find Bohras having matrimonial alliances with other Muslim communities in the region like the Bearys or even the Katchi Memon family in Mangalore which also has Gujarati roots. “We look for alliances in our own circles from other cities like Hyderabad, Secunderabad, Mumbai, Surat etc”, says Mr. Kagzi.

 

Mangalore has always been known for its multi-culturalism. The Bohra community too has over the years been a part of this multi-ethnic mixture of ingredients, with its little ‘Gujju’ flavour, and continues to be so.



Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
March 14,2020

In the wake of Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) UN High Commissioner, Michele Bachelet, has filed an intervention in the Supreme Court petition challenging the constitutionality of the Citizenship Amendment Act, as she is critical of CAA. Responding to her, India’s Foreign Minister S. Jai Shanker strongly rebutted her criticism, saying that the body (UNHCR) has been wrong and is blind to the problem of cross border terrorism. The issue on hand is the possibility of scores of people, mainly Muslims, being declared as stateless. The problem at hand is the massive exercise of going through the responses/documents from over 120 crore of Indian population and screening documents, which as seen in Assam, yield result which are far from truthful or necessary.

The issue of CAA has been extensively debated and despite heavy critique of the same by large number of groups and despite the biggest mass opposition ever to any move in Independent India, the Government is determined on going ahead with an exercise which is reminiscent of the dreaded regimes which are sectarian and heartless to its citizens, which have indulged in extinction of large mass of people on grounds of citizenship, race etc. The Foreign minister’s assertion is that it is a matter internal to India, where India’s sovereignty is all that matters! As far as sovereignty is concerned we should be clear that in current times any sovereign power has to consider the need to uphold the citizenship as per the principle of non-discrimination which is stipulated in Art.26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political (ICCPR) rights.

Can such policies, which affect large number of people and are likely to affect their citizenship be purely regarded as ‘internal’? With the World turning into a global village, some global norms have been formulated during last few decades. The norms relate to Human rights and migrations have been codified. India is also signatory to many such covenants in including ICCPR, which deals with the norms for dealing with refugees from other countries. One is not talking of Chicago speech of Swami Vivekanand, which said that India’s greatness has been in giving shelter to people from different parts of the World; one is also not talking of the Tattariaya Upanishad’s ‘Atithi Devovhav’ or ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbkam’ from Mahaupanishad today.

What are being talked about are the values and opinions of organizations which want to ensure to preserve of Human rights of all people Worldwide. In this matter India is calling United Nations body as ‘foreign party’; having no locus standi in the case as it pertains to India’s sovereignty. The truth is that since various countries are signatories to UN covenants, UN bodies have been monitoring the moves of different states and intervening at legal level as Amicus (Friend of the Court) to the courts in different countries and different global bodies. Just to mention some of these, UN and High Commissioner for Human Rights has often submitted amicus briefs in different judicial platforms. Some examples are their intervention in US Supreme Court, European Court of Human Rights, International Criminal Court, and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. These are meant to help the Courts in areas where UN bodies have expertise.

 Expertise on this has been jointly formulated by various nations. These interventions also remind the nations as to what global norms have been evolved and what are the obligations of individual states to the values which have evolved over a period of time. Arvind Narrain draws our attention to the fact that, “commission has intervened in the European Court of Human Rights in cases involving Spain and Italy to underscore the principle of non-refoulement, which bars compulsory expulsion of illegal migrants… Similarly, the UN has intervened in the International Criminal Court in a case against the Central African Republic to explicate on the international jurisprudence on rape as a war crime.”

From time to time organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have been monitoring the status of Human rights of different countries. This puts those countries in uncomfortable situation and is not welcome by those establishments. How should this contradiction between ‘internal matter’, ‘sovereignty’ and the norms for Human rights be resolved? This is a tough question at the time when the freedom indices and democratic ethos are sliding downwards all over the world. In India too has slid down on the scale of these norms.

In India we can look at the intervention of UN body from the angle of equality and non discrimination. Democratic spirit should encourage us to have a rethink on the matters which have been decided by the state. In the face of the greatest mass movement of Shaheen bagh, the state does need to look inwards and give a thought to international morality, the spirit of global family to state the least.

The popular perception is that when Christians were being persecuted in Kandhmal the global Christian community’s voice was not strong enough. Currently in the face of Delhi carnage many a Muslim majority countries have spoken. While Mr. Modi claims that his good relations with Muslim countries are a matter of heartburn to the parties like Congress, he needs to relook at his self gloating. Currently Iran, Malaysia, Indonesia and many Muslim majority countries have spoken against what Modi regime is unleashing in India. Bangladesh, our neighbor, has also seen various protests against the plight of Muslims in India. More than the ‘internal matter’ etc. what needs to be thought out is the moral aspect of the whole issue. We pride ourselves in treading the path of morality. What does that say in present context when while large section of local media is servile to the state, section of global media has strongly brought forward what is happening to minorities in India.   

The hope is that Indian Government wakes up to its International obligations, to the worsening of India’s image in the World due to CAA and the horrific violence witnessed in Delhi.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
August 9,2020

Contrary to present impression that Muslims are separatists due to whom the partition of India took place, the truth is that Muslims contributed to freedom movement and upheld India’s composite culture in equal measure. The partition process, mainly due to British policy of ‘divide and rule’ well assisted by Hindu and Muslim communalists is being hidden from the popular vision in India and Muslims in general are held responsible for the same. Not only that the communal historiography introduced by British to pursue their policies has become the bedrock of communal politics and worsening of the perceptions about Muslims is in progress in India.

Yet another example of this has been a series of tweets by the bureaucrat, who is close to retirement, K. Nageshwar Rao. Contrary to the service rules he has made statements, through his tweets which are appreciative of RSS-BJP and demonise the stalwarts Muslim leaders who not only contributed to the freedom movement but also later gave valuable service in laying the foundation of Independent India. As per Rao, his tweets he accuses Maulana Azad and the other Muslim Education ministers of “deracination of Hindus”. After naming “Maulana Abul Kalam Azad — 11 years (1947-58)”; “Humayun Kabir, M C Chagla & Fakruddin Ali Ahmed — 4 years (1963-67)”; and, “Nurul Hassan — 5 years (1972-77)”, he posts: “Remaining 10 years other Leftists like VKRV Rao.”

He points out that their policies were meant to “1. Deny Hindus their knowledge, 2. Vilify Hinduism as collection of superstitions, 3. Abrahamise Education, 4. Abrahamise Media & Entertainment, 5. Shame Hindus about their identity!  and 6. Bereft of the glue of Hinduism Hindu society dies.”

Then he goes on to praise RSS-BJP for bringing the glory back to Hindus. These statements of his on one hand promote the Hate and on the other tantamount to political statement, which civil servants should not by making. CPM politburo member Brinda Karat has written a letter to Home Minister Amit Shah to take suitable action against the erring bureaucrat.

Rao begins with Maulana Abul kalam Azad. Surely Azad was one of the major leaders of freedom movement, who was also the youngest President of INC, in 1923 and later between 1940 to 1945. He opposed the partition process tooth and nail till the very last. As the Congress President in 1923 he wrote a remarkable Para, symbolizing the urge for Hindu Muslim unity, “If an angel descends from heaven and offers me Swaraj in 24 hours on condition that I give up Hindu Muslim Unity, I will refuse. Swaraj we will get sooner or later; its delay will be a loss for India, but loss of Hindu Muslim unity will be a loss for human kind”. His biographer Syeda Hamid points out “He spoke without an iota of doubt about how debacle of Indian Muslims has been the result of the colossal mistakes committed by Muslim League’s misguided leadership. He exhorted Muslims to make common cause with their Hindu, Sikh, Christian fellow countrymen.” He was the one who promoted the translation of Hindu scriptures Ramayan and Mahabharat in to Persian.

Surely Mr. Rao, neither has read Azad or read about him nor knows his contributions to making of Modern India. While today, the ideological formation to which Mr. Rao seems to be pledging his commitment is critical of all that happened during Nehru era, it was during this period when as education minister Azad was shepherding the formations of IITs, Academies of Science, Lalit kala Academies. It was during this period that the efforts to promote Indian composite culture were undertaken through various steps.

The other stalwarts who are under the hammer have been outstanding scholars and giants in their own field of education. Humayun Kabir, Nurul Hasan, Dr.Zakir Husssain gave matchless ideas and practical contributions in different fields of education. One can say that contrary to the accusations, India could match up to the Computer era, software and associate things, due to creation of large manpower in these areas mainly due to these foundations which were laid down particularly in the field of education during this period.

The charge that these ‘Muslim’ education ministers white washed the bloody Islamic rule is a blind repetition of the offshoot of communal historiography introduced by British. While Kings were ruling for power and wealth, their courts had Hindus and Muslim both officers. The jaundiced vision sees this as a bloody Islamic rule but as a matter of fact the syncretic culture and traditions developed precisely this period. It was during this period that Bhakti Traidtion with Kabir, Tukaram, Namdeo, Tulsidas flourished. It was during this period that humane values of Sufi saints reached far and wide. It was during this period that poets like Rahim and Raskhan produced their classic literature n praise of Hindu Gods.

We also need to remind ourselves that large number of Muslims participated in the freedom Movement. Two scholars Shamsul Islam and Nasir Ahmad have come out with books on the myriad such freedom fighters, to recall just a few names. Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan, Zakir Hussain, Syed Mohammad Sharfuddin Kadri, Bakht Khan, Muzzafar Ahmad, Mohammad Abdir Rahman,, Abbas Ali, Asaf Ali, Yusuf Mehrali, Maulana Mazahrul Hague.

These are just a few of the names. The movement, led by Gandhi, definitely laid the foundations where composite Indian culture and respect for all religions, others’ religion was paramount and this is what created Indian fraternity, one of the values which finds its place in the preamble of Indian Constitution.

This blaming of Education ministers who were Muslims is an add-on to the process of Islamophobia in India. So for there have been many actions of Muslim kings which are selectively presented as being bloody, now the post Independent History, where glorious contributions have been made by Muslim leaders are being used to further deepen the divisive process. We need to pay respects to builders of modern India, irrespective of their religion.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
January 26,2020

During last couple of decades we have been witnessing the coming up of various statues in different parts of the country. There is diverse political logic and different set of political tendencies for erecting these statues. When Mayawati was UP CM, she got multiple of her own statues made, in addition to many statues of major dalit icons, irrespective of the criticism against that act. As per her strategy it was a symbol of identity of dalit assertion. The biggest statue to come up was that of Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel, a lifelong Congressman, whom RSS combine is trying to appropriate. This statue of Unity was ‘Made in China’. The clever trick was that the same forces were behind this statue, which was banned by Patel in the aftermath of Gandhi murder. Interestingly while currently BJP is blaming Congress for Partition of India, ironically it was Sardar Patel who was in the committee which gave final stamp of approval for the partition of India.

There is also a talk in UP, where the Ram temple campaign yielded rich electoral dividends for BJP, to have tallest statue of Lord Ram in Ayodhya. In a state where children are dying in hospitals due to lack of Oxygen cylinders, a huge budgetary allocation will be required for such project. While on statues one should also remember that in Maharashtra a tall statue of Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj is underway in Arabian Sea, near Mumbai. Only few voices of protest against it came up, e.g. that of renowned journalist, now, MP, Kumar Ketkar, whose house was vandalised for his opposing the move on the grounds that same massive amount can be utilized for welfare-development activities in the state.

On the back of this comes a comparatively low budget 114 feet tall statue of Jesus Christ in Karnataka, in Kappala hills Harobele village, where Christian pilgrims have been thronging from last several centuries. The land for this has been donated by Congress leader Shivaprasad and his brother, a Congress MP. It is planned to be carved out from a single rock. The plan of this statue is being opposed by those who have been behind most of the statue projects so far. Hindu Jagran Vedike, VHP, RSS are up in arms saying that they will not let this come up. There are various arguments cited for this opposition. It is being said that this was a place of worship of Lord Munnieshwara (a form of Lord Shiva).

More than this it is being argued that Shivakumar is trying to please his Italian boss in the party. Also that this will bring back the period of slavery of foreign rule, the colonial rule of British. As such this opposition is more in tune with the ideology of RSS combine, which has been for a statue here and a statue there. Their politics regards Christianity as a ‘foreign religion’! It is true that in Citizenship Amendment Act, they have not excluded Christianity while other religion, which they regard as ‘Foreign’ i.e. Islam. Here they are using a different logic, that the countries from where persecuted minorities are coming, are Muslim countries, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangla Desh.

In India the major targeting by RSS combine has been against Muslims, but Christians are also not spared. Starting in the decade of 1980, an intense propaganda has been going on that Christian Missionaries are converting. As RSS affiliate Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram became active in Adivasi areas, the likes of Swami Aseemanand, Swami Laxmanand and followers of Aasaram bapu spread out in Tribal areas. They started their programs to popularise Shabri and Hanuman, with congregations like Shabri Kumbh being regularly organized in these areas. The aim was to Hinduize the people in those areas.

The first major anti Christian violence came up in the ghastly form of burning alive of Pastor Graham Steward Stains along with his two minor sons Timothy and Philip. RSS affiliate Bajrang Dal's Dara Siingh aka Rajendra Pal was behind this and he is serving the life term for that. At the same time Wadhva Commission was appointed to investigate this crime which shook the country and President K.R. Narayan termed it as the one belonging to the inventory of the black deeds of human history.

The Wadhva commission report pointed out that there was no statistical significant change in the region where the pastor was working. Similarly the national figures tell us that the Christian population, if at all, has marginally declined in last five decades as per the census figures. They stand like this, percentage of Christians in population, 1971-2.60, 1981- 2.44, 1991-2.34, 2001-2.30 and 2011-2.30. There are arguments that some people are converting to Christianity but are not revealing their religion. This may be true in case of miniscule percentage of dalits, who may not reveal there conversion, as they stand to loose reservation provisions if they convert.

The anti Christian violence is scattered and is below the radar most of the places. There was massive valence in Kandhamal, Orissa, when on the pretext that Christians have murdered Swami Laxmananand, a massive violence was unleashed in 2008. On regular basis prayer meetings of Christians are attacked on the pretext that these are attempts at conversion. While there is a huge demand for the schools and colleges run by Christian groups, in Adivasis areas and remote areas the work of Swamis is on.

Now the trend is to dump Christian traditions. Since Ramnath Kovind became President, the usual practice of Carol Singers visiting Rashtrapati Bhavan has been stopped. In the army retreat so far ‘Abide with me’ by Scottish poet, Henri Francis Lyte, a Christian song, a favourite of Gandhi, has been dropped. The Christian minorities have perceived the threat in various forms. Currently they are as much part of the protests against CAA, NPR and NRIC as any other community.

While statues and identity issues cannot have primacy over the social development issues, it cannot be selective. To oppose Jesus Christ statue while spending fortunes for other statues is a part of the agenda of RSS combine, which is unfolding itself in various forms. opposition to Jesus Christ statue being yet another step in the direction.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.