Why do they resort to mockery of the Prophet?

[email protected] (Sharafuddin B S)
December 22, 2012

We hear about the blasphemy and mockery of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) at certain intervals. This is not a new phenomenon but happened all the time throughout the ages. Moreover, this kind of mockery is not limited to Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) alone. It also happened to many other revered Prophets who came before him, especially in the history of Jews, who tried to crucify Jesus Christ (pbuh), killed John the Baptist and others.

muhammadOne such effort is done very recently by some very insignificant people in USA, which created huge uproar in many parts of the world. They produced a malicious and blasphemous film ‘Innocence of Muslims’. The mastermind of this renewed blasphemy was an Egypt-born Coptic Christian, who is an illegal immigrant in USA. He along with one hundred Jews, collected some money, produced a very substandard film and posted in YouTube, which is available for free for anyone to propagate anything they want.

The irony is that these kinds of malicious materials are widely tolerated by many modern countries - which claim to be democratic and free countries - under the pretext of freedom of opinion.

Is this Freedom of Opinion?

In fact there is a clear line between freedom of opinion and blasphemy. Freedom of opinion is to express something candid, good, bad or different view point openly. Islam too advocates and respects freedom of opinion. The Quranic verse, “Allah does not like the public mention of evil except by the one who has been oppressed,” (4: 148) hints that if a person is oppressed, he can even pronounce the evil talk in public. This is just an example to see to what extent Islam gives and encourages freedom of opinion.

Meanwhile, if someone approaches you and abuses your father, or any other respectable personality by saying that he was a womanizer, an oppressor, a child molester and makes a fictitious film depicting the same and supplies it to the masses through various media, will you tolerate him for the sake of freedom of opinion?

Surely, this will not remain in the parameter of freedom of opinion; it is called blasphemy and generally not tolerated by anyone in a civilised society. Tolerating blasphemy is not tantamount to respecting freedom of opinion.

There are laws against blasphemy in every country and there are several instances of applying these laws. Even during the cases of blasphemy against Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) in the past, laws of blasphemy were implemented. When controversial writer Salman Rushdie wrote ‘Satanic Verses’, many non-Muslim countries banned it even before Penguin could release this ill-intended book in several countries. India, a country with non-Muslim majority too banned it when it was about to be published in its land. Khushwant Singh, then resident editor of Penguin Publications in India, who is known for his ‘Gossip Sweet and Sour’ columns also had recommended banning this book in India.

It is very important for any country to utilise the available laws against blasphemy and to develop strong laws against blasphemy as it is a very counter-productive to the society and countries. There is no contribution towards knowledge, logic, literature or progressive thinking in this kind of blasphemous works. The sole intention of it is to provoke people and to create chaos in the society.

Why do They Make Mockery?

Question arises why these people often resort to blasphemy of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) in particular? God forbid, every time in this kind of blasphemous works Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is portrayed as a molester, a womaniser, an oppressor, a terrorist and so on. Similar is the case with the infamous Danish cartoons, which had caused global uproar a few years ago.

Probably, a SWOT analysis of the Muslim community to ascertain the reason behind this blasphemy will lead us to some better conclusions.

Strengths of Muslims

Without exaggeration, some of strengths which Muslim community possesses are seldom there in any other communities of the world. One of the strength is that they have the only book of guidance which cannot be distorted. It’s a fact that none of the divine Scriptures which came before Quran is available today in a secured and undistorted form. You will not find any book which is an accurate book of guidance as Quran. It is also protected in the hearts of hundreds of thousands of people around the world, who have committed complete Quran into their memory, as Quran says: “We have certainly sent down the dhikr (Quran) and we will surely guard it” (15: 9).

quranThis is a biggest strength of Muslims because through this they always remain rightly guided. No one can say anything against Quran based on knowledge and logic. Probably this is one of the reasons, trouble mongers resort to the cowardice act of mockery of the Prophet (pbuh), as Quran came through him (pbuh) in the form of revelation.

Another strength of Muslim community is the ‘Shariah’ - the rules and regulations of Islam developed on the basis of Quran and traditions of Prophet Mohammad (pbuh). Major part of the Quran is all about rules and regulations for human life. It gives broader and illustrative rules and regulations about a believer’s private life, social life, transactions, social fabric, marriages, divorce, and distribution of assets and so on. Moreover, for every small act and every aspect of life there is detailed guidance and illustration in Islam. You will not find this kind of detailed rules and regulations in any religion. Due to this fact, constitutions of a few non-Muslim countries too allow their Muslim population to follow their own personal-laws based on Shariah. Whereas many non-Muslim communities develop their own rules and regulations for marriage, divorce and other civil rights which undergoes amendments and changes whenever they see flaws in it. But in Islam there are set of Quranic rules and regulations which are constant and unchangeable.

Resurgence of Islam

It is an obvious truth that despite the global media’s organised propaganda against Islam, there is a great deal of curiosity and attraction towards Islam across the world. Even though hundreds of anti-Islamic books are hitting the market every day and huge activities are underway to wage propaganda war against Islam throughout the world, today Islam has emerged as the biggest “practiced religion” and “fastest growing faith” in the world.

It is worth mentioning here that there were efforts to abolish the religious identity of Muslims several times in history in many countries. However, it so happened that there was religious awakening and resurgence after sometime. We may see such examples in Russia and its adjacent countries which were once part of USSR, and European countries like Bosnia, Turkey and elsewhere. Today, hundreds of thousands of Muslim gather for Eid Prayers in Moscow, where Muslim identity was once eliminated. Hundreds of thousands of peaceful demonstrators turned up in recent protest in Turkey against blasphemy of the Prophet (pbuh). This was a proof for the allegiance of people towards Islam.

moscow

Today, thousands of Muslims gather for Eid Prayers in Moscow, where Muslim identity was once eliminated.

At the time of Ottoman Empire, Turks had a close connection with Arabic language. However, the successive regime of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, not only banished Arabic language, but also tried to eliminate Islamic identity. In spite of this, people of Modern Turkey are turning towards Islam in great number and showing keen interest in practice of religion.

In fact, global Muslims do not have an organised way of missionary activities to convey the message of Islam compared to missionary activities of Christians and other ideologies. There are a few individual ‘Dayees’ (preachers) performing their mission here and there. However, Islam is considered as the fasted growing religion in most of the non-Muslim majority countries. In the West during the last fifty years, the growth of Muslim population is more than 200%. Disturbed by this development, some of the western countries are thinking of banning minarets of the masjids and prohibiting niqab (veil) and hijab in order to discourage the spread of Islam.

On the other hand a considerable number of great personalities and celebrities from different fields are constantly coming to the fold of Islam. British singer, songwriter and Pop icon Cat Stevens, at the zenith of his stardom became a Muslim and is now known as Yousuf Islam, a popular Muslim activist. British journalist and war-correspondent Yvonne Ridley, best known for her capture by the Taliban in the battlefield of Afghanistan, accepted Islam after reading Quran, and now actively spreading her thoughts about Islam. Canadian scholar of linguistics Dr Thomas Ballantine Irving, not only accepted Islam, but also translated the noble Quran. Eminent French medical scientist Dr. Maurice Bucaille, who is known for his masterpiece “The Bible, The Qur'an and Science”, accepted Islam and proved the divinity of Quran through modern science. These are mere a few well-known names, among hundreds of prominent personalities who came to the fold of Islam in recent years.

yvonne_Ridley

British journalist Yvonne Ridley, best known for her capture by the Taliban in the battlefield of Afghanistan, accepted Islam after reading Quran.

Inspiring Personality

The personality of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) itself is a strength of Muslims. Western scholar Michel H. Hart’s masterpiece ‘The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History’, a book written after extensive unbiased research, declares Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) as the most influential personality in the history. Sir Isaac Newton and Jesus Christ (pbuh) are placed in the second and third position respectively in his book. Newton was born in the 17th century AD while Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was born in the 7th century AD. According to Michal H. Hart, from 7th century to 17th century AD you will not find anyone who is as influential as Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). Interestingly the researcher Michal H. Hart was neither a follower of Prophet (pbuh) nor a Muslim.

The history of Arabia and Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is indeed astonishing. In the 7th century AD there were two super powers - the Roman Empire and the Persian Empire. Between these two mighty empires was the resource-less Arabian Peninsula, where there were only nomads, camels and less-educated people.

The same atmosphere was prevailing when Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was born. His life was full of challenges - born as an orphan, lost two of his care takers grandfather and uncle at an early age. He did not undergo any formal education and remained an illiterate. Until he was 40-year-old, lived like an ordinary man. He did not perform any extraordinary things in the society. However, he commanded great respect in Makah through his character, and was kwon among people as “the truthful” and “the honest”.

the100But things changed after his 40th year, when he became a Prophet: He started conveying an inspiring message and people became his followers in the society. Initially, nomads and uneducated people began to emerge as leaders through this message. Within 50 years, his message spread to a large part of the world. After another 100 years it reached much larger part of the world and within short span of time Islam emerged as a global super power.

History bears testimony that Muslim rulers conquered the mighty Roman and Persian empires. It is an astonishing history and it appears to be a legend. Even today we can see the remains of Roman Empire in Syria’s Palmyra, which was one of the capitals of Roman Empire. Istanbul and Baghdad - two great cities of Islamic civilisation - also were capitals of the same Roman Empire.

The influential personality of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) played a major role in the spread of Islam. We can see the influence of his personality even today. Anyone who studies his history derives lots of influence from it. That is the very reason the enemies of Islam try to target the Prophet (pbuh) and malign his image in every possible way. In Islamic terminology this is called ‘Fitnah’, an act of spreading chaos on the earth. The Fitnah of intentional and organised blasphemy deserve a severe punishment.

According to Quran, “Fitnah (Creating Chaos on the earth) is worse than committing a murder,” (2:191). Because, Fitnah leads to the loss of innocent lives and destruction of prosperities. The result of the latest Fitnah of blashphemy against the Prophet (pbuh) was also the same: A country lost eight jetliners, lost an Ambassador in Libya, many diplomats were killed, a large number of innocent people lost their lives in many courtiers and chaos erupted around the world. A legal action against the person who initiated the mockery in the initial stage, would have been averted all these chaos!

Honour of the Prophet (pbuh) Protected

The honour of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), has been protected through various means. Quran says that Allah Himself will protect the honour of His Prophet. He also protects the honor through Muslim community and through Islamic Sharia.

Allah says in Quran, “I am sufficient for you against the people who do mockery” (15: 95). Through this verse Allah has given a guarantee that He will protect the honor of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). In another verse Allah says “And we have raised high for you (Muhammad) your repute” (94: 4). Before the birth of Prophet (pbuh), “Muhammad” was an unknown name. Today we can see millions of people identify themselves with the name ‘Muhammad’ all over the world. Every time when the mu’addin (prayer caller at masjid) says the adaan (prayer call) in the microphone saying, “I bear witness that Muhammad (pbuh) is the messenger of Allah”, the name of the Prophet (pbuh) raises high in the sky. There is no minute in a day when this announcement is not proclaimed since time varies from country to country.

Quran exhorts the Muslim community that Prophet (pbuh) should be more dearer to them than any other things in their life. “Say: If your fathers, your sons, your brothers, your wives, your relatives, the wealth that you have gained, the commerce in which you fear a decline, and the dwellings in which you delight ... are dearer to you than Allah and His Messenger, and striving hard and fighting in His Cause, then wait until Allah brings about His Decision (torment)” (9: 24). Accordingly for a true Muslim, the most dearest thing in his/her life is love towards Allah, His Prophet (pbuh) and striving in the way of Allah.

Shariah, the rules and regulations of Islam, also protects the honour of Prophet (pbuh). It prescribes capital punishment for blasphemy. This can be seen during the conquest of Makkah, when the Prophet (pbuh) forgave all unbelievers of the conquered land including his blood thirsty enemies. He forgave staunch enemies of Islam like Abu Sufiyan and made a declaration that whoever takes shelter in the house of Abu Sufiyan will be forgiven. Ikrima, another staunch enemy of Islam too approached Prophet (pbuh) seeking asylum. When he was arriving from distance Prophet (pbuh) said: “Ikrima is coming towards us as a believer and migrant, hence do not abuse his father”. In spite of the fact that Ikrima’s father Abu Jahal was the bitterest enemy of Islam, the Prophet (pbuh) did not let anyone abuse him. He forgave every individual and declared: “there will be no revenge on any of you today.” However, he did not forgive four individuals who committed blasphemy and they were executed.

How to React?

If enemies of Islam utilize media to attack Islam, the best refutation could be through media itself. There are various media through which we may refute in an effective way. Though peaceful and timely demonstrations also sometime convey the message to the masses and governments to take necessary action, killing of the innocent people in the pretext of protest is not permissible in Islam, which strictly prohibits killing of innocent people, destroying public properties or cutting the trees even during wars. Even in their reaction and protest, Muslims should carry a message that through they are upset and angry they prove to be peace-loving people and always protect values promulgated by the final Prophet (pbuh).

protest

Islam strictly prohibits killing of innocent people, destroying public properties or cutting the trees even during wars.

There are two things that Muslims can do in order to respond to the blasphemy. One of them is swift reaction which is spontaneous. The second one is well-thought out pro-action. Muslim community is good at reaction but seldom we see any efforts done by Muslims which can be considered as pro-action.

Reminding Muslims about the proactive approach Qur’an says, “So they who have believed in him (Prophet), honored him, supported him and followed the light which was sent down with him are the victorious’ (7: 157).

Therefore Muslim community should be proactive by taking care of the four important responsibilities that they constantly have towards Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), which is believing in him, respecting him, helping him and following him.

Helping the Prophet (pubh) is nothing but spreading the message which he had conveyed. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was the last Prophet and after him prophet hood is terminated. But the prophetic mission, which is transferred to his followers, is not terminated. Today every fourth person in the world is a Muslim. Among them some are living peacefully in peaceful countries, where as some are living with difficulties and challenges, deprived of their freedom and rights. It is the responsibility of every individual Muslims particularly those who are living in peaceful societies to convey the message of Islam to maximum people so that the peace reaches the entire world.

Qur’an says, “Their intention is to extinguish Allah's Light (by blowing) with their mouths: But Allah will complete (the revelation of) His Light, even though the Unbelievers may detest (it). It is He Who has sent His Apostle with Guidance and the Religion of Truth, that he may proclaim it over all religion, even though the Pagans may detest (it)” (61: 8,9).

Surly, Islam has all the qualities and requisites to become a predominant faith, if supported by plan and efforts by Muslim community as Quran says, “Man will not get anything other than what he strives for and you will surely see the fruit of your striving” (53: 39,40).

Sharafuddin-Soofi

The writer is a multilingual personality of Mangalore origin currently residing in Kuwait, having several years of experience in journalism, teaching, public speaking and social service.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
March 14,2020

In the wake of Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) UN High Commissioner, Michele Bachelet, has filed an intervention in the Supreme Court petition challenging the constitutionality of the Citizenship Amendment Act, as she is critical of CAA. Responding to her, India’s Foreign Minister S. Jai Shanker strongly rebutted her criticism, saying that the body (UNHCR) has been wrong and is blind to the problem of cross border terrorism. The issue on hand is the possibility of scores of people, mainly Muslims, being declared as stateless. The problem at hand is the massive exercise of going through the responses/documents from over 120 crore of Indian population and screening documents, which as seen in Assam, yield result which are far from truthful or necessary.

The issue of CAA has been extensively debated and despite heavy critique of the same by large number of groups and despite the biggest mass opposition ever to any move in Independent India, the Government is determined on going ahead with an exercise which is reminiscent of the dreaded regimes which are sectarian and heartless to its citizens, which have indulged in extinction of large mass of people on grounds of citizenship, race etc. The Foreign minister’s assertion is that it is a matter internal to India, where India’s sovereignty is all that matters! As far as sovereignty is concerned we should be clear that in current times any sovereign power has to consider the need to uphold the citizenship as per the principle of non-discrimination which is stipulated in Art.26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political (ICCPR) rights.

Can such policies, which affect large number of people and are likely to affect their citizenship be purely regarded as ‘internal’? With the World turning into a global village, some global norms have been formulated during last few decades. The norms relate to Human rights and migrations have been codified. India is also signatory to many such covenants in including ICCPR, which deals with the norms for dealing with refugees from other countries. One is not talking of Chicago speech of Swami Vivekanand, which said that India’s greatness has been in giving shelter to people from different parts of the World; one is also not talking of the Tattariaya Upanishad’s ‘Atithi Devovhav’ or ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbkam’ from Mahaupanishad today.

What are being talked about are the values and opinions of organizations which want to ensure to preserve of Human rights of all people Worldwide. In this matter India is calling United Nations body as ‘foreign party’; having no locus standi in the case as it pertains to India’s sovereignty. The truth is that since various countries are signatories to UN covenants, UN bodies have been monitoring the moves of different states and intervening at legal level as Amicus (Friend of the Court) to the courts in different countries and different global bodies. Just to mention some of these, UN and High Commissioner for Human Rights has often submitted amicus briefs in different judicial platforms. Some examples are their intervention in US Supreme Court, European Court of Human Rights, International Criminal Court, and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. These are meant to help the Courts in areas where UN bodies have expertise.

 Expertise on this has been jointly formulated by various nations. These interventions also remind the nations as to what global norms have been evolved and what are the obligations of individual states to the values which have evolved over a period of time. Arvind Narrain draws our attention to the fact that, “commission has intervened in the European Court of Human Rights in cases involving Spain and Italy to underscore the principle of non-refoulement, which bars compulsory expulsion of illegal migrants… Similarly, the UN has intervened in the International Criminal Court in a case against the Central African Republic to explicate on the international jurisprudence on rape as a war crime.”

From time to time organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have been monitoring the status of Human rights of different countries. This puts those countries in uncomfortable situation and is not welcome by those establishments. How should this contradiction between ‘internal matter’, ‘sovereignty’ and the norms for Human rights be resolved? This is a tough question at the time when the freedom indices and democratic ethos are sliding downwards all over the world. In India too has slid down on the scale of these norms.

In India we can look at the intervention of UN body from the angle of equality and non discrimination. Democratic spirit should encourage us to have a rethink on the matters which have been decided by the state. In the face of the greatest mass movement of Shaheen bagh, the state does need to look inwards and give a thought to international morality, the spirit of global family to state the least.

The popular perception is that when Christians were being persecuted in Kandhmal the global Christian community’s voice was not strong enough. Currently in the face of Delhi carnage many a Muslim majority countries have spoken. While Mr. Modi claims that his good relations with Muslim countries are a matter of heartburn to the parties like Congress, he needs to relook at his self gloating. Currently Iran, Malaysia, Indonesia and many Muslim majority countries have spoken against what Modi regime is unleashing in India. Bangladesh, our neighbor, has also seen various protests against the plight of Muslims in India. More than the ‘internal matter’ etc. what needs to be thought out is the moral aspect of the whole issue. We pride ourselves in treading the path of morality. What does that say in present context when while large section of local media is servile to the state, section of global media has strongly brought forward what is happening to minorities in India.   

The hope is that Indian Government wakes up to its International obligations, to the worsening of India’s image in the World due to CAA and the horrific violence witnessed in Delhi.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
February 29,2020

Like most of the political phenomenon, even the practice of Nationalism is not a static one. It changes with the changing political equations of the political forces and assumes the expressions which are very diverse. As such the phenomenon of Nationalism has a long journey and various state policies in particular have used it for purposes which relate more to the power of the state ‘vis a vis’ its people, power of the state ‘vis a vis’ the neighboring countries among others.

In India there has been a certain change in the practices of the state which have transformed the meaning of Nationalism during last few years. Particularly with BJP, the Hindu Nationalist outfit gaining simple majority, it has unfolded the policies where one can discern the drastic change in the meaning and application of Nationalism in regard to its citizens, particularly those belonging to minority community, with regard to those who are liberal, and with those who stand with the concept of Human rights.

Our former Prime Minister of Dr. Manmohan Singh hit the nail on the head when he said that “Nationalism and the "Bharat Mata Ki Jai" slogan are being misused to construct a "militant and purely emotional" idea of India that excludes millions of residents and citizens. Former Prime Minister recently stated this in an apparent attack on the BJP.” The occasion was the release of a book, ‘Who is Bharat Mata’, edited by Purushottam Agarwal and Radhakrishna. This is a compilation of significant extracts from writings of Nehru, and important assessments of and contributions of Nehru by prominent personalities.

Dr. Singh went on to add "With an inimitable style…Nehru laid the foundation of the universities, academies and cultural institutions of Modern India. But for Nehru's leadership, independent India would not have become what it is today," This statement of Dr. Singh has great importance in contemporary times, as Nehru is being denigrated by Hindu nationalists for all the problems which India is facing today and attempts are on to undermine his role and glorifying Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel. This is also significant as it gives us the glimpses of what Nationalism meant for Nehru.

As Singh’s statement captures the present nationalism being practiced by BJP and company, the Hindu nationalists, immediately shot back saying that Dr. Singh is supporting the anti India activities at JNU and Jamia and his party is supporting the anti India nationalists. They asked whether Singh likes the nationalism of the likes of Shashi Tharoor or Manishankar Ayer who are provoking the Shaheen Bagh protest rather than making the protestors quiet. Whether he likes the anti national protests which go on at JNU or Jamia? As per them there is no Nationalism in Congress. One more example being cited is the private visit of Shatrughan Sinha who talked to Pakistani President during his visit there recently!

Most of the arguments being used to oppose Dr. Singh are very superficial. What is being referred to; is not opposition to Indian nationalism and its central values which were the core of anti colonial struggles. While ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’ may not be acceptable to a section of population, even the book he was releasing has the title ‘Who is Bharat Mata’. What is being stated by Singh is the twist which slogan ‘Bharat Mata ki Jai’ has been used by Hindu nationalists to frighten the religious minorities.

Indian nation came into being on the values, which later were the foundation of Indian Constitution. Indian Constitution carefully picked up the terminology which was away from the concepts of Hindu or Muslim nationalism. That’s how the country came to be called as ‘India that is Bharat’. The freedom of expression which was the hallmark of freedom movement and it was given a pride of place in our Constitution. It respected the diversity and formulated rules where the nation was not based on particular culture, as Hindu nationalists will like us to believe, but cultural diversity was centrally recognized in the Constitution. In addition promoting good relations with neighbors and other countries of the World was also part of our principles.

JNU, Jamia and AMU are being demonized as most institutions so far regard the freedom of expression as a core part of Indian democracy. These institutions have been thriving on discussions and debates which have base in liberalism. Deliberately some slogans have been constructed to defame these institutions. While Constitution mandates good relations with neighbors, creation of ‘Anti Pakistan hysteria’ is the prime motive of many a channels and sections of other media, which are servile to the ideology of ruling Government. They also violate most of the norms of ethical journalism, where the criticism of the ruling party is an important factor to keep the ruling dispensation in toes.

A stifling atmosphere has been created during last six years. In this the Prime Minster can take a detour, land in Pakistan to have a cup of tea with Pakistan PM, but a Congress leader talking to Pakistani President is a sign of being anti National. Students taking out a march while reading the preamble of Indian Constitution are labeled as anti-national; and are stopped while those openly wielding guns near Jamia or Shaheen Bagh roam freely.

Nationalism should promote amity and love of the people; it should pave the way for growth and development. Currently the nationalism which is dominant and stalking the streets has weakened the very fraternity, which is one of the pillars of our democracy. Nehru did explain that Bharat Mata is not just our mountains, rivers and land but primarily the people who inhabit the land. Which nationalism to follow was settled during the freedom movement when Muslim nationalism and Hindu nationalism were rejected by the majority of people of India in favor of the Nationalism of Gandhi, Nehru, Patel and Maulana Azad, where minorities are equal citizens, deserving affirmative action. In today’s scenario the Hindu nationalists cannot accept any criticism of their policies.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
March 8,2020

They say ‘history repeats itself first as a tragedy and then as a farce’. In case of India, communal violence not only keeps repeating itself, the pattern of the tragedy keeps changing every next time. Some features of the violence are constant, but they are under the wraps mostly. The same can be said about the Delhi violence (February 2020). The interpretations, the causative factors are very discernible, but those who are generally the perpetrators have a knack of shifting the blame on the victim community or those who stand for the victims.

As the carnage began presumably in the aftermath of statement of Kapil Mishra of BJP, which was given in front of a top police official, in which he threatened to get the roads emptied. The roots of violence were sown earlier. The interpretations given by the Hindu Nationalist camp is that the riot is due to the changing demographic profile of the area with Muslims increasing in number in those areas, and coming up of Shaheen Bagh which was presented was like ‘Mini Pakistan’. As per them the policies of BJP in matters of triple talaq, Article 370 and CAA, NPR, NRC has unnerved the ‘radical’ elements and so this violence.

As such before coming to the observations of the activists and scholars of communal violence in India, we can in brief say that violence, in which nearly 46 people have died, include one from police and another from intelligence. Majority victims are Muslims. The violence started right under the nose of the police and the ruling party. From the videos and other eye accounts, police not only looked the other way around, at places it assisted those attacking the innocent victims and burning and looting selective shops. Home minister, Amit Shah, was nowhere on the scene. For first three days the rioters had free run. After the paramilitary force was brought in; the violence simmered and slowly reduced in intensity. The state AAP Government, which in a way is the byproduct of RSS supported Anna Hazare movement, was busy reading Hanuman Chalisa and praying at Rajghat with eyes closed to the mayhem going in parts of Delhi.

Communal violence is the sore point of Indian society. It did begin during colonial period due to British policy of ‘Divide and Rule’. At root cause was the communal view of looking at history and pro active British acts to sow the seeds of Hindu-Muslim divide. At other level the administrative and police the British were fairly neutral. On one hand was the national movement, uniting the people and creating and strengthening the fraternal feeling among all Indians. On the other were Muslim Communalists (Muslim League) and Hindu Communalists (Hindu Mahasabha, RSS) who assisted the British goal of ‘divide and rule’ promoting hatred between the communities. After partition the first major change was the change in attitude of police and administration which started tilting against Muslims. Major studies by Dr. Asghar Ali Engineer, Paul Brass and Omar Khalidi demonstrated that anti Muslim bias is discernible in during and after the riots.

Now the partisan role of police has been visible all through. Sri Krishna Commission report brought forth this fact; as did the research of the Ex DIG of UP police Dr. V.N.Rai. Dr. Rai’s studies also concluded that no communal violence can go on beyond 24 hours unless state administration is complicit in the carnage. In one of the violence, investigation of which was done by concerned Citizen’s team (Dhule, 2013) this author observed that police itself went on to undertake the rampage against Muslims and Muslim properties.

General observation about riots is that violence sounds to be spontaneous, as the Home Minister is pointing out, but as such it is well planned act. Again the violence is orchestrated in such a way that it seems Muslims have begun the riots. Who casts the First stone? To this scholars point out that the carnage is so organized that the encircled community is forced to throw the first stone. At places the pretext is made that ‘they’ (minorities) have thrown the first stone.

The pretexts against minorities are propagated, in Gujarat violence Godhra train burning, in Kandhamal the murder of Swami Laxamannand and now Shaheen bagh! The Hindu Muslim violence began as riots. But it is no more a riot, two sides are not involved. It is plain and simple anti Minority violence, in which some from the majority are also the victims.

This violence is possible as the ‘Hate against this minority’ is now more or less structural. The deeper Hate against Muslims and partly against Christians; has been cultivated since long and Hindu nationalist politics, right from its Shakhas to the social media have been put to use for spreading Hatred. The prevalent deeper hate has been supplanted this time by multiple utterances from BJP leaders, Modi (Can be recognized by clothes), Shah (press EVM machine button so hard that current is felt in Shaheen Bagh), Anurag Thakur (Goli (bullet) Maro) Yogi Aditya Nath (If Boli (Words)Do not work Goli will) and Parvesh Varma (They will be out to rape).

The incidental observation of the whole tragedy is the coming to surface of true colors of AAP, which not only kept mum as the carnage was peaking but also went on to praise the role of police in the whole episode. With Delhi carnage “Goli Maro” seems to be becoming the central slogan of Hindu nationalists. Delhi’s this violence has been the first one in which those getting killed are more due to bullets than by swords or knifes! Leader’s slogans do not go in vain! Courts the protectors of our Constitution seem to be of little help as if one of them like Murlidhar Rao gives the verdict to file against hate mongers, he is immediately transferred.

And lastly let’s recall the academic study of Yale University. It concludes; BJP gains in electoral strength after every riot’. In India the grip of communalism is increasing frighteningly. Efforts are needed to combat Hate and Hate mongers.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.