Next big thing: wrist watches

March 4, 2013

wrist_watchesThe gadget industry seems to have decided that 2013 will be the year of the smartwatch, says David Pogue.

Every time you look, our computers have moved closer to us. In the beginning, they existed only in corporate headquarters. Then came the desktop PC – three feet away. Then the laptop – one foot. Then the smartphone – in our pockets. What"s next – computers on our wrists?

The central idea is sound. You already have an iPhone or Android phone. Wouldn"t it be neat if your watch could communicate with it wirelessly?

Imagine: the watch could beep or vibrate whenever you get an incoming call, text message or email. No more, “Sorry I didn"t get your call; my phone was in my backpack.” No more fumbling for your phone when that would be inconvenient or unsafe – like while you"re skiing, skateboarding or driving.

These watches can also make your phone beep loudly when it"s lost in the house. That"s much quicker than using Find My iPhone, which involves logging into a website.

They can also serve as a digital “leash”: if you wander away, accidentally leaving your phone on some restaurant table, the watch buzzes to warn you.

I tested the Meta Watch ($180 or Rs 9,882), Cookoo ($130 or Rs 7,137), Casio G-Shock GB-6900 ($180 or Rs 9,882), Martian ($300 or Rs 16,471), and I"m Watch ($400 or Rs 21,961, coming in July). More contenders, like a Kickstarter favourite, Pebble Watch, are on the way. (The Martian, Cookoo and Meta Watch also began life on Kickstarter, the website where inventors seek financing from the public.) Even Apple is said to be toying with an iWatch.

The designs are all over the map. Some have touch screens. Some look like regular analogue watches; others are basically iPod Nanos with straps. Some require daily charging; others take watch batteries.

They do have some things in common. First, these early smartwatches are thick and chunky – a desirable quality in a stew, maybe, but not for the delicate of wrist.

Second, they communicate with your phone over Bluetooth. You have to “pair” the watch to your phone on the first day – and whenever you exit Airplane Mode. Most models require a companion phone app for this purpose.

Most of these watches use Bluetooth 4.0, which means your phone will lose only a small amount of battery charge each day – maybe 5 or 10 percent – but only recent models, like the iPhone 4S and 5, are compatible.

Finally, the instruction manuals are terrible or nonexistent; it"s as if, in their zeal to make these things work, the companies forgot all about explaining it to you. Wrists ready? Here we go.

Casio G-shock GB-6900

This watch closely resembles Casio"s other G-Shocks: popular, masculine, rugged, waterproof digitals.

But this one can beep or vibrate when calls or emails come to your iPhone (Android is in the works) – though not, alas, text messages. There"s no Caller ID; a cramped scrolling display says only “Incoming call.” For email, the sender"s address scrolls slowly. You can dismiss these alerts with a double-tap on the glass – that"s the only thing this watch"s “touch screen” does.

The watch can also set itself as you cross time zones by checking in with your phone.

These limited functions are solid and power-stingy; one watch battery lasts two years. The watch has four buttons – the usual user-hostile digital watch assortment, like Mode, Adjust and Split/Reset – but they get the job done.

Cookoo Watch

The round face and analogue hands offer spartan good looks; only the watch"s alarming thickness (three-quarters of an inch) and four edge buttons let you know that it"s not a Swatch.

There"s no screen. Instead, icons dimly appear on the watch"s black background as notifications of incoming calls, calendar reminders or Facebook posts. (email and text notifications are coming soon, says the company.)

If you want to know what they are or who they"re from, you have to get out your phone.

The Cookoo offers a bidirectional “find” feature and a low-phone-battery warning; it can also set off your phone"s camera by remote control, which is great for self-portraits. There"s also a weird emphasis on “dropping pins” – telling your Facebook friends where you are, for example.

A standard watch battery lasts nine months, and the price is reasonable. But there are lots of rough edges and missing features.

Meta Watch

The text and graphics are white-on-silver, which is sometimes hard to read. The setup instructions for iPhone are ludicrously complex. The phone alerts you when text messages or calls come in, but notifications for email, appointments, Facebook posts, tweets and alarms are “coming soon.”

No instructions come with the watch, and even the online help page doesn"t tell you what the watch"s six buttons do.

That"s too bad, because there"s some promise here. The Frame model ($200 or Rs 10,980) isn"t much thicker than a real watch. (The $180 or Rs 9,882 Strata model is plastickier.) Both last about five days on a charge.

You charge the watch by clamping a USB clip onto it; the bottom jaw touches contacts on the watch. You can wear the Meta Watch swimming or showering.

The watch also runs widgets – the three Home screens hold four each – like stocks and weather. Someday, the company hopes, app writers will create new functions. For now, though, this watch feels like a prototype.

I"m Watch

Although this weirdly named watch runs an ancient version of Android, it looks like an iPod Nano on your wrist.

It"s the only contender with true touch-screen operation. You swipe through pages of tiny icons: Facebook and Twitter-reading apps, a compass, a calculator, address book, music player and so on. An online app store offers a couple of dozen very simple apps, some for a price. Unfortunately, the I"m is big, baffling, buggy and slow, and the battery doesn"t last a day. You"re supposed to be able to use it to make calls, but you get nothing but garbled snippets.

Here"s a better name for this watch: I"m Unfinished.

Martian Watch

This classy-looking watch has analogue hands; a crisp, bright scrolling line of text appears only when the watch has something to say. It notifies you of text messages, incoming calls, email, Twitter or Facebook posts.

On the iPhone, until the companion app is ready at the end of March, the Find Phone feature doesn"t work, and the only notifications are for text messages.

Even then, you see only the first 40 characters of text messages and the first 20 of Facebook/Twitter posts; the email alert shows only how many new messages you have, not what they are.

Cool: you can decline an incoming call by shaking your wrist a certain way. The watch can set off your phone"s camera remotely, and it can read incoming texts aloud. One USB charge lasts several days.

By far the most astonishing feature, though, is that the Martian is a full-blown speakerphone. It communicates with Android"s voice-dialling feature or, even more flexibly, the iPhone"s Siri.

You press the top button and say, for example, “Call mom"s cellphone,” and bingo – you"re having a phone conversation with your mother through your watch. You can also dictate text messages and emails or check your calendar by voice, all thanks to Siri. Audio is surprisingly clear on both ends, though it"s not powerful enough for loud places.

But seriously: what a giddy, useful feature. This is it, people: Dick Tracy. James Bond. The future.

Otherwise, though, you have to wonder if there"s a curse on this blossoming category. Why are these smartwatches so buggy, half-baked and delayed? The Casio and Martian watches are worth considering. But if you ask the other watches what time it is, they"ll tell you: too soon.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
June 5,2020

With the scrapping of Mitron and Remove China Apps from its Play Store gaining a lot of attention in India, Google on Thursday said that it removed a video app "for a number of technical policy violations", while adding that it also does not allow an app that "encourages or incentivizes users into removing or disabling third-party apps".

Both the apps became immensely popular in India within a short span of time due to the prevailing anti-China sentiment amid border tensions between India and China in Ladakh and calls by Indian activists to boycott Chinese products.

Reports suggested that the Mitron app is a repackaged version of TicTic, which is a TikTok clone.

The Remove China Apps was designed to help users identify applications of Chinese origin.

Without naming the apps, Google hinted that the Mitron app may make a comeback on the Play Store once it fixes some technical issues, but the chances of the Remove China Apps are thin.

"We have an established process of working with developers to help them fix issues and resubmit their apps. We've given this developer (of the video app) some guidance and once they've addressed the issue the app can go back up on Play," Sameer Samat, Vice President, Android and Google Play, said in a statement.

Google said that its Android app store was designed to provide a safe and secure experience for the consumers while also giving developers the platform and tools they need to build sustainable businesses.

Samat said that Google Play recently suspended a number of apps for violating the policy that it does not allow an app that "encourages or incentivizes users into removing or disabling third-party apps or modifying device settings or features unless it is part of a verifiable security service".

"This is a longstanding rule designed to ensure a healthy, competitive environment where developers can succeed based upon design and innovation. When apps are allowed to specifically target other apps, it can lead to behaviour that we believe is not in the best interest of our community of developers and consumers," Samat said.

"We've enforced this policy against other apps in many countries consistently in the past - just as we did here," he added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
January 7,2020

Washington, Jan 7: Facebook will ban deepfake videos ahead of the US elections but the new policy will still allow heavily edited clips so long as they are parody or satire, the social media giant said Tuesday.

Deepfake videos are hyper-realistic doctored clips made using artificial intelligence or programs that have been designed to accurately fake real human movements.

In a blog published following a Washington Post report, Facebook said it would begin removing clips that were edited--beyond for clarity and quality--in ways that "aren't apparent to an average person" and could mislead people.

Clips would be removed if they were "the product of artificial intelligence or machine learning that merges, replaces or superimposes content onto a video, making it appear to be authentic," the statement from Facebook vice-president Monika Bickert said.

However, the statement added: "This policy does not extend to content that is parody or satire, or video that has been edited solely to omit or change the order of words."

US media noted the new guidelines would not cover videos such as the 2019 viral clip -- which was not a deepfake -- of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that appeared to show her slurring her words.

Facebook also gave no indication on the number of people assigned to identify and take down the offending videos, but said videos failing to meet its usual guidelines would be removed, and those flagged clips would be reviewed by teams of third-party fact-checkers -- among them AFP.

The news agency has been paid by the social media giant to fact-check posts across 30 countries and 10 languages as part of a program starting in December 2016, and including more than 60 organisations.

Content labeled "false" is not always removed from newsfeeds but is downgraded so fewer people see it -- alongside a warning explaining why the post is misleading.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 24,2020

Melbourne, Jul 24: Home-made cloth face masks may need a minimum of two layers, and preferably three, to prevent the dispersal of viral droplets associated with Covid-19, according to a study.

Researchers, including those from the University of New South Wales in Australia, noted that viral droplets are generated by those infected with the novel coronavirus when they cough, sneeze, or speak.

As face masks have been proven to protect healthy people from inhaling infectious droplets as well as reducing the spread from those who are already infected, several types of material have been suggested for these, but based on little or no evidence of how well they work, the scientists said.

In the current study, published in the journal Thorax, the researchers compared the effectiveness of single and double-layer cloth face coverings with a surgical face mask (Bao Thach) at reducing droplet spread.

They said the single layer covering was made from a folded piece of cotton T shirt and hair ties, and the double layer covering was made using the sew method described by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The scientists used a tailored LED lighting system and a high-speed camera to film the dispersal of airborne droplets produced by a healthy person with no respiratory infection, during speaking, coughing, and sneezing while wearing each type of mask.

Their analysis showed that the surgical face mask was the most effective at reducing airborne droplet dispersal, although even a single layer cloth face covering reduced the droplet spread from speaking.

But the study noted that a double layer covering was better than a single layer in reducing the droplet spread from coughing and sneezing.

According to the researchers, the effectiveness of cloth face masks is dependent on the number of layers of the covering, the type of material used, design, fit as well as the frequency of washing.

Based on their observations, they said a home made cloth mask with at least two layers is preferable to a single layer mask.

"Guidelines on home-made cloth masks should stipulate multiple layers," the scientists said, adding that there is a need for more research to inform safer cloth mask design.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.