How business partners of Guj CM Anandiben’s daughter landed a good deal

February 5, 2016

New Delhi, Feb 5: Business associates of Anar Jayesh Patel, 45, daughter of Gujarat Chief Minister Anandiben Patel, own a company that's sitting on 400 acres of land near the Gir lion sanctuary in the state —and 250 acres of that land was given to that company at an official rate of Rs 15 per square metre.

anandibenAnar Patel describes herself as a social worker and an entrepreneur. Filings with the Registrar of Companies (RoC), accessed by ET, show a number of transactions between her and her business partners that started when the Gujarat government allotted 250 acres of public land in 2010-11 to Wildwoods Resorts and Realties.

Wildwoods' current promoters, Dakshesh Shah and Amol Shripal Sheth, are business partners of Anar Patel. ET sent questions to all involved, the CM, her daughter, Anar's business partners and Gujarat revenue secretary. There was no response from the Gujarat government.

Anar Patel, Shah and Sheth responded to ET and insisted all transactions were above board. ET also spoke to Sanjay Dhanak, the original promoter of Wildwoods. The land is in Gujarat's Amreli district, next to the lion sanctuary at Gir, and therefore an attractive commercial proposition.

Wildwoods also received government nod to purchase a further 172 acres of agricultural land, as well as approval to change land use from agricultural to non-agricultural.


Anandiben Patel was the Gujarat revenue minister at that time. The revenue department is the nodal authority for such land allotments.

Anandiben retains the revenue portfolio as chief minister. Her office did not respond to ET's questions. Her office and that of the state revenue secretary did not respond to the question whether allotting such large land parcels to for-profit private enterprises was common official policy, especially when beneficiaries did not have a track record of setting up largescale facilities.

The original promoter of Wildwoods said plans to build a tourist resort on that land didn't work out. Current promoters insisted there were no proscriptions against building resorts in the area and that all regulatory clearances were obtained. No resort has been built so far.

WILDWOODS 1.0 & WILDWOODS 2.0

Wildwoods is owned by Parshva Texchem and Anil Infraplus Ltd. When the land allotment orders were issued in 2010, Wildwoods was owned by Dubai-based businessman Sanjay Dhanak. Shah and Sheth took control of the company in 2011-12.

Dhanak told ET that Wildwoods had applied for the land and had planned to build a tourist resort. Parshva and Anil Infraplus are co-investors in firms where Anar Patel has a substantial stake. ET's review of documents filed with the Registrar of Companies shows a host of transactions between companies that received the government's land allotment as well as other companies run by Shah and Sheth and companies where Anar Patel has significant equity presence.

Dhanak told ET he could not remember how much was paid for the 422 acres of land. Dakshesh Shah, too, did not elaborate on the issue. He also told ET he was not aware how much Wildwoods had paid for the 422 acres since he bought into the firm in 2011 and was "not aware of previous transactions".

Dhanak, however, told ET that Shah was his partner at the time of allotment and that "he has all the books that detail all the transactions including how much was paid to change land use".


Dhanak told ET that after the allotment he changed his mind about setting up a tourist resort and wanted to cash out. "Jama nahi(My plans did not work out). Shah did not want me to sell my stake in the market and insisted I transfer it to him," he said. Dhanak said he has never been in the business of setting up resorts and only has a jewellery business in Dubai.

In an emailed response to ET, Dakshesh Shah said Wildwoods promoters weren't aware of any official advisory against building resorts in that area. He also said: "The original promoter had acquired all permissions from the respective regulatory bodies relating to land development. After acquisition of stake, no further permissions/relaxations have been given."

Shah also said he was not aware how much Wildwoods had originally paid the government for the land or the amount spent as land conversion charges. A spokesperson for Amol Sheth also did not disclose the amount Wildwoods paid. Neither did he disclose how much current promoters paid to the original promoter of Wildwoods.

MANY TRANSACTIONS

Dakshesh Shah is Anar Patel's business partner with a 50% stake in Patel's company, Anar Project. Besides, Shah's firm Parshva Texchem, which co-owns Wildwoods, is also a substantial shareholder in Anar Patel's Relish Pharmaceuticals. Shah and Anar Patel are also directors in Anar Project, Relish Pharma and 24x7 Fitness.


"Mr Dakshesh R Shah is one of my business partners. Mr Shah and me are joint promoters in Relish Pharma and he has invested in Relish Pharma from Parshva Texchem & Ms Renuka is investor in Relish Pharma," Anar Patel said in an email response to ET.

Shah told ET that Anar Patel is his business partner. He did not elaborate on the details of their dealings. "I am a businessman and I do invest in prospective projects when I find the opportunity," he said. Shah also said Wildwoods has had no financial dealings with any firm associated with Anar Patel. However, RoC filings tell a different story:

1. Anar Project filings show a "payable" of Rs 10 lakh to Wildwoods.

2. Innovative Infraplus, majority owned by Shah, advanced a Rs 2.95-crore loan to Anar Project and Rs 20 lakh to Anar Patel herself.

3. Innovative Infraplus, where Anar Project has a substantial stake, received an "advance" of Rs 8.73 crore from Amol Sheth's Anil Ltd as well as Rs 11.015 crore from Anil Mega Food Park.

4. Innovative also lists Anil Infraplus and Anil Technoplus among its creditors to whom it owes Rs 2.6 crore and Rs 15 crore, respectively.

5. Anar Project had advanced Rs 9 crore to Anil Technoplus. Sheth says the money was an "advance" against "material supplied subsequently".


6. Innovative has also loaned money to 24x7 Fitness and Aahna Solar, firms in which Anar Patel is a substantial investor.

7. Proper Dealcom, in which Shah's firm Parshva has a stake, had loaned Rs 9 crore to Relish Pharma in 2011-12.

8.Parshva Texchem also loaned Rs 2.30 lakh to Gramshree-Women Empowerment, a Section 25 company promoted by Gujarat CM Anandiben Patel and Anar Patel.

9. Innovative has also given a Rs 15-lakh advance to Gramshree, which it lists as a creditor. Amol Sheth did not comment on his business dealings with Anar Patel.

According to filings made with RoC, Sheth and Anar were directors briefly in Aahna Solar. The shareholding pattern of Aahna shows Patel, Shah and Anil Infraplus, which co-owns Wildwoods, are equal partners. In its filings, Aahna Solar states its only business is solar power generation. However, its balance sheets show that its revenues are from a restaurant and food business.

Comments

THINKERS
 - 
Saturday, 6 Feb 2016

Indian land for sale - less than HALF PRICE only....
Eligible candidate :
1. Should be close associates of PM.
2. Cheddi VIP membership only
3. Cheddi lower caste members not eligible.
Good deal to destroy the POOR of the country.... & follow the deceptive ways of life taught by their evil zionist.

TR
 - 
Saturday, 6 Feb 2016

True colors are showing. Mr. PM it is Happned right under your CM period, one by one will come out.

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 30,2020

Baharampore, Jan 30: Two persons were killed and one was injured in a clash over a protest programme against the CAA and the proposed NRC in West Bengal's Murshidabad district on Wednesday, police said.

The incident occured after an argument broke out between the two sides at Jalangi over a protest programme opposing Citizenship Amendment Act.

According to the police, a scuffle broke out between the local TMC leaders and residents' forum 'Nagarik Mancha', which was observing a shutdown in the area against the amended citizenship act and the proposed country-wide NRC.

The residents' forum was asked to withdraw the shutdown and the situation turned violent as both sides came to blows and hurled bombs at each other. Several two-wheelers and cars were damaged and set on fire during the clash.

Local TMC MP Abu Taher, denied that the party was involved in the clash and alleged that the violence was by Congress and CPI(M) supporters.

"I have requested the police to look into the incident. The culprits should be immediately arrested," he said.

Senior Congress leader and MLA Manoj Chakraborty said that the party was not involved in the incident and demanded judicial inquiry into it.

The injured have been rushed to Murshidabad Medical College and Hospital here, the police said.

The Muslim-majority district had witnessed violence and arson during the anti-CAA protests across the state in December last year.

West Bengal became the fourth state after Left-ruled Kerala, and Punjab and Rajasthan, where the Congress is in power, to have passed a resolution on January 27 against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act. The state assembly had on September 6, 2019, passed a resolution against NRC.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 6,2020

New Delhi, Feb 6: DMK Lok Sabha member M K Kanimozhi on Wednesday challenged popular actor Rajinikanth to raise his voice for Muslims, saying they have "already been affected" by the Citizenship (Amendment) Act and are protesting on streets against the law.

Reacting to his statements earlier in the day in Chennai that "CAA is no threat to Muslims" and "if they face trouble I will be the first person to raise voice for them," Kanimozhi, daughter of former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M Karunanidhi, told news agency that "Muslims in India have already been affected due to CAA".

"Let him (Rajinikanth) come forward and raise his voice for the affected Muslims", she said.

She said the members of the community have been protesting as the law leaves out Muslims.,

Asked whether Rajinikanth, through this pro-CAA statement, was moving closer to the BJP, the MP from Tuticorin said, "What he has said is no different from the BJP's narrative which we have been listening in parliament for the last few days".

Under CAA, members of Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi and Christian communities who came to India from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan till December 31, 2014, to escape religious persecution there will not be treated as illegal immigrants, and be given Indian citizenship.

Rajinikanth had asserted that the legislation did not pose any threat to Muslims. He wondered as to how Muslims, who chose to stay back in India following Partition will be sent out of the country. Besides, the central government had assured that Indian people will have no issues in view of CAA, he noted.

He charged that some political parties were instigating people against the CAA for their selfish interests.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
February 17,2020

New Delhi, Feb 17: The Supreme Court said on Monday that people have a fundamental right to protest against a law but the blocking of public roads is a matter of concern and there has to be a balancing factor.

Hearing pleas over the road blocks due to the ongoing protests at Shaheen Bagh against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), a bench comprising Justices S K Kaul and K M Joseph said its concern is about what will happen if people start protesting on roads.

Democracy works on expressing views but there are lines and boundaries for it, the bench said.

It asked senior advocate Sanjay Hegde and advocate Sadhana Ramachandran to talk to Shaheen Bagh protestors and persuade them to move to an alternative site where no public place is blocked.

The matter has been posted for next hearing on February 24.

People have a fundamental right to protest but the thing which is troubling us is the blocking of public roads, the bench said.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said Shaheen Bagh protestors should not be given a message that every institution is on its knees trying to persuade them on this issue.

The apex court said that if nothing works, we will leave it to the authorities to deal with the situation.

Protestors have made their made their point and the protests have gone on for quite some time, it said.

Restrictions have been imposed on the Kalindi Kunj-Shaheen Bagh stretch and the Okhla underpass, which were closed on December 15 last year due to the protests against CAA and Register of Citizens.

The top court had earlier said the anti-CAA protesters at Delhi's Shaheen Bagh cannot block public roads and create inconvenience for others.

The apex court was hearing an appeal filed by advocate Amit Sahni, who had approached the Delhi high court seeking directions to the Delhi Police to ensure smooth traffic flow on the Kalindi Kunj-Shaheen Bagh stretch, which was blocked by anti-CAA protesters on December 15.

While dealing with Sahni's plea, the high court had asked local authorities to deal with the situation keeping in mind law and order.

Separately, former BJP MLA Nand Kishore Garg has filed a petition in the apex court seeking directions to the authorities to remove the protestors from Shaheen Bagh.

One of the pleas has sought laying down of comprehensive and exhaustive guidelines relating to outright restrictions for holding protests or agitations leading to obstruction of public place.

In his plea, Garg has said that law enforcement machinery was being "held hostage to the whims and fancies of the protesters" who have blocked vehicular and pedestrian movement from the road connecting Delhi to Noida.

State has the duty to protect fundamental rights of citizen who were continuously being harassed by the blockage of arterial road, it said.

"It is disappointing that the state machinery is muted and a silent spectator to hooliganism and vandalism of the protesters who are threatening the existential efficacy of the democracy and the rule of law and had already taken the law and order situation in their own hand," the plea had said.

In his appeal, Sahni had sought supervision of the situation in Shaheen Bagh, where several women are sitting on protest, by a retired Supreme Court judge or a sitting judge of the Delhi High Court.

Sahni has said in his plea that protests in Shaheen Bagh has inspired similar demonstrations in other cities and to allow it to continue would set a wrong precedent.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.