Udupi: BJP sweeps Zilla Panchayat, all 3 Taluk Panchayats; Cong suffers blow

[email protected] (CD Network)
February 23, 2016

bjpUdupi, Feb 23: The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has swept the elections to the udupi Zilla Panchayat and all the three taluk panchayats in the district.

The results gave a major blow to the Congress party in coastal district as it not only faced second consecutive defeat in the ZP, but also lost three seats compared to the previous election.

The BJP, which had won 16 out of 25 seats in 2011, has now improved its performance by winning 20 out of 26 seats. The Congress has managed to win only 6 seats. In 2011 it had won 9 ZP seats. More details are awaited.

Udupi ZP election results at a glance

Party BJP Cong Others
2005 (25 seats) 12 13 0
2011 (25 seats) 16 09 0
2016(26 seats) 20 06 0

Udupi ZP Constituency

Winners

Perdoor

Sudhakar Shetty (Cong)

Brahmavar

Sheela Shetty (BJP)

Udyavar

Dinakar (BJP)

Hiriyadka

Chandrika (Cong)

Kurkaalu

Geetanjali (BJP)

Shirva

Wilson (Cong)

Yellur

Shilpa (BJP)

Padubidri

Shashikanth (BJP)

Hebri

Jyothi (BJP)

Belmannu

Reshma (BJP)

Bailoor

Sumith (BJP)

Meeyaru

Divya (BJP)

Bajagoli

Udaya Kotian (BJP)

Kota

Raghavendra Kanchan (BJP)

Mandarthi

Prathap Hegde (BJP)

Kavraadi

Jyothi (Cong)

Kalyanapura

Janardhana Thonse (Cong)

Shiroor

Suresh (BJP)

Baindoor

Shankara Poojary (BJP)

Kambada Kone

Gouri (BJP)

Thrasi

Shobha (BJP)

Vandse

Babu Shetty (BJP)

Koteshwara

Lakshmi (BJP)

Beejadi

Lata (BJP)

Siddapura

Taranath Shetty (BJP)

Haladi

Supritha (BJP)

Udupi’s 3 TP results at a glance

TP Total BJP Cong Others
Udupi 41 27 14 00
Karkala 20 19 01
Kundapur 37 27 10
Total

Also Read:

Will do deep introspection of Congress performance in DK, Udupi: UT Khader

Congress wrests Mangaluru, Bantwal Taluk Panchayats from BJP

Dakshina Kannada Zilla, Taluk panchayat election results at a glance

Counting begins in ZP, TP polls across Karnataka: Click her

Comments

abdul
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

This looks majority of people have voted based on caste/sects. muslim candidates won in muslim majority area even candiadates are not deserved and similarly in other relegion dominated areas too. this needs to be eradicated and elect the honest people who really works for betterment of society in all fileds.
I assume this result definatly not based on the performance of the previous tenure or state/central government performance.
every voters are the decision makers for future India.

IBRAHIM.HUSSAIN
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

This results shows the way to Sorake to resign from his current ministry. Oscar fernandes to be dethroned from Congress central hicommand. Mr. Promod must come out of Sorake/Oscar combine and work independently. We know he is a loyal worker of the party. But as long as the two opportunists are in the party, congress popularity will decline to Zero. This is a ringing bell to all congress great and mini leaders of Udupi District.

ASH
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

GOOD LESSON FOR SORAKE.... IF U DONT GIVE TICKET FOR MUSLIMS U WILL NEVER GET MUSLIM VOTE.

MUSLIM VOTERS ARE THE DECISION MAKERS

Farooq
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

tight slap on the face of Sorake

ASIF
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

THANKS FOR SUPPORTING BJP..... SPECIALLY SDPI AND OTHER CongRSS leaders...

Zahoor Ahmed
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

BJP must appreciate Congress (Oscar,Sorake,Ramanath Rai ) for retain Both districts

S.M. Nawaz Kuk…
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

JP Effect in Udupi Dist

SK
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

In the two coastal districts, Bjp wil have the upper hand.......that is seen in every day life......

pakka congress
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

This is really same for us all congressmen, people are not voting for true face, BJP s worst ruling in india.,

harishchandra
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

congress did so much kithapathi still BJP won, this is the truth of True leadership.

Pradeep Chinnaswamy
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

BJP won, so exited will celebrate in bengaluru,

Saleem
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

its total cheating vote counted, BJP government can do whatever they want until they are in power.

Mohan Kamte
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

Congress take up JNU Student to defeat ZP election, but congress itself bites the dust.

Surendra
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

BJP Jai Ho, Expected result.

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 3,2020

Tumakuru, Jan 3: Chief Minister B.S. Yediyurappa, who has drawn flak for the Centre releasing “inadequate” flood relief to the State, on Thursday asked Prime Minister Narendra Modi for additional relief during his speech at a farmers’ convention in Tumakuru.

The Chief Minister even said, “I have brought this to the notice of the Prime Minister three or four times, but till now no additional relief has been sanctioned. I request him with folded hands to release it soon,” in Kannada. The Prime Minister, who spoke later at the event, however, did not respond to the Chief Minister’s request in his speech.

Mr. Yediyurappa said the State had witnessed losses to the tune of over ₹30,000 crore because of floods.

‘Stress on irrigation’

Addressing farmers at one of his main support bases of Tumakuru, the Lingayat strongman advised the Prime Minister that his dream of doubling farmers’ income by 2023 could become a reality only if he focused on “providing scientific price to farm produce, bringing water to farms through irrigation, and by interlinking rivers”.

Mr. Yediyurappa’s remarks made at a programme to release the fourth instalment of the Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Yojana, a farm subsidy cash transfer scheme of the Union government, have raised eyebrows.

Stressing on the key role of irrigation schemes in farmers’ welfare, he sought a special package of ₹50,000 crore for completion of long-pending projects in Karnataka.

The five-minute-long speech is being seen as an attempt by the Chief Minister to assert himself within the party by publicly putting even the Prime Minister on the mat. This comes in the wake of the BJP suffering defeats in multiple States and the party’s victory in the recent bypolls in the State under Mr. Yediyurappa’s leadership, both of which have only strengthened the Chief Minister, sources in the party said. “We are curious as to how the party high command will now deal with this public assertion in front of the Prime Minister,” a senior party leader said.

The Chief Minister has been reportedly “deeply unhappy” over the delay in the flood relief by the Union government and also the “inadequate” amount released. The Opposition has attacked him over lack of adequate Central relief, which was interpreted as the BJP central leadership’s reported unhappiness with him. The Chief Minister had then said he was doing a “tightrope walk”.

After a delay of over two months, the Centre released ₹1,200 crore as flood relief in October 2019.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 28,2020

Bengaluru, Jan 28: Brace for hefty traffic penalties as the state government is all set to reverse a notification on revised fines which came into effect last September following pushback from road users and opposition parties.

The Karnataka government will implement traffic penalties as stipulated in the amended Motor Vehicles Act, 2019, in a phased manner following a diktat from the Centre. The government did not specify the timeline for it.

“At a recent meeting of transport ministers from various states, the Union government explained why it wanted to implement these huge fines. We found it convincing and will implement it in its original form,” said transport minister Laxman Savadi on Monday.

Savadi said India’s image globally has taken a beating due to the high number of road deaths and the Centre wants to change it at any cost. However, he said the entire set of hefty fines would not be reintroduced all at once.

BJP govt revised rates in Sept

The BJP government last September had revised fines on compoundable offences and those which are fined on the spot by traffic cops by 50%- 80%, barring drunken driving and racing.

As per the revised rates, helmetless riding attracted a penalty of Rs 500 against Rs 1,000 notified by the Centre. Driving without a licence attracted a fine of Rs 1,000 for

two- and three-wheelers and Rs 2,000 for light motor vehicles as against the earlier Rs 5,000 for all types of vehicles.

The central government recently told states and Union Territories they should enforce fines as per the amended Act and they cannot be rolled back. The road transport and highways ministry said fines cannot be reduced below the minimum amount fixed by law, unless the President gives his assent.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 23,2020

The euphoria over the claim that around 3,000 tonnes of gold reserves, worth Rs 12 trillion, have been discovered in Uttar Pradesh’s Sonbhadra district could not last even 24 hours, with the Geological Survey of India (GSI) clarifying on Saturday there had been no such discovery.

The GSI, headquartered in Kolkata, rebutted the claims of the Uttar Pradesh Directorate of Geology and Mining (UPDGM), and said “miscommunication” must have led to the wrong reporting of facts.

M Sridhar, director general of the GSI, said nobody in the agency gave any such data. He said 52,806 tonnes of gold ore was found in Sonbhadra district during the exploration work in 1998-2000. From this reserve, only 160 kg of gold can be extracted.

“There must have been some miscommunication of facts because of which the gold ore deposits have been overestimated. We have written a letter to Uttar Pradesh (UPDGM), stating the facts. The GSI has not estimated such kind of vast resource of gold deposits in Sonbhadra,” Sridhar said.

ALSO READ: 2,900-tonne gold mine found in Sonbhadra, 4 times that of India's reserves

The UPDGM had said on Friday that gold deposits were found in Son Pahadi and Hardi areas of the district. Sridhar said while gold ore was found in the area during the GSI’s exploration work in 1998-2000, it had told the state government about the discovery in November last year.

Under the new regulation, which came into effect from 2015, the GSI has to inform the state government when ore deposits are discovered. Earlier, no such action was mandatory. In its report, the GSI estimated that only 3.03 gm of gold can be extracted from a tonne of ore. It also clarified that even the extraction amount was tentative and could not be established for certain.

Moreover, Sridhar said the deposits were spread across only 0.5 sq km in forest land, which made the mining of ore economically unviable. “When there are several mines nearby, we can club it into a block and then it makes sense to mine the ore. But in this case, the deposits are too small to make it viable for any company to mine it,” he said. The GSI usually prioritises its exploration work based on the needs of the Centre. While strategic minerals like tin, cobalt, lithium, beryllium, germanium, gallium, indium, tantalum, niobium, selenium, and bismuth are atop the list in GSI exploration, gold is another commodity on its priority list.

According to the World Gold Council, India has reserves of 630 tonnes of gold.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.