Udupi: BJP sweeps Zilla Panchayat, all 3 Taluk Panchayats; Cong suffers blow

[email protected] (CD Network)
February 23, 2016

bjpUdupi, Feb 23: The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has swept the elections to the udupi Zilla Panchayat and all the three taluk panchayats in the district.

The results gave a major blow to the Congress party in coastal district as it not only faced second consecutive defeat in the ZP, but also lost three seats compared to the previous election.

The BJP, which had won 16 out of 25 seats in 2011, has now improved its performance by winning 20 out of 26 seats. The Congress has managed to win only 6 seats. In 2011 it had won 9 ZP seats. More details are awaited.

Udupi ZP election results at a glance

Party BJP Cong Others
2005 (25 seats) 12 13 0
2011 (25 seats) 16 09 0
2016(26 seats) 20 06 0

Udupi ZP Constituency

Winners

Perdoor

Sudhakar Shetty (Cong)

Brahmavar

Sheela Shetty (BJP)

Udyavar

Dinakar (BJP)

Hiriyadka

Chandrika (Cong)

Kurkaalu

Geetanjali (BJP)

Shirva

Wilson (Cong)

Yellur

Shilpa (BJP)

Padubidri

Shashikanth (BJP)

Hebri

Jyothi (BJP)

Belmannu

Reshma (BJP)

Bailoor

Sumith (BJP)

Meeyaru

Divya (BJP)

Bajagoli

Udaya Kotian (BJP)

Kota

Raghavendra Kanchan (BJP)

Mandarthi

Prathap Hegde (BJP)

Kavraadi

Jyothi (Cong)

Kalyanapura

Janardhana Thonse (Cong)

Shiroor

Suresh (BJP)

Baindoor

Shankara Poojary (BJP)

Kambada Kone

Gouri (BJP)

Thrasi

Shobha (BJP)

Vandse

Babu Shetty (BJP)

Koteshwara

Lakshmi (BJP)

Beejadi

Lata (BJP)

Siddapura

Taranath Shetty (BJP)

Haladi

Supritha (BJP)

Udupi’s 3 TP results at a glance

TP Total BJP Cong Others
Udupi 41 27 14 00
Karkala 20 19 01
Kundapur 37 27 10
Total

Also Read:

Will do deep introspection of Congress performance in DK, Udupi: UT Khader

Congress wrests Mangaluru, Bantwal Taluk Panchayats from BJP

Dakshina Kannada Zilla, Taluk panchayat election results at a glance

Counting begins in ZP, TP polls across Karnataka: Click her

Comments

abdul
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

This looks majority of people have voted based on caste/sects. muslim candidates won in muslim majority area even candiadates are not deserved and similarly in other relegion dominated areas too. this needs to be eradicated and elect the honest people who really works for betterment of society in all fileds.
I assume this result definatly not based on the performance of the previous tenure or state/central government performance.
every voters are the decision makers for future India.

IBRAHIM.HUSSAIN
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

This results shows the way to Sorake to resign from his current ministry. Oscar fernandes to be dethroned from Congress central hicommand. Mr. Promod must come out of Sorake/Oscar combine and work independently. We know he is a loyal worker of the party. But as long as the two opportunists are in the party, congress popularity will decline to Zero. This is a ringing bell to all congress great and mini leaders of Udupi District.

ASH
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

GOOD LESSON FOR SORAKE.... IF U DONT GIVE TICKET FOR MUSLIMS U WILL NEVER GET MUSLIM VOTE.

MUSLIM VOTERS ARE THE DECISION MAKERS

Farooq
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

tight slap on the face of Sorake

ASIF
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

THANKS FOR SUPPORTING BJP..... SPECIALLY SDPI AND OTHER CongRSS leaders...

Zahoor Ahmed
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

BJP must appreciate Congress (Oscar,Sorake,Ramanath Rai ) for retain Both districts

S.M. Nawaz Kuk…
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

JP Effect in Udupi Dist

SK
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

In the two coastal districts, Bjp wil have the upper hand.......that is seen in every day life......

pakka congress
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

This is really same for us all congressmen, people are not voting for true face, BJP s worst ruling in india.,

harishchandra
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

congress did so much kithapathi still BJP won, this is the truth of True leadership.

Pradeep Chinnaswamy
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

BJP won, so exited will celebrate in bengaluru,

Saleem
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

its total cheating vote counted, BJP government can do whatever they want until they are in power.

Mohan Kamte
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

Congress take up JNU Student to defeat ZP election, but congress itself bites the dust.

Surendra
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

BJP Jai Ho, Expected result.

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 5,2020

Bengaluru, May 5: The Karnataka government is planning to maintain a Health database of its citizens in the backdrop of experience gained from the COVID-19 pandemic, Medical Education Minister K Sudhakar said on Tuesday.

In a statement issued here, he said a “Health Register” will be maintained to keep track of all health issues of the people and the project will be implemented first in Chikkaballapur district on an experimental basis.

“COVID-19 has provided enough experience for all of us and therefore, there is a need to maintain health data of each person. The government will be undertaking a survey using a team of Primary Health Centre officials, Revenue officials, Education department staff and Asha Workers,” the Minister said in a release here.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com news network
February 14,2020

Bengaluru, Feb 14: In a major embarrassment to the police, the Karnataka High Court has termed as illegal the prohibitory orders imposed under Section 144 of CrPC by the City Police Commissioner in December 2019 in the light of the anti-Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) protests in Bengaluru.

The orders were passed “without application of mind” and without following due procedures, the court noted. Giving reasons for upholding the arguments of the petitioners that there was no application of mind by the Police Commissioner (Bhaskar Rao) before imposing restrictions, a division bench of the High Court said he had not recorded the reasons, except reproducing the contents of letters addressed to him by the Deputy Commissioners of Police (DCPs). 

The state government had contended that prohibitory orders were passed based on reports submitted by the DCPs who expressed apprehension about anti-social elements creating law and order problems and damaging public property by taking advantage of the anti-CAA protests.  

The High Court bench said the Police Commissioner should have conducted inquiry as stated by the Supreme Court to check the reasons cited by the DCPs who submitted identical reports. Except for this, there were no facts laid out by the Police Commissioner, the court said.

“There is complete absence of reasons. If the order indicated that the Police Commissioner was satisfied by the apprehension of DCPs, it would have been another matter,” it said.  

“The apex court has held that it must record the reasons for imposition of restrictions and there has to be a formation of opinion by the district magistrate. Only then can  the extraordinary powers conferred on the district magistrate can be exercised. This procedure was not followed. Hence, exercise of power under Section 144 by the commissioner, as district magistrate, was not at all legal”, the bench said. 

“We hold that the order dated December 18, 2019 is illegal and cannot stand judicial scrutiny in terms of the apex court’s orders in the Ramlila Maidan case and Anuradha Bhasin case,” the HC bench said while upholding the arguments of Prof Ravivarma Kumar, who appeared for some of the petitioners.   

Partly allowing a batch of public interest petitions questioning the imposition of prohibitory orders and cancelling the permission granted for protesters in the city, the bench of Chief Justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka and Justice Hemant Chandangoudar observed that, unfortunately, in the present case, there was no indication of application of mind in passing prohibitory orders.

The bench said the observation was confined to this order only and it cannot be applicable in general. If there is a similar situation (necessitating imposition of restrictions), the state is not helpless, the court said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com web desk
May 30,2020

Udupi, May 30: Following the announcement of re-opening of places of worship from June 8, Ibrahim Musliyar Bekal, the Qadhi of Udupi has called upon the Centre and State governments to issue uniform guidelines for Muslims to be followed while going to mosques for congregational prayers.

In a media statement, he said that even though the government is relaxing the lockdown in a phased manner things will not be like before as people have to follow the precautionary measures to control the spread of the coronavirus. 

He said that the union and state governments after holding discussions with the authorities of Central Waqf Council and the State Waqf Boards and Islamic scholars, should form a uniform guidelines for all mosques.

He also suggested a few guidelines such as offering congregational prayers soon after adaan, closing the mosque soon after prayers, maintaining physical distance and avoiding the use of toilet in mosques. 

He also suggested the sick, elderly people and children to prefer to offer prayers in homes instead of mosques until situation becomes normal. 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.