In the beginning of January 2020 two very disturbing events were reported from Pakistan. One was the attack on Nankana Sahib, the holy shrine where Sant Guru Nanak was born. While one report said that the place has been desecrated, the other stated that it was a fight between two Muslim groups. Prime Minister of Pakistan Imran Khan condemned the incident and the main accused Imran Chisti was arrested. The matter related to abduction and conversion of a Sikh girl Jagjit Kaur, daughter of Pathi (One who reads Holy Guru Granth Sahib in Gurudwara) of the Gurudwara. In another incident one Sikh youth Ravinder Singh, who was out on shopping for his marriage, was shot dead in Peshawar.
While these condemnable attacks took place on the Sikh minority in Pakistan, BJP was quick enough to jump to state that it is events like this which justify the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). Incidentally CAA is the Act which is discriminatory and relates to citizenship with Religion, which is not as per the norms of Indian constitution. There are constant debates and propaganda that population of Hindus has come down drastically in Pakistan and Bangla Desh. Amit Shah, the Home minister stated that in Pakistan the population of Hindus has come down from 23% at the time of partition to 3.7% at present. And in Bangla Desh it has come down from 22% to present 8%.
While not denying the fact that the religious minorities are getting a rough deal in both these countries, the figures which are presented are totally off the mark. These figures don’t take into consideration the painful migrations, which took place at the time of partition and formation of Bangla Desh later. Pakistan census figures tell a different tale. Their first census was held in 1951. As per this census the overall percentage of Non Muslim in Pakistan (East and West together) was 14.2%, of this in West Pakistan (Now Pakistan) it was 3.44 and in Eat Pakistan it was 23.2. In the census held in Pakistan 1998 it became 3.72%. As far as Bangla Desh is concerned the share of Non Muslims has gone down from 23.2 (1951) to 9.6% in 2011.
The largest minority of Pakistan is Ahmadis, (https://minorityrights.org/country/pakistan/) who are close to 4 Million and are not recognised as Muslims in Pakistan. In Bangla Desh the major migrations of Hindus from Bangla Desh took place in the backdrop of Pakistan army’s atrocities in the then East Pakistan.
As far as UN data on refugees in India it went up by 17% between 2016-2019 and largest numbers were from Tibet and Sri Lanka. (https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publication…)
The state of minorities is in a way the index of strength of democracy. Most South Asian Countries have not been able to sustain democratic values properly. In Pakistan, the Republic began with Jinnah’s classic speech where secularism was to be central credo of Pakistan. This 11th August speech was in a way what the state policy should be, as per which people of all faiths are free to practice their religion. Soon enough the logic of ‘Two Nation theory” and formation of Pakistan, a separate state for Muslim took over. Army stepped in and dictatorship was to reign there intermittently. Democratic elements were suppressed and the worst came when Zia Ul Haq Islamized the state in collusion with Maulanas. The army was already a strong presence in Pakistan. The popular formulation for Pakistan was that it is ruled by three A’s, Army, America and Allah (Mullah).
Bangla Desh had a different trajectory. Its very formation was a nail in the coffin of ‘two nation theory’; that religion can be the basis of a state. Bangla Desh did begin as a secular republic but communal forces and secular forces kept struggling for their dominance and in 1988 it also became Islamic republic. At another level Myanmar, in the grip of military dictatorship, with democratic elements trying to retain their presence is also seeing a hard battle. Democracy or not, the army and Sanghas (Buddhist Sang has) are strong, in Myanmar as well. The most visible result is persecution of Rohingya Muslims.
Similar phenomenon is dominating in Sri Lanka also where Budhhist Sanghas and army have strong say in the political affairs, irrespective of which Government is ruling. Muslim and Christian minorities are a big victim there, while Tamils (Hindus, Christians etc.) suffered the biggest damage as ethnic and religious minorities. India had the best prospect of democracy, pluralism and secularism flourishing here. The secular constitution, the outcome of India’s freedom struggle, the leadership of Gandhi and Nehru did ensure the rooting of democracy and secularism in a strong way.
India so far had best democratic credentials amongst all the south Asian countries. Despite that though the population of minorities rose mainly due to poverty and illiteracy, their overall marginalisation was order of the day, it went on worsening with the rise of communal forces, with communal forces resorting to identity issues, and indulging in propaganda against minorities.
While other South Asian countries should had followed India to focus more on infrastructure and political culture of liberalism, today India is following the footsteps of Pakistan. The retrograde march of India is most visible in the issues which have dominated the political space during last few years. Issues like Ram Temple, Ghar Wapasi, Love Jihad, Beef-Cow are now finding their peak in CAA.
India’s reversal towards a polity with religion’s identity dominating the political scene was nicely presented by the late Pakistani poetess Fahmida Riaz in her poem, Tum bhi Hum Jaise Nikle (You also turned out to be like us). While trying to resist communal forces has been an arduous task, it is becoming more difficult by the day. This phenomenon has been variously called, Fundamentalism, Communalism or religious nationalism among others. Surely it has nothing to do with the religion as practiced by the great Saint and Sufi traditions of India; it resorts mainly to political mobilization by using religion as a tool.
Comments
Yere gavu e kirkiri cow matha, India matha , chaddi jarnde. First of all confirm which is your mother then jai...
Dear Cheddis, Please take care of your mother who gave birth to YOU. MLA Waris did the right thing by opposing to build memorial of great person from our tax payers money. instead of Pending the money on the society ... This stupids people are spending in statue which is of no use and life less...
The leaders should look for those who have life & not spend on lifeless object. when people are living in poverty
today RSS will tell us to say bharath is ur mata, tomorrow cow is mata and then God, hence we can only say Jai Hind,,,,,,,,,,,,,
one anti national third class loafer who is born to a bitch in saudi ,shouting anti india slogan here ... CD Is allowing this type of antin india slogan... which shows menrtality of muslims and shows how irresponsible cd is .. ... 9 likes proves there are 9 bastards who are namak haram.... jai sri ram... we will soon teach these bastards a wonderful lesson ....jai bharat mata ... jai ho benjamin netanyahu ... jai narendra modi ...bharath mata na kalli walli andu abuse maadthiro curious anno halka soole magane ,if u r born to ur father come to india and say this ... namak haram
Community which forget their own Maatha & create 100's of Maatha's to gain political power.... RSS is terrorist organisation... they act as nationalists... shame on you...
Lots of poor people are suffering from no food, no water & shelter... help them & show your humanity... Instead you try to disturb peace & harmony between communities.... All secular hindu, muslim & christians should unite together to fight against this acting nationalist terror organisations.... we should create brotherhood among different communities...
We can’t even say Saudia Mata Ki Jai or Afghan Mata Ki Jai or Bhoomi Mata Ki Jai. Can RSS terrorist explain us who is that Bharat Mata?.....Jai Hind
To save the situation the MLA could have said Jai Hind ....
WHY NO ACTION ON SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR FOR CHANTING PAKISTAN ZINDABAD???? WHERE ARE THOSE PRO CHADDIS IN THE MAHA ASSEMBLY ??? AND NOW HERE IN CD WHY DONT YOU CRITICIZE TO SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR???? IS THIS NOT ANTI NATIONAL???? THERE ARE SO MANY EXAMPLE TO SAY THAT RSS IS NOT AN INDIAN IT IS THE FIRST PART OF ISIS, BECOZ RSS WAS EXISTS BEFORE ISIS.
We do not Say ''MATHA'' a imaginary word created by RSS idelogists ....we die but will not say it.....
Who ever want to say it let them first go and hoist INDIAN National Flag in Nagpur headquarters which is also in INDIA `
Aur kitni maa hey re thum logon ko.. Jay Hind..
Curious Khobar...
Shame on you...
shut your....
chaddi people have so many matha , cow, india etc...
bharath maataa ki kalli walli
we say only Jai Hind, we love india, we dont want to teach Rss people, we Never Say Bharat Mataki, .....
Many of RSS members have become terrorists after saying it....what is the big deal....as long as you love your country it does not really matter if he says or not....Muslims love India more than non muslims...they are ready to give life for it....Let RSS hoist Indian flag right in front of its Headquarter....then we can say they are patriots....until such time we cant consider them at all....
Nobody have the right to force anyone to do anything.
This is individual's right and choice to do so if he/she feels comfortable with it.
There may be no harm in telling Bharat Mataki Jai, but it should not be by force. It is his choice.
This is not constitutional or religious duty to say that.
However not telling is not at all a crime.
When individual enforces his own idea, then real obligatory duty also fails.
May God give wisdom to these people.
Add new comment