India ranked 77th on a sustainability index that takes into account per capita carbon emissions and ability of children in a nation to live healthy lives and secures 131st spot on a flourishing ranking that measures the best chance at survival and well-being for children, according to a UN-backed report.
The report was released on Wednesday by a commission of over 40 child and adolescent health experts from around the world. It was commissioned by the World Health Organization (WHO), UN Children's Fund (UNICEF) and The Lancet medical journal.
In the report assessing the capacity of 180 countries to ensure that their youngsters can survive and thrive, India ranks 77th on the Sustainability Index and 131 on the Flourishing Index, it said.
Flourishing is the geometric mean of Surviving and Thriving. For Surviving, the authors selected maternal survival, survival in children younger than 5 years old, suicide, access to maternal and child health services, basic hygiene and sanitation, and lack of extreme poverty.
For Thriving, the domains were educational achievement, growth and nutrition, reproductive freedom, and protection from violence.
Under the Sustainability Index, the authors noted that promoting today's national conditions for children to survive and thrive must not come at the cost of eroding future global conditions for children's ability to flourish.
The Sustainability Index ranks countries on excess carbon emissions compared with the 2030 target. This provides a convenient and available proxy for a country's contribution to sustainability in future.
The report noted that under realistic assumptions about possible trajectories towards sustainable greenhouse gas emissions, models predict that global carbon emissions need to be reduced from 39·7 giga tonnes to 22·8 gigatonnes per year by 2030 to maintain even a 66 per cent chance of keeping global warming below 1·5°C.
It said that the world's survival depended on children being able to flourish, but no country is doing enough to give them a sustainable future.
"No country in the world is currently providing the conditions we need to support every child to grow up and have a healthy future," said Anthony Costello, Professor of Global Health and Sustainability at University College London, one of the lead authors of the report.
"Especially, they're under immediate threat from climate change and from commercial marketing, which has grown hugely in the last decade," said Costello – former WHO Director of Mother, Child and Adolescent health.
Norway leads the table for survival, health, education and nutrition rates - followed by South Korea and the Netherlands. Central African Republic, Chad and Somalia come at the bottom.
However, when taking into account per capita CO2 emissions, these top countries trail behind, with Norway 156th, the Republic of Korea 166th and the Netherlands 160th.
Each of the three emits 210 per cent more CO2 per capita than their 2030 target, the data shows, while the US, Australia, and Saudi Arabia are among the 10 worst emitters. The lowest emitters are Burundi, Chad and Somalia.
According to the report, the only countries on track to beat CO2 emission per capita targets by 2030, while also performing fairly – within the top 70 – on child flourishing measures are: Albania, Armenia, Grenada, Jordan, Moldova, Sri Lanka, Tunisia, Uruguay and Vietnam.
"More than 2 billion people live in countries where development is hampered by humanitarian crises, conflicts, and natural disasters, problems increasingly linked with climate change," said Minister Awa Coll-Seck from Senegal, Co-Chair of the commission.
The report also highlights the distinct threat posed to children from harmful marketing.
Evidence suggests that children in some countries see as many as 30,000 advertisements on television alone in a single year, while youth exposure to vaping (e-cigarettes) advertisements increased by more than 250 per cent in the US over two years, reaching more than 24 million young people.
Studies in Australia, Canada, Mexico, New Zealand and the US – among many others – have shown that self-regulation has not hampered commercial ability to advertise to children.
Children's exposure to commercial marketing of junk food and sugary beverages is associated with purchase of unhealthy foods and overweight and obesity, linking predatory marketing to the alarming rise in childhood obesity, it said.
The number of obese children and adolescents increased from 11 million in 1975 to 124 million in 2016 – an 11-fold increase, with dire individual and societal costs, the report said.
To protect children, the authors call for a new global movement driven by and for children.
Specific recommendations include stopping CO2 emissions with the utmost urgency, to ensure children have a future on this planet; placing children and adolescents at the centre of global efforts to achieve sustainable development, the report said.
New policies and investment in all sectors to work towards child health and rights; incorporating children's voices into policy decisions and tightening national regulation of harmful commercial marketing, supported by a new Optional Protocol to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, it said.
Comments
Haha gabbu beary ...aithu kandi dini hogappa ...fish sales ge time aithu ...haha ...
Jihadi galige jai annodakke kalla ander yaavaglu ready ...name itself says every thing ....
FYI ...faizhal Bhai avru swimming practice maadtha iddiddu ...ganapati na mulugislikke ...not to kill as u guys think ....case already close ...en Bhai ...belagge bega bega message haaki bitideera. .Dana kaddiro lorry bega bantha hege ? Haha...
I would like to express my heartfelt solidarity with my beloved brothers ? Riyaz, Athaullah and all others comrades! Jai CFI.
Naren and Viren.....
I don't know what you uneducated goons are commenting........abvp got a big zero in JNU elections.......ha ha.....
We know who roam around with lethal weapons.....in the name of swayam sevak.....and go raksha......and live on TV in Maharashtra goons attacking and attempt to murder a police officer on Ganesha visarjan.....what you have to say.....
It is a good sign for PFI because now you think of joining secular colleges instead of communal colleges.Why do you want to satudy in such communal biased colleges.
These people donno that. Police are cheddies. Because of these police People are taking law in their hands.
Naren i think ur 10 Paisa kammi. Talking nonsense everyday.
Naren bhai.. you have given a list of murdered people and called them peace lovers. Solpa correction madkolli... Actually they were \beef piece\" lovers like you."
I heard from local sources that they were armed with lethal weapons ...put goonda act on these third rated goons ..how dare they can attack police officers ....maklige sariyaagi ikki ...
jihadist attacks on police and schools are nowadays very cmon...where as their community members are busy giving lecture on peace ....many PF the kasargode Isis militants are linked to PFI and CFI ..Indian intelligence must monitor jihadists ...same PFI is accused in 8-9 murders of Hindu peacelovers ....be it charan poojary or raju or Prashanth poojari ...polali ananthu ...candle santhu
Mohan ABVP rightly said .... ABVP will not tolerate if anyone attacks Police. Because Police men are wearing also Khaki chaddi inside. Police also belongs to them (RSS).
@ Abdul Samad
Yes you are right. Commissioner told the normal people to raise the voice whenever there is injustice. CFI students raised their voice against injustice but police are not even ready to take the memorandum So commissioner has to f
Srinivas college took revenge against these students. Down down srinivas college. Let us all fight for justice.
Yesterday at town hall programme our commisioner of police asked the decent people to raise their voice against injustice! When the young activist raise their voice they are treated with lati with oppression!! Waw what a hypocrites!! As we all know 60% of police are RSS activists. nothing to worry CFI leadership capable enough to resist democratically!!
Why the police version is not mentioned in the report? I request CD reporter to be impartial and add the version of police too. one sided story we dont want. We know very well who these guys are.
Three policemen were attacked by CFI terrorists. What the hell other policemen were doing? Why cant they use their guns to finish those who attack policemen?
Dont blame our college for no reason. This case has no link with hijab ban issue. Actually there was no need for a protest two weeks ago. College was ready to withdraw hijab ban if the parents of the students collectively wanted it. CFI just tried to get political milage by staging a protest. And now they are supporting ragging accused. what a shame!
I dont think anyone will lodge false ragging complaint. Something they might have done in the past. the college used the opportunity. CFI wanted to become hero and turned zero.
Very sad. What was the need for the police to cane the CFI activists? They could have accepted the memorandum and throw it into dust bin if the demand was not genuine. Unfortunately this happened within a day after leaders of different community came together for a better mangaluru.
Marlerr!!!!
jokers of the year
wow good shot!!!
Add new comment