Triple Talaq has no place in a secular country: Centre tells Supreme Court

October 8, 2016

New Delhi, Oct 8: The Centre on Friday opposed before the Supreme Court the practice of triple talaq, saying anything that is subjected to the whims of menfolk was incompatible with the principle of gender equality and justice as enshrined in the Constitution.

talaq“Gender justice and dignity of women are non-negotiable and overarching constitutional values, and can brook no compromise in a secular country like India,” the government stated. In an affidavit, the NDA government contended that triple talaq, nikah halala' (bar against remarriage with divorced husband, without an intervening marriage with another man) and polygamy cannot be regarded as an integral part of the religion.

“Even theocratic countries where Islam is a state religion have undergone reforms, so these practices cannot be regarded as integral to the religion and India being a secular republic, there is no reason to deny the women rights available under the Constitution,” the law ministry said.

Coming out in support of a batch of petitions, including one by advocate Balaji Srinivasan on behalf of Shayara Bano, the government said the issue of the validity of triple talaq, nikah halala' and polygamy needs to be considered in the light of principles of gender justice and overriding constitutional principles of non-discrimination, dignity and equality.

The Centre stated: “Secularism being a hallmark of Indian democracy, no part of its citizenry ought to be denied access to fundamental rights, much less can a section of secular society be worse off than its counterparts in theocratic countries, many of which have undergone reforms.”

The Centre said though polygamy was regarded progressive and path-breaking centuries ago, in light of the principle of gender justice, it required “serious reconsideration”.

Triple talaq, nikah halala' and polygamy cannot be regarded as essential and integral part of the religion and would therefore be not entitled to protection under Article 25 (right to practice religion) of the Constitution, it added.

Even an affidavit by the Muslim Personal Law Board has referred to those practices as “undesirable” and which cannot be elevated to essential religious practice, the government said.

“Personal laws must be examined in the light of the overarching goal of gender justice and dignity of women... Any provision of the personal law which is inconsistent with fundamental rights is void,” the government said. Can personal laws, meant to preserve diverse identity, be used as a pretext to deny women equality and status available under the Constitution, the Centre asked

Comments

shaji
 - 
Monday, 10 Oct 2016

Muslim Ulemas need to educate Ummah on Talaq issue as it is being misused and practiced incorrectly. It is not surprising that Central Govt is not accepting Shariat in the presence of advisers like MJ Akbar, Mukhtar Abbas, shanawaz, Muneer kallapally etc who have zero knowledge about islam. These people are traitors like Mir Qasim and busy in appeasing BJP high command.

Go Moothra
 - 
Saturday, 8 Oct 2016

Viren ......wish to become Muslim as we have a chance to marry 4 wives...... Bad luck......

but you should also know that you can marry 4 wives only if you can maintain Justice between which is almost a difficult task for Non Muslim...because we eat beef and have the strength to maintain all the daily aspects ....unlike a Fanatic Hindutva activist... who eat beef but with bear or whisky or rum

Abdulla
 - 
Saturday, 8 Oct 2016

Please watch this
MAJHA VISHESH : Aurangabad: Discussion on Ban Muslim Triple Talaq Law

Also this...
Br.imran Answering About Triple Talaq To a Non Muslim Sister.

And YOU judge yourself....

Kaizer
 - 
Saturday, 8 Oct 2016

People doesnt know what exactly triple talaq means
Wel Said Ahmed KC
there are some rulings in triple talaq, it doesnt mean u say triple talaq and the relationship goes invalid.
Follow the exact rulings of triple talaq which will be a best solution for everyone.

Ahmed K. C.
 - 
Saturday, 8 Oct 2016

Muslims are taking advantage of \triple talaq\" without knowing the correct way of \"triple talaq\"
If followed in the right way, there is no better solution than this for any broken marriages."

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 29,2020

Bengaluru, Jul 29: The Karnataka High Court’s division bench of Chief Justice Abhay Oka and Justice H P Sandesh today rejected an application that wanted Amulya Leona’s case to be transferred from Karnataka Police to the National Investigation Agency (NIA).

The bench, while observing that extraordinary jurisdiction can’t be exercised for transferring the case to the NIA, asked “What is so special that investigation should be transferred to NIA?”

The court, in its previous hearing, had questioned the maintainability of the petition seeking transfer of the sedition case against Leona to the NIA.

According to the petitioner, advocate Pavana Chandra Shetty, the case is a serious matter against national integration and unity and has not been investigated properly by the police. The state police also failed to file the chargesheet within 90 days, he said, and also asked for cancellation of her bail.

The bench asked the petitioner as to how a bail, already granted to a person, can be cancelled. “Is it not the indefeasible right of the accused to be released on bail if chargesheet is not filed within stipulated time? How can you make a prayer for cancellation of bail?”  the Court asked.

The counsel for the petitioner also stated that in cases of a cognizable offence, when the chargesheet is purposely not filed within the stipulated time, the matter will have to transferred to the appropriate authority.

The court responded to his contention by asking him how could the court override law and cancel the bail. “Where is the question of cancellation of bail? Can we override the law and say that bail should be cancelled?” said the bench.

Advocate Vishal Raghu had filed the petition for transfer of Leona’s case, who was accused of raising pro-Pakistan slogans at an anti-CAA rally on February 20 at Freedom Park. The advocate had blamed the probe team for not filing a chargesheet on time and has asked the state government to approach the higher court against bail granted to Leona.

Bengaluru student Amulya Leona was charged with sedition for her actions in the presence of All India Majlis-e-Ittehad-ul-Muslimeen chief Asaduddin Owaisi. She was arrested by the Bengaluru police for allegedly shouting ‘Pakistan Zindabad’ slogans at an anti- CAA Protest in Bengaluru in February this year. On June 11, she was granted conditional bail by the Bengaluru civil court.

Her bail plea was earlier rejected by a Bengaluru court, after she had spent a three-month period in jail, stating that she may abscond if she is released. The sessions judge Vidhyadhar Shirahatti had also stated that if the petitioner is granted bail, she may abscond and may involve in similar offence which affects peace at large and hence her petition is liable to be rejected. The court had also noted that Amulya Leona is an influential person who may threaten and influence the witness and hamper the case in case of the prosecution and will abscond if released on bail.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 12,2020

Mangaluru, Feb 12: As many as 54 house surgeons from Kasturba Medical College (KMC) staged a protest near the casualty of the Wenlock Hospital on Wednesday over over non-payment of monthly stipend.

House surgeons, who have studied MBBS under the government quota, have not received their stipend from last 11 months. They have to get a monthly stipend of Rs 20,000 during their one-year internship at the government hospital.

The protesting house surgeons alleged that their stipends have not been released despite Chief Minister BS Yediyurappa’s written order dated December 24.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com web desk
January 3,2020

Mangaluru, Jan 3: A young entrepreneur reportedly jumped off the Netravati bridge near Thokkottu on the outskirts of the city today morning.

The youth who allegedly committed suicide has been Navesh Kottari, 30, a resident of Ullalbail. He was the proprietor of N J Shamiyana.

The incident took place at around 6:30 a.m. Police and fire brigade rushed to the spot after sometime and launched search operation for the body in the river Netravati.

The body was retrieved in the afternoon.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.