Actress Ramya Barna secretly marries MLA Zameer Ahmed’s relative

News Network
July 15, 2017

Bengaluru, Jul 15: Sandalwood's popular actor Ramya Barna has allegedly married in a hush-hush affair with Fahad Ali Khan, who is two years younger to her, reports media.

It is reported that Ramya and Fahad Ali Khan solemnised their marriage on May 29, 2017 at Shivajinagar's sub-registrar's office. Fahad, as media reported, is the son of JD(S) leader Zameer Ahmed Khan's brother-in-law's nephew. Fahad had dabbled in politics - he had contested in BBMP elections from Jayamahal ward from JD (S).

Former JD(S) leader Zameer Ahemed Khan said that "He was not aware of the marriage and he came to know about it after television channels splashed the news."

There were reports that Ramya's last movie 'Toss' could be her last outing however no reason was cited for this. But now it has turned out that since Ramya had plans to settle down, she had decided to go slow on her movie journey.

'Toss' director Dayal Padmanabhan said that Ramya was not keen to join the film crew in its promotion. "She told me her mother had to undergo a surgery, so she could not be part of the promotion team. However, I wasn't aware of her marriage," Padmabhan said.

As the news broke, Ramya Barna confirmed that she had indeed married Fahad. "My mother was not feeling well so, we registered our marriage in a simple ceremony. However, I will hold a reception for family and colleagues from the industry, once my mother recovers well," said Ramya.

Coorg-born Ramya made her debut as a supporting artiste in 'Hani Hani' in 2008. Later, she acted in Yogaraj Bhat 's hit movie 'Pancharangi' and again went on to bag supporting role in Puneeth Rajkumar starrer 'Hudugaru'. For both the movies, she was nominated for Filmfare for best supporting actress - Kannada. Her Tulu movie, 'Oriyardori Asal' was a massive hit running housefull for 150 days! Ramya's recent movie 'Toss' is ready for release.

Comments

Ganesh
 - 
Monday, 17 Jul 2017

everything is possible in siddaramaiah's corrupt government.

Troll
 - 
Monday, 17 Jul 2017

Dear Brother Shubham , why in Mumbai ? come to Kalladka

We Muslims do not support violence .,...but if hate mongers think that our silence is our weakness , then its your biggest mistake ......we MUSLIMS like Lions ...we do not always wandering around announcing that we are the Kings . but if a hyena or or third class creature approach thinking wrongly ,,then you know the next

Roshan deen
 - 
Monday, 17 Jul 2017

Why BJP is not agitating for Inspector Roopa. It is open secrete.They have done pact with ruling AIADMK for Presidential election.Hence Roopa will not be supported by this party.

Mohammed
 - 
Monday, 17 Jul 2017

Today we are Muslims only by name.... none follows Islam and teaching of Prophet Mohammed (PBUH)....

If we did follow, our youth would not be involved in Fraud, drug peddling, Cattle theft, terrorism, right wing groupism etc...... this is not ISLAM

Islam is a religion of peace and righteousness.... open the books and Learn the religion yourself.... don't fall into trap of fake mulla's who misguide the youth...

GOD is the GREATEST

JAI HIND

Abdullah
 - 
Monday, 17 Jul 2017

Are you ready to take action against States that supports these goons???

TR
 - 
Monday, 17 Jul 2017

You could have called Cow Rakshas or police that he is carrying beef or cow meet.

You would not have faced this much trouble.

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 8,2020

Bengaluru, Jan 8: CISF personnel at Bengaluru airport on Wednesday detained two persons after they found two live bullets in their baggage during the routine inspection.

The detained person, said to be of a Mangaluru origin who arrived at the airport on Wednesday morning has claimed to be serving the American military. His mother who had arrived with him too has been taken into custody.

According to officials during the questioning, the man said that he was on a leave and that as he had hurriedly packed his belongings at the last minute there was a possibility that the bullets might have fallen into his bag mistakenly.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com web desk
July 27,2020

New Delhi, Jul 27: A month after banning 59 Chinese applications, the government of Indian has now reportedly banned 47 more apps of Chinese origin in the country. According to sources, the 47 banned Chinese apps were operating as clones of the earlier banned apps. 

The list of the 47 Chinese applications banned by the Indian government will be released soon.

India has also prepared a list of over 250 Chinese apps, including apps linked to Alibaba, that it will examine for any user privacy or national security violations, government sources said. The list also includes Tencent-backed gaming app PUBG.

Some top gaming Chinese applications are also expected to be banned in the new list that is being drawn up, sources said. The Chinese applications, that are being reviewed, have allegedly been sharing data with the Chinese agencies.

Today's decision follows after a high-profile ban of 59 Chinese apps including TikTok, as border tensions continued in Ladakh after a violent, fatal face-off between the Indian and Chinese armies. The government said these apps were engaged in activities that were prejudicial to the sovereignty, integrity and defence of India.

A government press release announcing the ban stated: "The Ministry of Information Technology, invoking it's power under section 69A of the Information Technology Act read with the relevant provisions of the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking of Access of Information by Public) Rules 2009 and in view of the emergent nature of threats has decided to block 59 apps since in view of information available they are engaged in activities which is prejudicial to sovereignty and integrity of India, defence of India, security of state and public order".

A day later, Google said it has removed all the banned applications from the Play Store. Following the ban, TikTok refuted the claims that suggest it will pursue legal action against the Indian government for banning the app in India.

Reacting to the 59 apps banned by India, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said the country is "strongly concerned regarding the decision of the Indian government".

“China is strongly concerned, verifying the situation,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian was quoted as saying by news agency ANI.

"We want to stress that the Chinese government always asks Chinese businesses to abide by international and local laws-regulations. The Indian government has a responsibility to uphold the legal rights of international investors including Chinese ones," Zhao Lijian said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 27,2020

In a development which highlights the diversity in the United Kingdom’s legal system, a 40-year-old Muslim woman has become the first hijab-wearing judge in the country.

Raffia Arshad, a barrister, was appointed a deputy district judge on the Midlands circuit last week after 17-year career in law.  

She said her promotion was great news for diversity in the world’s most respected legal system. She hopes to be an inspiration to young Muslims.

Ms Arshad, who grew up in Yorkshire, north England, has wanted to work in law since she was 11.

Ms Arshad said the judicial office was looking to promote diversity, but when they appointed her they did not know that she wore the hijab.

‘It’s definitely bigger than me,” she told Metro newspaper. "I know this is not about me.

"It’s important for all women, not just Muslim women, but it is particularly important for Muslim women."

Ms Arshad, a mother of three, has been practising private law dealing with children, forced marriage, female genital mutilation and other cases involving Islamic law for the past 17 years.

She was the first in her family to go to university and has also written a leading text on Islamic family law.

Although the promotion by the Lord Chief Justice was welcome news for her, Ms Arshad said the happiness from other people sharing the news was “far greater”.

“I’ve had so many emails from people, men and women," she said.

"It’s the ones from women that stand out, saying that they wear a hijab and thought they wouldn’t even be able to become a barrister, let alone a judge."

Ms Arshad is regularly the subject of discrimination in the courtroom because of her choice to wear the hijab.

She is sometimes mistaken for a court worker or a client.

Ms Arshad said that recently she was asked by an usher whether she was a client, an interpreter, and even if she were on work experience.

“I have nothing against the usher who said that but it reflects that as a society, even for somebody who works in the courts, there is still this prejudicial view that professionals at the top end don’t look like me,” she said.

A family member once advised her to not wear a hijab at an interview for a scholarship at the Inns of Court School of Law in 2001, warning that it would affect her chances of landing the role.

“I decided that I was going to wear my headscarf because for me it’s so important to accept the person for who they are," Ms Arshad said.

"And if I had to become a different person to pursue my profession, it’s not something I wanted.”

The joint heads of St Mary’s Family Law Chambers said they were “delighted” to hear the news of her appointment.

“Raffia has led the way for Muslim women to succeed in the law and at the bar, and has worked tirelessly to promote equality and diversity in the profession,” Vickie Hodges and Judy Claxton said.

“It is an appointment richly deserved and entirely on merit, and all at St Mary’s are proud of her and wish her every success.”

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.