Hadiya’s father prevents women’s panel chief from meeting her

News Network
November 21, 2017

Thiruvananthapuram, Nov 21: Asokan, father of Akhila, aka Hadiya, on Monday prevented the Kerala State Women’s Commission chairperson (SWC) M. C. Josephine from meeting his 26-year-old daughter who converted to Islam and then married a Muslim boy.

The latest controversy comes when she is scheduled to state her side of the case in the Supreme Court this month. Ms. Hadiya, who is forced to stay in her Hindu parents’ house in Kottayam, is the focal point of a national debate on whether she was a victim of “deceptive conversion” to Islam or “love jihad”. 

Her husband had moved the Supreme Court to free Ms. Hadiya from parental custody to reunite with him.

The apex court had reserved its judgment and ordered the National Investigation Agency to probe whether the marriage was part of a “love jihad” conspiracy to convert her to Islam. Ms. Josephine had gone to her house close on the heels of the visit of National Women’s Commission chairperson Rekha Sharma, who is said to be a BJP supporter.

Ms. Sharma had met Ms. Hadiya and claimed that she was hale and happy. She said Mr. Asokan rejected her offer to fly Ms. Hadiya to New Delhi at State expense. The father also refused to reveal their travel plans.

Comments

are you serious?? OMG such low mentality... she is legal age dude... till when should her father decide till she is 99 years old...

@ Yogesh, I presume you are a graduate, but still lack basic educated men’s rational thinking capacity. This would mainly be caused by your narrowmind and colour code thoughts…

 

so to make it more clear to you yourself, I will ask you a simple question if a Muslim girl (20 years) loves and marry a Hindu boy (22 years) will it be love gharwapasi, do you think NIA would be required???

This mind-set is very clear your hatred and biased reasoning against the opposite community, based upon no personal issues but only through mindwash is dangerous…

You have risen and become Taliban thoughts individual.

 

You might look at other community individual and without knowing him start hating him? Just because you are brain washed, my fellow citizen.

Get cure for your infection, don’t let it spread…

 

You have nothing to fear 

Sangeeth Shiva
 - 
Tuesday, 21 Nov 2017

Interrogate Jahan. He is working on love jihad

Kumar
 - 
Tuesday, 21 Nov 2017

Either Asokan is a Sanghi or he got threat from Sanghis. 80 percent is for the first one

Hari
 - 
Tuesday, 21 Nov 2017

Unltimate freedom denial. Should arrest her father

Yogesh
 - 
Tuesday, 21 Nov 2017

Stop love jihad. NIA probe should continue in this case 

Sandesh
 - 
Tuesday, 21 Nov 2017

Asokan has the right to decide. He is her father

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 2,2020

The Ayodhya police booked a senior journalist on Wednesday for raising questions on Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath's visit to the Ram Janmabhoomi for a religious ceremony amid the lockdown over the novel coronavirus pandemic.

The FIR mentions a tweet by Siddharth Varadarajan, editor of news portal 'The Wire', where he said: "On the day the Tablighi Jamaat event was held, Adityanath insisted a large Ram Navami fair planned for Ayodhya from March 25 to April 2 would proceed as usual and that 'Lord Ram would protect devotees from the coronavirus."

Varadarajan had clarified in another tweet that it was "Acharya Paramhans, Hindutva stalwart and head of the official Ayodhya temple trust, who said Ram would protect devotees from coronavirus, and not Adityanath, though he allowed a public event on 25/3 in defiance of the lockdown and took part himself".

Taking the suo-motu cognizance, Faizabad Kotwali police station incharge Nitish Kumar Shrivastava registered an FIR under sections 188 (disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant) and 505(2) (statements conducing to public mischief) of the Indian Penal Code for doing "disreputable" comment against the chief minister.

Statement by the Founding Editors of The Wire: pic.twitter.com/frw5oRxw18

— The Wire (@thewire_in) April 1, 2020
Reacting to it, Varadarajan termed the FIR "politically motivated, saying that the offences invoked were not even remotely made out.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 16,2020

Kottayam, Mar 16: A trial court in Kerala  on Monday dismissed a discharge petition filed by Bishop Franco Mulakkal, in connection with the case of alleged rape of a nun in which he is the prime accused.

In his plea filed before the Additional District and Sessions Court I, Mulakkal had claimed that prima facie there was no case to frame charges against him.

Dismissing the plea, the trial court said the bishop should stand for trial in the rape case.

The bishop's lawyer said an appeal would be filed in the High Court against the trial court order.

The prosecution had filed its objection to the plea filed by the bishop, accused of raping and sexually assaulting a nun of the same diocese.

The bishop had filed the plea just ahead of commencement of the preliminary hearing on charges against him in January this year.

The case is based on a complaint filed against the bishop by the nun.

In her complaint to the police in June, 2018, the nun had alleged that she was subjected to sexual abuse by the bishop during the period between 2014 and 2016.

The bishop, who was arrested by the Special Investigation Team which probed the case, has been charged with wrongful confinement, rape, unnatural sex and criminal intimidation.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com news network
May 31,2020

Mangaluru, May 31:  Even as the worst locust attack on India in recent years raised concerns over its impact on crops, swarms of locusts have triggered panic in Karnataka’s Dakshina Kannada too. 

Farmers in the coastal district were taken aback when they found the swarms of locusts, which they feared as the arrival of desert locusts in the region.

According to reports, Renjalady village under the limits of Nuji Baltila Gramp Panchayats in Kadaba taluk and Shirlalu village in Belthangady taluk witnessed locust attacks in last couple of days. 

“Locust swarms were seen in many areas. We have also alerted agriculture department. Already insects have destroyed crops of many farmers,” said a farmer in Shirlalu village.  

Joint director of Dakshina Kannada district agriculture department MC Seetha confirmed that officials have received information from villagers about the locust scare and entemologists have already visited the place to collect more information.

Not Desert Locusts?

“We contacted entemologists and forwarded the pictures that farmers sent to us. Looking at the picture, entemologists have opined that it may be calotropis locust or colour grasshopper. Desert locusts usually arrive in lakhs,” said Ms Seetha. Desert locusts that are destroying crops in other parts of India may not come to Dakshina Kannada, she added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.