Father chops off 18-year-old son’s hand for watching porn on phone

coastaldigest.com news network
March 6, 2018

Hyderabad, Mar 6: In a bizarre incident, a 45-year-old man chopped off his 18-year-old son’s hand in Hyderabad on Monday for allegedly getting addicted to pornography on his smartphone despite repeated warnings.

Mohammad Qayyum Qureshi, an electrician by profession from Jalpalli colony in Pahadishareef area in the old city, surrendered to the police stating that he had chopped off the right hand (between wrist and elbow) of his son, Mohammad Khalid Qureshi, who works as an assistant at a local cable television operator.

According to Pahadisheriff Police, Khalid had recently purchased a smart phone. Since then he has been watching movies and porn, particularly during night, much to his father's anger.

A few days ago, the duo had a heated argument over the issue as Khalid said that he was only watching movies. Khaled then bit his father's hand and ran away from home. However, he returned and continued with his binge watching.

During the early hours of Monday, while Khalid and everyone else in the home were in deep sleep, Qayyum chopped the former's hand.

Khalid woke up writhing in pain and started screaming. He was rushed to a private hospital in Chaitanyapuri, where doctors tried to reconnect the wrist with rest of the hand. However, they said that there was little chance of saving Khalid's hand as the wrist was almost severed from the hand.

Comments

dont worry Madhu and kotian will allow their children to watch and have sex with them. all in the name of sex education and freedom.

True.. but as a social animal you should follow some social codes and conduct. While your son watching (if) porn you should say this same thing.

Viren Kotian
 - 
Tuesday, 6 Mar 2018

Hahaha. Which movie he was watching?

Sultan
 - 
Tuesday, 6 Mar 2018

Brave father. Role model. He has sent a good message to the society. Also prevented many potential rapes from his son.

Madhu
 - 
Tuesday, 6 Mar 2018

That father produced him after doing sex. And now chopped off son’s hand just for watching sex. What the hell! Where the humanity is heading?

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
June 7,2020

Behrampur, Jun 7: A migrant labourer spent two days in jungle after allegedly being denied entry to a quarantine centre and his village in Behrampur.

According to a local from the village, no one helped the labourer. "He came from Chennai. He went to the police and block office but no one helped. Then, he went to the jungle."

Later, the police took him to the quarantine centre.

As per the Union Health Ministry, there are 2,608 confirmed COVID-19 cases in the Odisha, including 996 active cases, 1,604 recovered/discharged/migrated and 8 deaths.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 29,2020

New Delhi, Jun 29: India recorded 19,459 new coronavirus cases and 380 deaths in the last 24 hours.

According to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare on Monday, the total coronavirus cases in the country stands at 5,48,318 including 2,10,120 active cases, 3,21,723 cured/discharged/migrated and 16,475 deaths.

Maharashtra's COVID-19 count touched 1,64,626 and cases in Delhi have reached 83,077.

The total number of samples tested up to 28 June is 83,98,362 of which 1,70,560 samples were tested yesterday, as per the data provided by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 3,2020

Chennai, Mar 3: The Madras High Court has ruled that if a working woman gives birth to a child in the second delivery after twins in the first, she is not entitled to maternity benefits as it should be treated as third child.

"As per existing rules, a woman can avail such benefits only for her first two deliveries. Even otherwise it is debatable as to whether the delivery is not a second delivery but a third one, in as much as ordinarily when twins are born they are delivered one after another, and their age and their inter-se elderly status is also determined by virtue of the gap of time between their arrivals, which amounts to two deliveries and not one simultaneous act," the court said.

The first bench, comprising Chief Justice A P Sahi and Justice Subramonium Prasad stated this while allowing the appeal from Ministry of Home Affairs.

It set aside the order June 18 2019 order of a single Judge, who extended 180 days of maternity leave and other benefits to a woman member of the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) under the rules governing the Tamil Nadu government servants.

The issue pertains to an appeal moved by the ministry, which contended that the leave claim is by a member of CISF to whom the maternity rules of Tamil Nadu would not apply.

She would be covered by the maternity benefits as provided under the Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, the ministry said.

When the appeal came up for hearing, the bench said it found that a second delivery, which, in the present case, resulted in a third child, cannot be interpreted so as to add to the mathematical precision that is defined in the rules.

The admissibility of benefits would be limited if the claimant has not more than two children, the bench said "This fact therefore changes the entire nature of the relief which is sought for by the woman petitioner, which aspect has been completely overlooked by the single judge", the bench said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.