Bengaluru, Feb 14: In a major embarrassment to the police, the Karnataka High Court has termed as illegal the prohibitory orders imposed under Section 144 of CrPC by the City Police Commissioner in December 2019 in the light of the anti-Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) protests in Bengaluru.
The orders were passed “without application of mind” and without following due procedures, the court noted. Giving reasons for upholding the arguments of the petitioners that there was no application of mind by the Police Commissioner (Bhaskar Rao) before imposing restrictions, a division bench of the High Court said he had not recorded the reasons, except reproducing the contents of letters addressed to him by the Deputy Commissioners of Police (DCPs).
The state government had contended that prohibitory orders were passed based on reports submitted by the DCPs who expressed apprehension about anti-social elements creating law and order problems and damaging public property by taking advantage of the anti-CAA protests.
The High Court bench said the Police Commissioner should have conducted inquiry as stated by the Supreme Court to check the reasons cited by the DCPs who submitted identical reports. Except for this, there were no facts laid out by the Police Commissioner, the court said.
“There is complete absence of reasons. If the order indicated that the Police Commissioner was satisfied by the apprehension of DCPs, it would have been another matter,” it said.
“The apex court has held that it must record the reasons for imposition of restrictions and there has to be a formation of opinion by the district magistrate. Only then can the extraordinary powers conferred on the district magistrate can be exercised. This procedure was not followed. Hence, exercise of power under Section 144 by the commissioner, as district magistrate, was not at all legal”, the bench said.
“We hold that the order dated December 18, 2019 is illegal and cannot stand judicial scrutiny in terms of the apex court’s orders in the Ramlila Maidan case and Anuradha Bhasin case,” the HC bench said while upholding the arguments of Prof Ravivarma Kumar, who appeared for some of the petitioners.
Partly allowing a batch of public interest petitions questioning the imposition of prohibitory orders and cancelling the permission granted for protesters in the city, the bench of Chief Justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka and Justice Hemant Chandangoudar observed that, unfortunately, in the present case, there was no indication of application of mind in passing prohibitory orders.
The bench said the observation was confined to this order only and it cannot be applicable in general. If there is a similar situation (necessitating imposition of restrictions), the state is not helpless, the court said.
Comments
my dear DK people plz throw this chut*ya man to arabian sea...alone with some bootlicking slave like BD,VHP etc.
I think our prime minister dont know the latest result declared of PUC II. may be he came to insult us. Or I think he thought he is in UP where more then 150 schools Is having all children failed where our BJPs star campainer Mr Yogi is CM of that state. Mr Prime minister i think you need a peace of paper from your adviser before you start you lies.
following positions ?
Pakoda manager
pakoda supervisor
pakoda salesman
pakoda engineer
etc.....
Modi dont know how many Jobs he have Created every year, Upon that he is Blaming Congress.. Hahaha What a Joke :D Till now what all Modi promised we didnt get anything and till he is in power people of India will not get anything and will Suffer.
#PakodaBusiness #BoycottChaiwala
People and media should boycott such blabber public programmes
Modiji graduates in karnataka far better than graduates of PAKODAS in your area.
We people dont have Alzheimer's disease. We didnt forget your election speech and your promises. B#####d
Dont you have shame feku..!
You are not fit for PM post. You fit for nothing.. shameless
Joke of the year.. This Feku came to power by promising lakhs of jobs in India. Till now he didnt act for that and he mocked youths by pakoda business statement
Add new comment