Communal violence prevention bill back in focus, Parliament adjourned

December 5, 2013

Communal_violenceNew Delhi, Dec 5: No business could be transacted on the first day of Parliament's Winter Session, which began on Thursday, as the Opposition strongly opposed the Centre's move to bring the Anti-Communal Violence Bill among other important legislations.

According to reports, both houses of Parliament were adjourned for the day after obituary references.

Minutes ahead of the commencement of the Winter Session, the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, made an appeal to all political parties to ensure the smooth functioning of Parliament and sought to evolve a broad consensus on all important matters.

Expecting fireworks during the Winter Session, the Prime Minister said, "Government will try to arrive at a consensus and seek support of all parties on all controversial issues."

Responding to objections raised by several chief ministers, including Narendra Modi, to the proposed Anti-Communal Violence Bill, Dr Singh said, "It will be our effort to evolve a broad based consensus on Anti-Communal Violence, Women's Reservation and other important Bills.”

Seeking the cooperation of the opposition parties in ensuring the smooth functioning of Parliament, the PM said, "This session of Parliament is of short duration hence it is obligatory on all parties to get essential business transacted as speedily and smoothly as possible."

The appeal from the PM came shortly after various political parties condemned the move to introduce the Anti-Communal Violence Bill in this session.

Reacting to it, KC Tyagi of the JD (U) said, "In the name of this Bill (Communal Violence) Narendra Modi is doing politics."

BJP leader Murli Manohar Joshi also reacted by saying, "The Communal Violence Bill is highly divisive in itself."

"This is not Communal Violence Bill, this is Communal Vote Bill, " Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi of BJP said.

While BSP chief Mayawati opposed the high amount of control the Communal Violence Bill gives to the Centre, D Raja of the Left said that changes must be made to the bill.

"First a consensus on Communal Violence Bill must be made and then it should be brought in Parliament," Mayawati said.

However, Union Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde said that the Communal Violence Bill will definitely be passed in this session.

Bringing the issue back in spotlight, BJP's PM candidate Narendra Modi wrote a letter to the Prime Minister and raised objections to the controversial bill.

The Winter Session of Parliament is likely to be a stormy one with Centre aiming to push several controversial bills and the Opposition all set to attack it on a number of issues.

The tone of the Winter Session will also depend on the outcome of Assembly polls in five states, especially as the exit polls have suggested huge losses for the ruling Congress in major states.

The UPA government has listed a number of important bills, including Anti-Communal Violence Bill and Women's Reservation Bill etc, while the Opposition, which is demanding extension of the 12-day sitting, is likely to press for introducing the Telangana Bill.

The Centre is expected to face Opposition heat over bills like the Lokpal Bill and Women's Reservation Bill which have been passed by one House and now await the other House's nod.

A bill on the creation of the new Telangana state does not figure in the government's agenda but the BJP is adamant that the process for the same should be set in motion immediately.

As per the Anti-Communal Violence Bill is concerned, the Centre wants to bring an amended version, but it has been opposed by several states and the Opposition, which sees it as an attempt to infringe on the Constitutional rights of a state.

The UPA, which has faced criticism over allegations of corruption, for failing to control inflation and its handling of the overall economy, will certainly try to make an attempt to win back some lost ground by putting up key Bills for debate.

The BJP has also sought a discussion on internal security with a special focus on the 27 October blasts in Patna ahead of a rally in the city addressed by its prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi.

The main opposition party has a wide range of controversial issues on which it will challenge the government, including a move to bring in a controversial communal violence Bill, alleged misuse of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the functioning of the Joint Parliamentary Committee that probed irregularities in the allocation of second-generation telecom spectrum.

At Tuesday’s all-party meeting, the Samajwadi Party threatened to disrupt proceedings if the Women’s Reservation Bill and legislation seeking to carve out a quota in job promotions for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes are taken up.

The BJP and Asom Gana Parishad strongly opposed any plans to introduce a constitutional amendment Bill on the India-Bangladesh Land Boundary Agreement; the Bill is listed in the legislative agenda.

Left parties are seeking a detailed debate on the communal riots that killed more than 62 people and displaced thousands in Uttar Pradesh’s Muzaffarnagar district in August-September.

The government has also listed one of its major reform initiatives, the Direct Taxes Code Bill, in the legislative agenda as well as an education tribunal Bill that aims to create a quasi-judicial body to fast-track resolution of conflicts in the education sector, and the proposed whistle blowers protection law.

The government's arsenal seems restricted to countering the BJP on the Gujarat snooping scandal, targeting its prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 19,2020

New Delhi, Feb 19: The UIDAI on Tuesday said its Hyderabad office has sent notices to 127 people for allegedly obtaining Aadhaar numbers on "false pretences" but asserted these have nothing to do with citizenship.

The notices were issued after reports from the police, the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) said.

"Aadhaar is not a document of citizenship and UIDAI has been mandated under the Aadhaar Act to ascertain residency of a person in India for 182 days prior to applying for Aadhaar," the nodal body, which issues the 12-digit biometric ID, said in a statement.

The Supreme Court, in its landmark decision, has directed the UIDAI not to issue Aadhaar to illegal immigrants, it said.

"It may be noted that the regional office Hyderabad received reports from the state police that 127 people have obtained Aadhaar on false pretences, as in their preliminary enquiry they were found illegal immigrants who were not qualified to obtain an Aadhaar number," the UIDAI said.

As per the Aadhaar Act, such Aadhaar numbers are liable to be cancelled.

"Therefore, the regional office Hyderabad has sent notices to them to appear in person and to substantiate their claims for getting an Aadhaar number," it said.

The UIDAI emphasised that these notices have "nothing to do with citizenship and cancellation of Aadhaar number is in no way related to the nationality of any resident".

In case it is found and proved that any of them obtained Aadhaar by submitting false documents or through false pretences, their Aadhaar is liable to be cancelled or suspended depending on the severity of the transgression, UIDAI said.

"Severe errors like forged documents, etc., will lead to appropriate actions, including suspending /cancelling the Aadhaar," it cautioned.

"Sometimes it becomes necessary to cancel the Aadhaar number when it is found that a resident has obtained it by submitting false biometrics or documents. It is a routine quality improvement process that the UIDAI takes up regularly," the authority said.

The 127 people have been asked to appear before the UIDAI deputy director in Hyderabad for a personal hearing on February 20.

Additional time has been given to allow them to collect the requisite documents, "Since it may take them some more time to collect the original documents that they had submitted for obtaining Aadhaar, as informed by the state police, the UIDAI has postponed the personal hearing to May 2020," it added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
February 4,2020

New Delhi, Feb 4: Saying the matter had been adjourned many times and it will have to hear it someday, the Supreme Court on Tuesday fixed April 14 for hearing a plea by Zakia Jafri, wife of slain MP Ehsan Jafri, challenging the SIT's clean chit to then Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi in the 2002 riots.

A bench comprising Justices A M Khanwilkar and Dinesh Maheshwari posted the matter for hearing in April after Zakia's counsel sought an adjournment and urged the court to post it after the Holi vacation.

When advocate Aparna Bhat, appearing for Zakia, told the court that the issue in the matter is contentious, the bench said, "It has been adjourned so many times, whatever it is, we will have to hear it someday. Take one date and make sure you all are available." Zakia had filed a petition in the apex court in 2018 challenging the Gujarat High Court's October 5, 2017 order rejecting her plea against the decision of the Special Investigation Team.

Ehsan Jafri was among the 68 people killed at Gulberg Society on February 28, 2002, a day after the S-6 Coach of the Sabarmati Express was burnt at Godhra killing 59 people and triggering riots in Gujarat.

On February 8, 2012, the SIT filed a closure report giving a clean chit to Modi and 63 others, including senior government officials, saying there was "no prosecutable evidence" against them.

Comments

Althaf
 - 
Tuesday, 4 Feb 2020

No use.. will Supreme court gives justice??? 

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 7,2020

Jammu, Apr 7: Old habits will just no longer do, a Jammu and Kashmir administration employee found to his dismay on Tuesday when he was sent to a quarantine centre for blowing his nose and spitting on the road.

The man, who works as an accountant in the civil secretariat here, had gone to meet a relative in Paloura on the outskirts of the city when he was nabbed, officials said.

The neighbours panicked when they saw him blowing his nose and immediately called the police, which rushed to the spot with a medical team and a magistrate, they said.

He was immediately taken to a quarantine facility set up at the IIT hostel in the Janipur area and his samples taken for a coronavirus test.

Given the high levels of anxiety over the spread of COVID-19, news of his being taken by police started circulating widely. There were also some WhatsApp messages that he was trying to deliberately spread the infection and was arrested by police.

However, police officials said they had not arrested him and merely put him in a quarantine centre. It was not clear how long he would be in the centre.

The employee told police officials he had an itch in his nose and nothing more.

"Be responsible citizens and stop spreading rumours or fake news," an official said, requesting people to be more responsible.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.