Congress replies to AAP queries

December 17, 2013

ArvindKejriwalNew Delhi, Dec 17: The Aam Aadmi Party refused to reveal its cards on Monday after the Congress replied to the former’s 18 issues that sought clarity before forming a government with the Congress’ “unconditional support”.

An AAP meeting is scheduled on Tuesday to take a final decision. All India Congress Committee general secretary in-charge for Delhi, Shakeel Ahmed, said 16 of the 18 points raised by the AAP were administrative tasks for “which there is no need for our support”.

“On full statehood for Delhi, we have conveyed that the Congress is for giving Delhi full statehood, as was mentioned in our manifesto, but this is an issue which is in the Centre’s domain,” he said.

On the AAP’s concern over the Lokpal Bill, the Congress said Delhi already “has a strong Lokayukta. If they want to modify the Delhi Lokayukta Act within the laid down parameters, they are free to do it and there is no need for the AAP to come to the Assembly or Parliament,” Ahmed said.

AAP legislator and spokesperson Manish Sisodia said the party “wants to form” a government but “does not want to negotiate with any party behind four walls of a room.”

“We will consider the Congress’ reply on Tuesday and take a decision,” Sisodia said. “People have been telling AAP leaders that they did good by bringing in the public domain their talks with the Congress on issue-based support.”

“If President’s Rule is imposed for a day, let it be so,” Sisodia said, pointing to the AAP’s commitment to hold public meetings across the city and seek people’s views on government formation.

AAP leader Yogendra Yadav also echoed a similar view. “The AAP’s political affairs committee will meet at 10 am on Tuesday and take the issue forward in view of the Congress’ reply,” he said.

Raj Niwas sources said if the AAP failed to take a decision on government formation in the next 48 hours, there was a strong possibility that the new 70-member Assembly may be kept under suspended animation by Lieutenant Governor Najeeb Jung as tenure of the present Assembly would come to an end on December 18.

On whether the AAP would be able to take a decision in the next 48 hours, Yadav said: “Constitutional procedures have their own calendar. For us, constitutional deadlines are not important. We will inform the lieutenant governor about our decision on government formation when we are ready.”

The AAP is the second-largest party in the Assembly with 28 MLAs. Jung invited Arvind Kejriwal after the BJP, which had support of 32 MLAs, expressed its inability to form a government.

After Kejriwal sought more time from Jung on Saturday, he sent a report to President Pranab Mukherjee about possible options of suspending the Assembly and imposing President’s Rule in case the AAP did not form the government.

Union Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde, however, did not disclose contents of the report. “We are examining the report legally,” he said.

The Congress, which was drubbed in the Assembly elections after a 15-year rule, wrote to Jung on Friday, offering “unconditional support” to the AAP which, in turn, sought clarity on 18 issues including the Jan Lokpal Bill, full statehood for Delhi, audit of private power companies, among others.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 3,2020

Chennai, Mar 3: The Madras High Court has ruled that if a working woman gives birth to a child in the second delivery after twins in the first, she is not entitled to maternity benefits as it should be treated as third child.

"As per existing rules, a woman can avail such benefits only for her first two deliveries. Even otherwise it is debatable as to whether the delivery is not a second delivery but a third one, in as much as ordinarily when twins are born they are delivered one after another, and their age and their inter-se elderly status is also determined by virtue of the gap of time between their arrivals, which amounts to two deliveries and not one simultaneous act," the court said.

The first bench, comprising Chief Justice A P Sahi and Justice Subramonium Prasad stated this while allowing the appeal from Ministry of Home Affairs.

It set aside the order June 18 2019 order of a single Judge, who extended 180 days of maternity leave and other benefits to a woman member of the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) under the rules governing the Tamil Nadu government servants.

The issue pertains to an appeal moved by the ministry, which contended that the leave claim is by a member of CISF to whom the maternity rules of Tamil Nadu would not apply.

She would be covered by the maternity benefits as provided under the Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, the ministry said.

When the appeal came up for hearing, the bench said it found that a second delivery, which, in the present case, resulted in a third child, cannot be interpreted so as to add to the mathematical precision that is defined in the rules.

The admissibility of benefits would be limited if the claimant has not more than two children, the bench said "This fact therefore changes the entire nature of the relief which is sought for by the woman petitioner, which aspect has been completely overlooked by the single judge", the bench said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 19,2020

New Delhi, Jan 19: Reacting to a tweet by ace lawyer Indira Jaising urging her to forgive the four men on death row for brutally raping that finally took her life, Nirbhaya's mother said on Saturday: "Even if God asks me, I won't forgive them."

Speaking to news agency, over the phone, the mother who had been fighting for seven long years to send her daughter's killers to the gallows, said, "...even if god comes and asks me to forgive them, I will not. People like these (Jaising) are a blot on the society."

Commenting on Jaising's tweet, she said: "Who is she to tell or suggest to me to forgive them. What relation does she have with me. I have nothing to do with such people. She can be a relative of those (the convicts) that she is having a soft corner for."

"She is an insult to women. She is running a business in the name of human rights. She is a veteran, she should give a message to the society. But she instead will go against her own kind," she added.

Earlier in the day, Jaising had requested Nirbhaya's mother to follow the example of Congress president Sonia Gandhi, who had moved for the clemency of a woman, Nalini Murugan convicted for the assassination of her husband and former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi.

"While I fully identify with the pain of Nirbhaya's mother I urge her to follow the example of Sonia Gandhi who forgave Nalini and said she didn't want the death penalty for her. We are with you but against death penalty," Jaising tweeted on Friday.

A Delhi Court on Friday issued fresh death warrants against the four convicts -- Akshay, Pawan, Mukesh and Vinay in the Nirbhaya gang rape and murder case.

Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Satish Kumar Arora fixed 1 February as the date of execution of the four death row convicts. They will be hanged at 6am.

The move came after the prosecution moved an application seeking issuance of fresh death warrants following the rejection of the mercy plea of one of the convicts Mukesh by President Ram Nath Kovind.

The 23-year-old victim was brutally gang-raped and tortured on December 16, 2012, which later led to her death.

All the six accused were arrested and charged with sexual assault and murder. One of the accused was a minor and appeared before a juvenile justice court, while another accused committed suicide in Tihar Jail.

Four of the convicts were sentenced to death by a trial court in September 2013, and the verdict was confirmed by the Delhi High Court in March 2014 and upheld by the Supreme Court in May 2017, which also dismissed their review petitions.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 18,2020

New Delhi, Jun 18: With the highest single-day increase of 12,881 COVID-19 cases reported in the last 24 hours, India's coronavirus count has reached 3,66,946 on Thursday.

This includes 1,60,384 active cases and 1,94,325 cured, discharged and migrated patients, according to the Union Health and Family Welfare Ministry.

Meanwhile, with 334 deaths being reported due to the infection, the toll due to the virus stands at 12,237 in the country.

There is a big increase in the number of confirmed cases in the country today as compared to the recent days when the spike had been limited to under 11,000 cases.

Maharashtra with 1,16,752 cases continues to be the worst-affected state in the country with 51,935 active cases while 59,166 patients have been cured and discharged in the state so far. The toll due to COVID-19 stands at 5,651 in the state.

The number of confirmed cases in Tamil Nadu also crossed the 50 thousand mark on Thursday and reached 50,193. The national capital is the third-worst affected by the infection in the country with the count reaching 47,102 today.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.