Drama galore in India's doubles tennis teams

August 5, 2016

Ravi Ubha, Aug 5: India loves Bollywood, and its Olympic tennis team has inadvertently provided a sequel suitable for the country’s renowned film industry.

olyAs at the London Games four years ago, personality clashes and animosity are threatening to overshadow Indian players’ reputation for strong doubles play.

Since the 2012 Games, Sania Mirza has risen to No. 1 in the women’s doubles rankings, and Leander Paes, who at 43 is headed to a record seventh Olympics, has collected five more Grand Slam titles in doubles or mixed doubles to raise his career total to 18.

But instead of celebrating Paes’ longevity and the team’s medal chances, Indian players have been rehashing public feuds.

“It doesn’t look good, but it happens in various other countries,” said Bharat Oza, the secretary-general of India’s national tennis governing body, the All India Tennis Association. Oza, however, was not immediately able to give examples.

Four years ago, the tennis association’s preference was for Mahesh Bhupathi to partner in London with Paes, recreating the so-called Indian Express team that won three Grand Slams and in 1999 became the first men’s pair in the Open era to reach all four Grand Slam finals in one season. But Bhupathi, whose doubles partner at the time was Rohan Bopanna, refused to play with Paes.

Bhupathi, who used stinging language like “we don’t speak and have no camaraderie” and said Paes “privately and publicly stabbed me in the back,” could not be convinced.

Disappointing show

Ultimately, Bhupathi and Bopanna formed one team, with Paes forced to play with the unheralded Vishnu Vardhan.

Paes, though, was chosen to play mixed doubles alongside Mirza, even though she had won two mixed doubles Grand Slam titles with Bhupathi, including one at the French Open just weeks earlier.

Mirza, feeling like a pawn, released a lengthy, no-holds-barred statement denouncing the decision.

“As an Indian woman belonging to the 21st century, what I find disillusioning is the humiliating manner in which I was put up as a bait to try and pacify one of the disgruntled stalwarts of Indian tennis,” she said.

None of India’s four doubles teams won more than one Olympic match on the grass of the All England Club.

Any thoughts of a seamless process this year fizzled when Bopanna told the Indian association that he wanted to play in Rio de Janeiro with Saketh Myneni, who has yet to appear in the top 100 in singles or doubles but has regularly played with Bopanna in the Davis Cup.

As a top-10 doubles player at the ranking cutoff for the Olympics in June, Bopanna earned an automatic spot in the Rio tournament and could line up with any country-

man he chose, but his governing body had to approve.

“I have much admiration for Leander Paes and his many achievements, but unfortunately we have not been able to put together a good combination despite our best efforts, and I do not believe our styles of play are either compatible or complementary,” Bopanna said in a statement.

“Considering that this is a team event where two individuals need to jell together

to do well, regardless of individual achievements, it is the team and the combination that matters.”

The Indian tennis association, to no one’s surprise, turned down Bopanna’s request, and he was named Paes’ partner. This time, though, there was no fight.

“The moment we declared this is what the combinations are, immediately, within five minutes, Rohan sent me an email saying that I agree to play because he knew if he refuses, then he knows we don’t send a team,” Oza said.

If Bopanna had prevented Paes from making a record-extending seventh appearance in the Olympic tennis event and deprived the country of men’s participants, he would have been cast as a villain by many in India.

“The best bet would be to field Leander and Rohan, so that’s why we told Rohan,

‘We appreciate what you say, but ultimately we have to think about the country and the medal prospect,’” Oza said. “Naturally Leander is an iconic figure in the Davis Cup and world tennis.”

Measured moves

Mirza avoided being placed in an awkward position again. A team of Bopanna and Mirza was the only one that had a rankings combination that guaranteed India a spot in the 16-team mixed doubles draw.

At Wimbledon, Mirza said she did not “have a take” on the latest turbulent chapter in Indian tennis. “I’m there to represent my country, and I’m looking forward to it,” she added.

Bopanna, in an email, said: “What’s done in the past, there is nothing to dwell on that. It’s time where you look into the future and move on.” Paes did not respond to questions emailed to him.

For Mirza, chemistry in doubles is pivotal. “I think it’s good if you get along on and off the court, but history has said people who don’t get along well on the court can still win,” she said. “It just depends person to person. For me, it’s important.”

Paes and Bopanna won together in a lower-tier Davis Cup series against South Korea in July. Paes would not normally have played in such an event, but he was urged to participate by the Indian tennis association, Oza said.

“Leander has said he would only play at the World Group level, not below that, but we told him that because the government, the public, population of India and people abroad are looking at what you people are doing, you at least better make an appearance saying that we can play good doubles, so that at least will satisfy some of the murmurs that are going around,” Oza said.

“We called him because it was an important tie, and it was before Rio, so at least you can have some exercise together, playing in match conditions.”

Bopanna said, “We had a few strong practice sessions prior to the start of the tie.”

Paes’s lone Olympic medal came not in doubles but in singles, in Atlanta in 1996, when he took home the bronze. If he and Bopanna stand side by side on the podium in Brazil, this Bollywood-style drama would come to a pleasing conclusion for Indian tennis fans.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 24,2020

Wellington, Feb 24: Indian batsmen's inadequacies in adverse conditions were laid bare as they crashed to an embarrassing 10-wicket defeat against a ruthless New Zealand side that wrapped up the opening Test in just over three days here on Monday.

Starting the day on 144 for four, India were all out for 191 in their second innings. This was only a shade better than their dismal 165 in the first innings, which eventually proved to be decisive.

Trent Boult (4/39 in 22 overs) and Tim Southee (5/61 in 21 overs), the most under-rated new ball pairs in world cricket, showed that when it boils down to playing incisive seam and swing bowling, this batting line-up is still a work in progress.

The required target of nine runs was knocked off by New Zealand without much ado for their 100th Test win.

India's last defeat was against Australia at Perth during the 2018-19 series but the loss at the Basin Reserve would hurt them more because the visitors have not surrendered in such a fashion of late.

There was no resistance from a star-studded line-up and more than intent, the failure was due to poor technique on a track that had something on the third and fourth day as well.

This is a team that plays fast bowling much better than their predecessors, the reason for their success on the bouncy Australian tracks.

But when it comes to facing conventional seam and swing bowling in testing conditions, they are yet to learn the art of saving a Test match.

India had lost the mental battle on the first day itself when they saw the moisture on the wicket.

The toss became a factor and not for one session did they look comfortable. Mayank Agarwal was the only batsman, who felt at home in patches, as New Zealand showed what a Test match strategy is all about.

If the first innings was about mixing back of length deliveries with fuller length balls, the second innings saw the pacers coming from round the wicket and targeting the rib-cage. The line was disconcerting and it stifled them for good.

It affected their mindset and once Ajinkya Rahane and Hanuma Vihari stepped out on the fourth morning, defeat was written all over as both looked ill-equipped to handle such high quality seam bowling.

Rahane (29 off 75 balls) and Vihari (15 off 79 balls) are players who only play long-form cricket at the international level and both are known for their patience.

But little would have the Indian vice-captain apprehended that he would get a delivery from Boult, which he thought would move away after pitching but it held its line and he had no option but to jab at it, and all he got was an edge.

Southee, who bowls a lovely classical outswinger, then bowled an off-cutter from the other end and before Vihari could comprehend, it came back sharply to peg the stumps back.

Within first 20 minutes, the two seasoned practitioners of swing had knocked the stuffing out of India's resistance.

Rishabh Pant (25 off 41 balls) batted only in the manner he can and played one breathtaking shot off Southee, a slog sweep off a 130 kmph-plus delivery to the deep mid-wicket boundary.

But there was too much left to do with too little support from the other end. Bending on one knee, he tried another audacious slog scoop but couldn't clear.

Southee, who had a terrific match, deservingly completed his 10th five-wicket haul and all it took was 16 overs to end the innings and the match.

New Zealand now have 120 points in the World Test championship and India stayed on top with 36 points.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 5,2020

New Delhi, Mar 5: Cricket's slow geographical expansion is turning out to be a blessing in disguise for the cash-rich Indian Premier League (IPL) which looks set to beat the dreaded novel coronavirus threat and go ahead as scheduled.

At a time when the number of recorded deaths because of the deadly outbreak across the globe is touching 3500 with a plethora of international sporting events getting cancelled, the IPL seems to be in a parallel universe where "all is well".

And there are multiple practical reasons why the T20 extravaganza will be held as per schedule. A major reason is the small number of countries that play the game and an even smaller fraction of overseas players, who will compete in the world's richest cricket league starting March 29 in Mumbai.

Till Thursday, the reported number of positive COVID-19 cases in India stood at 29, including 16 Italian tourists. However, none of the overseas recruits of eight IPL franchises have expressed any apprehensions about travelling to India.

Just over 60 players from cricket nations such as Australia, England, New Zealand, South Africa and the Caribbean islands comprise the elite foreign brigade and the reported positive cases of coronavirus in all these countries is next to none.

"The IOC is saying Olympics in Tokyo will be held as per schedule. In comparison, IPL is a minuscule tournament. If Olympics can be held, there's no reason why IPL can't be held," a BCCI official told PTI on conditions of anonymity.

STAR SPORTS FACTOR

The second and perhaps the biggest reason is broadcasters. Star Sports has bought the rights for Rs 16,347 crore (USD 2.55 billion) for a period of five years and their advertising revenues will take a huge hit if the tournament doesnt go ahead as planned. Former Delhi Daredevils CEO Hemant Dua explained the economics. "Look Star as well as BCCI has got everything insured. I don't know if there is any specific insurance cover for cancellation due to coronavirus but there is no chance of that happening if I read the situation properly," Dua told PTI.

GOVERNMENT GUIDELINES

The BCCI is also depending on the guidelines given by the government with regards to dealing with the health crisis.  "Every person availing international flights will be screened for coronavirus at the port of entry. That is the biggest health security measure. Obviously the BCCI will strictly adhere to any health advisory that government will issue," a Board official said.

But since there is an advisory that social gatherings are inadvisable at this point, won't it affect the league? "You will only come to know once the ticket sales start. If the stadiums are packed, that means people are coming but if stands are largely empty, then you can presume that people are wary.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 8,2020

Indore, Jan 8: Skipper Virat Kohli struck an unbeaten 30 as India beat Sri Lanka by seven wickets in the second Twenty20 international in Indore on Tuesday.

The hosts rode a 71-run opening stand between KL Rahul, who hit 45, and Shikhar Dhawan, who made 32, to chase down their target of 143 in 17.3 overs and take a 1-0 lead in the three-match series after the first match was rained off.

Leg-spinner Wanindu Hasaranga took the wickets of the Indian openers but Shreyas Iyer, who scored 34 before falling to paceman Lahiru Kumara, and Kohli, who hit the winning six, got the team home.

The third match is on Friday in Pune.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.