Expected? Key documents in Malegaon blasts case missing from NIA court!

April 7, 2016

Mumbai, Apr 7: All the statements were given in front of a magistrate and hence admissible as evidence to nail the alleged culprits that include a 'sadhvi' and a serving Indian Army officer.

blastIn a major setback to the 2008 Malegaon blasts case, seven statements of witnesses - all recorded in the presence of a magistrate and admissible as evidence - have gone missing from the Special NIA Court.

Coming in the wake of Special Public Prosecutor Rohini Salian's statement in June last year that National Investigation Agency (NIA) officers were putting pressure on her to go soft in the case, the disappearance of the crucial court documents will again call into question the prosecution's intent and ability to take the case, in which members of an alleged Hindu radical group stand accused, to its logical conclusion.

Two low-intensity explosions in Malegaon's Bhikku Chowk on September 29, 2008, had left seven people dead and left over 80 injured. The Maharashtra police's Anti Terrorist Squad, which investigated the case before it was handed over to NIA in 2011, arrested a dozen-odd accused, including self-styled Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and serving Indian Army officer Lt Col Srikant Purohit. Both worked for Hindu radical group Abhinav Bharat.

An embarrassed NIA has formed three teams to look for the missing statements, while the court officials have also joined in the search. Salian, who quit the case last year over, what she called, NIA's pressure to not push too hard, on Wednesday told media that an official from the Special NIA Court came to her looking for the documents. "One of the staff from the special court enquired with me if I am in the possession of the key documents, including several witness statements recorded under section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which, he said, were not traceable in the court," she said.

Salian said she had handed over all documents to the designated special prosecutor Avinash Rasal in the presence of NIA officials. "I have not kept a single document related to the case with me," she said.

Rasal, on his part, said he had no knowledge of any witness statements having gone missing, but said that it is possible that some documents may have been misplaced. "The documents have been moved frequently from one court to the other. If the documents are not in the Special NIA Court, then they are probably some place else and the court officials should be able to locate them," he said.

Top NIA officials, including DIG Abhin Modak, all through Wednesday did not respond to calls and text messages and an agency spokesman said he had no comment to offer on the matter.

Among the witness statements gone missing is that of Dharmendra Bairagi, a close aid of Ramji Kalsangra, a key accused in the case who is absconding. Bairagi, in his statement recorded before a magistrate, had said that he was witness to a meeting between Kalsangra and Pragya Thakur in Ujjain just months before the 2008 blasts. He had also said he had heard the two discussing a plan to engineer blasts.

Another key statement that is missing is that of the founder of Abhinav Bharat Hemani Savarkar. Savarkar's statement details a meeting between Lt Col Purohit and Pragya Thakur in Nashik in 2007. It also accuses Lt Col Purohit of misusing Abhinav Bharat's name to raise funds.

Top criminal lawyer Majid Memon called the disappearance of the documents shocking. "In a case relating to terror, which is considered a serious offence, if lethargy, negligence or deliberate removal of important documents surfaces, it is an extremely serious matter. The court should not tolerate such lapses."

He added that this appears as a deliberate attempt at weakening the case and helping the accused. "On the face of it, this cannot be accidental or a case of omission."

While copies of the missing statements are available with the accused, these, in the absence of the originals, become secondary evidence. Statements recorded in the presence of a magistrate have evidentiary value before the trial court. Though a witness can still be called for deposition before the trial court so that he can be cross-examined, if the witness deviates from the statement given before the magistrate, the trial court can still rely on the statement.

Advocate Shirikant Bhat said that while statements can be reconstructed from a copy of the same available either with the prosecution or the defence, it all depends on how reliable or authentic this document being relied upon is. "And whether or not that document should be relied upon for reconstruction is for the court to decide," he said.

Advocate Shrikant Shivade, who is appearing for Col. Purohit in the case, said reconstruction based on the copies available either with the prosecution or the defense will be possible only if the process of filing the documents on record has been followed. "We will have to check if the statements were ever on record in this case," he said.

Comments

PONDER & Use UR
 - 
Saturday, 9 Apr 2016

Naren, Bopanna..
I dont think U guys have read QURAN...
I feel U just quoted the same thing which the devils agent salman rusdie... explained in his book...
If U read QURAN with its content ... U will understand the TRUTH. Sometimes try to read by yourself and dont be like animals, whatever is fed, U accept it.
Also If we quote from the Hindu scriptures... We can find many such wars & violence done ... But we use our intellectual which ALLAH and Prophet Muhammad pbuh taught us... not to insult other religion.
Please quote from hindu scriptures also, there are plenty of verse of Violence.... and some verses, I feel disgusting to read ... which u people say its from god... But its NOT and which was added by some shaukuni along with the word of God.....to FOOL U and those who blindly follow without using the intellect that God has given us.

Please read with open mind and Stop following blindly..

Curious
 - 
Friday, 8 Apr 2016

NIA looks like a RSS wing works pro for some community and anti for other communities.

Naren kotian
 - 
Thursday, 7 Apr 2016

Jai Sri ram ...god knew that nationalist Indians will never commit henious crimes like one particular community... So documents disappeared...welcome nationalist Indians ..soon we will make sure all sangh parivar guys are out from jail .hara hara modi ..death to jihad ...we must create terror in the hearts of terrorist community ..its the mossad policy ...jai ho Israel jai ho Indo Israel relationshi ...sangh parivar must double up nexus with Israel in all fields covertly and overtly ...hahaha jihadi galige menasina kaayi itta haage madlikke ishtu saaku ...ummah muah chummah ..

Bopanna
 - 
Thursday, 7 Apr 2016

Koran instruct in violence, 4:89; 5:33. 9,5,111,123. 47;4. but still further the Koran also teaches that the Jewish people are descendants of swine and apes.2:65.; 7:166; 5:60. T

PONDER & Dont
 - 
Thursday, 7 Apr 2016

When Tiger bit human --- There is no law to punish the Tiger
When leopard bit human --- There is no law to punish the leopard
When snake bit human --- There is no law to punish the snake
When Dog bites the human --- There is no law to punish the Dog

Dear HUMAN, when human makes trouble to other human, there is LAW to protect the innocent... (cos humans are intelligent creature, Created by God)
Some people in the authorities are joining the ANIMALs category and they are proving it by their EVIL plans & DECEPTION.

HONeST
 - 
Thursday, 7 Apr 2016

Our system in the hands of DECIEVERS and LIARS... An OPEN LIE to protect the KILLERS

ummar
 - 
Thursday, 7 Apr 2016

AAB KI BAAAR MODHI SARKAAR ,,'

EFFECT OF FEKUUMODHII

Rikaz
 - 
Thursday, 7 Apr 2016

That means no justice for those who killed due to their heinous crime. They should have put to gallows.

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 28,2020

Bengaluru, Mar 28: The Karnataka government on Saturday said that the state run Indira Canteens would provide food packets free of cost to the poor and needy in the wake of the lockdown, the government said here on Saturday.

The canteens would operate in three schedules -from 7:30 AM to 10 AM, 12:30 PM to 3 PM and 7:30 PM to 9 PM, the government said in a public announcement

During the scheduled hours, street side vendors, labourers and poor would be provided food free of cost.

After the cabinet meeting on Friday, Chief Minister B S Yediyurappa had said food packets would be provided to the poor and needy with the help of some organisations through the Canteens and had sought the help of everyone in this regard.

The State-sponsored, subsidised 'Indira Canteens' as of now serves breakfast at Rs five and lunch and dinner at Rs 10.

The government asked people availing the facility to maintain cleanliness at the canteen and staff who serve food to compulsorily use masks and hand gloves.

It also said soaps and sanitizers should be made available at the canteens.

The government also asked people to maintain a minimum distance of one metre while standing in queue and take all precautionary measures.

Earlier, a day after announcing that food would be provided free of cost through the canteens for daily wagers, Yediyurappa on March 24 had said it has been decided that the canteens will not be opened, after realizing that it was leading to crowding, which drew criticism.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
March 14,2020

In the wake of Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) UN High Commissioner, Michele Bachelet, has filed an intervention in the Supreme Court petition challenging the constitutionality of the Citizenship Amendment Act, as she is critical of CAA. Responding to her, India’s Foreign Minister S. Jai Shanker strongly rebutted her criticism, saying that the body (UNHCR) has been wrong and is blind to the problem of cross border terrorism. The issue on hand is the possibility of scores of people, mainly Muslims, being declared as stateless. The problem at hand is the massive exercise of going through the responses/documents from over 120 crore of Indian population and screening documents, which as seen in Assam, yield result which are far from truthful or necessary.

The issue of CAA has been extensively debated and despite heavy critique of the same by large number of groups and despite the biggest mass opposition ever to any move in Independent India, the Government is determined on going ahead with an exercise which is reminiscent of the dreaded regimes which are sectarian and heartless to its citizens, which have indulged in extinction of large mass of people on grounds of citizenship, race etc. The Foreign minister’s assertion is that it is a matter internal to India, where India’s sovereignty is all that matters! As far as sovereignty is concerned we should be clear that in current times any sovereign power has to consider the need to uphold the citizenship as per the principle of non-discrimination which is stipulated in Art.26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political (ICCPR) rights.

Can such policies, which affect large number of people and are likely to affect their citizenship be purely regarded as ‘internal’? With the World turning into a global village, some global norms have been formulated during last few decades. The norms relate to Human rights and migrations have been codified. India is also signatory to many such covenants in including ICCPR, which deals with the norms for dealing with refugees from other countries. One is not talking of Chicago speech of Swami Vivekanand, which said that India’s greatness has been in giving shelter to people from different parts of the World; one is also not talking of the Tattariaya Upanishad’s ‘Atithi Devovhav’ or ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbkam’ from Mahaupanishad today.

What are being talked about are the values and opinions of organizations which want to ensure to preserve of Human rights of all people Worldwide. In this matter India is calling United Nations body as ‘foreign party’; having no locus standi in the case as it pertains to India’s sovereignty. The truth is that since various countries are signatories to UN covenants, UN bodies have been monitoring the moves of different states and intervening at legal level as Amicus (Friend of the Court) to the courts in different countries and different global bodies. Just to mention some of these, UN and High Commissioner for Human Rights has often submitted amicus briefs in different judicial platforms. Some examples are their intervention in US Supreme Court, European Court of Human Rights, International Criminal Court, and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. These are meant to help the Courts in areas where UN bodies have expertise.

 Expertise on this has been jointly formulated by various nations. These interventions also remind the nations as to what global norms have been evolved and what are the obligations of individual states to the values which have evolved over a period of time. Arvind Narrain draws our attention to the fact that, “commission has intervened in the European Court of Human Rights in cases involving Spain and Italy to underscore the principle of non-refoulement, which bars compulsory expulsion of illegal migrants… Similarly, the UN has intervened in the International Criminal Court in a case against the Central African Republic to explicate on the international jurisprudence on rape as a war crime.”

From time to time organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have been monitoring the status of Human rights of different countries. This puts those countries in uncomfortable situation and is not welcome by those establishments. How should this contradiction between ‘internal matter’, ‘sovereignty’ and the norms for Human rights be resolved? This is a tough question at the time when the freedom indices and democratic ethos are sliding downwards all over the world. In India too has slid down on the scale of these norms.

In India we can look at the intervention of UN body from the angle of equality and non discrimination. Democratic spirit should encourage us to have a rethink on the matters which have been decided by the state. In the face of the greatest mass movement of Shaheen bagh, the state does need to look inwards and give a thought to international morality, the spirit of global family to state the least.

The popular perception is that when Christians were being persecuted in Kandhmal the global Christian community’s voice was not strong enough. Currently in the face of Delhi carnage many a Muslim majority countries have spoken. While Mr. Modi claims that his good relations with Muslim countries are a matter of heartburn to the parties like Congress, he needs to relook at his self gloating. Currently Iran, Malaysia, Indonesia and many Muslim majority countries have spoken against what Modi regime is unleashing in India. Bangladesh, our neighbor, has also seen various protests against the plight of Muslims in India. More than the ‘internal matter’ etc. what needs to be thought out is the moral aspect of the whole issue. We pride ourselves in treading the path of morality. What does that say in present context when while large section of local media is servile to the state, section of global media has strongly brought forward what is happening to minorities in India.   

The hope is that Indian Government wakes up to its International obligations, to the worsening of India’s image in the World due to CAA and the horrific violence witnessed in Delhi.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 18,2020

Bengaluru, Jun 18: With Karnataka observing 'Mask Day' today, Chief Minister BS Yediyurappa said that the state has organised a walk from Vidhana Soudha to Cubbon Park to create awareness about the importance of wearing a mask as a preventive measure against COVID-19.

"We are celebrating 'Mask Day' at all district headquarters today. We have organised a walk from Vidhana Soudha (to Cubbon Park) to create awareness about the importance of wearing a mask as a preventive measure against COVID-19," Yediyurappa told media persons here.

Earlier, the Chief Minister has said that film actors and sports personalities will take part in the event and it will be celebrated in all taluks as well.

"We will take strict action against those who are not maintaining social distancing. A fine of Rs 200 will be imposed on those for not wearing a mask in public places," he had said.

As many as 7,530 people have detected positive for COVID-19 in Karnataka, of which 94 people have succumbed to the infection till date, as per the Union Health and Family Welfare Ministry.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.