Goa probes alleged sexual assault by Tehelka founder Tarun Tejpal

November 22, 2013

Tehelka_founderPanaji/New Delhi, Nov 22: The Goa government on Thursday ordered a suo motu "preliminary inquiry" into allegations that Tehelka's high-profile founder-editor and author Tarun Tejpal sexually assaulted a junior colleague in the lift of a starred hotel near the state capital of Panaji.

Briefing the media, chief minister Manohar Parrikar, who also holds the home portfolio, said that "a prima facie case has been made out" and didn't rule out summoning Tejpal, who has not been available for comment since the charges surfaced on Wednesday.

Goa DGP Kishan Kumar said the police have also asked the magazine's managing editor Shoma Chaudhury to hand over a copy of the complaint submitted to her by the victim "for necessary action". He said Chaudhury had not referred the matter to the police after receiving the complaint from the girl "as she was legally bound to do". "We cannot register an FIR based on media reports. We'll need a copy of the complaint," he added. Sources said the police have obtained video footage of the lift from the hotel management.

Tejpal had on Wednesday announced his decision to step down as editor of Tehelka for six months following the journalist's complaint to Chaudhury on November 18 alleging that while on duty she was sexually assaulted by Tejpal on two occasions on November 7 and 8 at the magazine's annual ThinkFest.

What provoked searing criticism was Tejpal's email to Chaudhury which stated that he was recusing himself from editorship as he "must do the penance that lacerates me". Kavita Krishnan, who heads the All India Progressive Women's Association (AIPWA), described Tehelka's response as "completely inadequate and in fact shocking. Penance is no substitute for due process and penalty." "Tarun Tejpal is no God to decide his own course of punishment," said Mamata Sharma, head of the National Commission for Women (NCW).

Chaudhury also came under fire on Thursday for her handling of the situation. She had told a TV channel, "There was an incident which has been dealt with internally. An unconditional apology was extended by Tarun. The journalist concerned was satisfied with the action taken." The journalist responded by saying, "I am deeply disappointed with Tehelka's response. The claim that I am 'satisfied' is false."

In her mail to Chaudhury, which details the two separate alleged incidents as well as everything that happened before and after, the journalist said, "Both times, I returned to my room in a completely distraught condition, trembling and crying.'' She said she had reported both incidents to three colleagues who were also in Goa for the festival. She said Tejpal later sent her text messages insinuating that she had "misconstrued'' the "drunken banter".

In an email to the magazine's staffers, Chaudhury had said: "There has been an untoward incident, and though he has extended an unconditional apology to the colleague involved, Tarun will be recusing himself as the editor of Tehelka for the next six months."

She attached an email from Tejpal which began, "The last few days have been most testing, and I squarely take the blame for this. A bad lapse of judgement, an awful misreading of the situation, have led to an unfortunate incident that rails against all we believe in and fight for."

When questioned about the incident, Shoma told The Indian Express: "I don't know how this concerns you...I don't think you can ask me these questions".

Facing flak for describing the case as an "internal matter", Chaudhury tried to defend her position by saying: "From my understanding she wanted an apology and it was given to her. The editor stepped down which was not something she had asked for, it was over and above that."

But when the criticism snowballed late Thursday, Chaudhury issued a statement saying Tehelka had now constituted a committee, as per Vishaka guidelines, headed by feminist and publisher Urvashi Butalia to investigate the matter.

At the press conference, chief minister Parikkar said that though Goa police could have filed an FIR, they had limited themselves to conducting a preliminary enquiry and the next course of action would depend on what this yielded.

Parrikar said action would be taken as per law. "Higher the person, higher the punishment should be, subject to the law. If in a high profile case, you do not punish the guilty, society will lose faith in institutions."

The victim has not submitted any complaint to the Goa police but Parrikar said that a preliminary enquiry does not need a complaint. "Also, a criminal offence within the jurisdiction of Goa necessitates that we investigate the charges regardless of whether a complaint is there or not," he added. The preliminary inquiry could take between anywhere one day to a week because the offence was committed about 10 days ago, he indicated.

Asked about the nature of the offence, Parrikar said that available information pointed towards attempted rape or molestation. Asked if he was depending only on media reports, Parrikar said the government had no knowledge of the offence beyond media reports.

The Goa state women's commission would also take cognizance of the offence and initiate suo motu action, he said. Commission chairperson Vidhya Shet Tanawade said the commission would meet on Friday to discuss the issue and decide on what needed to be done.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 13,2020

Jan 13: For the first time in years, the government of India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi is playing defense. Protests have sprung up across the country against an amendment to India’s laws — which came into effect on Friday — that makes it easier for members of some religions to become citizens of India. The government claims this is simply an attempt to protect religious minorities in the Muslim-majority countries that border India; but protesters see it as the first step toward a formal repudiation of India’s constitutionally guaranteed secularism — and one that must be resisted.

Modi was re-elected prime minister last year with an enhanced majority; his hold over the country’s politics is absolute. The formal opposition is weak, discredited and disorganized. Yet, somehow, the anti-Citizenship Act protests have taken hold. No political party is behind them; they are generally arranged by student unions, neighborhood associations and the like.

Yet this aspect of their character is precisely what will worry Modi and his right-hand man, Home Minister Amit Shah. They know how to mock and delegitimize opposition parties with ruthless efficiency. Yet creating a narrative that paints large, flag-waving crowds as traitors is not quite that easy.

For that is how these protests look: large groups of young people, many carrying witty signs and the national flag. They meet and read the preamble to India’s Constitution, into which the promise of secularism was written in the 1970’s.

They carry photographs of the Constitution’s drafter, the Columbia University-trained economist and lawyer B. R. Ambedkar. These are not the mobs the government wanted. They hoped for angry Muslims rampaging through the streets of India’s cities, whom they could point to and say: “See? We must protect you from them.” But, in spite of sometimes brutal repression, the protests have largely been nonviolent.

One, in Shaheen Bagh in a Muslim-dominated sector of New Delhi, began simply as a set of local women in a square, armed with hot tea and blankets against the chill Delhi winter. It has now become the focal point of a very different sort of resistance than what the government expected. Nothing could cure the delusions of India’s Hindu middle class, trained to see India’s Muslims as dangerous threats, as effectively as a group of otherwise clearly apolitical women sipping sweet tea and sharing their fears and food with anyone who will listen.

Modi was re-elected less than a year ago; what could have changed in India since then? Not much, I suspect, in most places that voted for him and his party — particularly the vast rural hinterland of northern India. But urban India was also possibly never quite as content as electoral results suggested. India’s growth dipped below 5% in recent quarters; demand has crashed, and uncertainty about the future is widespread. Worse, the government’s response to the protests was clearly ill-judged. University campuses were attacked, in one case by the police and later by masked men almost certainly connected to the ruling party.

Protesters were harassed and detained with little cause. The courts seemed uninterested. And, slowly, anger began to grow on social media — not just on Twitter, but also on Instagram, previously the preserve of pretty bowls of salad. Instagram is the one social medium over which Modi’s party does not have a stranglehold; and it is where these protests, with their photogenic signs and flags, have found a natural home. As a result, people across urban India who would never previously have gone to a demonstration or a political rally have been slowly politicized.

India is, in fact, becoming more like a normal democracy. “Normal,” that is, for the 2020’s. Liberal democracies across the world are politically divided, often between more liberal urban centers and coasts, and angrier, “left-behind” hinterlands. Modi’s political secret was that he was that rare populist who could unite both the hopeful cities and the resentful countryside. Yet this once magic formula seems to have become ineffective. Five of India’s six largest cities are not ruled by Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party in any case — the financial hub of Mumbai changed hands recently. The BJP has set its sights on winning state elections in Delhi in a few weeks. Which way the capital’s voters will go is uncertain. But that itself is revealing — last year, Modi swept all seven parliamentary seats in Delhi.

In the end, the Citizenship Amendment Act is now law, the BJP might manage to win Delhi, and the protests might die down as the days get unmanageably hot and state repression increases. But urban India has put Modi on notice. His days of being India’s unifier are over: From now on, like all the other populists, he will have to keep one eye on the streets of his country’s cities.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 21,2020

New Delhi, Mar 21: Novel coronavirus cases in India rose to 258 on Saturday after 35 fresh cases were reported in various parts of the country, according to the Health Ministry.

Among the 258 are 39 foreign nationals, including 17 from Italy, three from the Philippines, two from the UK, one each belonging to Canada, Indonesia and Singapore.

The total figure also includes four deaths reported from Delhi, Karnataka, Punjab and Maharashtra.

"The total number of active COVID-19 cases across India stands at 231 so far," the ministry said, adding that 23 others have been cured/discharged/migrated while four have died.

Delhi has, so far, reported 26 positive cases, which include one foreigner, while Uttar Pradesh has recorded 24 cases, including one foreigner.

Maharashtra has 52 cases, including three foreigners, while Kerala has recorded 40 cases, which include seven foreign nationals.

Karnataka has 15 coronavirus patients. The number of cases in Ladakh rose to 13 and Jammu & Kashmir four. Telangana has reported 19 cases, which include 11 foreigners.

Rajasthan has also reported 17 cases, including two foreigners. Gujarat has reported seven cases so far.

Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Uttarakhand have reported three cases each.

West Bengal, Odisha and Punjab each reported two cases while Puducherry, Chhattisgarh and Chandigarh reported one case each.

In Haryana, there are 17 cases, which include 14 foreigners.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 14,2020

New Delhi, Jan 14: One of the four Nirbhaya gang rape convicts, who are scheduled to be hanged on January 22, moved a mercy plea before President Ram Nath Kovind to set aside the death sentence issued against him.

He also moved the Delhi High Court to set aside the death warrant issued by a trial court. This hearing is scheduled for Wednesday before a bench of Justices Manmohan and Sangita Dhingra Sehgal.

The petition, filed through advocate Vrinda Grover, seeks setting aside of the January 7 order issuing the warrant of his execution.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.