Govt nod for gold bonds, new monetization scheme

September 10, 2015

New Delhi, Sep 10: The government on Wednesday cleared two moves meant to reduce the import of gold. While the first entails the issue of gold bonds that individuals can invest in instead of buying it in physical form, the second is the Gold Monetization Scheme or a new deposit tool meant to help people earn returns on the precious metal lying idle in bank lockers. The gold deposited through this scheme will be re-circulated in the economy, helping cut imports.

goldbarBoth the proposals were announced in the last Budget . But the returns that the two instruments will offer will only be announced after a few weeks. As a result, investment consultants are advising people to wait for the details to come out.

India is among the top two markets for gold with the demand for bars and coins estimated at 300 tonnes annually as households have traditionally seen it as a safe investment. But the high demand and large quantities of imports distort the trade numbers and put pressure on the current account deficit and, in adverse situations, impacts the exchange rate.

As a result, the government announced sovereign gold bonds, which can be purchased by resident Indians with annual cap on investment of up to 500 grams per person. The bonds will be in denominations of 5, 10, 50 and 100 grams and will earn interest, which could be floating or at a fixed rate. So, instead of buying gold, you buy the bonds and on redemption, the amount will be transferred to your bank account.

When it comes to the price of the yellow metal, the government said it would be based on a reference rate fixed by RBI. The bonds will have a tenure of five-seven years and will be sold through banks, post offices, non-banking finance companies and agents hawking National Savings Certificate (NSC).

Just as gold is mortgaged during tough times, the bonds can be used as collateral for loans and will be traded on exchanges. In a statement, the government said the exemption from capital gains would be considered in the next budget with the benefit of indexation available to investors.

"The deposit will not be hedged and all risks associated with gold price and currency will be borne by GOl (government) through the Gold Reserve Fund. The position may be reviewed in case Gold Reserve Fund becomes unsustainable," an official statement said.

Gold Monetisation Scheme

If the move to issue gold bonds is meant to wean away buyers of the metal in physical form, the decision to launch a revamped gold monetisation scheme is aimed at tapping into vast quantities lying with households although similar schemes have failed to generate interest in the past.

Unlike gold lying at home, the amount deposited under the Gold Monetisation Scheme will fetch interest, much like a savings bank account, although the returns will be far lower at 1.5-2%. But on the flip side, the scheme is targeted at individuals who are willing to deposit a minimum 30 grams.

You will need to get a purity certificate from an approved Assaying and Hallmarking Centre and open a Gold Savings Account. You will then deposit the gold with a bank -- which will transfer it to a warehouse -- and choose a tenure which can range from one-three years (with rollover in multiples of one year to 12-15 years). "Like a fixed deposit, breaking of lock-in period will be allowed in either of the options and there will be a penalty on premature redemption (including part withdrawal)," a statement said.

When it comes to redemption, if you are a short-term investor, you will have the option to redeem it either in cash or the equivalent quantity of gold. But medium- and long-term deposits will only be redeemed in cash.

To reduce imports and use the gold mopped up through the GMS, there will be a loan facility for jewellers.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
February 11,2020

New Delhi, Feb 11: Delhi BJP chief Manoj Tiwari on Tuesday said the party will review why it failed to meet its own expectations in the Assembly polls and saw a moral victory in the fact that the party's vote share has increased since 2015.

"Delhi must have given mandate after careful thinking. Our vote percentage has increased from 32 per cent to around 38 per cent. Delhi did not reject us and the increase (in vote share) is a good sign for us," he told reporters.

He said the BJP hopes that there would be less blame game and more work in the national capital and congratulated Arvind Kejriwal on his party's victory in the polls.

After winning the Patparganj seat, AAP senior leader Manish Sisodia accused the BJP of indulging in the politics of hate.

"We indulge in politics of development not politics of hate. We're against the roadblock in Shaheen Bagh as we were earlier," he said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 27,2020

Jaipur, Jan 27: Senior Congress leader Shashi Tharoor said that if the Citizenship Amendment Act leads to the implementation of the NPR and the NRC, it would be a complete victory for Pakistan's founding father, Muhammad Ali Jinnah.

He said that Jinnah's idea of a country was already winning in India with the contentious Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) coming into effect, but asserted that there was still a choice available.

"I would not say Jinnah has completely won, but I would say Jinnah is winning. There is still a choice available to the nation between Jinnah's idea of a country and Gandhiji's idea of a country," he said on the sidelines of the Jaipur Literature Festival on Sunday.

The CAA came into force in India in December amid protests across the country and around the world.

The MP from Thiruvananthapuram said that the amended Citizenship Act took Jinnah's logic by declaring that religion shall be the basis of nationhood, reaffirming that Gandhi's idea is that all religions are equal .

"The CAA is, if you are talking Tennis, you would say one set up or big first set lead for Jinnah. But the next step would be if the CAA would lead to the National Population Register (NPR) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC). If that happens, then you would consider that Jinnah's victory is complete," he said.

The CAA seeks to grant citizenship to migrants belonging to Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Christian, Jain and Parsi communities who came to India from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan on or before December 31, 2014.

On the BJP's defence that the NPR was carried out during the UPA regime, Tharoor said that the Congress government had utilised a decision of the NDA government led by former prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee.

"It never asked where were your parents born. It never authorised the enumerators to note on the margin 'dubious citizenship', a term used in the NPR rules crafted by this government. That is purely BJP's invention," he said.

If we go around this country authorising people to interview all the citizens, or identify some who have 'dubious citizenship', you can be pretty sure which Indians are going to be found on the 'dubious citizenship', he said.

"That will principally be one community that is not mentioned in the CAA. And if that happens, then it is indeed Jinnah's victory.

"From wherever he is, he can point to this place and say, 'see I was right in the 1940. We are separate nations and Muslims deserved their own country because Hindus cannot be just'," Tharoor said.

Speaking about the Delhi election, the three-time MP said that the maximum development in the national capital happened under the Congress government.

"What Sheila Dikshit did in her 15 years as Chief Minister of Delhi, no other leader could do it before or after her," he said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
January 11,2020

Those owning a single house in joint names would continue to file their income tax returns (ITRs) in much simpler ITR-1 (Sahaj) and ITR-4 forms (Sugam) for assessment year 2020-21 with the government issuing a clarification in this regard.

The clarification has come days after the government modified the eligibility for filing the returns in ITR-1 and ITR-4, stating that those owning a property jointly, spending Rs 2 lakh on foreign travel and paying electricity bill of Rs 1 lakh in a year would not be able to file returns in the simpler forms.

They would have to file their returns with much more detailed information in other specified forms.

Following the changes in the eligibility for filing returns in the two forms, concerns were raised over it with taxpayers claiming that it will cause huge hardship for them.

"The matter has been examined and it has been decided to allow a person, who jointly owns a single house property, to file his/her return of income in ITR-1 or ITR-4 Form, as may be applicable, if he/she meets the other conditions," a Finance Ministry statement said.

"It has also been decided to allow a person, who is required to file return due to fulfilment of one or more conditions specified in the seventh proviso to section 139(1) of the Act, to file his/her return in ITR-1 Form," it added.

Tax practitioners welcomed the government’s move of going back to the previous position.

"This is a welcome clarification allowing middle class taxpayers owning a single house property to file simpler ITR forms, 1 and 4, and not the detailed ITR forms even if they own house property in joint names," said Shailesh Kumar, Director, Nangia Andersen Consulting.

It may be noted that taxpayers holding multiple house properties would have to file more detailed return forms.

In the major changes notified earlier this month by the Income-Tax department, individual taxpayers were disallowed to file return either in ITR-1 or ITR 4 if he or she was a joint-owner in house property.

In another change, those who deposited more than Rs 1 crore in bank account or spent Rs 2 lakh on foreign travel or paid Rs 1 lakh on electricity bill in a financial year were also barred from using the easy-to-fill return forms.

"By today's clarification, the government has maintained status quo. Now, the taxpayers can continue filing their returns in the same fashion in which they did last year," said Naveen Wadhwa, Deputy General Manager (DGM), Taxmann.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.