Hadiya’s father prevents women’s panel chief from meeting her

News Network
November 21, 2017

Thiruvananthapuram, Nov 21: Asokan, father of Akhila, aka Hadiya, on Monday prevented the Kerala State Women’s Commission chairperson (SWC) M. C. Josephine from meeting his 26-year-old daughter who converted to Islam and then married a Muslim boy.

The latest controversy comes when she is scheduled to state her side of the case in the Supreme Court this month. Ms. Hadiya, who is forced to stay in her Hindu parents’ house in Kottayam, is the focal point of a national debate on whether she was a victim of “deceptive conversion” to Islam or “love jihad”. 

Her husband had moved the Supreme Court to free Ms. Hadiya from parental custody to reunite with him.

The apex court had reserved its judgment and ordered the National Investigation Agency to probe whether the marriage was part of a “love jihad” conspiracy to convert her to Islam. Ms. Josephine had gone to her house close on the heels of the visit of National Women’s Commission chairperson Rekha Sharma, who is said to be a BJP supporter.

Ms. Sharma had met Ms. Hadiya and claimed that she was hale and happy. She said Mr. Asokan rejected her offer to fly Ms. Hadiya to New Delhi at State expense. The father also refused to reveal their travel plans.

Comments

are you serious?? OMG such low mentality... she is legal age dude... till when should her father decide till she is 99 years old...

@ Yogesh, I presume you are a graduate, but still lack basic educated men’s rational thinking capacity. This would mainly be caused by your narrowmind and colour code thoughts…

 

so to make it more clear to you yourself, I will ask you a simple question if a Muslim girl (20 years) loves and marry a Hindu boy (22 years) will it be love gharwapasi, do you think NIA would be required???

This mind-set is very clear your hatred and biased reasoning against the opposite community, based upon no personal issues but only through mindwash is dangerous…

You have risen and become Taliban thoughts individual.

 

You might look at other community individual and without knowing him start hating him? Just because you are brain washed, my fellow citizen.

Get cure for your infection, don’t let it spread…

 

You have nothing to fear 

Sangeeth Shiva
 - 
Tuesday, 21 Nov 2017

Interrogate Jahan. He is working on love jihad

Kumar
 - 
Tuesday, 21 Nov 2017

Either Asokan is a Sanghi or he got threat from Sanghis. 80 percent is for the first one

Hari
 - 
Tuesday, 21 Nov 2017

Unltimate freedom denial. Should arrest her father

Yogesh
 - 
Tuesday, 21 Nov 2017

Stop love jihad. NIA probe should continue in this case 

Sandesh
 - 
Tuesday, 21 Nov 2017

Asokan has the right to decide. He is her father

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 25,2020

Mangaluru, Mar 25: Fishing boats returned to the old Port in Mangaluru after the government prohibited deep-sea fishing till further orders on Wednesday to prevent the assembly of a large gathering here in the wake of the novel coronavirus pandemic. 

According to officials, deep-sea fishing activities result in the gathering of a large number of people and is much against the government's direction on maintaining social distancing. 

According to the Department, the 42-Km coastline in Dakshina Kannada hass 57 purse seine boats, 1,270 trawl boats, 1,483 gillnet boats, 549 other mechanised boats.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 2,2020

Mangaluru, Feb 2: A local court on Saturday remanded Aditya Rao,the suspect in the Mangaluru International Airport (MIA) bomb case, to two weeks judicial custody.

Rao was produced before the Sixth Judicial First Class Magistrate Court after the 10-day police custody expired.

Rao has been in police custody since January 22 after he surrendered before the police in Bengaluru on January 21 and was later brought here.

He had allegedly planted an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) at the airport on January 20 triggering panic and later made a hoax call to the airport terminal that a bomb had been planted in an IndiGo flight.

During the last ten days, police took the accused to several places in the city and Udupi where he had frequented in the recent past.

He was also taken to the room where he stayed while he was working at a hotel in the city.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 5,2020

Chennai, Feb 5: In order to ensure housing for all, the Madras High Court has proposed ban on non-resident Indians from purchasing houses in India, prohibit speculative sale, and impose 100 per cent extra stamp duty on purchase of second house.

The court on its own impleaded the Union housing and finance ministries as party respondents.

It has directed them to answer a series of questions including as to how many families have basic amenity of housing in India as well as in Tamil Nadu, population and housing ratio in the country and in the state, when 'Housing for All' mission of the central government would be achieved.

"Why the government does not consider imposing such restrictions to control escalation of house prices and to provide a house to every family in the country, a division bench of Justice N Kirubakaran and Justice Abdul Quddhose wondered.

Directing the authorities to inform as to whether the central and state have got special schemes to provide housing for the marginalized and economically weaker sections including SC/ST communities, the bench has also sought the details of the number of families that possess more than one house.

"Why the governments do not restrict families/individuals from purchasing/possessing more than one housing unit/flat/plot till "Housing for all" is achieved?

Why not the government charge 100 per cent more or extra stamp duty to discourage buying more than one house by a family while purchasing second house?

Why not the government conditionally allow the families to purchase more than one house provided the said family pays 100 per cent extra statutory dues like property tax, electricity charges, water and sewerage charges on the second property?" the bench said.

This apart, the court also wanted the authorities to know as to why it should not prohibit the NRIs from purchasing houses in India to bring down the cost of housing.

Justifying its directions, the court said "Lakhs and lakhs of people are living on platforms, roads, and cement pipes, slums, under the trees and on banks of water bodies without proper shelter and basic amenities and safety."

It is true that the Centre had taken a policy decision to provide housing unit to every family.

It should be achieved at the earliest, the court said, adding it could become fruitful when restrictions are put on persons who hold more than one housing units.

The court passed the order while hearing an appeal moved by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board challenging a single judge order against acquisition of about 369 acres of private land in Thudiyalur and Vellakinar areas of Coimbatore for a housing scheme.

Comments

Suresh SS
 - 
Wednesday, 5 Feb 2020

We believed that only Indian Govt. ministers, MP and MLAs has this disease, now it is spreading everywhere even Indian High courts. it is certainly very harmful virus  

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.