Houthi attacks blamed on US inaction

October 17, 2016

Jeddah, Oct 17: The Houthi militias, which are backed by Iran, have — for the third time in less than a week — attacked US Navy in the strategic Bab Al-Mandab Strait, one of the world's busiest shipping lanes.

HOUTHI

Saturday night's attack came after the first one on Monday, Oct. 10. At that time, the US Navy said it was unsure if it was being targeted or if the attack was a mistake.

The second attack — on Wednesday, Oct. 12 — prompted the US military to respond with verbal warnings and limited strikes on Thursday. Three radar sites in Houthi-held Yemeni territories near Ras Isa, north of Mukha and near Khoka, were taken out.

Pentagon Press Secretary Peter Cook said at the time that “the limited self-defense strikes were conducted to protect our personnel, our ships and our freedom of navigation.”

However, the Houthi militias — a radical religious group whose primary slogan is “Death to America” — remained undeterred and waged a third attack on Saturday night, firing a number of missiles at the USS Mason and other US ships in the Red Sea.

“The Mason once again appears to have come under fire from cruise missiles fired from Yemen,” Adm. John Richardson, chief of US naval operations, told reporters on Sunday.

The Mason was in international waters when multiple incoming surface-to-surface missiles were detected by the ship's crew about 3:30 p.m. EDT. No damage was reported to the vessel or other ships accompanying it.

A US official was quoted as saying by news agencies that an additional radars could have been used in the latest attack.

Saturday night's attack has eliminated all doubts that the attacks were a mistake or that the Houthis wanted to avoid a confrontation with the US.

In fact, the only one who seems to be avoiding a full-fledged confrontation is the US, thereby emboldening the Houthi militias — as rightly explained by Ali Khedery, formerly the longest serving US official in Iraq who is now based in Dubai.

Khedery blamed the recurrent attacks on America's lack of robust responses to such grave provocations.

“Due to the strategic missteps in the Middle East since Sept. 11 2001, by both US Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama and their administrations, and because of the quagmires in Iraq and Afghanistan, many jihadi groups have felt emboldened enough to threaten the US,” he told Arab News on Sunday. “These groups include Sunni jihadi groups, such as Al-Qaeda (Al-Qaeda in Iraq and Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula) and Daesh, and the Shiite jihadi groups, such as the Quds Force, Hezbollah, the Iraqi Shiite militias and now, most recently, the Houthis.”

“The reason these groups feel emboldened is because the Iranians, for example, working with Al-Qaeda and the Shiite militia groups killed and wounded thousands of American soldiers in both Afghanistan and Iraq without any major repercussions or reactions from the US,” he said.

“A message should have gone that the United States as a superpower cannot, and should not, be messed about by these Third World powers, such as Iran or even worse, by their militias and proxies,” said Khedery. “Unfortunately, a precedent was set when there was no major retaliation to the killings with impunity of American soldiers across Iraq. This led the jihadi groups to become more and more emboldened and that is why there is a situation such as the one in Yemen, where the Houthis feel that they can fire anti-ship missiles at the US Navy without any major response.”

A US State Department official opted not to provide specific answers to specific questions from Arab News. However, he responded with a statement which said that the US had indeed attacked three Houthi radar sites on Thursday in what he described as “limited self-defense strikes.” He added that these counter-attacks were conducted “to protect our personnel, our ships and our freedom of navigation in this important maritime passageway.”

The official insisted, however, that “the strikes were not conducted as part of the Saudi coalition's hostilities with the Houthis” and that “the United States continues to call on all parties in Yemen — the Saudi-led coalition, the Yemeni government, the Houthis and Saleh-aligned forces — to commit to an immediate cessation of hostilities and implement this cessation based on the April 10 terms.”

Salman Al-Ansari, founder and president of the Washington-based Saudi-American Public Relation Affairs Committee (SAPRAC), said one should call things for what they are.

“It is Iran that attacked the US Navy with rockets via its militia in Yemen,” he said. “We, as Saudis, believe that US security is an extension of global security.”

He said Saudi Arabia was very concerned at seeing the Houthis targeting the US Navy. “Saudi Arabia will always be committed to stand with its partner — the US — through thick and thin,” he added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 24,2020

Paris, Apr 24: The worldwide death toll from the coronavirus pandemic crossed 190,000 on Friday, with nearly two-thirds of the fatalities in Europe, according to an AFP tally compiled from official sources at 0740 GMT.

A total of 190,089 people have died and 2,698,733 been infected since the virus emerged in China in December. The hardest hit continent is Europe, with 116,221 deaths and 1,296,248 cases.

The country with the most deaths is the United States with 49,963, followed by Italy with 25,549, Spain with 22,157, France with 21,856 and Britain 18,738.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 23,2020

Singapore, Mar 23: Oil prices fell at the open in Asia on Monday after a trillion-dollar Senate proposal to help the coronavirus-hit American economy was defeated and death tolls soared across Europe and the US.

US benchmark West Texas Intermediate initially tumbled more than three percent but then pulled back some ground to trade 1.5 percent lower, at $22 a barrel.

Brent crude, the international benchmark, fell 4.9 percent to $25 a barrel.

Prices have fallen to multi-year lows in recent weeks as lockdowns and travel restrictions to fight the virus hit demand, and top producers Saudi Arabia and Russia engage in a price war.

The latest drop came after a trillion-dollar Senate proposal to rescue the US economy was defeated after receiving zero support from Democrats, and with five Republicans absent from the chamber because of virus-related quarantines.

The bill had proposed funding for American families, thousands of shuttered or suffering businesses and the nation's critically under-equipped hospitals.

Coronavirus deaths soared across Europe and the United States at the weekend despite heightened restrictions.

The death toll from the virus -- which has upended lives and closed businesses and schools across the planet -- surged to more than 14,300 Sunday, according to an AFP tally.

AxiCorp chief markets strategist Stephen Innes said that "total demand devastation" had set it.

"Oil markets collapsed out of the gate this morning as prices react... to stringent containment lockdown measures," he said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
March 1,2020

Washington, Mar 1: The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has proposed a fine of over $200 million for all major US mobile carriers for selling the location data of customers to some agencies.

The Federal Communications Commission today proposed fines against the nation's four largest wireless carriers for apparently selling access to their customers' location information without taking reasonable measures to protect against unauthorised access to that information. As a result, T-Mobile faces a proposed fine of more than $91 million, AT&T faces a proposed fine of more than $57 million, Verizon faces a proposed fine of more than $48 million, and Sprint faces a proposed fine of more than $12 million, the FCC said in a statement on Friday.

The Enforcement Bureau of FCC opened this investigation after reports surfaced that a Missouri Sheriff, Cory Hutcheson, used a "location-finding service" operated by Securus, a provider of communications services to correctional facilities, to access the location information of the wireless carriers' customers without their consent between 2014 and 2017.

"American consumers take their wireless phones with them wherever they go. And information about a wireless customer's location is highly personal and sensitive. The FCC has long had clear rules on the books requiring all phone companies to protect their customers' personal information. And since 2007, these companies have been on notice that they must take reasonable precautions to safeguard this data and that the FCC will take strong enforcement action if they don't. Today, we do just that," said FCC Chairman Ajit Pai.

"This FCC will not tolerate phone companies putting Americans' privacy at risk."

The FCC also admonished these carriers for apparently disclosing their customers' location information, without their authorisation, to a third party

The four major US carriers mentioned sold access to their customers' location information to "aggregators," who then resold access to such information to third-party location-based service providers (like Securus).

Although their exact practices varied, each carrier relied heavily on contract-based assurances that the location-based services providers (acting on the carriers' behalf) would obtain consent from the wireless carrier's customer before accessing that customer's location information.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.