Major blow to Adani's Udupi power project; NGT declares clearances granted to set up plant are illegal

coastaldigest.com news network
March 16, 2019

Udupi, Mar 16: In a major blow to Adani's Udupi Power Plant project at Yellur village of Udupi district, the Principal Bench of the National Green Tribunal declared on 14" March 2019 that all the clearances granted to set up the power plant are illegal. It has also ordered the suspension of the Environmental Clearance dated 1.08.2017 granted to expand the plant by addition of 2x800MW units to raise ultimate capacity to 2800MW. The Tribunal invoked the "Polluter Pays" principle and appointed a committee of experts to ascertain the damages to the crops and the environment in general of the area. It has directed the Company to pay 5 crores as an interim environmental compensation to CPCB who will also be the Nodal agency to study the damages caused. It has also ordered the Company to pay Rs. 1 lakh as cost to the Petitioners.

The Tribunal found that genuinely serious issues raised by the villagers and the Applicants had not been given the due attention it observed by all concerned including the Government. The fact that multitudes of disputes and litigations relating to the project had been instituted bears witness to the fact that all was not well. Environmental clearance dated 20.03.1997 had been granted without following the due process statutorily prescribed and mandatorily required to be followed. Extension of the validity period of the EC had been granted on 16.04.2002 at the request of the project proponent as work could not be commenced within the 5 years' period stipulated in the EC. This is without authority of law. On 05.10.2004 the EC was cancelled by the Ministry as the project proponent had still not commenced with the work of the project. This order of cancellation was recalled vide a personal letter dated 31.01.2005 by the Director MOEF under questionable circumstances at the request of the project proponent.

The Tribunal pointed out that the procedures laid down under the EIA Notifications are not mere formalities to be followed but have been prescribed to ensure that the environment is duly protected while taking up a project keeping in view the Precautionary Principle and the principle of Sustainable Development. The fact that the procedures prescribed in the Notification were not at all followed except few parts of it, lead it to reasonably conclude that there has been damage caused to the environment for which consequences have fallen on the people in terms of healtn, decline in the agricultural productivity and, therefore, their livelihood, degradation of natural habitat of birds and animals, etc.

Tribunal took a serious note of the study carried out on "Environmental Profile and People's Livelihood aspects in the vicinity of Coal Based Thermal Power Plant at Yellur Panchayat, Udupi District" by a group of Scientists as CES Technical Report 126 dated April 2012 published by the Energy & Wetland Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, has made alarming observations in respect of the project area during field investigations. It has been observed that mismanagement of the environment was evident from the contamination of the water (surface and ground), soil and air apart from the impaired functional aspects of the biotic elements. This was deduced from the reduced productivity of grains, jasmine flower and horticultural produce, reproductive ability of livestock, poultry animals, etc. There was dust on the leaves during the dry seasons which induced phyto-toxicity leading to poor pollination and hence reduced productivity. There was reduction in the population of pollinators. Stunted growth of saplings and enhanced respiratory diseases, etc. were noticed caused by release of saline mist from the cooling towers of the plant which is locally dispersed by the wind even up to 2 kms.

The Tribunal found the conduct of the MoEF&CC in the entire episode does not appear to be above board. The Tribunal expresses grave anguish and concern which in its view ought to be corrected and left it upon the MoEF&CC to deal with this aspect as their wisdom may dictate.

The Tribunal observed that justifiably, therefore, the directions would be called for to remove the plant and order for restoration of the area and the environment. However, considering the facts and circumstances, the lapse of time and the fait accompli situation that has arisen, we are of the view that the interest of public will not be served in passing such order. The need of the hour is to explore such measures and steps that would mitigate the harm already caused in addition to ensuring that the plant operates strictly within the environmental norms. It has thus invoked the "Polluter Pays" principle under Section 20 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 and hold M/s. Udupi Power Corporation Ltd., the Respondent No. 5, project proponent, liable to pay Environmental Compensation which shall bg assessed by a Committee of Experts. It has constituted a Committee comprising of- 1. Senior Scientist, CPCB. 2. Senior Representative, IIT Chennai. 3. Senior Scientist, IIT Bangalore. CPCB shall be the nodal agency to coordinate amongst the Members for taking up the task.

The Committee shall assess the environmental damage on account of the environmental violations and submit its report within three months. Awaiting such report, it directed UPCL to pay an interim Environmental Compensation of k5 crores with the CPCB. The interim compensation would be subject to assessment of final damages by the Committee of Experts. This amount shall be deposited within a period of one month from hence. The CPCB, in the meanwhile, shall utilize the interim compensation for restitution and remedial works for restitution of the environment including the possible plight of the people affected by the plant. It has made it clear that this amount shall be distinct from the other obligations of UPCL under the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) or other obligations.

The project was challenged as early as in 2004 by the Samithi before the then National Environmental Appellate Authority (NEAA), New Delhi. The appeal was dismissed by the sole non-judicial adjudicator who was formerly the Secretary, MOEF responsible earlier for the grant of the very Environmental Clearance. Aggrieved by the decision, the Samithi filed WP before the Karnataka High Court in 2005. Bellibettu Alade Devasthana and CSI St. Luke's Church also filed separate Writ Petitions before the High Court. The cases were transferred to the National Green Tribunal South Zone, Chennai in 2012 under the Supreme Court order. Due to the lack of Judges in Zonal Tribunal at Chennai the cases were finally heard by the Principal Bench at New Delhi and the judgement was released on 14th March 2019. The State of Karnataka actually does not need power from the plant and Govt has either stopped or considerably reduced receiving the supply from UPCL. The Energy Dept website show that as on 31.07.2018 the total generation of power from various sources has increased to 27,176.43 MW out of which 4,713.26 MW is Wind Energy and 5,172.72 MW is Solar among others. The website also shows that the available potential of the Renewable Energy totals to 86,792MW of which Wind Energy is 55,857MW and Solar 24,700MW. With such RE potential the killer coal-based power plants are not at all required in the State leave alone in the sensitive Ecologically Coastal Zone.

As such the State Govt is required to issue directions to UPCL to shut it down and shift it to another place perhaps another country like Bangladesh. It has also come to the knowledge of the Samithi that UPCL is now planning new Transmission Lines to supply power to other State perhaps through the grid at Kerala. It would only mean that we would be used as sacrificial lambs for the Company and this will not be acceptable.

Comments

jaleel
 - 
Monday, 18 Mar 2019

Now even the plant is shut, it's the public who are at lose. Govt provided public money to Mota bhai to set up this plant. Coorporate sect always play with public life, money. They keep people busy in fake and unwanted issues and politicians prepare grounds for all these nuisance. Tuticorn in Tamilnadu and likewise many examples are in front of us. This will happen again and again We are fools really. At least for the sake of our next generation we should start thinking like a man not like donkey  

 

 

 

 

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com news network
May 21,2020

Bengaluru, May 21: Chief Minister B S Yediyurappa today slammed Law Minister JC Madhuswamy for yelling at a woman farmer in Kolar, an incident that attracted widespread criticism. 

The incident happened on Wednesday when Madhuswamy, who is also the minor irrigation minister, was inspecting the Koramangala-Challaghatta (KC) Valley project, under which Bengaluru’s sewage is treated and pumped into lakes in Kolar. 

During his visit, farmer Nalini Gowda questioned Madhuswamy on the encroachment of the 1,022-acre S Agrahara lake. At one point, Madhuswamy lost his cool and yelled, “Aye! Shut your mouth, rascal,” and asked the police to take her away. Before this, Madhuswamy told her, “Make a request. I’m a very bad man. You can only air your grievance. Don’t command us.” 

A video of this exchange was aired by news channels. 

“What (Madhuswamy) said is not right. I have warned him. None can forgive such an explicit manner of talking with a woman. That, too, behaving like that being a minister doesn’t bode well. I will talk to that woman also and I’ll ensure this doesn’t happen again,” Yediyurappa told reporters.

The incident has come as a shot in the arm to the Opposition Congress, which is already attacking the Yediyurappa administration on the COVID-19 crisis. Condemning Madhuswamy’s behaviour, Leader of the Opposition Siddaramaiah demanded an apology and asked Yediyurappa to sack him from the Cabinet. 

Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC) president D K Shivakumar said it was unbecoming of Madhuswamy to behave like that being a senior minister. “People will ask us questions and express their problems, naturally. What’s important is how we handle ourselves. Be it a woman or anyone, they come to us because we’re into public service. Calling them ‘rascal’ and things is not right. Maybe there was some irritation, but I agree with (Siddaramaiah) that he should be dropped from the Cabinet,” he said.

On his part, Madhuswamy said he felt intimidated. “If I have hurt the feelings of any woman, I will certainly apologise,” he said. “But citizens should realise, we go to their villages to ask about their problems. If they start abusing us publicly, how can we work? My secretary and I heard her for five minutes and then told her that we know our responsibility. We asked her to close the issue. She didn’t stop and I got tempted (sic),” the minister said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 6,2020

Dubai, May 6: The Indian nationals cleared by the UAE health authorities and found to be asymptomatic will only be allowed to fly back home in one of India's biggest ever repatriation exercises, the Indian Embassy in Abu Dhabi has said ahead of the first set of flights on Thursday.

On Monday, the Indian government announced plans to begin a phased repatriation of its citizens stranded abroad from May 7. Air India will operate 64 flights from May 7 to May 13 to bring back around 15,000 Indian nationals stranded abroad amid the COVID-19-induced lockdown, India's Civil Aviation Minister Hardeep Singh Puri said on Tuesday.

The first two special flights that will operate from Thursday to evacuate Indians stranded in the UAE due to the coronavirus pandemic will begin with applicants from Kerala, who formed the majority of the expatriates who have registered to be repatriated from here, Indian Ambassador to the UAE Pavan Kapoor has said.

"All departing passengers will have to undergo medical screening and IGM/IGG test at the departure airport and only those cleared by the UAE health authorities and found to be asymptomatic will be allowed to board the plane,” the Indian Embassy in Abu Dhabi said on Tuesday.

According to the embassy, all passengers will be required to sign an undertaking to undergo compulsory quarantine at the destination of arrival and bear the cost of the same.

“Each passenger, at the time of boarding would be handed over a safety kit containing 2 three-layered face masks, 2 pairs of gloves and pouches/small bottles of hand sanitizers. While on board the flight, the health protocol of the Ministry of Civil Aviation of India will be strictly followed,” said the embassy.

The passenger lists for the two flights on May 7 have been finalised by the Embassy / Consulate and sent to Air India Express for issue of tickets.

The Embassy / Consulate will continue conveying the details of further special flights as and when they are announced by the Government of India, over the next few days.

Less than 2,000 Indians wishing to return home from the UAE will be flown to six Indian states in the first week of India’s biggest ever repatriation exercise named Vande Bharat Mission—sans social distancing and COVID-19 tests, the Gulf News reported.

Only those cleared by the UAE health authorities and found to be asymptomatic will be allowed to board the plane.

The short-listed applicants, who were contacted by the Indian missions on Tuesday to purchase tickets for the first two flights to Kerala on Thursday, told the Gulf News that the tickets are priced around Dh 725 to Dh 750 (over Rs 15,000).

Sharjah resident Rasheed Thayyil said his 70-year-old mother Nepheeza Thottungal, who came on a visit to the UAE in February, received an email from the Indian Consulate in Dubai which quoted an airfare of around Dh725 (approx Rs 15,000), the report said.

Another applicant from Abu Dhabi Ambily Babu said she purchased a ticket at Dh 750 from Air India Express for her Abu Dhabi-Kochi flight scheduled to fly on Thursday evening, it said.

Air India Express which is set to operate the first two flights to Kerala on Thursday will operate its Boeing 737-800 aircraft, with a seating capacity of 186 economy class seats, the report added.

With nine seats reserved for isolation, only 177 passengers would be flown, it said.

The Indian expatriate community of approximately 3.42 million is reportedly the largest ethnic community in the UAE constituting roughly about 30 per cent of the country's population, according to information available on the Indian Embassy website.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 18,2020

Bengaluru, Jun 18: Karnataka Public Service Commission (KPSC) was reprimanded for withholding information, sought by a candidate regarding an examination held in 2005 for Gazeted Probationary posts, by the State Information Commissioner here on Thursday.

According to official sources, the State Information Commissioner NP Ramesh, while disposing off a petition by the candidate, who had written an examination conducted by the KPSC for the gazeted probationary posts held in 2005, had directed to provide the information sought by the candidate, free of costs within ten days.

The State Information Commissioner in his order had termed the conduct of the KPSC as against the spirit of transparency among the public authorities.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.