Mandhwaraj appeasing beef eaters by calling Rama, Krishna non-vegetarians: BJP

[email protected] (CD Network)
October 19, 2016

Udupi, Oct 19: Criticising fisheries minister Pramod Madhwaraj for calling Rama, Krishna and Valmiki non-vegetarians, Udupi district president Mattar Ratnakar Hegde claimed that the former's statement is aimed at appeasing beef eaters.

Untitled-1 copy copySpeaking to media persons here, Mr Hegde said that Mr Madhwaraj's comments were completely irresponsible and untimely. “He should be held responsible for everything,” he said. However, the BJP leader did not say whether Mr Madhwaraj statement was true or false.

He said that Mr Madhwaraj, who is also the Udupi district in-charge minister, should take up the development works instead getting into unnecessary controversies. Let Madhwaraj take up the repair work of the roads and set right the problems and unhygienic conditions that exist in the government hospital, he added.

The minister should also stop interfering in the affairs of gram panchayat. The concept of decentralisation of power is intrigued. He demanded that immediate measures should be taken to eliminate the scarcity of sand. The sand should not be transported to the neighbouring districts, he added.

Protest

He said Udupi district unit of BJP will organise a huge protest rally at Clock Tower condemning the failures of the Congress-led state government.

Mr Hegde said, the recent murder of RSS?activist Rudresh in Bengaluru has shocked the people in the state. Stating that the state government is “glorifying violence,” he said the BJP and RSS activists hare fear for life. There is no security for the lives of Sangh Pariwar members.

He said the state government has done nothing to set right the law and order, which is deteriorating every day. Mattar added that the government is full of confusions. The previous BJP government had introduced many programmes for the people. However, most of the benefits are discontinued by the present Congress-led state government.

Also Read: Sri Rama, Sri Krishna, Valmiki were non-vegetarians, reminds Madhwaraj

Comments

Mohammed
 - 
Wednesday, 19 Oct 2016

1st say is it true or false , what minister has told,....to go on protest, you guys are jobless, you earn by such issues, go ahead

INDIAN
 - 
Wednesday, 19 Oct 2016

these are foul game by rss people i know most of the rss prople eat beef here in dubai

Abu Muhammad
 - 
Wednesday, 19 Oct 2016

These RSS BJP ignorant must know that both Ram and Krishna are not only non-vegetarians but BEEF EATERS TOO. See for authenticity - BRIHADARANYAKA UPANISHAD, Chapter VI, Brahmana 4-(Slokas)17,18 & 19 - \In case one wishes to have a son -learned, famed, excellent speaker, know all VEDAS and to attain full length of life, - they two (Man & Woman) should have(eat) rice boiled with BEEF or VEAL meat prepared with ghee\".
Why Rama's father Dashrath and Krishna's father Vasudeva were not aware of this sacred scriptures and instructions? For sure they knew and implemented it fully to beget Maryada purush RAM & KRISHNA.
The above dish is exactly implemented by MUSLIMS wholeheartedly in the form of BEEF BIRYANI, no wonder DK Muslims has all the qualities of a MAN as explained by the above Upansihad.

Wake up Hindu Brothers, Read your own scriptures and fear God!!"

TRUE INDIAN
 - 
Wednesday, 19 Oct 2016

Rightly said

Hindu scriptures give permission to have non-vegetarian food

It is mentioned in Manu Smruti, the law book of Hindus, in chapter 5 verse 30
“The eater who eats the flesh of those to be eaten does nothing bad,
even if he does it day after day, for God himself created some to be eaten
and some to be eater.”

c. Again next verse of Manu Smruti, that is, chapter 5 verse 31 says
“Eating meat is right for the sacrifice, this is traditionally known as a rule of
the gods.”

d. Further in Manu Smruti chapter 5 verse 39 and 40 says “God himself created sacrificial animals for sacrifice, … , therefore killing in a sacrifice is not killing.”

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
February 8,2020

Mumbai, Feb 8: Anil Ambani, the brother of Asia’s richest man has pleaded poverty in his dispute with three Chinese banks seeking $680 million in defaulted loans.

“The value of my investments has collapsed,” Anil Ambani said, according to a court filing by the banks in a London lawsuit.

“The current value of my shareholdings is down to approximately $82.4m and my net worth is zero after taking into account my liabilities. In summary, I do not hold any meaningful assets which can be liquidated for the purposes of these proceedings.”

The lawsuit was filed by three state-controlled Chinese banks which argue that they provided a loan of $925 million to Ambani’s Reliance Communications Ltd. in 2012 with the condition that he personally guarantee the debt. The comments were disclosed on Friday as Ambani sought to avoid depositing hundreds of millions of dollars with the court ahead of a trial.

The embattled Indian tycoon says that while he agreed to give a non-binding “personal comfort letter,” he never gave a guarantee tied to his personal assets -- an “extraordinary potential personal liability.”

The 60-year-old is the brother of Mukesh Ambani, who’s worth $56.5 billion and is the wealthiest man in Asia. Anil, on the other hand, has seen his personal fortune dwindle over recent years, losing his billionaire status. His Reliance Communications filed for bankruptcy last year.

The banks asked Judge David Waksman to force Ambani to put up $656 million into the court’s account.

Representatives for Ambani’s Reliance Group said they couldn’t immediately comment. They said the group will issue a statement once the court issues the final order.

Ambani’s lawyer, Robert Howe, said the court shouldn’t order his client to make a payment he can’t make. The tycoon argues that an order requiring him to do so would hinder his ability to defend himself in the case, Howe said.

“There’s no evidence of some giant pot of gold that he can pull $1 million, let alone $10 million, let alone $100 million,” Howe said.

Bankim Thanki, an attorney representing Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd., China Development Bank and the Export-Import Bank of China, said in a filing that Ambani’s statements are “plainly a yet further opportunistic attempt to evade his financial obligations to the lenders.”

Ambani was caught up in another legal wrangle last year when India’s Supreme Court threatened him with prison after Reliance Communications failed to pay Rs 5.5 billion ($77 million) to Ericsson AB’s Indian unit. The judges gave him a month to find the funds, and his brother, Mukesh, stepped in just in time to make the payment.

Anil said in a filing that he recognized that the judge would want to know if he could satisfy any order to put up funds from outside resources, including his family.

“I can confirm that I have made enquiries but I am unable to raise any finance from external sources,” he said. Judge Waksman had said in an earlier ruling that he believed Ambani’s defence would be shown to be “opportunistic and false.”

Ambani’s lawyer told the judge that as a result of the comments the tycoon’s relatives were unlikely to lend any funds.

There is a “very substantial risk they will never get it back,” Howe said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 14,2020

Kalaburagi, Mar 14: Delivering its judgment within a period of three and half months, a court here on Friday awarded death sentence to a man, who was a convict in the rape and murder case of a minor girl.

The Second Additional District and Sessions court in Kalaburagi sentenced Yallappa to death in the matter.

"The convict, had on December 2, 2019, taken the minor victim behind an Angwanwadi centre in Yakapur village. He raped the girl, murdered her and ran away," special public prosecutor LV Chutnalakar told media.
He said that the body of the girl was recovered around 10 pm on the same night.

"The investigation in the matter was taken up after a complaint was filed by the parents of the victim. The police conducted a speedy probe and filed a chargesheet, after which the conviction and sentence were pronounced," Chutnalakar said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com news network
June 12,2020

Mangaluru, Jun 12: A huge crowd gathered for the grand opening of the newly built 175-metre-long two-lane bridge across Phalguni River on National Highway 169 near Gurupura on the outskirts of the city today.

Even as the photos of the bridge inauguration ceremony went viral on social media, netizens took the elected representatives and the district administration to task for flouting safety norms at a time when the coronavirus cases are continuing to mount in coastal Karnataka.

The bridge was completed in a record time of 15 months. Dakshina Kannada MP and State BJP President Nalin Kumar Kateel and district in-charge Minister Kota Srinivas Poojari inaugurated the bridge in the presence of Mangaluru City North MLA Y. Bharath Shetty and others.

The bridge has come as a breather to thousands of travellers between Mangaluru-Moodbidri-Karkala on the busy NH. The age-old steel bridge had become dilapidated and was a cause for concern for road users. The highway is also under the process of getting widened to four lanes.

The bridge was constructed at an estimated cost of Rs 30 crore by contractor Sudhakar Shetty of Mugrodi Construction. Work started in February last and the contractor had time till February next.

While the two-lane carriageway is 16 metres wide, the bridge has 2.5-metre-wide pedestrian paths on both the sides. New approach roads of 500 metres each were also part of the project.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.