Mangaluru City Corporation polls: BJP 44; Cong 14; SDPI 2

coastaldigest.com web desk
November 14, 2019

Mangaluru, Nov 14: The Bharatiya Janata Party has managed to wrest control over the Mangaluru City Corporation ending the Congress rule in the coast city.

There were 180 candidates in the fray in 60 wards of MCC. BJP, which had contested in all 60 wards, managed to win 44 seats whereas Congress won only 14 seats. The Social Democratic Party of India, which had one seat in the MCC, won two seats this time.

Full result:

Ward number 01: Surathkal West (Final)

BJP: Shobha Rajesh 985

Cong: Shantha S Rao 548

Ind: Revathi Puthran 760

 

Ward number 02: Surathkal East (Final)

BJP: Shwetha A 2496

Cong: Indira 1133

 

Ward number 03: Katipalla East (Final)

BJP: Lokesh Bollaje 2486

Cong: Basheer Ahmed 1680

JD(S): Nawaz Katipalla 484

 

Ward number 04: Katipalla Krishnapura (Final)

BJP: Lakshmi Shekar Devadiga 2675

Cong: Savitha Shetty 2127

 

Ward number 05: Katipalla North (Final)

SDPI: Shamshad Abubakkar 2766

BJP: Suraiyya 648

Cong: Fathima B 881

 

Ward number 06: Idya East (Final)

BJP: Saritha 2233

Cong: Vineetha Rao 1759

 

Ward number 07: Idya West (Final)

BJP: Nayana Kotian 2282

Cong: Prathibha Kulai 1710

 

Ward number 08: Hosabettu (Final)

BJP: Varun Chowta 3030

Cong: Ashok Shetty 1765

JD(S): Ronald Fernandes 47

 

Ward number 09: Kulai (Final)

BJP: Vedavathi 3140

Cong: Gayathri 768

 

Ward number 10: Baikampady (Final)

BJP: Sumithra Kariya 2002

Cong: Sudhakara 877

 

Ward number 11: Panambur Bengre (Final)

Cong: Chandrika 1081

BJP: Sunitha 1236

JD(S): Shobha 369

CPI: Sunitha Krishna 888

 

Ward number 12: Panjimogaru (Final)

BJP: Naveen Chandra B Poojary 1690

Cong: Anil Kumar 1359

 

Ward number 13: Kunjathbail North (Final)

BJP: Sharath Kumar 2950

Cong: K Mohammed 1709

 

Ward number 14: Marakada (Final)

BJP: Lohith Amin 2055

Cong: Harinath 1704

 

Ward number 15: Kunjathbail South (Final)

BJP: Sumangala 3780

Cong: Shalini M N 1684

 

Ward number 16: Bengre Kulur (Final)

BJP: Kiran Kumar 2308

Cong: Panduranga Kukkyan 976

Ind: Chandrashekar 543

Nota 18

 

Ward number 17: Derebail North (Final)

BJP: Manoj Kumar 2142

Cong: Mallikarjuna 1369

 

Ward number 18: Kavoor (Final)

BJP: Gayathri A 3296

Cong: Bhavya 1725

 

Ward number 19: Pacchanady (Final)

BJP: Sangeetha R Nayak 2700

Cong: Vishalakshi 1544

 

Ward number 20: Tiruvail (Final)

BJP: Hemalatha Raghu Salian 3028

Cong: Prathibha R Shetty 1903

 

Ward number 21: Padavu West (Final)

BJP: Vanitha Prasad 3071

Cong: Ashalatha 1499

 

Ward number 22: Kadri Padav (Final)

BJP: Jayananda Anchan 2484

Cong: Umesh 1963

 

Ward number 23: Derebail East (Final)

BJP: Rajani L Kotian 2849

Cong: Jyothi L Devadiga 1583

 

Ward number 24: Derebail South (Final)

Cong: M Shashidhar Hegde 2235

BJP: Charith Kumar 1908

 

Ward number 25: Derebail West (Final)

BJP: Jayalakshmi V Shetty 2233

Cong: Roopa Chethan 1331

 

Ward number 26 : Derebail Central (Final)

BJP: Ganesh Kulal 3052

Cong: B Padmanabha Amin 1275

 

Ward number 27: Boloor (Final)

BJP: Jagadish Shetty 2360

Cong: Kamalaksha Salian 988

 

Ward number 28: Mannagudda (Final)

BJP: Sandhya 3019

Cong: Meghanadas 698

 

Ward number 29: Kambla (Final)

BJP: Leelavathi Prakash 1884

Cong: Rekha Surekha 518

 

Ward number 30: Kodialbail (Final)

BJP: Sudeer Shetty Kannur 1846

Cong: Prakash B Salian 1661

 

Ward number 31: Bejai (Final)

Cong: Lancelot Pinto 1939

BJP: Prashanth Alva 1527

 

Ward number 32: Kadri North (Final)

BJP: Shakeela Kava 1813

Cong: Mamatha Shetty 791

 

Ward number 33: Kadri South (Final)

BJP: Manohar Shetty 1526

Cong: D K Ashok 1277

 

Ward number 34: Shivbagh (Final)

BJP: Kavya Natraj 1731

Cong: Kiran James Peter 1690

 

Ward number 35 : Padavu Central (Final)

BJP: Kishore Kottari 2200

Cong: Abdul Azeez 610

 

Ward number 36: Padav East (Final)

Cong: Bhaskar K 2492

BJP: Sujan Das 1921

 

Ward number 37: Maroli (Final)

Cong: Keshava 2037

BJP: Kiran Devadiga 2011

 

Ward number 38: Bendoor (Final)

Cong: Naveen R D Souza 1578

BJP: Jessel D Souza 469

 

Ward number 39 : Falnir (Final)

Cong: Jacintha Alfred 1762

BJP: Asha D Silva 1423

 

Ward number 40: Court (Final)

Cong: Vinayaraj A C 1137

BJP: Ranganath Kini 899

 

Ward number 41: Central Market (Final)

BJP: Poornima 2037

Cong: Mamatha Shenoy 428

Ind: Rekha Surendra 210

 

Ward number 42: Donkarakery

BJP: M Jayashree Kudva

Cong: Manjula Y Nayak

 

Ward number 43: Kudroli (Final)

Cong: Shamshudin 1256

BJP: Arshad 877

JD(S): Aziz Kudroli 612

SDPI: Murzain Kudroli 1121

 

Ward number 44: Bunder (Final)

Cong: Zeenath 1308

BJP: Priyanka 1281

JD(S): Rameeza Nasir 1150

 

Ward number 45: Port (Final)

Cong: Abdul Lateef 2043

BJP: Anil Kumar 1493

 

Ward number 46: Contonment

BJP: Diwakar

Cong: K Bhaskar Rao

 

Ward number 47: Milagres

BJP: Ghanshyam

Cong: Abdul Rauf

 

Ward number 48: Kankanady Valencia

BJP: Sandeep Garodi

Cong: Ashith Gregory

 

Ward number 49: Kankanady

BJP: Vijay Kumar Shetty

Cong: Praveen Chandra Alva

 

Ward number 50: Alape South

BJP: Shobha Poojary

Cong: Sesamma

 

Ward number 51: Alape North (Final)

BJP: Roopashree Poojary 2073

Cong: Shobha K 2007

 

Ward number 52: Kannur (Final)

BJP: Chandravathi Vishwanath 1862

Cong: Raziya 1591

 

Ward number 53: Bajal

BJP: Chandrashekara

Cong: Ashraf

 

Ward number 54: Jeppinamogaru

BJP: Veena Mangala

Cong: Madhushree

 

Ward number 55: Attavara

BJP: Shailesh Shetty

Cong: Keerthi Raj

 

Ward number 56: Mangaladevi (Final)

BJP: Premananda Shetty 2187

Cong: Dinesh V Rao 874

JD(S): N Mahesh Rao 60

NOTA: 17

 

Ward number 57: Hoigebazar (Final)

BJP: Revathi 2116

Cong: Sharmila 1258

 

Ward number 58: Bolara (Final)

BJP: Bhanumathi P S 1541

Cong: Rathikala 1348

 

Ward number 59: Jeppu

BJP: Bharath Kumar

Cong: T Honnaya

 

Ward number 60: Bengre (Final)

SDPI: Muneeb Bengre 1701

BJP: Gangadhar Salian 1498

Cong: Asif Ahmed 1192

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 6,2020

Bengaluru, Feb 6: A flower vendor from Channapatna town in Karnataka got a shock of his life when he found a credit of Rs 30 crore in his wife's bank account. This happened when Syed Malik Burhan was struggling to meet expenses for a medical emergency in the family.

According to reports, bank officials knocked on his doors on December 2 asking him to explain how the money came to his account.

"On December 2, they came searching our house. They only said a huge amount has been deposited in my wife's (Rehana) account and then asked me to come to the Bank along with my wife carrying Aadhaar card," Mr Burhan said.

He claimed that the Bank staff sought to exert pressure on him to sign on a document but he refused. Mr Burhan recalled that he had purchased a saree through an online portal following which he received a call seeking his bank details which, he was told, were needed as he had won a car.

"Since then, we are running from pillars to post to find out how the money came to our account. We had only Rs 60 but suddenly such huge money came, which we are unable to understand," said Mr Burhan.

Mr Burhan said he had lodged a complaint with the Income Tax department, which he claimed was not keen on investigating it initially. Based on his complaint, the Channapatna town police in Ramanagara district registered a case of forgery and impersonation under the IPC besides the Information Technology Act for cheating and impersonation on January nine.

According to police, there were many financial transactions, which Mr Burhan may be unaware of. "We are trying to find out what these transactions mean. We will arrest whoever is behind it. We will not spare them," said a police officer in Channapatna.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com news network
June 28,2020

Mangaluru, Jun 28: The patience and presence of mind exhibited by the family members of youth covid-19 victim thwarted the attempt by a few miscreants to create communal disharmony in the coastal city today.

A 31-year-old youth from Idya in Surathkal, who was under treatment for covid-19 at designated Wenlock Hospital in the city, passed away last night. 

Even though there is a Muslim graveyard under the jurisdiction of Idya mosque, it was waterlogged due to heavy rains. 

Hence, the Idya mosque management had obtained permission from Mangaluru’s Bolar mosque management to bury the mortal remains of the youth in Bolar graveyard. 

All necessary arrangements were made at the Bolar graveyard for the burial this morning. Meanwhile, a few residents of Bolar belonging to another community staged a protest against bringing covid-19 victim’s mortal remains to Bolar.

Mohammad Husain, general secretary of Bolar mosque, said that the family members of the departed youth exhibited their presence of mind and urged the Muslims of Bolar to preserve communal harmony.

“The Bolar mosque committee had given green signal for the burial and all arrangements were made. Meanwhile, a few people staged protest and warned us against burying the covid-19 victim’s body. When the aggrieved family members came to know this, they immediately cancelled the plan,” he said. 

“The aggrieved family requested us to uphold communal amity and co-existence. They decided to bury the body in Idya itself. Then the protesters also returned,” he said.

Burial in Bolar after DC’s intervention

When the mortal remains were being taken towards Surathkal in the ambulance, the Deputy Commissioner of Dakshina Kannada ordered the authorities concerned to take a U-turn and bring back mortal remains to Bolar.  

The DC said it was wrong to take the mortal remains to another place after making all necessary armaments in Bolar graveyard. In order to pacify the porters it was decided to dig another grave on the other side of the graveyard, sources said.

Comments

Kudla
 - 
Sunday, 28 Jun 2020

we know the mentality of these... they are educate but their brain is full of dumb...

 

if tommorow some of their family member die in COVID and we will see how they manage..

 

first we are all human being and we must repsect the dead person..

 

 

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 29,2020

Newsroom, Jan 29: Karnataka’s capital has earned the unwelcome distinction of global capital of traffic congestion. According to a report by TomTom, the Netherlands-based global provider of navigation, traffic and map products, Bengaluru beat 415 other cities across 57 countries to earn the title of world's most traffic congested city in 2019.

“Bengaluru takes the top spot this year with drivers in the southern Indian city expecting to spend an average of 71% extra travel time stuck in traffic," TomTom said in the ninth edition of its annual Traffic Index.

Three other Indian cities, namely, Mumbai, Pune and New Delhi are also ranked in the 2019 edition of TomTom’s Traffic Index of the world’s most traffic-congested cities. 

The report released on Tuesday ranks cities by the average time added to a trip. TomTom index also includes details on when congestion is heaviest and lightest, how highways compare with surface streets, and how much time drivers wasted waiting for other drivers to get out of their way.

Following closely on the heels of Bengaluru is Manila, Philippines, with the similar 71% traffic congestion. Among the top five worst traffic affected cities are Mumbai and Pune from India at the fourth and fifth place respectively, while Bogota, Colombia is on third spot.

Delhi, the national capital of India is on the 8th spot, while Moscow (Russia), Lima (Peru), Istanbul (Turkey) and Jakarta (Indonesia) are on 6th, 7th, 9th and 10th spot respectively.

Mumbai recorded a 65% traffic congestion with 9th September, 2019 being the worst day. On an average, a Mumbaikar lost 209 hours in traffic congestion. Pune has 59% traffic congestion with 2nd August, 2019 being the worst day. 193 hours are lost due to congestion. Delhi, on the other hand, has 56% traffic congestion. 23rd October, 2019 was the worst day, while 190 hours are lost in traffic congestion.

Interestingly, among all the four Indian cities, Delhi has the most number of cars. Previous studies have concluded that Delhi has the best road conditions among the Metro cities of India.

If you are wondering what exactly the percentages mean, a 53% congestion level in Bangkok, for example, means that a trip will take 53% more time than it would during Bangkok’s baseline uncongested conditions.

TomTom calculates the baseline per city by analyzing free-flow travel times of all vehicles on the entire road network – recorded 24/7, 365 days a year. The report by Dutch navigation and mapping company ranks cities by the average time added to a trip. It also includes details on when congestion is heaviest and lightest, and how much time drivers wasted waiting for other drivers to get out of their way.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.