Mangaluru city gears up for smart growth, Rs 2K-cr investment envisaged

[email protected] (CD Network)
September 21, 2016

Mangaluru, Sep 21: Retrofitting downtown area of the city, re-development of old-port and fisheries harbour and development of a solar farm on an island facing the old port are some of the highlights of the smart city project proposal of the Mangaluru City Corporation, which envisaged a total investment of Rs. 2,000 crore in the next five years.

mayot 1

Welcoming the move of the Union government to include Mangaluru in its third Smart City list, the City Corporation has pledged to take necessary steps to implement its proposed projects expecting a speedy growth in economic activities in the city.

K Harinath, Mayor of MCC, said that the civic body would give priority to health, cleanliness and implementing the ban on plastic effectively, he said adding that the MCC has already renovated two to three public toilets, laying emphasis on the cleanliness of the city.

"An effective plan prepared by the City Corporation is one of the main reasons for the selection of Mangaluru for the smart city project. Along with the participation of the general public to prepare a plan, support of District in-Charge Minister, MLAs, and councillors is appreciable. We will start implementing various projects from now to make Mangaluru a model city," he explained.

Mohammed Nazir, Commissioner of MCC, said that now the government would constitute a special purpose vehicle (SPV), which is an entity or a company floated for implementing a specific task or project, for implementing the smart city project. It would be headed by an Indian Administrative Service officer.

He said that the detailed project report on how to implement the projects mooted under the smart city project would be prepared by the special purpose vehicle.

Joint Commissioner Gokuldas Nayak said, "The smart city project submitted by the MCC under the first list was long-term proposals worth Rs 20,000 crore to be implemented in nine phases over a period of 20 years. As it was not immediately useful for the public, Mangaluru could not bag the smart city project in the first list."

Area-based plan

The area based proposal submitted by the MCC include development of central business area - 100 acre, Hampankatta Junction - 27 acre, fisheries harbour redevelopment - 22 acre, Old Port redevelopment - 10 acre, waterfront and marine development - 25 acre, mixed use zone for IT service, offices, small scale industries, hospitality and leisure, alongside limited capacity factory functioning by adaptive reuse of tile factories - 42 acres, public connector streets leading to waterfront development as commercial and retail zone - 47 acre and solar farm on island facing Bunder - 20 acre.

mayot 2

mayot 3

Comments

Satyameva jayate
 - 
Thursday, 22 Sep 2016

When will the drainage flowing canals in the city will be cleaned and covered....still 50 % of Mangalore sinks in rain....roads are still incomplete and started feeling like hill wonder la ride sitting in vehicle..at least some main areas to be clear....

SK
 - 
Wednesday, 21 Sep 2016

If the rowdy goondas like Senas are ruling the roads of Mangalore, then the investments will be well secured .... Like what happened in Bengaluru in cauvery issue ..... It will be like doing homa on water....

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com news network
February 14,2020

Bengaluru, Feb 14: In a major embarrassment to the police, the Karnataka High Court has termed as illegal the prohibitory orders imposed under Section 144 of CrPC by the City Police Commissioner in December 2019 in the light of the anti-Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) protests in Bengaluru.

The orders were passed “without application of mind” and without following due procedures, the court noted. Giving reasons for upholding the arguments of the petitioners that there was no application of mind by the Police Commissioner (Bhaskar Rao) before imposing restrictions, a division bench of the High Court said he had not recorded the reasons, except reproducing the contents of letters addressed to him by the Deputy Commissioners of Police (DCPs). 

The state government had contended that prohibitory orders were passed based on reports submitted by the DCPs who expressed apprehension about anti-social elements creating law and order problems and damaging public property by taking advantage of the anti-CAA protests.  

The High Court bench said the Police Commissioner should have conducted inquiry as stated by the Supreme Court to check the reasons cited by the DCPs who submitted identical reports. Except for this, there were no facts laid out by the Police Commissioner, the court said.

“There is complete absence of reasons. If the order indicated that the Police Commissioner was satisfied by the apprehension of DCPs, it would have been another matter,” it said.  

“The apex court has held that it must record the reasons for imposition of restrictions and there has to be a formation of opinion by the district magistrate. Only then can  the extraordinary powers conferred on the district magistrate can be exercised. This procedure was not followed. Hence, exercise of power under Section 144 by the commissioner, as district magistrate, was not at all legal”, the bench said. 

“We hold that the order dated December 18, 2019 is illegal and cannot stand judicial scrutiny in terms of the apex court’s orders in the Ramlila Maidan case and Anuradha Bhasin case,” the HC bench said while upholding the arguments of Prof Ravivarma Kumar, who appeared for some of the petitioners.   

Partly allowing a batch of public interest petitions questioning the imposition of prohibitory orders and cancelling the permission granted for protesters in the city, the bench of Chief Justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka and Justice Hemant Chandangoudar observed that, unfortunately, in the present case, there was no indication of application of mind in passing prohibitory orders.

The bench said the observation was confined to this order only and it cannot be applicable in general. If there is a similar situation (necessitating imposition of restrictions), the state is not helpless, the court said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 12,2020

 Bengaluru, Jan 12: Two pilgrims from Bengaluru, who were siblings, drowned in sea off Auro Beach in Puducherry today.

The deceased have been identified as V Gauthman, 22, and his brother Vivek, 20.

Gauthman and Vivek were among a group of around 150 devotees from Bengaluru to the Adhiparasakhi temple at Melmaruvathur in Kancheepuram district of Tamil Nadu. They started their journey from Bengaluru in three buses on Friday.

After offering special puja at Adhiparasakthi temple and worshipping at a few other temples, they reached Auro Beach on Sunday afternoon. 

While they were having lunch on the beach, Gauthman entered the sea. He was caught in a huge wave.

Vivek, who tried to rescue his brother, too was caught in the wave.

Other pilgrims and fishermen began to search for them in fishing boats.

After an hour, their bodies were washed ashore, around two km from the spot.

The Auroville police retrieved the bodies and sent them for postmortem.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 3,2020

Bengaluru, May 3: The Excise Commissioner of Karnataka has issued an order granting permission to distilleries, breweries and wineries situated outside the containment zones to begin production activity. The permission has been granted on the condition that they strictly comply with COVID-19 related guidelines issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs.

"In view of the state government order and the new guidelines issued by the MHA, permission is granted to distilleries, breweries and wineries situated in rural areas and industrial estates and industrial townships with access control (outside containment zones) to commence only production activity," the Excise Commissioner said in the order.

The Excise Commissioner further said in the order that the Deputy Commissioner of Excise shall ensure that wherever distilleries, breweries and wineries are permitted to carry on production activities, they shall strictly comply with COVID-19 related guidelines issued by the MHA.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.