Modi slams Shinde’s directive on arrest of Muslim youth for terror

January 13, 2014

Modi-GoaNew Delhi, Jan 13: Narendra Modi has long associated Delhi with all the negative facets of the Congress led UPA regime. With the Aam Aadmi Party’s success in the national capital and the buzz around its electoral potential on a national scale, the BJP prime ministerial candidate referred to`Delhi’ in a different perspective – to question media obsession, (television news in particular) towards the new party and talking about how it was blind to the good work being done by the BJP chief ministers elsewhere, particularly in Goa, where he said chief minister Manohar Parikar stood taller than the much talked about Arvind Kejriwal.

Modi’s massive public rally in Goa, is more significant than being a simple voter mobilisation in the scenic coastal state. Goa after all sends only two MPs to the Lok Sabha. It was instead, important for the national perspective of the party. Given that the state receives visitors from all parts of the country and also various parts of the world, Modi wants to portray Goa, along with Gujarat, as a model BJP ruled state and also project Goa chief minister Manohar Parrikar, an IIT Bombay alumnus, in direct opposition to Kejriwal, for his honesty, integrity, simplicity, firm and people friendly approach.

Modi said “Goa should act as messenger to the country”. Though he didn’t name the Aam Aadmi Party or Kejriwal, his reference to it was loud and clear.

The BJP's Prime Ministerial candidate knows that he has already taken the campaign against the Congress to a certain level and has been successful in both creating and encashing on the rising exasperation against 10 years of Congress rule at the centre. Modi only had to keep going strong vis-à-vis the Grand Old Party but he realises that he can no longer afford to ignore the new kid on the block which has been gaining lot of traction in some of his social constituents. “Those acting as a shield of the Congress are equally guilty”, he said.

By talking about Parrikar’s credentials, and then his own, Modi tried to convince the people not to vote for “television faces” which were neither tried nor tested. “Imagine what would happened had Manohar Parrikar had been in Delhi. The country would have known about his good work but what can we do, he is in Goa and media can’t see anything beyond Delhi. I have been working so hard, serving the people of Gujarat for the last 12 years but I have always been portrayed as vanquished in TV and newspapers. I could never make a place for good. Leading the country needs a big vision and implementation of the right policies. The country could advance only if it is led by leaders who have a tried and tested track record and experience. TV faces can’t do that well.”

The Aam Aadmi Party has begun expanding nationally with an aggressive membership drive. Kumar Vishwas created a buzz on Sunday by his visit to Congress president Rahul Gandhi's bastion of Amethi, while Yogendra Yadav made a foray into Haryana.

If Modi chose his public rally to attack Aam Aadmi credentials, other party leaders are taking different other routes to question the young party’s capabilities. His trusted party colleague, Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun has made a strong and direct pitch against AAP. “The AAP government has so far confused substantive governance with style of governance. It may be entitled to its unconventional style of governance. The unconventional style is not a substitute for substantive governance. Publicity without any substantive governance is simply gimmickry. Responsible governance has a long lasting impact. Gimmickry is always short lived", he said.

Kejriwal’s experiments to hold a Janata Darbar on the streets of Delhi and subsequent chaotic scenes have raised questions about their ideas of governance.

Though Modi for a change did not directly target Rahul Gandhi, he went after Jayanti Natrajan, a Gandhi-Nehru family loyalist, who was the environment and forest ministry. “We had heard of Income Tax, Sales Tax but in Delhi a new kind tax, Jayanti (Natrajan) tax was being levied. A file in the environment ministry would not move without payment of the Jayanti tax.” He then went on to say how the UPA government disallowed a decision to lease mining rights in Gujarat through auction.

Former Environment and forest minister Jayanti Natrajan’s resignation had officially been publicised as her desire to work for the party than as a removal from the government on charges of money making for clearing or keeping files on hold in perpetuity.

The BJP leader is also making home minister Sushilkumar Shinde’s directive to states to review terrorism related cases against arrested Muslim youth under various criminal offences a big electoral issue, which can have socially polarising effects.

Though Modi was cautious enough to also clarify that criminals have no religion and law does not discriminate between accused on basis of their religion, he did make it political by accusing Congress of vote bank politics. “See the audacity of the home minister. He writes to us in the states to ensure that Muslims are not arrested for involvement in criminal acts. The state functions on one philosophy -punishment of the guilty and justice to the innocent. Moreover law and order is a state subject. How can the home minister dictate to states?”

Goa has been lucky for Modi. First in 2002 it was the venue where his chief ministerial position was saved, and then in June 2013 when he was officially made the face of the party’s 2014 campaign.

Now after this sudden AAP challenge Modi will hope that Goa yet again proves lucky for him.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com web desk
June 16,2020

New Delhi, Jun 16: Despite Prime Minister Narendra Modi led government’s attempt to downplay the border dispute with China, matters have heated up unprecedentedly along the Line of Actual Control (LAC)- the effective Sino-India border in Eastern Ladakh. 

The country has lost three precious lives – an army officer and two soldiers. The last time blood was spilled on the LAC, before the latest episode, was 45 years ago when the Chinese ambushed an Assam Rifles patrol in Tulung La.

India had lost four soldiers on October 20, 1975 in Tulung La, the last time bullets were fired on the India-China border though both the countries witnessed bitter stand-offs later at Sumdorong Chu valley in 1987, Depsang in 2013, Chumar in 2014 and Doklam in 2017.

Between 1962 and 1975, the biggest clash between India and China took place in Nathu La pass in 1967 when reports suggest that around 80 Indian soldiers were killed and many more Chinese personnel.

While three soldiers, including a Commanding Officer, were killed in the latest episode in Galwan Valley, the government describes it as a "violent clash" and does not mention opening fire.

New Delhi described the locality where the 1975 incident took place as "well within" its territory only to be rebuffed by Beijing as "sheer reversal of black and white and confusion of right and wrong".

The Ministry of External Affairs had then said that the Chinese had crossed the LAC and ambushed the soldiers while Beijing claimed the Indians entered their territory and did not return despite warnings.

The Indian government maintained that the ambush on the Assam Rifles' patrol in 1975 took place "500 metres south of Tulung" on the border between India and Tibet and "therefore in Indian territory". It said Chinese soldiers "penetrating" Indian territory implied a "change in China's position" on the border question but the Chinese denied this and blamed India for the incident.

The US diplomatic cables quoted an Indian military intelligence officer saying that the Chinese had erected stone walls on the Indian side of Tulung La and from these positions fired several hundred rounds at the Indian patrol.

"Four of the Indians had gone into a leading position while two (the ones who escaped) remained behind. The senior military intelligence officer emphasised that the soldiers on the Indian patrol were from the area and had patrolled that same region many times before," the cable said.

One of the US cables showed that former US Secretary of State and National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger sought details of the October 1975 clash "without approaching the host governments on actual location of October 20 incident". He also wanted to know what ground rules were followed regarding the proximity of LAC by border patrols.

A cable sent from the US mission in India on November 4, 1975 appeared to have doubts about the Chinese account saying it was "highly defensive".

"Given the unsettled situation on the sub-continent, particularly in Bangladesh, both Chinese and Indian authorities have authorised stepped up patrols along the disputed border. The clash may well have ensued when two such patrols unexpectedly encountered each other," it said.

Another cable from China on the same day quoted another October 1974 cable, which spoke about Chinese officials being concerned for long that "some hotheaded person on the PRC (People's Republic of China) might provoke an incident that could lead to renewed Sino-Indian hostilities. It went on to say that this clash suggested that "such concerns and apprehensions are not unwarranted".

According to the United States diplomatic cables, Chinese Foreign Ministry on November 3, 1975 disputed the statement of the MEA spokesperson, who said the incident took place inside Indian territory.

The Chinese had said "sheer reversal of black and white and confusion of right and wrong". In its version of the 1975 incident, they said Indian troops crossed the LAC at 1:30 PM at Tulung Pass on the Eastern Sector and "intruded" into their territory when personnel at the Civilian Checkpost at Chuna in Tibet warned them to withdraw.

Ignoring this, they claimed, Indian soldiers made "continual provocation and even opened fire at the Chinese civilian checkpost personnel, posing a grave threat to the life of the latter. The Chinese civilian checkpost personnel were obliged to fire back in self defence."

The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson had also said they told the Indian side that they could collect the bodies "anytime" and on October 28, collected the bodies, weapons and ammunition and "signed a receipt".

The US cables from the then USSR suggested that the official media carried reports from Delhi on the October 1975 incident and they cited only Indian accounts of the incident "ridiculing alleged Chinese claims that the Indians crossed the line and opened fire first".

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 4,2020

Aurangabad, Apr 4: A marriage was solemnised on a video call, the unique method which was adopted due to coronavirus lockdown.

A Muslim man named Mohammad Minhajudd, based in Aurangabad exchanged marriage vows with a Muslim woman based in Beed via video call on Friday.

The entire country is witnessing a 21-day lockdown due to which there is a limitation on the movement of people from one place to another and gatherings have been banned to prevent the spread of the coronavirus that has wreaked havoc across the globe.

The marriage halls are also closed during the lockdown period.

The bridegroom's father Mohammad Gayaz said that the marriage was fixed between the two persons six months ago when there was no fear about coronavirus. We got the elders of the family assembled at our home and conducted the marriage on phone.

Mufti Anis ur Rehman, the Qazi who performed the rituals for the marriage, said that both the families are happy as the marriage got conducted with the minimal cost incurred and the ceremony was a simple one. 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
July 2,2020

Lucknow, Jul 2: Senior BJP leader Uma Bharti Thursday appeared in person before a special court here conducting trial in the 1992 Babri mosque demolition case.      

The special CBI court is currently recording the statements of 32 accused under CrPC section 313 (court's power to examine the accused), a stage in the trial that follows the examination of prosecution witnesses.

The 61-year-old saffron clad BJP leader is the 19th accused to depose before the court in the over 27-year-old case. Thirteen other alleged accused, including former deputy prime minister LK Advani and senior BJP leaders MM Joshi and Kalyan Singh are yet to be examined at this stage. Their lawyers have indicated to the CBI court that they prefer to appear through video conferencing. 

The mosque in Ayodhya was demolished in December 1992 by 'kar sevaks' who claimed that an ancient Ram temple had stood on the same site. The CBI court is conducting day-to-day hearings to complete the trial by August 31, as directed by the Supreme Court.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.