MS Dhoni taking on England in England and BCCI at home!

August 27, 2014

Aug 27: MS Dhoni is currently playing two series — on the field against England , and off it against the BCCI officials. H Natarajan writes about the predicament that Dhoni finds himself in and which is not helping Indian cricket in any way.

MS DhoniAt a time when Team India needed all the support from the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), it is doing things that is only precipitating the crisis that MS Dhoni finds itself in England.

First, the timing of BCCI to get rid of the team’s bowling and fielding coach midway through the English tour did nothing positive for the team. The decision was mindless and insensitive. It was mindless, because it only served to disrupt a team that is already battling many demons; insensitive, because it showed little care to two men who have been long with the team. If changes were felt necessary, it could have waited till the end of the tour. The decisions did not affect either the players or the coach [Duncan Fletcher], which further underlined the mindlessness.

Even as reports swirled around that Fletcher’s wings have been clipped by the appointment of Ravi Shastri as Director of Cricket, Dhoni told the media before the first One-Day International at Bristol that Fletcher “will lead us into the World Cup.” He further added, “He [Fletcher] is still the boss. We have Ravi Shastri who will look into everything, but Fletcher is the boss. It’s not as if his powers or his position have been curtailed. I don’t know what you feel from the outside, but operations still remain the same. We have a few other support staff coming into the dressing room, but overall the operation remains the same.”

This was a strong, emphatic and public statement. It was most uncharacteristic of Dhoni, who is known to hold his cards close to his chest. In all likelihood the BCCI decision would have created great uncertainty and unease within the team. So, against his nature, Dhoni would have felt the need to do what was best for the team as a damage control measure by putting Fletcher on a pedestal.

Going by the various statements flying in the air, it seems that Dhoni was not consulted before the decisions were made to sideline the existing coaches and get replacements from India, as also to make Fletcher report to Shastri. As the skipper said: “It’s a bit tough on Trevor [Penney] and Joe [Dawes], especially when fielders drop catches and the fielding coach has to miss the series.” It left nobody in any doubt that the captain has no grievance against the coaches.

When the captain is making such a statement, how confident will the new coaches — Sanjay Bangar, Bharat Arun and R Sridhar — be stepping into the Indian dressing room?

A more potent is: Why did BCCI not consult the captain, as it always does, in such matters?

It’s well possible that BCCI decision would have irked Dhoni — and other team members — and which resulted in Dhoni going public with what he felt. But Dhoni touched a raw nerve on two counts:

1. By saying that Fletcher is the boss, which contradicted Shastri’s earlier statement that all coaches, including, Fletcher will report to him [Shastri].

2. By saying that Fletcher will lead Team India into the World Cup.

Though Fletcher’s tenure as coach extends till the 2015 World Cup, Dhoni seems to have overstepped the mark by making the second point as the BCCI is well within its right to get rid of the coach and find a replacement. In fact, the general feeling among the cricketing fraternity, and the appointment of Shastri was seen as hint for Fletcher to make way gracefully.

But worse was to follow. The Indian Express, published a story quoting an unnamed BCCI official that “Dhoni can’t decide who should be coach. BCCI will decide it. At the same time, we also want to add that it is the selection committee that will decide the coach and captain for the World Cup.”

The situation got messier when Shastri told Times Now that Dhoni is the “only boss” of the team, which was a subtle way to downplay the captain’s statement that Fletcher was the “boss”. In all the cross-firing, Fletcher has remained a mute spectator, which he is anyways at all times — much like Dr Manmohan Singh was when he was India’s Prime Minister.

The future of Fletcher and the other support staff will be taken at the next Annual General Meeting (AGM) before West Indies begins their tour of India on October. But October is still more than a month away. The knee-jerk reaction of BCCI in sidelining the coaches midway through the tour, the contradictory statements made by Dhoni and Shastri, the plight of Fletcher and the immaturity with which BCCI functionaries are making statements against the captain when Team India is still touring are all contributing to push India deeper in the quicksand that it finds itself in. What is needed is a statesman-like approach from all concerned so that the team recovers quickly before it starts the defence of the ICC World Cup. Egos need to take a backseat in the larger interests of Indian cricket.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 7,2020

London, Apr 7: Bowling coach Waqar Younis feels that it was the absence of pacers Wahab Riaz and Mohammad Amir which saw Pakistan getting whitewashed during Australia tour last year.

Amir and Riaz had quit the red-ball format ahead of the matches against Australia in 2019.

"Just before the Australia series, they ditched us and we had the only choice to pick youngsters.

We were the new management and decided to go on with taking in the younger lot and groom them. ESPNcricinfo quoted Younis as saying.

Pakistan was not able to win a single match in Australia as they got defeated both in T20Is and Test series.

"It's not like we have lost a lot, but yes they left us at the wrong time. But anyway, we don't have any grudge against them," Younis added.

"We cannot control players' choice on what they want to play, but then there should be a mechanism so we all are on board. "It's not like I am saying we could have won in Australia but we could have done better than what we have done," he opined.

Amir gave up the red ball format in July in order to manage his workload and extend his white-ball career for Pakistan as well as in T20 leagues around the world, while Riaz took an "indefinite break" from Test cricket in September last year.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 19,2020

Jun 19: The BCCI is open to reviewing its sponsorship policy for the next cycle but has no plans to end its association with current IPL title sponsor Vivo as the money coming in from the Chinese company is helping India's cause and not the other way round, board treasurer Arun Dhumal said on Friday. Anti-China sentiments are running high in India following the border clash between the two countries at Galwan valley earlier this week. The first skirmish at the India-China border in more than four decades left at least 20 Indian soldiers dead. Since then, calls have been made to boycott Chinese products.

But Dhumal said Chinese companies sponsoring an Indian event like the IPL only serve his country's interests.

The BCCI gets Rs 440 crore annually from Vivo and the five-year deal ends in 2022.

"When you talk emotionally, you tend to leave the rationale behind. We have to understand the difference between supporting a Chinese company for a Chinese cause or taking help from Chinese company to support India's cause," Dhumal said.

"When we are allowing Chinese companies to sell their products in India, whatever money they are taking from Indian consumer, they are paying part of it to the BCCI (as brand promotion) and the board is paying 42 per cent tax on that money to the Indian government. So, that is supporting India's cause and not China's," he argued.

Oppo, a mobile phone brand like Vivo, was sponsoring the Indian cricket team until September last year when Bengaluru-based educational technology Byju's start-up replaced the Chinese company.

Dhumal said he is all for reducing dependence on Chinese products but as long as its companies are allowed to do business in India, there is no harm in them sponsoring an Indian brand like the IPL.

"If they are not supporting the IPL, they are likely to take that money back to China. If that money is retained here, we should be happy about it. We are supporting our government with that money (by paying taxes on it)."

"If I am giving a contract to a Chinese company to build a cricket stadium, then I am helping the Chinese economy. GCA built the world's largest cricket stadium at Motera and that contract was given to an Indian company (L&T)," he said.

"Cricketing infrastructure worth thousands of crores was created across country and none of the contract was awarded to a Chinese company."

Dhumal went on to say the BCCI is spoilt for choice when it comes to attracting sponsors, whether Indian or Chinese or from any other nation.

"If that Chinese money is coming to support Indian cricket, we should be okay with it. I am all for banning Chinese products as an individual, we are there to support our government but by getting sponsorship from Chinese company, we are helping India's cause."

"We can get sponsorship money from non-Chinese companies also including Indian firms. We can support our players any way but the idea is when they are allowed to sell their products here, it is better that part of money comes back to the Indian economy."

"The BCCI is not giving money to the Chinese, it is attracting on the contrary. We should make decision based on rationale rather than emotion," he added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 3,2020

New Delhi, Feb 3: Former India cricketer Sanjay Manjrekar feels there are a lot of similarities between the Virat Kohli-led Team India and the Pakistan team when Imran Khan had led it as both captains instill strong self-belief in their respective teams.

Manjrekar also said that Pakistan under Imran had found different ways of winning matches even when it seemed all was lost.

"India under Virat in NZ reminds me of Pakistan under Imran. Strong self belief as a team. Pakistan under Imran found different ways of winning matches, often from losing positions. That only happens when the self belief is strong," Manjrekar tweeted.

The cricketer turned commentator expressed his opinion after India completed a rare 5-0 whitewash with a seven-run victory over New Zealand in the final T20 International in Mount Maunganui on Sunday.

Manjrekar also lauded KL Rahul, now also shouldering wicket-keeping duty, for his impressive showing in recent times.

"Samson & Pant... the next batting brigade of India obviously have the skill & the power game they just need to infuse a small dose of Virat's batting 'smarts' (mind) into their game," Manjrekar wrote.

The victory at the Bay Oval saw India stretch their record for most successive T20I wins.

This was their eighth win in a row, bettering the previous three instances when they won seven successive matches.

Kohli is the most successful Test captain in Indian cricket history, winning 11 consecutive series at home and are on top of the ICC rankings.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.