The nation wants to know: Why did Arnab quit as editor-in-chief of Times Now?

[email protected] (CD Network)
November 1, 2016

arnabNew Delhi, Nov 1: Popular television journalist Arnab Goswami has reportedly resigned as the Editor-in Chief of Times Now. Arnab was not seen on his prime time show The Newshour in couple of days.

According to sources, he announced his resignation at an editorial meeting. He told his team that he will start something on his own.

Goswami was recently given “Y category” security cover from the government after the Intelligence Bureau perceived a threat to his life from “Pakistan based terrorists groups”.

He will get 24-hour protection from around 20 security personnel, including two personal security officers, who will guard him from close distance.

Comments

ali
 - 
Thursday, 3 Nov 2016

He earned lot of money through spreading false news. After getting lot of money. now he decided to start his own to suck BJP.

Haq
 - 
Wednesday, 2 Nov 2016

I think the center has given him the cooked story to prepare himself before the Bhopal fake encounter case to bohw bohw on the news-hour....thats y he resigns it seems....now he knows the real fact of the feku......Allah will give him Hidaya...

Anil Holla
 - 
Wednesday, 2 Nov 2016

Who ever speaks for Mr .Modi will get XYZ Security. Soon Anupum Kher will also get same facility.Ordinary People work hard and pay TAX. But our Modi Govt uses for all these useless people's Security.

India is Growing India is Shining.

ibbu Saheb
 - 
Wednesday, 2 Nov 2016

LET HIM GO... WHO WANTS TO KNOW THE REASON... I DON'T.... AND PLZ TAKE AWAY HIS GOVT SECURITY... DONT WASTE OUR TAX MONEY ON SUCH PEOPLE ..............

Yasir
 - 
Wednesday, 2 Nov 2016

Finally coward has resigned. Great news for our country's peace and prosperity.

Mohammed SS
 - 
Wednesday, 2 Nov 2016

Surely his bad time is nearing, AWASANA KALADALLY VIPAREETA BUDDI

Not andha bhakt
 - 
Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016

He will start reading news in Khaki chaddi now

Wellwisher
 - 
Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016

Definitely some thing worst expected from this fellow. Might be joined with some anti nation communal group. Other than that nothing nation will expect.
God save our media and the nation.
Jai Hind

Althaf
 - 
Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016

Wasting Tax payers money on useless reporter's security.

Not andha bhakt
 - 
Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016

He will start new channel. RSS now

NoiseFree
 - 
Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016

He will start Patanjali Times with Baba Ramdev.

Satyameva jayate
 - 
Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016

He is going to make a new news channel with Modi ....Fakes Now.....
Or next Modis spokesperson.....sure....

PK
 - 
Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016

May be he read the QURAN and understood the REALITY on how EVILs in this world trap people by spilling out venom & by twisting the real FACT.

Suresh
 - 
Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016

Arnab goswami where are. You? Nation is worried

Ramya
 - 
Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016

When are you coming back

Ashwini Aithal
 - 
Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016

Arnab please come back soon... People are asking \itna sannata kyu hai bhai!!!\". I have not been able to focus at work, getting irritated quickly, not able to eat my dinner, getting sleepless nights.., please come back and tell the nation that you are not dumping all of us!!!
Your viewer from New York!"

TRUE INDIAN
 - 
Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016

MOHAN BHAGAT IS WAITING WITH HIS ARMS OPEN.

Punya
 - 
Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016

Thank god... Finally an end to noise pollution, after Diwali.

Rahul
 - 
Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016

Peaceful new year ahead

Khan Ukkasha
 - 
Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016

thank God. Now Indian Journalism is saved from disaster . Work of journalist is to preach truth not to bark and fire in air

S.K.Gupta
 - 
Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016

The viewers will miss his famous style of questioning the guest panelists: THE NATION WANTS TO KNOW!!!!!!!!

Chandrakanth
 - 
Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016

We miss your News hour . Waiting to see you launch a global channel.

Freek
 - 
Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016

He will start a new channel: Name will be TIMES BOW WOW

Rikaz
 - 
Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016

Crazy man!

Modi would take him in his cabinet.....cant say....\Birds of feather flock together\""

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 9,2020

Bengaluru, May 9: The bar owners in Karnataka, while welcoming the state government's decision to allow takeaway sales of liquor, said that the move is not going to benefit them much.

Venkatesh Babu, a Bengaluru-based bar owner said, "We welcome this move, our bar was closed for two months due to coronavirus crisis. We have been facing losses since then."

"The state government has told us to sell our stocks at maximum retail price (MRP). It is difficult for us to manage as the rent is high and we also have to pay salaries," he added.

The owner of Pingara Bar and Restaurant, Shivamogga said, "The government has said that is for parcel only and that too at MRP. There is no benefit to our business. We are only clearing the existing stock. They have given us time till May 17 and are not even giving us fresh stock. We are only allowed to sell what we have already."

Karnataka government in its Friday order allowed restaurants, pubs and bars to sell liquor at retail prices from May 9 till May 17, the day the third phase of lockdown is slated to end.

Earlier, the government had allowed the opening of liquor shops in order to mobilise revenue.

However, bars, pubs, restaurants were ordered to remain closed amid the COVID-19 lockdown.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 10,2020

Karwar: The number of Covid-19 patients in Uttara Kannada district has gone up to 39 with seven more persons from Bhatkal testing positive for the virus on Sunday.

These seven persons include five men and two women. Among them, the youngest is 15 years and the eldest is 60 years. Rest of the patients are 50, 21, 16, 42, and 31 years old, a health bulletin said. All the new seven cases are contacts of the eight persons who were found positive on Saturday.

Of the new cases, one is an auto-rickshaw driver who had reportedly transported one of the patients. Now the administration is collecting the details of the driver’s journeys and the persons who had travelled in his auto-rickshaw. It is said that some of these persons who were confirmed positive on Sunday had travelled to Udupi and moved around in Bhatkal town to buy medicine.

The pressure on the administration is increasing with new positive cases being detected in Bhatkal town every day. After the first 11 cases, there were no new cases for 20 days. However, since Friday, there is sudden spike in the number of new cases in Bhatkal town.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 2,2020

The current physical distancing guidelines provided by the World Health Organisation (WHO) and by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) may not be adequate to curb the coronavirus spread, according to a research which says the gas cloud from a cough or sneeze may help virus particles travel up to 8 metres. The research, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, noted that the the current guidelines issued by the WHO and CDC are based on outdated models from the 1930s of how gas clouds from a cough, sneeze, or exhalation spread.

Study author, MIT associate professor Lydia Bourouiba, warned that droplets of all sizes can travel 23 to 27 feet, or 7-8 metres, carrying the pathogen.

According to Bourouiba, the current guidelines are based on "arbitrary" assumptions of droplet size, "overly simplified", and "may limit the effectiveness of the proposed interventions" against the deadly pandemic.

 She explained that the old guidelines assume droplets to be one of two categories, small or large, taking short-range semi-ballistic trajectories when a person exhales, coughs, or sneezes.

However based on more recent discoveries, the MIT scientist said, sneezes and coughs are made of a puff cloud that carries ambient air, transporting within it clusters of droplets of a wide range of sizes.

Bourouiba warned that this puff cloud, with ambient air entrapped in it, can offer the droplets moisture and warmth that can prevent it from evaporation in the outer environment.

"The locally moist and warm atmosphere within the turbulent gas cloud allows the contained droplets to evade evaporation for much longer than occurs with isolated droplets," she said.

"Under these conditions, the lifetime of a droplet could be considerably extended by a factor of up to 1000, from a fraction of a second to minutes," the researcher explained in the study.

The MIT scientist, who has researched the dynamics of coughs and sneezes for years, added that these droplets settle along the trajectory of a cough or sneeze contaminating surfaces, with their residues staying suspended in the air for hours.

"Even when maximum containment policies were enforced, the rapid international spread of COVID-19 suggests that using arbitrary droplet size cutoffs may not accurately reflect what actually occurs with respiratory emissions, possibly contributing to the ineffectiveness of some procedures used to limit the spread of respiratory disease," Bourouiba wrote in the study

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.