Madoor Isubu arrest sheds new light on DK's underworld network

[email protected] (CD Network)
December 11, 2010

Madoor_isubu_copy

Mangalore, December 11: Dakshina Kannada police said that the interrogation of Madoor Isubu (36), who is allegedly a close associate of notorious underworld kingpin, Chota Shakil, has revealed many previously unrevealed information about underworld link to coastal Karnataka.

Superintendent of Police A Subrahmanyeshwara Rao told 'Coastaldigest.com' that Isubu, who was brought to Bantwal and later shifted to Mangalore is facing interrogation from Detection Crime Branch Police. He was produced before the JMFC Bantwal on December 9.

The court remanded Isubu, who is facing four cases in Bantwal, to seven days police custody.


Dismissing to reveal the exact location of interrogation, Rao also said that Isubu is cooperating with police during interrogation process.

He said that Isbu had established contact with dreaded underworld don Chota Shakeel earlier this year.

Confusion prevails

Though the DK police have finally succeeded in apprehending Madoor Isubu, top police officials have given controversial statements over his arrest.

DGP Ajaykumar Singh at a press meet in Bangalore on December 9 claimed that the special team constituted by DK SP Rao had arrested Isubu at the Yeshwanthpur Railway Station where he had been to meet a friend.

However Isubu's family members and advocate feel he might have been arrested on Monday or prior to that. But according to Singh he was arrested just a day ago, giving room for suspicion about the timing of his arrest.

The list of police cases against Isubu is as follows:

1) Ullala PS CrNo 189/2001 u/s 448, 323, 504, 506, 427, r/w 34 IPC:

2) Ullala PS CrNo 194/2002 u/s 143, 147, 148, 448, 504, 323, 341, 324, 506, 307 r/w 149 IPC:

3) Ullala PS CrNo 103/2003 u/s 143,147,148,448, 504, 323, 341, 324, 506,307 r/w 149 IPC

4) Ullala PS CrNo 120/2003 u/s 143, 147, 148, 447, 504, 506, 323 r/w 149 IPC:

5) Ullala PS CrNo 229/2003 u/s : 143,147,148,324,341 r/w 149 IPC and 2(a) KPDLP Act.

6) Ullala PS Cr NO 230/2003 u/s : 143,147,148,341,324 r/w 149 IPC

7) Ullala PS Cr No 244/03 u/s 143, 147, 148, 341, 427, 504, 109, 120(b) 153(a) 302, 341 r/w 149 IPC (Narasimha Shettigar Murder Case)

8) Ullala PS Cr No 27/2004 u/s 143, 147, 148, 341, 307, 153(a) r/w 149 IPC (Chandrashekar Uchill Attempt to Murder Case)

9) Bajpe PS Cr No. 91/2005 U/s 143, 147, 148, 120(B), 302 of IPC ( Polali Ananthu Murder Case)

10) Suratkal PS Cr No 219/2006 u/s 143, 147, 148, 341, 324, 120(b) 212, 109, 302 r/w 149 IPC ( Sukhananda Shetty Murder Case)

11) Bantwala Rural PS CrNo- 19/2009 u/s 143, 147, 148 ,120(b) 302 r/w 149 IPC ( Candle Santhu Murder Case)

12) Bantwala Town PS CrNo 148/2009 u/s 387, 511 IPC ( Baliga Jewellers Extortion Case)

13) Bantwala Town PS CrNo 149/2009 u/s 387, 511 IPC ( Baliga Jewellers Extortion Case)

14) Bantwala Town PS Cr No. 182/2009, U/S 307 R/w 34 IPC and Sec 3,5,25,27 Arms Act (Baliga Jewellers Shootout Case)

15) Mangalore North PS Cr No 73/2010 U/S 120(B) IPC & Sec 3,5,25,27 Arms Act (Advocate Harish Rai Attempt to Murder Case)

16) Moodabidre PS Cr. No. 70/2010 U/s 120 (B) & 307 IPC (Advocate Shanthi Prasad Hegde Attempt to Murder Case)

17) Mangalore North PS Cr No 82/2010 U/s 114,120(B) IPC r/w 5,20,27 Arms Act (Advocate Jagadish Shenava Attempt to Murder Case )

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com news network
May 22,2020

It has been 33 years since the night of 22 May, 1987 when nearly 50 Muslim men from Hashimpura, a settlement in Meerut were rounded up and packed into the rear of a truck of the Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC), an armed police of Uttar Pradesh. It was the blessed month of Ramadan and all the Muslims were fasting.

That night 42 of those on board the truck were killed in two massacres in neighbouring Ghaziabad district. One along the Upper Ganga canal near Muradnagar, the other along the Hindon canal in Makanpur, on the border with Delhi.

The cops had returned home after dumping the dead bodies into the canal. A few days later, the dead bodies were found floating in the canal and a case of murder was registered. 

Vir Bahadur Singh was the chief minister of Uttar Pradesh and Rajiv Gandhi was the prime minister of India when this incident took place. 

Not much has changed for the survivors and the relatives of the victims even today. The wounds are still fresh. Hashimpura remains devoid of basic municipal amenities, the erring silence on the narrow lanes of the locality amid the activities of a daily life speaks of the horror of the fateful day in 1987.

The massacre was the result of one among the many outcomes of the decision taken by the Rajiv Gandhi government to open the locks of Babri Masjid. After a month of rioting, the situation was tense in various parts of Meerut, and a lot spilled over in the nearby areas.

Timeline

May 22, 1987

Nearly 50 Muslims picked up by the PAC personnel from Hashimpura village in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh.
Victims later shot and bodies thrown into a canal. 42 persons declared dead.

1988

UP government orders CB-CID probe in the case.

February 1994

CB-CID submits inquiry report indicting over 60 PAC and police personnel of all ranks.

May 20, 1996

Charge sheet filed against 19 accused before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad by CB-CID of Uttar Pradesh police. 161 people listed as witnesses.

September 2002

Case transferred to Delhi by the Supreme Court on a petition by the families of victims and survivors.

July 2006

Delhi court frames charges of murder, attempt to murder, tampering with evidence and conspiracy under the IPC against 17 accused.

March 8, 2013

Trial court dismisses Subramanian Swamy's plea seeking probe into the alleged role of P Chidambaram, then Minister of State for Home, in the matter.

January 22, 2015

Trial court reserves judgement.

March 21, 2015

Court acquits 16 surviving accused giving them benefit of doubt regarding their identity.

May 18, 2015

Trial court decision challenged in the Delhi HC by the victims' families and eyewitnesses who survived the incident.

May 29, 2015

HC issues notice to the 16 PAC personnel on Uttar Pradesh government's appeal against the trial court verdict.

December 2015

National Human Rights Commission is impleaded in the matter. NHRC also seeks further probe into the massacre.

February 17, 2016

HC tags Swamy's appeal with the other petitions in the matter.

September 6, 2018

Delhi HC reserves verdict in the case.

October 31, 2018

Delhi HC convicts 16 former PAC personnel for life after finding them guilty of the murder of 42 people.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 30,2020

Thiruvananthapuram, Mar 30: With suicide cases being reported from various parts of the state after liquor sales were stopped in Kerala following the lockdown, Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan has directed the Excise Department to provide liquor to those with a prescription from a doctor.

The move comes after many reportedly showed acute withdrawal symptoms and suicide cases were reported in the state.

On Saturday, in Kodungaloor in Thrissur district, a youth committed suicide by jumping into the river after suffering from withdrawal symptoms.

In another incident, a 38-year-old man working in a barbershop in Kayamkulam consumed shaving lotion after he didn't get alcohol. Though he was taken to hospital after he developed uneasiness, he died.

The Kerala government has also asked the Excise Department to provide free treatment and admit people with withdrawal symptoms to the de-addiction centres.

The Chief Minister has said the government is also considering the option of online sale of liquor as the sudden unavailability of alcohol may lead to social problems.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 18,2020

Bengaluru, May 18: Indian food delivery startup Swiggy said on Monday it would lay off 1,100 employees, or nearly 14% of its workforce, to cut costs, as a weeks-long nationwide lockdown to curb the coronavirus outbreak hits demand for online food ordering.

The company, backed by South African internet giant Naspers, also said it will scale down adjacent businesses and has already shut several of its cloud kitchens - facilities that only cater to takeaway orders - temporarily or permanently.

“The core food delivery business has been severely impacted and will stay impacted over the short term, but is expected to start growing again after that,” said Sriharsha Majety, co-founder and chief executive at Bengaluru-based Swiggy.

Swiggy, one of India’s best known startups, is among many that are laying off employees and reshaping their business in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which has forced 1.3 billion Indians indoors and crippled business.

India is currently under a two-month lockdown, and though several curbs are being eased, public places such as restaurants remain closed, hurting restaurants themselves as well as companies such as Swiggy and main rival Zomato.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.