Targeted by college authorities, hijab clad girl pledges to fight for her right

August 11, 2011

SCRF_1

Mangalore, August 11: A 17-year old Muslim girl, who was literally threatened by her College management and principal against entering in to the class with Hijab, even after receiving a hefty fees from her, has decided to struggle for her constitutional rights.

Hadia, who had managed to complete the first year of the PUC at Jain College Moodbidri, despite the institution suddenly imposed 'unconstitutional rules' forcing Muslim girls to remove their head scarf. However, now she has firmly decided to fight for 'freedom of dress'.

On Thursday, she along with her mother Hina approached DK Deputy Commissioner N S Channappa Gowda requesting him to intervene into the issue and direct to college authorities to not to violate constitutional right of a girl.

Ms Hadia, who is now in second year of PUC, aims to become interior designer. However, she feels extremely uncomfortable and embarrassed to sit in the class with her head uncovered and her forearms bare in front of boys and male teachers.

She recalls that the college authorities did not utter a single word about her Hijb when she joined the partially aided college last year.

“A month later, they announced during the assembly that students would not be allowed to cover their heads, wear full sleeves dress. This announcement was a direct target against the Muslim girls, who used to wrap the dupatta of the uniform in a way that covered their hair and neck, and falls across their chest, according to the Islamic customs” she said.

After this sudden announcement, Hadia was emotionally hurt and forced to stay away from College for more than a month because she was denied permission to cover her head.

“I had never violated the norms of uniform, as I covered my head with the uniform dupatta and did not wear a burkha,” says the girl.

She and her guardians made several requests to the college authorities to allow her to cover her hair with the dupatta of the uniform, but in vain.

After a long gap she attended the class without her head covered to answer her examinations and completed the year.

“This year I attended class with Hijab, as I did not want to lose my identity anymore. Moreover, the Indian constitution has guaranteed freedom to practice one's religion without hurting anybody. However, the authorities asked me to go out, apparently violating my rights,” she said.

“Last year I had approached the then DC V Ponnuraj asking for justice. He had clarified that the college administration cannot force a girl to remove her head scarf and promised to speak with college authorities. But, things had never changed after his promise,” recalls Hadia.

Mr Channappa Gowda too promised to “speak” with college authorities, she said, adding that she will decide about her next step after knowing DC's action.

Meanwhile justifying the decision of college authorities, In-charge Principal Keshav Bhat, said that using uniform dupatta as hijab is violation of uniform norms. “If we allow her to attend classes wearing Hijab, other Muslim girls may demand permission to wear burkha” he said.

While contacted Director of the Department of Pre-University Education Rashmi V Mahesh said the department had no views on the subject. She said if a student complained that the “freedom of dress” was being “proscribed”, then the department would look into it. “Freedom of dress should be left to the student,” Ms. Mahesh said.

SCRF_6

SCRF_7

SCRF_9

Comments

Marita
 - 
Friday, 21 Oct 2016

First of all I want to say fantastic blog! I had a quick question that I'd like to ask if you do not
mind. I was curious to know how you center yourself and clear your
head before writing. I have had a hard time clearing my mind in getting my thoughts out.
I do enjoy writing however it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes tend to be wasted simply just
trying to figure out how to begin. Any ideas or hints? Kudos!

Feel free to visit my blog post book promotion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fallen_Idol_(film)

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 2,2020

Bengaluru, Jul 2: Karnataka government has issued a show-cause notice to 18 private hospitals for refusing to admit a 52-year-old patient with influenza-like illness (ILI) symptoms, who later died.

According to the notice dated on June 30, a 52-years patient named Bhawarlal Sujani died after he was denied admission by 18 private hospitals.

The patient was taken to these hospitals on Saturday and Sunday for admission on observing some ILI like symptoms. But none of these hospitals admitted in on the pretext of unavailability of bed/ventilators, read the notice.

This is a clear violation of providing medical assistance and admission necessitated under the agreed provision of KPME Registration. They should strictly adhere to the provisions under Sections 11 & 11 A of KPME Act 2017. Private Medical Establishments cannot deny/ refuse/ avoid treatment to patients with Covid-19 and Covid-19 like symptoms, the state Health Department said.

By denying the admission to the deceased patient, your hospitals have violated the provisions of the above-said act. You are liable for legal action in this regard, as per the notice.

The state Health department asked the hospitals to reply as to why action should not be initiated under the relevant Acts. 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com news network
June 2,2020

Newsroom, Jun 2: The government of India has announced operation of another 20 special flights to repatriate stranded NRIs from Kingdom of Saudi Arabia under Vande Bharat Mission.

All the repatriation flights will take off from three major airports – Dammam, Riyadh and Jeddah – between June 10 and June 16. Most of the flights will land in Kerala.

The first flight from Saudi Arabia to Karnataka in the new schedule will be operated on June 11. It will take off from Jeddah with passengers from both Kerala and Karnataka. After landing in Kozhikode it will continue its journey to Bengaluru. 

The next three flights  –  Dammam to Bengaluru on June 12, Jeddah to Bengaluru on June 13 and Riyadh to Bengaluru on June 15 – will directly fly to Karnataka. 

Even though thousands of Mangalureans are stranded in Saudi Arabian cities due to lockdown, the government has not announced any flight to Mangaluru International Airport.

The following are the newly announced flights from Saudi Arabia to India:

Comments

Bi bi Ayesha
 - 
Friday, 3 Jul 2020

Hi. I am frm Saudi Arabia I got my final exit already done plz help me I need to go to Karnataka ( Bangalore) we r 3 members 1 adult ad 2 kids. Plz plz reply to my msg. 

Muttappa Malla…
 - 
Sunday, 28 Jun 2020

Hi when is start flight dammam to bengalore

 

 

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 28,2020

Mysuru, Jan 28: The Second Additional District and Sessions Court on Monday granted anticipatory bail to B Nalini, who displayed the ‘Free Kashmir’ placard during a protest, and also to Maridevaiah, the organiser of the protest.

Nalini and Maridevaiah had applied for bail as Jayalakshmipuram police had booked them under sedition charges. Nalini had displayed the placard during a protest at Manasagangotri, the University of Mysore campus, recently. The court, which took up the case on January 24, had kept the order pending.

The court directed the accused to submit their passport to the court and a bond for a sum of Rs 50,000. The court also directed them to be present before the police, whenever needed.

Meanwhile, the Mysuru Bar Association has decided to take measures against the association members who are in favour of Nalini. Seventy-five members, seeking to represent Nalini, have withdrawn their support, the association secretary B Shivanna said. The association has suspended advocates Manjula Manasa and P P Baburaj.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.